Real life evaluation of safinamide effectiveness in Parkinson’s disease

Concomitant treatment with safinamide and antidepressant drugs: Safety data from real clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the possible pharmacological interactions between safinamide and antidepressants, and in particular the appearance of serotonin syndrome with data from real life.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with Parkinson's disease from our Movement Disorders Unit, who were under treatment with any antidepressant drug and safinamide. Specifically, symptoms suggestive of serotonin syndrome were screened for. Also, we collected time of simultaneous use, doses of levodopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs.

RESULTS

Clinical records were reviewed for the study period of September 2018 to September 2019. Seventy-eight PD patients who were treated with safinamide of which 25 (32.05%) had a concomitant treatment with an antidepressant drug, being sertraline and escitalopram the most frequent. Mean age was 80 years±8.43 and H&Y stage was 3 [2-4]. Mean dose of levodopa used was 703.75mg±233.15. Median duration of concomitant treatment with safinamide and antidepressant drug was 6 months (IQR 20.5), and over eighteen months in 5 cases. No case of serotonin syndrome was recorded, neither was any of its typical manifestations combined or in isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real clinical practice study suggests that concomitant use of safinamide with antidepressant drugs in PD patients seemed to be safe and well tolerated, even in the long term. However, caution is warranted, individualizing treatment regimens and monitoring the potential appearance of adverse effects.

Levodopa Dose Equivalency in Parkinson's Disease: Updated Systematic Review and Proposals

BACKGROUND

To compare drug regimens across clinical trials in Parkinson's disease (PD) conversion formulae between antiparkinsonian drugs have been developed. These are reported in relation to levodopa as the benchmark drug in PD pharmacotherapy as 'levodopa equivalent dose' (LED). Currently, the LED conversion formulae proposed in 2010 by Tomlinson et al. based on a systematic review are predominantly used. However, new drugs with established and novel mechanisms of action and novel formulations of longstanding drugs have been developed since 2010. Therefore, consensus proposals for updated LED conversion formulae are needed.

OBJECTIVES

To update LED conversion formulae based on a systematic review.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase databases were searched from January 2010 to July 2021. Additionally, in a standardized process according to the GRADE grid method, consensus proposals were issued for drugs with scarce data on levodopa dose equivalency.

RESULTS

The systematic database search yielded 3076 articles of which 682 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Based on these data and the standardized consensus process, we present proposals for LED conversion formulae for a wide range of drugs that are currently available for the pharmacotherapy of PD or are expected to be introduced soon.

CONCLUSIONS

The LED conversion formulae issued in this Position Paper will serve as a research tool to compare the equivalence of antiparkinsonian medication across PD study cohorts and facilitate research on the clinical efficacy of pharmacological and surgical treatments as well as other non-pharmacological interventions in PD. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Switching from Rasagiline to Safinamide as an Add-On Therapy Regimen in Patients with Levodopa: A Literature Review

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease, and the treatment is focused on the patient's clinical symptoms. Levodopa continues to be the most effective drug for symptomatic PD treatment. However, chronic levodopa treatment is associated with the development of motor complications in most patients. Add-on therapeutic drugs, such as dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors, for example, safinamide and rasagiline, may be a desirable addition to continuously increase the levodopa dose for the optimization of motor control in PD. The scientific literature shows that safinamide significantly alleviated motor fluctuations with no increase in troublesome dyskinesia, thanks to its unique double mechanism, providing further benefits to fluctuating PD patients when compared to a placebo or other drugs. Switching from rasagiline to safinamide has been shown to improve the wearing-off phenomena, which is defined as the recurrent, predictable worsening of symptoms of parkinsonism at the end of the levodopa dose until the next dose reaches a clinical effect. In this situation, safinamide may be helpful for reducing the total daily dose of levodopa, improving the OFF time and ON time without troublesome dyskinesias, and being more effective than other MAO-B inhibitors. In this narrative review, we explore the switch from rasagiline to safinamide in patients with motor complications as a feasible and effective alternative to optimize antiparkinsonian treatment.

