A randomised, double-blind, dose-ranging study to evaluate efficacy and safety of three doses of botulinum toxin type A (Botox) for the treatment of spastic foot

The Effect of Botulinum Neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) on Muscle Strength in Adult-Onset Neurological Conditions with Focal Muscle Spasticity: A Systematic Review

Botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) injections are effective for focal spasticity. However, the impact on muscle strength is not established. This study aimed to investigate the effect of BoNT-A injections on muscle strength in adult neurological conditions. Studies were included if they were Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, or cohort studies (n ≥ 10) involving participants ≥18 years old receiving BoNT-A injection for spasticity in their upper and/or lower limbs. Eight databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Medline, PEDro, Pubmed, Web of Science) were searched in March 2024. The methodology followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022315241). Quality was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist and the PEDro scale. Pre-/post-injection agonist, antagonist, and global strength outcomes at short-, medium-, and long-term time points were extracted for analysis. Following duplicate removal, 8536 studies were identified; 54 met the inclusion criteria (3176 participants) and were rated as fair-quality. Twenty studies were analysed as they reported muscle strength specific to the muscle injected. No change in agonist strength after BoNT-A injection was reported in 74% of the results. Most studies' outcomes were within six weeks post-injection, with few long-term results (i.e., >three months). Overall, the impact of BoNT-A on muscle strength remains inconclusive.

Evaluation of therapeutic benefits of botulinum toxin for foot dystonia associated with Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Foot dystonia occurs in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and leads to pain, malformation, and difficulty with walking. Botulinum toxin injections may be effective for foot dystonia, but the extent of improvement and effects on motor function are unclear.

METHODS

In this study, we performed botulinum toxin injections for foot dystonia in 25 patients with PD. At 3 weeks and 3 months post-infection, we assessed changes in plantar pressure distribution utilizing the Pressure Plate system; dystonia using the Modified Ashworth Spasm score; pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) score; and lower extremity function using the Calf-raise Senior (CRS) test, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and gait parameters (eg, stride length, step length).

RESULTS

We found improved Modified Ashworth Spasm score (p < 0.01) and VAS score (p < 0.01) post-injection. CRS test score (3 weeks, p = 0.006; 3 months, p = 0.068), stride length (3 weeks, p = 0.012; 3 months, p = 0.715), and step length (3 weeks, p = 0.011; 3 months, p = 0.803) also improved. Plantar pressure distribution improved after botulinum toxin injection (metatarsal 1, 3 weeks, p = 0.031; 3 months, p = 0.144; metatarsal 2, 3 weeks, p = 0.049; 3 months, p = 0.065; metatarsal 3, 3 weeks, p = 0.002; 3 months, p = 0.017; metatarsal 4, 3 weeks, p = 0.017; 3 months, p = 0.144; medial heel, 3 weeks, p = 0.01; 3 months, p = 0.395; lateral heel, 3 weeks, p = 0.035; 3 months, p = 0.109).

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin injection for foot dystonia in patients with PD can reduce spasms and pain and normalize plantar pressure distribution, which improves balance and lower extremity function.

Botulinum Toxin-A High-Dosage Effect on Functional Outcome and Spasticity-Related Pain in Subjects with Stroke

Stroke patients can develop spasticity and spasticity-related pain (SRP). These disorders are frequent and can contribute to functional limitations and disabling conditions. Many reports have suggested that higher doses than initially recommended of BTX-A can be used effectively and safely, especially in the case of severe spasticity; however, whether the treatment produces any benefit on the functional outcome and SRP is unclear. Studies published between January 1989 and December 2022 were retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register. Only obabotulinumtoxinA (obaBTX-A), onabotulinumtoxinA, (onaBTX-A), and incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBTX-A) were considered. The term "high dosage" indicates ≥600 U. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Globally, 460 subjects were treated with BTX-A high dose, and 301 suffered from stroke. Studies had variable method designs, sample sizes, and aims. Only five (55.5%) reported data about the functional outcome after BTX-A injection. Functional measures were also variable, and the improvement was observed predominantly in the disability assessment scale (DAS). SRP pain was quantified by visual analog scale (VAS) and only three studies reported the BTX-A effect. There is no scientific evidence that this therapeutic strategy unequivocally improves the functionality of the limbs. Although no clear-cut evidence emerges, certain patients with spasticity might obtain goal-oriented improvement from high-dose BTX-A. Likewise, data are insufficient to recommend high BTX dosage in SRP.

Treatment of adult spasticity with Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA): Development, insights, and impact

Upper and lower limb spasticity (ULS, LLS) often occur following a stroke or in patients with other neurological disorders, leading to difficulties in mobility and daily living and decreased quality of life. Prior to the use of onabotulinumtoxinA, antispastic medications had limited efficacy and often caused sedation. Phenol injections were difficult for physicians to perform, painful, and led to tissue destruction. The success of onabotulinumtoxinA in treating cervical dystonia led to its use in spasticity. However, many challenges characterized the development of onabotulinumtoxinA for adult spasticity. The wide variability in the presentation of spasticity among patients rendered it difficult to determine which muscles to inject and how to measure improvement. Another challenge was the initial refusal of the Food and Drug Administration to accept the Ashworth Scale as a primary endpoint. Additional scales were designed to incorporate a goal-oriented, patient-centered approach that also accounted for the variability of spasticity presentations. Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of post-stroke spasticity of the elbow, wrist, and/or fingers showed significantly greater improvements in the modified Ashworth Scale and patient treatment goals and led to the approval of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of ULS in adult patients. Lessons learned from the successful ULS trials were applied to design an LLS trial that led to approval for the latter indication. Additional observational trials mimicking real-world treatment have shown continued effectiveness and patient satisfaction. The use of onabotulinumtoxinA for spasticity has ushered in a more patient-centered treatment approach that has vastly improved patients' quality of life.

Validating stroke-induced bilateral ankle coordination deficits using bilateral ankle measure relationship with motor functions in lower limbs

BACKGROUND

Coordinated control between the bilateral ankle joints plays an important role in performing daily life functions, such as walking and running. However, few studies have explored the impact of stroke on movement disorders that decrease the coordination control of the bilateral extremities and may decrease daily activities that require coordination control of the bilateral ankles. This study aimed to investigate the coordination control of the bilateral ankles using a novel bilateral ankle measurement system and evaluate the relationship of bilateral movement coordination control deficits with motor and functional performances of the lower extremities in patients with stroke.

METHODS

Twenty-one healthy adults (36.5 ± 13.2 y/o) and 19 patients with chronic stroke (58.7 ± 10.5 y/o) were enrolled. A novel measurement device with embedded rotary potentiometers was used to evaluate bilateral ankle coordination control. Participants were asked to move their dominant (non-paretic) foot from dorsiflexion to plantarflexion position and non-dominant (paretic) foot from dorsiflexion to plantarflexion position (condition 1) simultaneously, and vice versa (condition 2). Alternating time and angle for coordination control with movements of both ankles were calculated for each condition. Motor and functional performance measurements of the lower extremities included the lower-extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-LE), Berg Balance Test (BBS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Barthel Index (BI).

