The role of radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia

MRI features of responsible contacts in vascular compressive trigeminal neuralgia and prediction modeling

BACKGROUND

Multiple neurovascular contacts in patients with vascular compressive trigeminal neuralgia often challenge the diagnosis of responsible contacts.

PURPOSE

To analyze the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of responsible contacts and establish a predictive model to accurately pinpoint the responsible contacts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with unilateral trigeminal neuralgia were enrolled. A total of 153 definite contacts (45 responsible, 108 non-responsible) were analyzed for their MRI characteristics, including neurovascular compression (NVC) grading, distance from pons to contact (D_pons-contact), vascular origin of compressing vessels, diameter of vessel (D_vessel) and trigeminal nerve (D_{trigeminal nerve}) at contact. The MRI characteristics of the responsible and non-responsible contacts were compared, and their diagnostic efficiencies were further evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The significant MRI features were incorporated into the logistics regression analysis to build a predictive model for responsible contacts.

RESULTS

Compared with non-responsible contacts, NVC grading and arterial compression ratio (84.44%) were significantly higher, D_pons-contact was significantly lower at responsible contacts (P < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.033, respectively). NVC grading had a highest diagnostic area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.742, with a sensitivity of 64.44% and specificity of 75.00%. The logistic regression model showed a higher diagnostic efficiency, with an AUC of 0.808, sensitivity of 88.89%, and specificity of 62.04%.

CONCLUSION

Contact degree and position are important MRI features in identifying the responsible contacts of the trigeminal neuralgia. The logistic predictive model based on D_pons-contact, NVC grading, and vascular origin can qualitatively improve the prediction of responsible contacts for radiologists.

Risk Factors for Radiation Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Simple Summary

Radiation necrosis is a known complication after stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial tumors. We evaluated 388 patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery at our institution. The most common tumors were metastases (47.2%), followed by vestibular schwannomas (32.2%) and meningiomas (13.4%). 15.7% developed radiation necrosis after a median of 8 months. According to our data, larger tumor diameter (HR 1.065) and higher radiation dose (HR 1.302) were associated with an increased risk of radiation necrosis independently of tumor type. Advanced age was shown to be a risk factor for radiation necrosis only in cases with metastasis (HR 1.066). The data from this study suggest that the development of radiation necrosis is dependent on size and dose, not on the type of the neoplasm.

Abstract

Purpose: single-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established part of the multimodal treatment in neuro-oncology. Radiation necrosis after high-dose irradiation is a known complication, but there is a lack of evidence about the risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible risk factors for radiation necrosis in patients undergoing radiosurgery. Methods: patients treated with radiosurgery between January 2004 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data, imaging and medication were gathered from electronic patient records. The largest diameter of the tumors was measured using MRI scans in T1 weighted imaging with gadolinium and the edema in T2 weighted sequences. The diagnosis of a radiation necrosis was established analyzing imaging criteria combined with clinical course or pathologically confirmed by subsequent surgical intervention. Patients developing radiation necrosis detected after SRS were compared to patients without evidence of an overshooting irradiation reaction. Results: 388 patients were included retrospectively, 61 (15.7%) of whom developed a radiation necrosis. Median follow-up was 24 (6–62) months with a radiation necrosis after 8 (6–12) months. The most frequent tumors were metastases in 47.2% of the cases, followed by acoustic neuromas in 32.2% and meningiomas in 13.4%. Seventy-three (18.9%) patients already underwent one or more previous radiosurgical procedures for different lesions. The mean largest diameter of the tumors amounted to 16.3 mm (±6.1 mm). The median—80%—isodose administered was 16 (14–25) Gy. Of the radiation necroses, 25 (43.1%) required treatment, in 23 (39.7%) thereof, medical treatment was applied and in 2 (3.4%) cases, debulking surgery was performed. In this study, significantly more radiation necroses arose in patients with higher doses (HR 1.3 [CI 1.2; 1.5], p < 0.001) leading to a risk increment of over 180% between a radiation isodose of 14 and 20 Gy. The maximum diameter was a second significant risk factor (p = 0.028) with an HR of 1065 for every 1 mm increase in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: large diameter and high doses were reliable independent risk factors leading to more frequent radiation necroses, regardless of tumor type in patients undergoing radiosurgery. Alternative therapeutic procedures may be considered in lesions with large volume and an expected high radiation doses due to the increased risk of developing radiation necrosis.