Non-motor symptoms burden in motor-fluctuating patients with Parkinson's disease may be alleviated by safinamide: the VALE-SAFI study

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor symptoms often experienced in concomitance with non-motor symptoms (NMS), such as depression, apathy, pain, sleep disorders, and urinary dysfunction. The present study aimed to explore the effect of safinamide treatment on NMS and quality of life in motor-fluctuating PD patients. VALE-SAFI is an observational single-centre study performed in fluctuating PD patients starting safinamide treatment and followed for 6 months. The effects of safinamide on NMS, sleep, fatigue, depression and pain were assessed through validated sales. Changes in the scales from baseline to the 6-month follow-up visit were analysed. 60 PD patients (66.67% males) were enrolled at baseline, and 45 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. PD patients improved motor symptoms at follow-up, with the significant reduction of motor fluctuations. The global score of the NMS Scale significantly decreased between baseline and the follow-up. Regarding pain domains, patients reported a significant improvement in discolouration and oedema/swelling. Further, a significant improvement was observed from baseline to follow-up in sleep quality measured through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, while no changes were documented in daytime sleepiness. No differences were found in depression and fatigue between baseline and follow-up. Finally, the patient’s perception of the impact of PD on functioning and well-being decreased from baseline to follow-up. The present findings confirmed the beneficial effect of safinamide on both motor and non-motor symptoms, also improving the quality of life of PD patients. Furthermore, these data support the positive effects of safinamide on pain and mood, as well as on sleep quality and continuity.

Prescription Pattern of Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors Combined with Levodopa: A Retrospective Observational Analysis of Italian Healthcare Administrative Databases

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease is still incurable, and several factors are considered when defining pharmacological therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the prescription pattern of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs) marketed in Italy (selegiline, rasagiline, safinamide) as an add-on to levodopa among new users of MAO-BIs, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Through cross-linkage of administrative healthcare data in the Ricerca e Salute (ReS) database, adults with a supply of one or more MAO-BIs in 2017, and with no other MAO-BI use since 2013, were selected. Levodopa had to be supplied within 30 days before/after the MAO-BI. The incidence, use, sex, age, comorbidities, 2-year prescription patterns (i.e., switches, proportion of treated patients per semester/year, mean daily milligrams/monthly tablets supplied, discontinuation, change to other anti-Parkinson drug) of patients taking MAO-BIs were provided.

RESULTS

In 2017, 1059 new users received an MAO-BI (incidence 22.6 × 100,000 adults) combined with levodopa: 502 subjects (10.7 × 100,000) were treated with selegiline, 161 (3.4 × 100,000) were treated with rasagiline, and 396 (8.4 × 100,000) were treated with safinamide. The cohorts mainly consisted of males with a median age of ≥ 74 years. Treatment incidences increased with age. Switches occurred in 18.0%, 11.0%, and 4.3% of the selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide cohorts, respectively. Most of the patients switching from selegiline/safinamide changed to rasagiline, while most of the patients switching from rasagiline changed to safinamide. From the first to second years, patient numbers reduced by ≤ 50%, and the daily milligrams/monthly tablets slightly increased. Six-month discontinuation occurred in > 50% of all cohorts, and ≥ 65% of discontinuing patients changed to another anti-Parkinson drug.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis described the heterogeneous use of MAO-BIs as an add-on to levodopa in Italy. Further clinical trials and real-world studies are encouraged to update the few existing guidelines and to align clinical practice strategies.