RESULTS

Compared with the healthy group, alternating time was shorter in the stroke group by 8.3% (p = 0.015), and the alternating angles of conditions 1 and 2 were significantly higher than those of the healthy group by 1.4° (p = 0.001) and 2.5° (p = 0.013), respectively. The alternating angle in condition 2 showed moderate correlations with TUG (r = 0.512; p = 0.025), 10-m walk (r = 0.747; p < 0.001), gait speed (r =  - 0.497 to - 0.491; p < 0.05), length (r =  - 0.518 to - 0.551; p < 0.05), and BI (r =  - 0.457; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Stroke decreases alternating time, increases alternating angle, and shows bilateral ankle coordination control deficits temporally and spatially. A higher alternating angle is moderately to highly associated with motor function and lower limb function in patients with stroke.

Treatment outcome of local injection of botulinum toxin for claw toe: Differences between cerebral hemorrhage and infarction

BACKGROUND

Some patients with post-stroke claw toe respond well to botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment while others do not. This study was designed to assess the impact of stroke type (cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction) on the outcome of BoNT treatment for claw toe.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients who received local BoNT (onabotulinumtoxin A) injections into the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and flexor digitorum longus (FDL) muscles. All patients suffered stroke-related leg paralysis and spasticity.

RESULTS

The study participants were 58 patients (mean age, 61.4 ± 10.3 years, ± SD) with time since stroke of 6.7 ± 4.4 years. The stroke type was cerebral hemorrhage (n = 38) and cerebral infarction (n = 20). After a total of 124 BoNT administrations with medical records entries on the subjective symptoms, the odds for symptomatic improvement was approximately 5.8 times higher in patients of the infarction group compared with the hemorrhage group (OR = 5.787, 95% CI = 2.369-14.134, p = 0. 000). Fifty-one patients (32 with cerebral hemorrhage, 19 with cerebral infarction) received the first local BoNT injection and had available medical records, analysis of which showed a significantly higher rate of symptomatic improvement in patients of the infarction group than those of the hemorrhage group (p = 0.006). After adjustment by factors known to influence treatment outcome (degree of spasticity and paralysis, BoNT dosage, and extent of FDL muscle control of toe movements), the treatment effect was predominantly higher in patients with cerebral infarction.

CONCLUSION

The BoNT treatment response was better for claw toes in cerebral infarction patients than in hemorrhage patients, possibly suggesting that claw toe is associated with more severe spasticity in this group of patients.

Evaluating the Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injection and Physiotherapy on Post-Stroke Patients During One Year Observation - a Pilot Study

Introduction: Stroke is a serious health problem in the modern population. Spasticity is one of the consequences of stroke and affects about 30% of people. Increased muscle tone affects postural control disorders. Due to the specificity of spasticity, therapy in post-stroke patients is a challenge for neurological physiotherapy. Therefore, it requires the development of appropriate management standards . Study aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 3 combination therapy cycles based on botulinum toxin injection and physiotherapy for muscle tone, muscle strength and postural stability in post-stroke patients qualified for the spasticity treatment programme of the lower and upper limbs. Material and methods: The pilot study involved 12 patients (6 from the lower limb and 6 from the upper limb programme). The 1-year combination therapy programmes included 3 botulinum toxin injections and 3 weeks of physiotherapy after each injection. Clinical evaluation was conducted before and after the 1-year observation cycle. The results were evaluated using: MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale), MRC (Medical Research Council Scale) and posture stability test on a balance platform (BiodexSD). Results: A decrease was observed in muscle tone of the lower and upper limbs, as well as an increase in muscular strength of the upper limb. However, there were no noted statistical significance of the studied parameters. Conclusions: Physiotherapy in combination with the botulinum toxin is an important element of improvement in post-stroke patients. However, further research is needed to explicitly confirm its effectiveness.

A severe case of non-infective myositis six weeks post intramuscular injections of Onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) in a young man with tetraplegia: case report

INTRODUCTION

Myositis of unknown aetiology might be a very rare complication of intramuscular injections of onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) for spasticity treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a case of significant myositis of unknown aetiology in a 17-year-old man, who was admitted for rehabilitation 4 months after his initial spinal cord injury (SCI) as a result of a mountain bike accident. He has an incomplete tetraplegia, C4 AIS B international Standards for Neurological Classification for Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) [1] due to C5 vertebra 3 column fracture [2]. He had severe spasticity of his lower limb muscles treated with Botox, following which, he required two acute hospital transfers for diagnosis and management of myositis.

DISCUSSION

This is a severe unusual presentation of myositis caused by intramuscular botulinum toxin for treatment of spasticity, in the frequent setting of spasticity where intramuscular botulinum toxin injections are routinely used.

Do gait parameters improve after botulinum toxin injections in post stroke patients? A prospective study

The intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin is one of the most efficient ways to treat localized spasticity in patients suffering from Central Nervous System lesions like stroke, cerebral palsy and multiple sclerosis. The gait analysis based on kinetics and kinematics is a recognized way of measurement of the effect of intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin in spastic patients suffering from chronic stroke. The aim of this study is to provide evidence of the beneficial effect of botulinum toxin on characteristics of gait pattern on patients suffering from chronic stroke. So, thirteen patients with spasticity due to chronic stroke were included in the protocol and were treated by botulinum toxin injections in the lower extremity. All patients were evaluated before the injection as well as one month after the botulinum injection on a foot pressure sensitive walkway with a power plate and by the readings of seven inertial measurements units which recorded spatio-temporal specific parameters during walking, and the spasticity was measured according to modified Ashworth Scale. While all spatio-temporal parameters of motion analysis and balance improved for most of the patients after botulinum toxin injection, only one parameter, the normal to hemiplegic step length, reached statistical significant improvement (p < 0.03). Moreover the modified Ashworth score was statistically improved post injection (p < 0.001). In conclusion the use of botulinum toxin injections is beneficial in post stroke patients as this is depicted in gait parameters improvement which accompanies the spasticity reduction.

Continuous Increase of Efficacy under Repetitive Injections of Botulinum Toxin Type/A beyond the First Treatment for Adult Spastic Foot Drop

The objective of this study was to quantify the increase in efficacy during the first four cycles of treatment with botulinum toxin type/A (BoNT/A) in 24 free-walking BoNT/A naïve adult patients with post-stroke hemispasticity and spastic foot drop. Patients were followed over 390 days and received five injections of 800 U aboBoNT/A every three months. Patients assessed the treatment effect at eight visits using a global assessment scale, physicians scored the muscle tone at the ankle joint, measured active and passive ranges of motion (aRoMs, pRoMs) at the knee and ankle joint and determined the distance patients succeeded to walk during a minute. Patients' assessments significantly (p < 0.006) increased with time and significantly correlated with all parameters measured. The best correlation (r = 0.927; p < 0.0001) was found with the sum of the aRoMs of knee and ankle joint. After one year of treatment outcome measures were better than and significantly correlated with the peak effect of the first injection. This correlation was higher for pRoMs (r = 0.855; p < 0.00001) compared to aRoMs (r = 0.567; p < 0.009). When BoNT/A treatment of the spastic foot in chronic hemispasticity is performed regularly every three months for at least one year, patients will experience a significant increase of benefit beyond the first treatment, but have to learn how to adapt to and use the new degree of freedom induced by the injections.