Gamma Ray Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Targeting Proximal or Distal to the Dorsal Root Entry Zone

Introduction

Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) has gained interest among patients who are not suitable for surgical procedures. Although two target zones are more recognized - dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) and retrogasserian zone (RGZ) - the optimal targeting technique remains controversial in terms of clinical outcomes and rates of complications. Therefore, various modifications to the radiosurgical technique for TN have been made.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the differences in shoot location (i.e., RGZ vs. DREZ) regarding effectiveness and adverse effects in patients with medically refractory TN. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of the integral dose (ID) on treatment outcomes and complications.

Methods

We present a retrospective cohort study of 49 patients with primary, drug-resistant TN treated with gamma knife radiosurgery targeting the distal and proximal parts of the nerve regarding the DREZ with a prescription dose of 90 Gy (80 to 96 Gy). A subset of these patients (n=38) where the ID could be measured to the nerve was correlated to treatment outcomes and complications.

Results

The median follow-up time was 36 months for RGZ and 51 months for DREZ targets. Neurovascular conflict was identified in 87.5% of the RGZ group and 88.2% of the DREZ group. Using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score, 26 (81.3%) RGZ and 12 (70.6%) DREZ patients were successfully treated (BNI I-IIIb; p=0.02). Seven (21.9%) RGZ and eight (47.1%) DREZ patients reported complete pain relief without medication (BNI I). Time response was 22.3 days for RGZ and 34.1 days for DREZ (p=0.277). There were 10 (31.3%) patients in the RGZ group with associated complications versus six (35.3%) patients in the DREZ group (χ²=0.0826, degree of freedom=1, p=0.773). Treatment outcomes using higher ID were better in the RGZ than DREZ (81.8% vs. 57.1, respectively), and a significant association was found between a higher ID delivered to the nerve and the development of complications (p=0.02).

Conclusion

Based on the obtained results, the RGZ was a more effective targeting area with better treatment outcomes without significant differences in complication rates than DREZ. A higher ID at the RGZ than DREZ had a greater therapeutical effect. Further investigation regarding the optimal target area along the ID delivered and clinical outcomes are required.

A new target for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with botulinum toxin type A

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is typically treated pharmacologically with anticonvulsants, but these can be ineffective, or can lose their effectiveness over time. In recent years, botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), when injected subcutaneously across multiple sites, can effectively treat TN. However, approximately 30% of TN cases are refractory to subcutaneous BoNT-A treatment. We report here the case of a 79-year-old female patient with TN presenting as severe, episodic pain in the lower left gingival area. She was on anticonvulsant therapy (carbamazepine) for about 3 years prior to BoNT-A treatment. Despite initial relief, the pain not only recurred, but also began to worsen, even as her carbamazepine dose was increased substantially. We injected 50 U of BoNT-A into the oral mucosa of the painful gingival area, but the patient's pain was unaffected. We then changed to an intramuscular injection protocol and injected the same dose of BoNT-A into the left masseter, which produced a good therapeutic effect for about 5 months; she was then administered a second treatment (intra-masseter), and at a 2-week follow-up, still reported being pain-free. This case and a survey of the literature suggest that BoNT-A injection protocols maybe closely correlated with their clinical efficacy in cases of TN, possibly due to the ability of BoNT-A to be transported retrogradely along trigeminal nerve axons. We believe that finding the optimal BoNT-A therapy injection protocol(s) will significantly reduce the number of refractory cases of TN.

Assessing and treating primary headaches and cranio-facial pain in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases

BACKGROUND

Pain is a very common condition in patient undergoing rehabilitation for neurological disease; however the presence of primary headaches and other cranio-facial pains, particularly when they are actually or apparently independent from the disability for which patient is undergoing rehabilitation, is often neglected. Diagnostic and therapeutic international and national guidelines, as well as tools for the subjective measure of head pain are available and should also be applied in the neurorehabilitation setting. This calls for searching the presence of head pain, independently from the rehabilitation needs, since pain, either episodic or chronic, interferes with patient performance by affecting physical and emotional status. Pain may also interfere with sleep and therefore hamper recovery.

METHODS

In our role of task force of the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (ICCPN), we have elaborated specific recommendations for diagnosing and treating head pains in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In this narrative review, we describe the available literature that has been evaluated in order to define the recommendations and outline the needs of epidemiological studies concerning headache and other cranio-facial pain in neurorehabilitation.