Safinamide in the treatment pathway of Parkinson's Disease: a European Delphi Consensus

Safinamide is a highly selective, reversible MAO B-inhibitor recently marketed in European and North American countries. To better define clinical indications regarding motor and non-motor symptoms, targeted population and safety of this compound, ten movement disorders specialists, experts in their field, convened and developed a panel of statements on: the role of glutamate in Parkinson's disease, introduction to fluctuations, efficacy of safinamide on motor symptoms, motor complications and non-motor symptoms, quality of life, safety of safinamide and target population for use. Strong consensus was reached for all the statements on the efficacy of safinamide on motor symptoms, motor fluctuations, quality of life and safety. Among non-motor symptoms, a positive consensus was reached for the symptoms sleep/fatigue, mood, and pain while there was a lack of consensus for the statements regarding the efficacy of safinamide in improving cognition, urinary and sexual functions. The statement on orthostatic hypotension obtained a negative consensus. The consistent and large agreement reached in this Delphi panel perfectly reflects the perception of efficacy, safety and tolerability of safinamide as evident from pivotal trials and clinical practice and shows how these findings may guide movement disorders specialists in their clinical therapeutic approach. The impact of non-motor symptoms in PD is considerable, and management remains an unmet need. In this context, the ability of safinamide to impact some non-motor symptoms may represent the most promising and distinctive feature of this compound and deserves further investigations.

Efficacy of Safinamide and Gender Differences During Routine Clinical Practice

Background: There is increasing evidence of gender differences in the epidemiology and clinical manifestation of both motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Nevertheless, few data are available on gender differences in the response to antiparkinsonian drugs. Safinamide is a multimodal drug with positive effects on motor and non-motor fluctuations that might improve patients' care and quality of life. Objective: To analyze gender differences on clinical effects of safinamide in PD patients treated in real-life conditions during the SYNAPSES trial. Methods: SYNAPSES was a multinational, multicenter, observational study. At baseline, patients with PD diagnosis received safinamide as an add-on to levodopa and were followed up for 12 months, with visits performed every 4 months. A new statistical analysis was performed to describe the efficacy of safinamide in men and women on motor complications, motor symptoms, and adverse events. Results: Six hundred and sixteen (38%) out of 1,610 patients enrolled in the SYNAPSES study were women and 994 (62%) men. Safinamide improved motor symptoms and motor complications (fluctuations and dyskinesia) in both genders, with a good safety profile and without requiring any change in the concomitant dopaminergic therapy. Clinically significant improvements, according to the criteria developed by Shulman et al., were seen in 46% of male and female patients for the UPDRS motor score and 43.5% of men vs. 39.1% of women for the UPDRS total score. Conclusions: Safinamide was effective in improving motor fluctuations and dyskinesia and proved to be safe in both male and female patients with PD. Further prospective studies, specifically addressing potential gender differences in response to PD therapies, are needed to develop tailored management strategies.

Concomitant treatment with safinamide and antidepressant drugs: Safety data from real clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the possible pharmacological interactions between safinamide and antidepressants, and in particular the appearance of serotonin syndrome with data from real life.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with Parkinson's disease from our Movement Disorders Unit, who were under treatment with any antidepressant drug and safinamide. Specifically, symptoms suggestive of serotonin syndrome were screened for. Also, we collected time of simultaneous use, doses of levodopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs.

RESULTS

Clinical records were reviewed for the study period of September 2018 to September 2019. Seventy-eight PD patients who were treated with safinamide of which 25 (32.05%) had a concomitant treatment with an antidepressant drug, being sertraline and escitalopram the most frequent. Mean age was 80 years±8.43 and H&Y stage was 3 [2-4]. Mean dose of levodopa used was 703.75mg±233.15. Median duration of concomitant treatment with safinamide and antidepressant drug was 6 months (IQR 20.5), and over eighteen months in 5 cases. No case of serotonin syndrome was recorded, neither was any of its typical manifestations combined or in isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real clinical practice study suggests that concomitant use of safinamide with antidepressant drugs in PD patients seemed to be safe and well tolerated, even in the long term. However, caution is warranted, individualizing treatment regimens and monitoring the potential appearance of adverse effects.