Efficacy and Optimal Dose of Botulinum Toxin A in Post-Stroke Lower Extremity Spasticity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Post-stroke spasticity impedes patients’ rehabilitation progress. Contradictory evidence has been reported in using Botulinum Neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) to manage post-stroke lower extremity spasticity (PLES); furthermore, an optimum dose of BoNT-A for PLES has not yet been established. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify the efficacy and optimal dose of BoNT-A on PLES. "Meta" and "Metafor" packages in R were used to analyze the data. Hedges’ g statistic and random effect model were used to calculate and pool effect sizes. Twelve RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Muscle tone significantly improved in week four, week eight, and maintained to week twelve after BoNT-A injection. Improvements in functional outcomes were found, some inconsistencies among included studies were noticed. Dosage analysis from eight studies using Botox® and three studies using Dysport® indicated that the optimum dose for the commonest pattern of PLES (spastic plantar flexors) is medium-dose (approximately 300U Botox® or 1000 U Dysport®). BoNT-A should be regarded as part of a rehabilitation program for PLES. Furthermore, an optimal rehabilitation program combined with BoNT-A management needs to be established. Further studies should also focus on functional improvement by BoNT-A management in the early stage of stroke.

Goal Attainment: A Clinically Meaningful Measure of Success of Botulinum Toxin-A Treatment for Lower Limb Spasticity in Ambulatory Patients

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment for lower limb spasticity leads to patient goal attainment and identify factors associated with positive goal attainment and to assess the effect of BoNT-A treatment on patients’ gait.

Design

Retrospective cohort study between June 2014 and February 2019.

Setting

Public outpatient spasticity clinic in a tertiary hospital.

Participants

Thirty patients (N=30; 50% female; average age, 50.5y) with lower limb spasticity of heterogenous etiologies (96.7% cerebral±spinal origin and 3.3% isolated spinal origin); 73.3% (N=22) of patients had previously received BoNT-A treatment.

Interventions

BoNT-A injection to lower limb muscles.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure was goal attainment measured using Goal Attainment Scaling. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) was used to assess spasticity. Gait was characterized by spatiotemporal parameters.

Results

Fifty-six treatment episodes were analyzed and showed that BoNT-A treatment resulted in a significant reduction in spasticity (pretreatment MAS=3.18±0.73; posttreatment MAS=2.27±0.89; P<.001) with no associated change in gait parameters. Logistic regression revealed that most patients (74.1%) achieved all of their goals, with younger patients having a high likelihood of goal attainment regardless of their gait profile identified by latent profile analysis of the gait parameters. Patients considered to have a low functioning gait profile demonstrated a significantly greater likelihood of goal attainment than patients with the other gait profiles combined (odds ratio, 45.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1602.1; P=.036). Chronic spasticity and pretreatment severity of spasticity (MAS) and its reduction were not associated with likelihood of goal attainment.

Conclusions

The success and efficacy of BoNT-A treatment in improving patient perceived gait quality and reducing the negative symptoms of spasticity were best measured using Goal Attainment Scaling. The study emphasizes the importance of measuring patient goals as a clinical outcome. Gait parameters were most informative when used collectively to classify patients based on their overall gait profile, which assisted in identifying differences between patients’ likelihood of goal attainment after treatment.

Long-Term Observational Results from the ASPIRE Study: OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Adult Lower Limb Spasticity

INTRODUCTION

OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment for spasticity varies according to numerous factors and is individualized to meet treatment goals.

OBJECTIVE

To explore real-world onabotulinumtoxinA utilization and effectiveness in patients with lower limb spasticity from the Adult Spasticity International Registry (ASPIRE) study.

DESIGN

Two-year, multicenter, prospective, observational registry (NCT01930786).

SETTING

Fifty-four international clinical sites.

PATIENTS

Adults (naïve or non-naïve to botulinum toxin[s] treatment for spasticity, across multiple etiologies) with lower limb spasticity related to upper motor neuron syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS

OnabotulinumtoxinA administered at the clinician's discretion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment utilization, clinician- and patient-reported satisfaction.

RESULTS

In ASPIRE, 530 patients received ≥1 onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for lower limb spasticity (mean age, 52 years; stroke, 49.4%; multiple sclerosis, 20.4%). Equinovarus foot was treated most often (80.9% of patients), followed by flexed knee (26.0%), stiff extended knee (22.5%), and flexed toes (22.3%). OnabotulinumtoxinA doses ranged between 10 and 1100 U across all presentations. Electromyography (EMG) was most commonly used for injection localization (≥41.1% of treatment sessions). Despite low patient response on the satisfaction questionnaire, clinicians (94.6% of treatment sessions) and patients (84.5%) reported satisfaction/extreme satisfaction that treatment helped manage spasticity, and clinicians (98.3%) and patients (91.6%) would probably/definitely continue onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. These data should be interpreted with care. Twenty-one adverse events (AEs) in 18 patients (3.4%) were considered treatment-related. Sixty-seven patients (12.6%) reported 138 serious AEs; 3 serious AEs in two patients (0.4%) were considered treatment-related. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

ASPIRE provides long-term observational data on the treatment of lower limb spasticity with onabotulinumtoxinA. Real-world data from this primary analysis can help to guide the clinical use of onabotulinumtoxinA to improve spasticity management.

Duration of Symptom Relief Between Injections for AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in Spastic Paresis and Cervical Dystonia: Comparison of Evidence From Clinical Studies

Background: Botulinum toxin-A is a well-established treatment for adult and pediatric spastic paresis and cervical dystonia. While guidelines and approved labels indicate that treatment should not occur more frequently than every 12 weeks, studies and real-world evidence show that the timing of symptom recurrence between treatments may vary. Methods: We report retreatment criteria and response duration (retreatment intervals) from four pivotal, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with open-label extensions involving patients treated with abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNTA) for upper limb (NCT01313299) or lower limb (NCT01249404) spastic paresis in adults, lower limb spastic paresis in children (NCT01249417), and cervical dystonia in adults (NCT00257660). We review results in light of recently available preclinical data. Results: In spastic paresis, 24.0-36.9% of upper limb patients treated with aboBoNTA and 20.1-32.0% of lower limb patients did not require retreatment before 16 weeks. Moreover, 72.8-93.8% of aboBoNTA-treated pediatric patients with lower limb spastic paresis did not require retreatment before 16 weeks (17.7-54.0% did not require retreatment before 28 weeks). In aboBoNTA-treated patients with cervical dystonia, 72.6-81.5% did not require retreatment before 16 weeks. Conclusion: AboBoNTA, when dosed as recommended, offers symptom relief beyond 12 weeks to many patients with spastic paresis and cervical dystonia. From recently available preclinical research, the amount of active neurotoxin administered with aboBoNTA might be a factor in explaining this long duration of response.

