The role of the ear, nose and throat specialist in diagnosing headaches

Problem of headache: A cross-sectional study

Objectives

To assess the medical students, interns, general practitioners, and family physicians' perception of neurological and otolaryngeal causes of headaches.

Materials and Methods

A prospective, qualitative, questionnaire-based cross-sectional study took place. Five hundred and seventy-one senior medical students, interns, general practitioners (GPs), and family physicians from different geographical regions in Saudi Arabia were involved in the study. An online questionnaire is used to estimate the respondents' knowledge regarding neurological and otolaryngeal causes of headaches. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 21.

Results

Five hundred and seventy-one participants were involved in the study. They were 377 females and 194 males with a female-to-male ratio of 1.9:1. Most of them were medical students (69.9%). However, medical interns, general practitioners, and family physicians' respondents were (17.3%), (7.5%), and (5.3%), respectively. They constituted different geographical regions of Saudi Arabia. An average level of knowledge about headaches was recorded in (55%) of the participants, while (42.7%) had a good level of knowledge about its etiologies.

Conclusions

A considerable percentage of the current study population has average knowledge about neurological and otolaryngeal factors of headache. It is advocated that the current national medical curriculum be thoroughly reviewed and clear referral pathways must be established to have better management of these cases.

Nose and headache: what have we learned? Naso e cefalee: cosa abbiamo imparato

Sinonasal involvement in secondary headache has long been interpreted as sinusitis and overestimation has been a problem in the past. In the last 20 years, the innovative interpretation of contact points between the lateral nasal wall and the septum as triggering cause of facial pain via the trigeminovascular system has gained importance in nasal secondary headaches. Also in this case, the prevalence and relevance has been misinterpreted in the beginning, undermining the success rate of pain improvement after surgical removal of these contact points. Therefore, studies have started to concentrate on the need of suitable preoperative evaluation to define the ideal, responsive candidate for surgical management of this form of headache. This article analyzes the outcome of these studies and tries to highlight the need for long-term follow-up to finally determine the relevance of surgical treatment for this particular headache form.

Rhinologic evaluation in patients with primary headache

OBJECTIVES

In subjects with primary headaches, rhinologic pathologic condition may be associated with treatment refractoriness. In some cases, surgical correction of intranasal pathologic condition may decrease medication use. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of a rhinologic perspective in primary headache subjects by using neurologic management.

METHODS

Subjects with primary headache were examined by a neurologist and otolaryngologist. Initially, neurologic assessment was made, and medication was started. Migraine symptoms and pain severity were recorded using the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale and a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS). Subject's pain severity of tension type headache was evaluated by VAS. Direct otorhinolaryngologic history of all primary headache subjects was taken, and they all underwent physical examination, rigid nasal endoscopy, sinus computed tomography, and mucosal contact point test. All examination and radiologic findings were noted. Subjects were separated into groups after 1-month medical neurologic management.

RESULTS

One hundred nine subjects were enrolled. Ninety-nine subjects completed follow-up. Seventy-eight percent of the subjects were women. The mean age was 33.6 years (range, 18-63 y). Twenty-six subjects had no significant intranasal pathologic condition (group 1). Twenty subjects had an intranasal pathologic condition but responded to the neurologic treatment (group 2). Fifty-three subjects had an intranasal pathologic condition, and the neurologic treatment failed for these 53 subjects. Surgical intervention was planned for these 53 subjects (group 3). Thirty-eight subjects accepted the operation (group 3a), and 15 subjects refused the surgical intervention (group 3b). All subject's Migraine Disability Assessment Scale and VAS scores were compared. A total of 73 subjects had rhinologic abnormalities. Groups 1 and 2 benefited from the neurologic treatment, but headache severity of group 3a reduced after rhinologic surgery. Group 3b who rejected surgical intervention did not respond to the neurologic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes a series of subjects presenting with various primary headaches who also have underlying rhinologic abnormalities. Surgical treatment of the underlying rhinologic pathologic abnormalities had a beneficial effect on headache.