Switch from rasagiline to safinamide in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients: a retrospective, pilot study

Besides the inhibition of monoamine-oxidase-B, high-dose safinamide (100 mg) also blocks voltage-gated Na⁺ and Ca⁺⁺ channels and inhibits glutamate release at overactive synapses. This latter mechanism may provide further benefit to fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD) patients compared to rasagiline. Here, we retrospectively investigated the consequences of shifting from rasagiline to high-dose safinamide in PD patients reporting symptoms of wearing-off, defined by the Wearing-Off-Questionnaire-19 (WOQ-19) score ≥3 at baseline. Seventeen PD patients were switched from rasagiline 1 mg to safinamide 100 mg because of the report of symptoms of fluctuations while under therapy with either levodopa+rasagiline or levodopa+rasagiline+dopamine agonists, or re-occurrence of fluctuations previously corrected by add-on with rasagiline. Patients were re-evaluated 4-6 months after switch. Switch to safinamide 100 mg produced benefit in 9/17 (52.9%) subjects, together with significant reduction of subjective symptoms of wearing-off. There was no report of adverse events. Findings from this retrospective, exploratory study suggest that safinamide 100 mg may produce more powerful benefit that rasagiline 1 mg as add-on to levodopa in fluctuating PD patients, possibly because of the bimodal mechanism of action of the former drug.

The Current Evidence for the Use of Safinamide for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

Introduction

Parkinson’s therapeutic interventions are only symptomatic. An optimal treatment should therefore address the largest number of motor and non-motor symptoms, to manage patients at best. Safinamide is one of the most recent approved drugs for fluctuating patients, in add-on to levodopa, that remains the gold standard treatment. It has a unique mechanism of action, both dopaminergic (as MAO-B inhibitor) and glutamatergic (through Na⁺ channel blockade). Results from Phase III trials, post-hoc analyses and real-life experiences suggest a beneficial effect on motor (such as tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and gait) and non-motor (pain, mood, sleep) symptoms.

Areas Covered

Here, the authors discuss clinical efficacy and safety of safinamide, identifying the patients’ profiles that could benefit most. A search in PubMed was performed in September 2020, with no time limits. Publications’ abstracts were reviewed.

Conclusion

Safinamide is peculiar due to its double mechanism of action. Its benefits in improving motor functions and fluctuations, and some non-motor symptoms, could have a valuable impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL), together with its safety profile.

Impact of SAfinamide on Depressive Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Patients (SADness-PD Study): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the effects of safinamide on depression, motor symptoms, and the serotonin syndrome related to its co-administration with antidepressants in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients at 1 and 3 months of follow-up compared to baseline.

RESULTS

n = 82 (safinamide 50 mg = 22, 100 mg = 60, with antidepressants = 44). First, we found improvement in depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: -6 ± 5.10 at 1 month and -7.27 ± 5.10 at 3 months, p < 0.0001; Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale: 60.3% and 69.5% of patients at 1 and 3 months reported some improvement). Second, safinamide improved the daily life activities and motor symptoms/motor complications (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-II): -2.51 ± 6.30 and -2.47 ± 6.11 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; III: -3.58 ± 8.68 and -4.03 ± 8.95 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; IV: -0.61 ± 2.61 and -0.8 ± 2.53 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001). Third, 7.31% and 8.53% of patients developed non-severe adverse events related to safinamide at 1 and 3 months. Serotonin syndrome was not observed in the patients treated with antidepressants; some isolated serotonin syndrome symptoms were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide could be useful for treating depression in PD; it was effective for motor symptoms and motor complications and safe even when co-administered with antidepressants.