Long-term efficacy and safety of a new botulinum toxin type A preparation in mouse gastrocnemius muscle

A new type A botulinum toxin (BoNT/A) preparation, JTM201 (NCBI chromosomal DNA ID: CP046450), has been developed, which comprises 900-kDa complexed toxin purified from Clostridium botulinum (strain: NCTC13319), but its safety and efficacy have not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of JTM201 at different concentrations in comparison to another commercially available BoNT/A product, Botox® (onabotulinumtoxin A, ONA), using a mouse model. The LD₅₀ of JTM201 was similar to that of ONA, but the intrinsic activity of JTM201 was higher than that of ONA. Functional recovery of the nerves and muscles in SKH-1 mice after administration of the two BoNT/A preparations (JTM201 and ONA) to the right gastrocnemius muscle was observed over 24 weeks. In addition, JTM201 did not induce any skin or muscle inflammatory response in 24 weeks. Paralysis induced by neurotransmitter blockade after JTM201 administration was comparable to that of ONA treatment. Both muscle weight and volume decreased in a concentration-dependent manner following JTM201 or ONA toxin injection until week 4. Reduced muscle fiber size due to atrophy and consequent fibrosis were detected following injection of JTM201 or ONA. Moreover, we assessed the extent of diffusion of JTM201 or ONA to the tibialis anterior and quadriceps femoris muscles, demonstrating limited diffusion to off-target muscles. In conclusion, JTM201 demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety equivalent to those of ONA based on compound muscle action potential, muscle volume, and histology analyses. These data suggest that JTM201 is a new BoNT/A formulation with safety and efficacy comparable to those of ONA.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Botulinum Toxin on Sleep Quality in Stroke-Related Spasticity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is a commonly used agent in the treatment of stroke-related spasticity. Sleep disorders can often be seen as a comorbidity or complication in stroke patients. Based on the data that spasticity is associated with sleep disorders, in this study, we aimed to evaluate whether sleep quality has changed in patients with stroke treated with BoNT.

METHODS

Thirty five (17 female / 18 male) stroke patients with gastrocnemius and / or soleus spasticity were included in this observational cross-sectional study. In clinical evaluation before and three months after BoNT injection; for spasticity evaluation modified Ashworth scale (MAS), pain assessment visual analog scale (VAS), functional evaluation; passive joint range of motion (ROM) measurement, functional independence measurement (FIM), lower limb Brunstrom staging, life quality assessment short form-36 (SF-36) quality of life scale, and sleep quality assessment Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scales were used.

RESULTS

After the BoNT injection, there was a statistically significant decrease in MAS and VAS scores, a significant increase in passive ROM measurements, FIM, lower limb Brunstrom staging, and SF-36 physical function sub parameter. There was also a significant decrease in PSQI scores. Before and after treatment, there was no correlation found between PSQI values with pain and spasticity. However, there was a weak negative correlation between post-treatment PSQI values, passive ROM, SF-36 physical function and SF-36 physical role sub parameters (respectively: r: -0.335 p: 0.049, r: -0.364, 0.032, r: -0.404, p: 0.016). Conlusion: The results of our study suggest that BoNT, which is frequently used in the treatment of spasticity in stroke patients, has positive effects on sleep quality.

High Dosage of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Adult Subjects with Spasticity Following Acquired Central Nervous System Damage: Where Are We at?

Spasticity is a common disabling disorder in adult subjects suffering from stroke, brain injury, multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Spasticity may be a disabling symptom in people during rehabilitation and botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has become the first-line therapy for the local form. High BTX-A doses are often used in clinical practice. Advantages and limitations are debated and the evidence is unclear. Therefore, we analysed the efficacy, safety and evidence for BTX-A high doses. Studies published from January 1989 to February 2020 were retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register. Only obabotulinumtoxinA (obaBTX-A), onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBTX-A), and incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBTX-A) were considered. The term “high dosage” indicated ≥ 600 U. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies had variable method designs, sample sizes and aims, with only two randomised controlled trials. IncoBTX-A and onaBTX-A were injected in three and eight studies, respectively. BTX-A high doses were used predominantly in treating post-stroke spasticity. No studies were retrieved regarding treating spasticity in MS and SCI. Dosage of BTX-A up to 840 U resulted efficacious and safety without no serious adverse events (AEs). Evidence is insufficient to recommend high BTX-A use in clinical practice, but in selected patients, the benefits of high dose BTX-A may be clinically acceptable.

Efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of adult lower-limb post-stroke spasticity, including pes equinovarus

BACKGROUND

Lower-limb spasticity can impair ambulation and gait, impacting quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

This ancillary analysis of the TOWER study (NCT01603459) assessed the efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for lower-limb post-stroke spasticity including pes equinovarus.

METHODS

Participants received escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400-800U) across 3 injection cycles. Changes were compared for those treated in the lower limb (with/without upper-limb treatment) or the upper limb only or for participants treated or untreated for pes equinovarus. Outcome measures were those used in the seminal study: resistance to passive movement scale (REPAS), Ashworth Scale (AS), functional ambulation and lower-limb goal attainment.

RESULTS

Among 132/155 (85%) participants with post-stroke spasticity, in cycles 1, 2 and 3, 99, 119 and 121 participants received lower-limb treatment with mean (SD) total limb incobotulinumtoxinA doses of 189.2 (99.2), 257.1 (115.0) and 321.3 (129.2) U, respectively. Of these, 80, 105 and 107, respectively, were treated for pes equinovarus. The mean (SD) improvement in REPAS lower-limb score was greater with treatment in the lower limb versus the upper limb only: -1.6 (2.1) versus-0.4 (1.4); -1.9 (1.9) versus -0.6 (1.6); -2.2 (2.2) versus -1.0 (0.0) (P=0.0005, P=0.0133 and P=0.3581; analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], between-group differences) in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For all cycles, the mean improvement in ankle joint AS score from injection to 4 weeks post-treatment was greater for participants treated versus not treated for pes equinovarus, with a significant between-group difference in cycle 1 (P=0.0099; ANCOVA). At the end of cycle 3, 42% of participants walked independently and 63% achieved 2 of 2 lower-limb treatment goals (baseline 23% and 34%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for treatment of pes equinovarus and other patterns of lower-limb post-stroke spasticity.

High-dose Botulinum Toxin Therapy: Safety, Benefit, and Endurance of Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Botulinum neurotoxin therapy (BoNT) is a powerful tool for treating many neurologic disorders. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved maximum onabotulinum toxin A (OnaA) dose is 400 units (U) per visit, but higher doses are commonly necessary, particularly when treating multiple body regions.

