Intravenous thrombolysis for minor stroke and rapidly improving symptoms: a quantitative overview

Posterior Circulation Stroke Patients Receive Less Reperfusion Therapy Because of Late Arrival and Relative Contraindications: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Reperfusion treatment (RT) is administered to individuals with posterior circulation strokes (PCS) later and less frequently. We aimed to study the impact of demographic and clinical factors on the decision for RT in PCS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data from 500 subjects admitted to the tertiary stroke centre's emergency department between 2018 and 2020 due to PCS. Demographic and clinical factors were analysed among three groups: the RT group, the group with no RT because of absolute contraindications (ACI), and the group with no RT because of relative contraindications (RCI).

RESULTS

Of the patients, 202 (40.3%) were female. The median NIHSS was four (4), and the subjects' median age was 69 (18). RT was performed on 120 (24%) subjects. FAST symptoms (OR-5.62, 95% CI [2.90-12.28]) and higher NIHSS (OR-1.13, 95% CI [1.09-1.18]) at presentation, atrial fibrillation (OR-1.56, 95% CI [1.02-2.38]), hypertension (OR-2.19, 95% CI [1.17-4.53]) and diabetes (OR-1.70, 95% CI [1.06-2.71]) increased the chance of RT. Late arrival was the most prevalent ACI for 291 (58.2%) patients. FAST-negative subjects (OR-2.92, 95% CI [1.84-4.77]) and males (OR-1.58, 95% CI [1.11-2.28]) had a higher risk of arriving late. Because of RCI, 50 (10%) subjects did not receive RT; the majority were above 80 and had NIHSS ≤ 5. Subjects with RCI who received the RT had a higher NIHSS (4 vs. 3, p < 0.001), higher hypertension (59 (92.2%) vs. 35 (77.8%), p = 0.032) and heart failure (23 (35.9%) vs. 7 (15.6%), p = 0.018) prevalence. There was a trend for less RT in females with RCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Late arrival was the most common barrier to RT, and the male gender increased this risk. because of relative contraindications, 10% of subjects were not considered for RT. The presence of FAST symptoms, vascular risk factors, and a higher NIHSS increased the chance of RT.

Effect of rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis on the prognosis of patients with minor ischemic stroke

AIMS

The evidence of rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis in patients with minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is still controversial. This study aims to investigate the effect of rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis on the prognosis of patients with MIS.

METHODS

We continuously enrolled and analyzed patients with MIS admitted into our hospital within 24 h after symptom onset between January 2016 and December 2018, including 96 patients received intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h after symptom onset and 84 patients not received intravenous thrombolysis. A favorable long-term outcome was a 90-day mRS score of 0-1. Good short-term outcome was a 7-day NIHSS score of 0 or less than NIHSS onset.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between two groups of patients' age, gender, history of hypertension, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, smoking, drinking, and baseline NIHSS score. Patients with history of stroke (22.62% vs. 10.42%, p < 0.05) and diabetes (46.43% vs. 22.92%, p = 0.01) were higher in group of non-thrombolysis. The difference of NIHSS score after 7 days was statistically different between the two groups (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in 90-day mRS score. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the prognosis of patients was correlated with neutrophil ratio and CRP at admission.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MIS received intravenous thrombolysis may be associated with earlier neurological improvement, but might has no significant effect on long-term prognosis. The level of neutrophil ratio and CRP at admission are risk factors determining the prognosis, which requires further research.

Factors Associated with In-Hospital Delay in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Lessons from China

In-hospital delay reduces the benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), while factors affecting in-hospital delay are less well known in Chinese. We are aiming at determining the specific factors associated with in-hospital delay through a hospital based cohort. In-hospital delay was defined as door-to-needle time (DTN) ≥60min (standard delay criteria) or ≥75% percentile of all DTNs (severe delay criteria). Demographic data, time intervals [onset-to-door time (OTD), DTN, door-to-examination time (DTE), door-to-imaging time (DTI), door-to-laboratory time (DTL) and final-test-to-needle time (FTN, the time interval between the time obtaining the result of the last screening test and the needle time)], medical history and additional variables were calculated using Mann-Whitney U or Pearson Chi-Square tests for group comparison, and multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables of in-hospital delay. A total of 202 IVT cases were enrolled. The median age was 61 years and 25.2% were female. The cutoff points for the upper quartile of DTN (severe delay criteria) was 135min.When compared with the reference group without in-hospital delay, older age, shorter OTD and less referral were found in the standard delay group and male sex, presence with transient ischemic attacks or rapidly improving symptom, and with multi-model CT imaging were more frequent in the severe delay group. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, FTN (P<0.001) and DTL (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with standard delay; while DTE (P = 0.005), DTI (P = 0.033), DTL (P<0.001), and FTN (P<0.001) were positively associated with severe delay. There was not a significant change in the trend of DTNs during the study period (P = 0.054). In-hospital delay was due to multifactors in China, in which time delays of decision-making process and laboratory tests contributed the most. Efforts aiming at reducing the delay should be focused on the optimization for the items of screening tests and improvement of the pathway organization.