Neuroprotective and neuro-survival properties of safinamide against methamphetamine-induced neurodegeneration: Hypothetic possible role of BDNF/TrkB/PGC-1α signaling pathway and mitochondrial uncoupling protein -2(UCP-2)

Methamphetamine is a behavioral psychostimulant that has a high potential for misuse and induction of neurotoxicity. Safinamide is a novel inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) with neuroprotective properties. Methamphetamine abuse causes dysfunction in the respiratory chain of the mitochondria, but the specific signaling mechanism and role of the uncoupling protein-2(UCP-2) remain unclear. As we know, some indirect evidence indicates that neurodegeneration can be caused by inhibition of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) receptor, TrkB and its downstream signaling pathway, such as the PGC-1α protein. Neuroprotective strategies and approaches to the management, treatment or prevention of methamphetamine-induced neurodegeneration by modulating BDNF / TrkB / PGC-1α-UCP-2 can be considered as novel therapeutic approaches to these psychostimulant neurochemical and neurobehavioral approaches. Previous studies have shown that safinamide, a monoamine oxidase-B (MAOB) inhibitor, can function as a neuroprotective agent and inhibit the neurodegenerative process especially in Parkinson's disease but its impact on other neurodegenerative processes and drug-induced neurotoxicity remain unclear. Although there is some evidence that BDNF / TrkB / PGC-1α-UCP-2 signaling pathway and mitochondrial UCP-2 mediated safinamide induced neuroprotection but it's exact and precise mechanism of action and neuroprotective effects in neurodegenerative disorder and the protective properties against methamphetamine induced neurodegeneration and the role of BDNF / TrkB / PGC-1α signaling pathway and role of mitochondrial UCP-2 in this process have not yet been clarified. Therefore, in subjects addicted to methamphetamine, we hypothesized that safinamide will provide neuroprotection against methamphetamine-prompted neurodegeneration, and it appears that BDNF / TrkB / PGC-1α signaling pathway and mitochondrial UCP-2 are likely to play a critical role.

Safinamide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

The deficiency pattern of neurotransmitters is heterogeneous in patients with Parkinson's disease. Consequence is an individual variable expression of motor and nonmotor features. They respond to agents with a broader spectrum of mode of actions, whereas dopamine substitution only targets impaired motor behavior. The pharmacological profile of safinamide includes reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibition and modulation of voltage-dependent sodium- and calcium channels with consecutive decline of glutamate release. Safinamide improves motor and nonmotor symptoms. Combination of safinamide with the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor opicapone in one capsule is a promising future treatment alternative, which simplifies drug therapy in Parkinson's disease. Both agents complement each other in terms of application mode and efficacy on motor complications as adjuncts to levodopa therapy.

A Spanish Consensus on the Use of Safinamide for Parkinson's Disease in Clinical Practice

Safinamide is an approved drug for the treatment of fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD). Scarce data are available on its use in clinical practice. A group of Spanish movement disorders specialists was convened to review the use of safinamide across different clinical scenarios that may guide neurologists in clinical practice. Eight specialists with recognized expertise in PD management elaborated the statements based on available evidence in the literature and on their clinical experience. The RAND/UCLA method was carried, with final conclusions accepted after a 2-round modified Delphi process. Higher level of agreement between panellists was reached for the following statements. Safinamide significantly improves mean daily ON time without troublesome dyskinesias [corrected]. Adjunctive treatment with safinamide is associated with motor improvements in patients with mid-to-late PD. The efficacy of safinamide on motor fluctuations is maintained at long-term, with no increase over time in dyskinesias severity. The clinical benefits of safinamide on pain and depression remain unclear. Safinamide presents a similar incidence of adverse events compared with placebo. The efficacy and safety of safinamide shown in the pivotal clinical trials are reproduced in clinical practice, with improvement of parkinsonian symptoms, decrease of daily OFF time, control of dyskinesias at the long term, and good tolerability and safety.

Long-Term Efficacy of Safinamide on Symptoms Severity and Quality of Life in Fluctuating Parkinson's Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by a wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms. Levodopa is still the most effective drug; however, its long-term use is associated with motor complications which may deteriorate patient's quality of life. Safinamide is a unique treatment modulating both dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems. Previous results from two six months, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies demonstrated that safinamide has positive effects on both motor functions and quality of life in PD patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of safinamide 100 mg/day over two-year treatment on PD symptoms severity and quality of life, using data from the study 018.