METHODS

We collected demographics, OnaA dose, body regions injected and indications, patient-reported efficacy via 7-point Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS), and duration of benefit.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were identified receiving OnaA >400 U/session. Dystonia (n = 44) and spasticity (n = 24) were the most common indications for high-dose OnaA. Mean duration of benefit was 9 weeks (standard deviation [SD] 3). More than 70% of patients self-reported "very much improved" or "much improved" at 6 month, 1 year, and last visit. No serious adverse effects were reported.

DISCUSSION

The majority of patients tolerated >400 U OnaA with continued benefit. OnaA doses >400 U may be safe and effective in appropriate patients.

Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity after Stroke

Post-stroke lower limb spasticity impairs balance and gait leading to reduced walking speed, often increasing wheelchair use and caregiver burden. Several studies have shown that appropriate treatments for lower limb spasticity after stroke include injections of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), phenol or alcohol, surgical correction and a rehabilitation program. In the present article, we review the safety and effectiveness of BoNT-A for the treatment of lower limb spasticity after stroke, with a focus on higher doses of BoNT-A. The cumulative body of evidence coming from the randomized clinical trials and open-label studies selected in the article suggest BoNT-A to be safe and efficacious in reducing lower limb spasticity after stroke. Studies of high doses of BoNT-A also showed a greater reduction of severe post-stroke spasticity. In stroke survivors with spasticity of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles, a combined approach between surgery and BoNT-A can be indicated. However, controversy remains about improvement in motor function relative to post-stroke spasticity reduction after BoNT-A treatment.

Motion analysis for the evaluation of muscle overactivity: A point of view

Muscle overactivity is a general term for pathological increases in muscle activity such as spasticity. It is caused by damage to the central nervous system at the cortical, subcortical or spinal levels, leading to an upper motor neuron syndrome. In routine clinical practice, muscle overactivity, which induces abnormal muscle tone, is usually evaluated by using the Modified Ashworth Scale or the Tardieu Scale. However, both of these scales involve testing in passive conditions that do not always reflect muscle activity during dynamic tasks such as gait or reaching. To determine appropriate treatment strategies, muscle overactivity should be evaluated by using objective measures in dynamic conditions. Instrumental motion analysis systems that include 3-D motion analysis and electromyography are very useful for this purpose. The method can be used to identify patterns of abnormal muscle activity that can be related to abnormal kinematic patterns. It allows for objective and accurate assessment of the effects of treatments to reduce muscle overactivity on the movement to be improved. The aim of this point-of-view article is to describe the utility of instrumental motion analysis and to outline both its numerous advantages in evaluating muscle overactivity and to present the current limitations for its use (e.g., cost, the need for an engineer, errors relating to marker placement and cross talk between electromyography sensors).

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity between botulinum toxin subtypes A1 and A2 in cynomolgus macaques

Botulinum toxin type A (subtype A1) is used as therapeutic agent for some neurological disorders causing spasticity. The toxin products have an upper dosage limit, and their adverse events, such as side effects of diffusion following high-dose administration, have become serious issues. Therefore, a preparation with greater therapeutic efficacy at lower dosages and less diffusion in the body is desired. We have attempted to produce neurotoxin derived from subtype A2 (A2NTX), which has a different amino acid sequence from that of neurotoxin derived from subtype A1. In this study, to investigate whether A2NTX is applicable for treatment, we compared the muscle relaxation effects and the toxicity between A1LL and A2NTX in adult cynomolgus macaques. In the isometric muscle contraction test elicited by 30 Hz tetanus stimulation, the contractions observed in the 0.4 U/site A1LL-treated group were similar in value to those in the 0.13 U/site A2NTX-treated group. In the toxicity test, the 12 and 24 U/kg A1LL- and A2NTX-treated groups all exhibited similar signs of toxicity regarding symptoms, rate of weight loss, and decrease in the length of the right lower leg perimeter. Thus, A2NTX demonstrated approximately 3.0-times higher muscle relaxation activity than A1LL, and their toxicity was equivalent. This study suggested that A2NTX products are more suitable for the treatment of neurological disorders.

Effects of a 6-month self-rehabilitation programme in addition to botulinum toxin injections and conventional physiotherapy on limitations of patients with spastic hemiparesis following stroke (ADJU-TOX): protocol study for a randomised controlled, investigator blinded study

INTRODUCTION

Home-based self-rehabilitation programmes combined with botulinum toxin injections (BTIs) appear to be a relevant approach to increase the recommended intensive rehabilitation of patients with spasticity following a stroke. The literature highlights a lack of evidence of beneficial effects of this adjuvant therapy to reduce limitations of patients with stroke. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a 6-month self-rehabilitation programme in adjunction to BTI, in comparison with BTI alone, to reduce limitations of patients with spasticity following a stroke.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

220 chronic patients will participate to this multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, assessor blinded study. All patients will benefit from two successive BTI (3 months apart), and patients randomised in the self-rehabilitation group will perform in adjunction 6 months of self-rehabilitation at home. All patients continue their conventional physiotherapy. The main outcome is the primary treatment goal (PTG), which will be determined jointly by the patient and the medical doctor using Goal Attainment Scaling. Impairments and functions, quality of life, mood and fatigue will be assessed. Botulinum toxin will be injected into the relevant muscles according to the PTG. Patients in the self-rehab group will be taught the self-rehabilitation programme involving respectively 10 min of stretching, 10 min of strengthening and 10 min of task-oriented exercises, corresponding to their PTG. Compliance to the self-rehabilitation programme will be monitored.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Patients will sign written informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from ethics committee. The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international congresses. The results will also be disseminated to patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02944929.

Effect of botulinum toxin injection on length and force of the rectus femoris and triceps surae muscles during locomotion in patients with chronic hemiparesis (FOLOTOX)

Background

After stroke, spasticity of the rectus femoris (RF) and triceps surae (TS) muscles frequently alters the gait pattern. Knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion in swing are often reduced, respectively called Stiff Knee Gait (SKG) and equinus. A preliminary uncontrolled study suggested that botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections could improve muscle length and force generated during gait, improving inter-segmental coordination.

The aim of this randomised controlled study is thus to evaluate changes in the length of the RF and TS muscles during gait 1 month after either BTX-A or placebo injection in patients with chronic stroke, SKG and spastic equinus. The secondary aims are to evaluate peak length and peak force generated during gait, as well inter-segmental coordination assessed using the continuous relative phase method initially described by Barela et al. in patients with stroke.

Methods

This is a prospective, three-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, triple blind study over 3 months with 4 visits. Forty patients will be included. During visits V1, V3 and V4, length and force generated by RF and TS during gait will be assessed using musculoskeletal models (MSM). Muscle force will also be assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. Inter segmental coordination will be evaluated using 3D gait analysis and functional tests will be performed. During V2, patients will receive either an injection of BTX-A in the RF and TS muscles or a placebo injection of saline solution.

Discussion

We expect an increase in peak length and a decrease in peak force generated by the RF and TS muscles in the BTX-A group 1 month post injection. Moreover, we expect these parameters to be more improved in the BTX-A than the Control group. This is the first study to assess these parameters in a randomised, controlled trial using instrumented methods (isokinetic evaluation and 3D gait analysis). The results should help to improve understanding of the mechanism(s) underlying improvements in inter-segmental coordination that have been found in many previous uncontrolled studies.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01821573, First received: March 27, 2013 Last updated: September 14, 2016 Last verified: September 2016 Other Study ID Numbers: P110136 AOM11223.

Botulinum Toxin Type A Treatment Combined with Intensive Rehabilitation for Gait Poststroke: A Preliminary Study

GOAL

To examine the effects of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment combined with intensive rehabilitation for gait compared with intensive rehabilitation alone in patients with chronic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative case series design was used. Subjects were 19 patients with chronic stroke and spastic hemiplegia. In 9 patients (group I), BoNT-A was injected into spastic muscles of the affected lower limbs, followed by a 4-week inpatient intensive rehabilitation program. In the other 10 patients (group II), a 4-week inpatient intensive rehabilitation program alone was first provided (control period) followed by the same treatment protocol in group I. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores, range of motion (ROM), gait speed in the 10-Meter Walking Test, 6-Minute Walking Distance Test (6MD) scores, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) scores, and Berg Balance Scale scores were evaluated every 4 weeks following baseline assessments.

RESULTS

All results except for the MAS score of knee flexor and the ROM of knee flexion improved in group I and the gait speed, 6MD, and TUG scores improved in group II. Intergroup comparisons at week 4 showed significantly greater improvements in the MAS score of ankle plantar flexor, ROM of ankle dorsiflexion, and 6MD in group I than in group II (P = .016, .011, and .009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BoNT-A treatment for lower-limb spasticity, combined with intensive rehabilitation, was effective in improving spasticity and the 6MD compared with intensive rehabilitation alone in patients with chronic stroke.

Patient Registry of Spasticity Care World: Data Analysis Based on Physician Experience

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Objective

The aim of the study was to report physician experience–based “real-world” treatment patterns with botulinum toxin type A in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury.

Design

A prospective, multicenter, international observational registry design was used.

Results

Six hundred twenty-seven participants with stroke and 132 participants with traumatic brain injury were assessed and treated by 17 more experienced physicians and 12 less experienced physicians. Due to the limited usage of abobotulinumtoxinA Dysport and incobotulinumtoxinA Xeomin, data were reported on onabotulinumtoxinA BOTOX only. Based on physician experience, onabotulinumtoxinA doses were statistically different with larger mean doses injected by more experienced physicians in the upper limb (59.9 [39.0], P = 0.001) and in the lower limb (101.8 [69.2], P < 0.001). Treated deformities significantly differed for both upper limb and lower limb (P < 0.001). More experienced physicians showed a larger mean change in Ashworth Scale scores from baseline for the equinovarus/equinus foot and stiff knee (P = 0.001 and 0.03). Less experienced physicians showed a larger mean change in Ashworth Scale scores from baseline for the adducted thigh (P = 0.05). Less experienced physicians had statistically significant larger change in hand pain scores for clenched fist deformity treatment at follow-up compared with more experienced physicians (P = 0.01). Physician experience demonstrated a significant difference on patients reported satisfaction toward their secondary goal with higher scores for more experienced physician (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

This international registry provides clinical nuances of treatment based on physician clinical experience in a robust sample size.

Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Skeletal muscle spasticity is a major physical complication resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI), which can lead to muscle contracture, joint stiffness, reduced range of movement, broken skin and pain. Treatments for spasticity include a range of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, often used in combination. Management of spasticity following TBI varies from other clinical populations because of the added complexity of behavioural and cognitive issues associated with TBI.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity in people with TBI.

SEARCH METHODS

In June 2017, we searched key databases including the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and others, in addition to clinical trials registries and the reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cross-over RCTs evaluating any intervention for the management of spasticity in TBI. Only studies where at least 50% of participants had a TBI (or for whom separate data for participants with TBI were available) were included. The primary outcomes were spasticity and adverse effects. Secondary outcome measures were classified according to the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health including body functions (sensory, pain, neuromusculoskeletal and movement-related functions) and activities and participation (general tasks and demands; mobility; self-care; domestic life; major life areas; community, social and civic life).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Data were synthesised narratively; meta-analysis was precluded due to the paucity and heterogeneity of data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine studies in this review which involved 134 participants with TBI. Only five studies reported between-group differences, yielding outcome data for 105 participants with TBI. These five studies assessed the effects of a range of pharmacological (baclofen, botulinum toxin A) and non-pharmacological (casting, physiotherapy, splints, tilt table standing and electrical stimulation) interventions, often in combination. The studies which tested the effect of baclofen and tizanidine did not report their results adequately. Where outcome data were available, spasticity and adverse events were reported, in addition to some secondary outcome measures.Of the five studies with results, three were funded by governments, charities or health services and two were funded by a pharmaceutical or medical technology company. The four studies without useable results were funded by pharmaceutical or medical technology companies.It was difficult to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions due to poor reporting, small study size and the fact that participants with TBI were usually only a proportion of the overall total. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to the paucity of data and heterogeneity of interventions and comparator groups. Some studies concluded that the intervention they tested had beneficial effects on spasticity, and others found no difference between certain treatments. The most common adverse event was minor skin damage in people who received casting. We believe it would be misleading to provide any further description of study results given the quality of the evidence was very low for all outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The very low quality and limited amount of evidence about the management of spasticity in people with TBI means that we are uncertain about the effectiveness or harms of these interventions. Well-designed and adequately powered studies using functional outcome measures to test the interventions used in clinical practice are needed.

Recovery of rat muscle size but not function more than 1 year after a single botulinum toxin injection

INTRODUCTION

Neurotoxin injection is used to treat a wide variety of neuromuscular disorders. The purpose of this study was to measure the functional and structural properties of botulinum toxin-injected adult rat skeletal muscle over nearly the entire lifespan.

METHODS

Ten groups of animals were subjected to either neurotoxin injection [Botox, Type A (BT-A); Allergan, Irvine, California] or saline solution injection. Neurotoxin-injected animals (n = 90) were analyzed at different time-points: 1 week; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months; 12 months; or 18 months.

RESULTS

In spite of the recovery of structural features, such as muscle mass and fiber area, dorsiflexion torque production remained significantly depressed by 25%, even at 12 months after neurotoxin injection.

DISCUSSION

The data demonstrate that, after a single BT-A injection, although gross muscle morphology recovered over a 12-month time period, loss of contractile function did not recover. Muscle Nerve 57: 435-441, 2018.

Detection of Botulinum Toxin Muscle Effect in Humans Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Qualitative Case Series

BACKGROUND

Although important for dosing and dilution, there are few data describing botulinum toxin (BT) movement in human muscle.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand BT movement within human muscle.

DESIGN

Proof-of-concept study with descriptive case series.

SETTING

Outpatient academic practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Five subjects with stroke who were BT naive with a mean age of 60.4 ± 14 years and time poststroke of 4.6 ± 3.7 years.

METHODS

Three standardized injections were given to the lateral gastrocnemius muscle (LGM): 2 contained 25 units (U) of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) in 0.25 mL of saline solution and the third 0.25 mL of saline solution only. The tibialis anterior muscle (TAM) was not injected in any subject. A leg magnetic resonance image was obtained at baseline, 2 months, and 3 months later with a 3.0 Tesla Siemens scanner. Three muscles, the LGM, lateral soleus muscle (LSM), and TAM, were manually outlined on the T2 mapping sequence at each time point. A histogram of T2 relaxation times (T2-RT) for all voxels at baseline was used to calculate a mean and standard deviation (SD) T2-RT for each muscle. Botulinum toxin muscle effect (BTME) at 2 months and 3 months was defined as a subject- and muscle-specific T2-RT voxel threshold ≥3 SD above the baseline mean at or near BT injection sites.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BTME volume for each leg magnetic resonance imaging slice at 3 time points and 3 muscles for all subjects.

RESULTS

One subject missed the 3-month scan, leaving 18 potential observations of BTME. Little to no BTME effect was seen in the noninjected TAM. A BTME was detected in the LGM in 13 of 18 possible observations, and no effect was detected in 5 observations. Possible BTME effect was seen in the LSM in 3 subjects due to either diffusion through fascia or needle misplacement. Volume of BTME, as defined here, appeared to be substantially greater than the 0.25-mL injection volume.

CONCLUSIONS

This descriptive case series is among the first attempts to quantify BTME within human muscle. Our findings are preliminary and are limited by a few inconsistencies. However, we conclude that use of magnetic resonance imaging to detect the volume of BTME is feasible and may assist researchers in modeling the spread and diffusion of BT within human muscle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Treatment diary for botulinum toxin spasticity treatment: a pilot study

The aim of this study is to develop a treatment diary for patients receiving spasticity treatment including botulinum toxin injection and physiotherapy and/or occupational therapy. The diary focuses on problems triggered by skeletal muscle overactivity; agreed goals for treatment and the patient’s self-evaluation of achievement on the Goal Attainment Scale; which skeletal muscles were injected; physiotherapists’ and occupational therapists’ evaluation of the patients’ achievement of objectives on the Goal Attainment Scale; and proposals for optimization of treatment and changing goals. The evaluation included a satisfaction questionnaire and the WHO-QoL BREF and WHO-5 well-being score. Overall, 10 patients were enrolled in the pilot study. The patients were generally satisfied with the diary, found that it involved them more in their treatment and made it easier to set personal goals, and found it worth the time spent using it. However, no clear advantage in relation to their quality of life (WHO-QoL BREF and WHO-5 well-being score) was reported.

Effects of tibial nerve neurotomy on posture and gait in stroke patients: A focus on patient-perceived benefits in daily life

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the objective and subjective functional effectiveness of tibial nerve neurotomy (TNN) in post-stroke spastic equinovarus foot (SEF).

METHODS

In an open study, 23 hemiplegic patients were assessed immediately before TNN and then 5months after TNN. The main outcome measure was the Lower Limb Function Assessment Scale (LL-FAS), which provided an ecologic assessment of impairments in standing and walking (i.e. kinematic abnormalities) and their impacts on activities of daily living. Patients were also assessed for global clinical impression of change, fear of falling, neuromotor impairments, spatiotemporal and video gait parameters and walking capacities.

RESULTS

TNN had a very marked effect on the level of spasticity and the range of motion in dorsiflexion (p<10(-3)). These changes resulted in better foot positioning when standing and walking (particularly in stance), which was perceived very favorably by the patients. There was a clear, patient-perceived improvement in activities performed when standing and walking (LL-FAS (p<0.01)), the global clinical impression of change (p<10(-3)) and the fear of falling (p=0.022) that was not revealed by conventional, objective measurements (New Functional Ambulation Classification, Rivermead Mobility Index).

CONCLUSION

TNN is an effective treatment for post-stroke SEF; it is associated with a patient-reported improvement in standing and walking abilities during activities of daily living. Further research must now assess the long-term subjective efficacy of TNN.

OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Pain in Patients With Post-Stroke Spasticity: Findings From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

CONTEXT

Patients with post-stroke spasticity (PSS) commonly experience pain in affected limbs, which may impact quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To assess onabotulinumtoxinA for pain in patients with PSS from the BOTOX(®) Economic Spasticity Trial, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients with PSS (N = 273) were randomized to 22- to 34-week double-blind treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA + standard care (SC) or placebo injection + SC and were eligible to receive open-label onabotulinumtoxinA up to 52 weeks. Assessments included change from baseline on the 11-point pain numeric rating scale, proportion of patients with baseline pain ≥4 achieving ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in pain, and pain interference with work at Week 12, end of double-blind treatment, and Week 52.

RESULTS

At baseline, most patients (74.3%) experienced pain and 47.4% had pain ≥4 (pain subgroup). Mean pain reduction from baseline at Week 12 was significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA + SC (-0.77, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.40) than placebo + SC (-0.13, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.24; P < 0.05). Higher proportions of patients in the pain subgroup achieved ≥30% and ≥50% reductions in pain at Week 12 with onabotulinumtoxinA + SC (53.7% and 37.0%, respectively) compared with placebo (28.8% and 18.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). Reductions in pain were sustained through Week 52. Compared with placebo + SC, onabotulinumtoxinA consistently reduced pain interference with work.

CONCLUSION

This is the first randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrating statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in pain and pain interference with work with onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with PSS.

Botulinum toxin A injection of UES in schizencephaly with dysphagia: Case report

A 4-year-old schizencephaly patient admitted to authors' institution with dysphagia caused by upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysfunction. Videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was done for the diagnosis and the botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) was injected to the cricopharyngeal muscle. UES dysfunction improved and oral feeding was possible after the injection. This normal swallowing function remained for over 79 months which was confirmed by follow up VFSS. To the best of our knowledge, this is first case of schizencephaly patient to be treated by BTX-A for UES dysfunction and longest to maintain its effect with single session of injection.

Evaluation of clinical outcomes of patients with post-stroke wrist and finger spasticity after ultrasonography-guided BTX-A injection and rehabilitation training

Objective: Using ultrasonography (US) to guide botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection in patients with post-stroke wrist and finger flexor muscle spasticity and assessing clinical outcomes after the injection and rehabilitation intervention.

Methods: Twenty-three patients with wrist and finger spasticity after stroke were recruited in this study from May 2012 to May 2013. Under US guidance, the proper dose (250 U) of BTX-A was injected into each spastic muscle at two injection sites. Then, conventional rehabilitation training started next day after BTX-A injection. The degree of spasticity was assessed by modified Ashworth scale (MAS) and wrist and finger motor function by active rang of movement (AROM), and Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) at the baseline, 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after BTX-A injection.

Results: Significant decreases (p < 0.02) in the MAS scores of both the finger flexor muscle tone and wrist flexor muscle tone measured at 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the BTX-A injection were found in comparison with the baseline scores. Compared with the baseline, the AROM values of the wrist and finger extensions and the FMA scores of the wrist and hand significantly increased (p < 0.02) at 2, 4 and 12 weeks after the BTX-A injection.

Conclusions: US-guided BTX-A injection combined with rehabilitation exercise decrease spasticity of the wrist and finger flexor muscles and improve their motor function in stroke patients up to 12 weeks following BTX-A injection.

Gait improvement by low-dose botulinum toxin A injection treatment of the lower limbs in subacute stroke patients

[Purpose] Lower-limb spasticity after stroke may be associated with worse functional outcome. Our study aim was to establish whether a low-dose botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection in subacute stroke patients can improve spasticity, gait, and daily living abilities. [Subjects] Twenty-three subacute stroke patients were randomly allocated to BTX-A treatment group (11 patients) and control group (12 patients). [Methods] In the BTX-A treatment group patients, 200 units BTX-A was injected into the triceps surae (150 iu) and posterior tibial (50 iu) by electrical stimulation-guided. The patients in the control group received the same volume of placebo solution into the same injection locations. Gait analysis (step length, cadence, speed), the 6-min walking test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) of the lower limbs, modified Ashworth scale assess (MAS) assessment of the lower limbs, surface electromyography (sEMG), and modified Barthel index (MBI) assessment were performed before and at 4,8 weeks after treatment. [Results] We found that the FMA of the low limbs and MBI were significantly improved in both groups. The gait analysis, FMA, and MBI results in the BTX-A treatment group were better than those in the control group. MAS and surface electromyography (sEMG) showed better improvement of spasticity in the treatment group. [Conclusion] Early low-dose botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection in subacute stroke patients into the lower-limb may improve gait, spasticity, and daily living abilities.

Relationship between hip flexion and ankle dorsiflexion during swing phase in chronic stroke patients

BACKGROUND

During the clinical examination of stroke patients, it is common to observe that involuntary hip flexion occurs during voluntary ankle dorsiflexion (synkinesia). This suggests that there is a relationship between these two joints. We hypothesized that there may be a relationship between hip and ankle flexion during swing phase of the gait cycle. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a biomechanical relationship between peak hip flexion and peak ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase of the gait cycle following stroke.

METHOD

The paretic lower limbs of 60 patients with stroke were evaluated using clinical tests and 3D-gait analysis. The clinical assessment included muscle strength, spasticity and passive range of ankle motion. The gait analysis focused on sagittal frontal and transverse kinematic gait parameters during swing.

FINDINGS

A stepwise-linear-regression indicated that peak hip flexion and gait speed were the only 2 parameters which accounted for peak ankle dorsiflexion. There was also a significant negative correlation between peak hip flexion and peak ankle dorsiflexion during swing, and a significant positive correlation between hip flexor and ankle dorsiflexor muscle strength.

INTERPRETATION

These results suggest that the biomechanical behaviour of hip and ankle joints during the swing phase of the gait cycle is linked in patients with stroke. They also suggest that two strategies exist: if sufficient ankle dorsiflexion is present, less hip flexion is required (distal-strategy) whereas if dorsiflexion is reduced, it is compensated for by an increase in peak hip flexion (proximal-strategy).

High doses of onabotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke spasticity: a retrospective analysis

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of high doses of onabotulinumtoxinA (from 600 to 800 units) in 26 patients affected by upper and/or lower limb post-stroke spasticity. They were assessed before, 30 and 90 days after treatment. We observed a significant muscle tone reduction and a significant functional improvement (assessed with the Disability Assessment Scale). No adverse events were reported. In our retrospective analysis the treatment with high doses of onabotulinumtoxinA showed to be effective and safe.

Anterior knee pain caused by patellofemoral pain syndrome can be relieved by Botulinum toxin type A injection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic effects of Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) for anterior knee pain caused by patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).

DESIGN

Prospective case control study for intervention.

SETTING

A tertiary hospital rehabilitation center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve bilateral PFPS patients with anterior knee pain were recruited. The worse pain knee was selected for injection, and the counterpart was left untreated.

INTERVENTION

Injection of BTA to vastus lateralis (VL) muscle.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to assess pain, stiffness, and functional status of the knee, and CYBEX isokinetic dynamometer to assess isokinetic muscle force before and after BTA application to VL.

RESULTS

Remarkable improvement after receiving BTA injection was obtained not only in the questionnaire of WOMAC (p<0.05), but also in knee flexion torque (p<0.05). No significant change of knee extension torque was noted (p=0.682).

CONCLUSION

BTA injection is a good alternative treatment to improve anterior knee pain, knee function and isokinetic flexion torque.

Comparison between tibial nerve block with anaesthetics and neurotomy in hemiplegic adults with spastic equinovarus foot

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of diagnostic motor nerve block with anaesthetics and of selective tibial neurotomy in the treatment of spastic equinovarus foot in hemiplegic adults.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 30 hemiplegic adults with spastic equinovarus foot benefited from a diagnostic nerve block with anaesthetics followed by a selective tibial neurotomy performed at the level of the same motor nerve branches of the tibial nerve. Spasticity (Ashworth scale), muscle strength (Medical Research Council scale), passive ankle dorsiflexion (ROM), gait parameters (10 meters walking test) and gait kinematics (video assessment) were assessed before and after the nerve block and two months and two years after selective tibial neurotomy.

RESULTS

The decrease in spasticity and the improvement in gait kinematics were similar after the diagnostic nerve block and two months and two years after neurotomy. The diagnostic nerve block did not revealed the slight increase in gait speed and in tibialis anterior muscle strength that was observed two years after neurotomy.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that diagnostic nerve block with anaesthetics and selective neurotomy equally reduce spasticity and improve gait in case of spastic equinovarus foot in hemiplegic adults. Diagnostic nerve block can be used as a valuable screening tool before neurotomy.

Comparison of Systemic Toxicity between Botulinum Toxin Subtypes A1 and A2 in Mice and Rats

The adverse events caused by botulinum toxin type A (subtype A1) product, thought to be after-effects of toxin diffusion after high-dose administration, have become serious issues. A preparation showing less diffusion in the body than existing drugs has been sought. We have attempted to produce neurotoxin derived from subtype A2 (A2NTX) with an amino acid sequence different from that of neurotoxin derived from subtype A1 (A1NTX). In this study, to investigate whether A2NTX has the potential to resolve these issues, we compared the safety of A2NTX, a progenitor toxin derived from subtype A1 (A1 progenitor toxin) and A1NTX employing the intramuscular lethal dose 50% (im LD50) in mice and rats and the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) in rats. Mouse im LD50 values for A1 progenitor toxin and A2NTX were 93 and 166 U/kg, respectively, and the rat im LD50 values were 117 and 153 U/kg, respectively. In the rat CMAP test, the dose on the contralateral side, which caused a 50% reduction in the CMAP amplitude, that is, CMAP-TD50 , was calculated as 19.0, 16.6 and 28.7 U/kg for A1 progenitor toxin, A1NTX and A2NTX, respectively. The results indicate that A2NTX is safer than A1 progenitor toxin and A1NTX.