METHODS

Data from 352 patients were analyzed to evaluate the effects of safinamide on OFF time and ON time (with no or non-troublesome dyskinesia) in the overall population and in subgroups of patients (receiving levodopa monotherapy or with other anti-Parkinson therapies), and the effects of safinamide on motor symptoms/clinical fluctuations (by means of UPDRS III and IV) and on health-related quality of life (using UPDRS II and PDQ-39 summary index score).

RESULTS

Safinamide, administered as add-on to standard therapy in fluctuating PD patients, significantly improved motor symptoms and clinical fluctuations in the overall population and in some subgroups of patients. Additionally, safinamide improved quality of life and activities of daily living, maintaining the efficacy in the long-term.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of these analyses suggest that safinamide may be considered an appropriate adjunct therapy in patient not sufficiently controlled. Further investigations are desirable to confirm these results in usual care setting.

Safinamide in Clinical Practice: A Spanish Multicenter Cohort Study

Background: Safinamide is an approved drug for the treatment of motor fluctuations of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients with a potential benefit on non-motor symptoms (NMS). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted, in which the clinical effect of safinamide on both motor and NMS was assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Change scale. Furthermore, we assessed the appearance of adverse events (AEs) and its effect on dyskinesia, that were also recorded in non-fluctuating PD patients and in those previously treated with rasagiline. Results: We included 213 PD patients who received safinamide in addition to their regular levodopa therapy. Thirty-five withdrew prematurely from safinamide, mainly because of AEs. Out of 178, clinical improvement on motor and NMS was found in 76.4% and 26.2%, respectively. A total of 44 reported AEs of mild intensity. We did not find a difference concerning the clinical benefit or AEs when comparing either patients who had or had not been taking Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitor (MAOB-I) previously or between patients with and without motor complications. Conclusions: Safinamide is an effective and safe add-on to levodopa drug for PD patients. Moreover, safinamide could elicit an additional clinical improvement in PD patients previously treated with other MAOB-I and in non- fluctuating patients with suboptimal motor control.

Rasagiline and safinamide as a dopamine-sparing therapy for Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the prescription of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAOB-I), rasagiline and safinamide, contributes to the reduction of levodopa and/or dopamine agonists (DA) dose in order to minimize adverse effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 724 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have been prospectively included in our database since the year 2000, representing a total of 5124 visits. For each patient and visit, antiparkinsonian treatment was recorded. In the presence of rasagiline and safinamide, we analysed the evolution of levodopa equivalent dose (LED) and LED for DA (LED-DA).

RESULTS

The data obtained from the 1664 visits between 2006 and 2010 (321 patients) and the 1709 visits between 2014 and 2018 (403 patients) were analysed in order to assess the impact of the introduction of rasagiline and safinamide, respectively. The annual mean LED remained stable without statistically significant differences. In the first period (impact of rasagiline), the annual mean LED-DA in 2010 was significantly higher than in 2006 (P = 0.001). In the second period (impact of safinamide), the annual mean LED-DA in 2018 was significantly lower than in 2014 (P = 0.002). A repeated-measure analyses of LED-DA including only patients who had taken safinamide showed a statistically significant decrease in LED-DA (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of MAOB-I in the overall treatment of PD as part of routine clinical practice has not helped to reduce annual mean LED. However, safinamide reduces annual mean LED-DA and may be linked to a reduction in dose-dependent adverse effects in the long term.

Efficacy of safinamide on non-motor symptoms in a cohort of patients affected by idiopathic Parkinson's disease

The primary endpoint of this work was to evaluate the effect of safinamide on non-motor symptoms (NMS) in patients affected by idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) complicated by motor fluctuations. We retrospectively collected data from 20 subjects affected by idiopathic PD in treatment with L-dopa alone or in combination with dopamine agonists, who began to be treated with safinamide due to the occurrence of motor fluctuations. Secondary endpoints included SCales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease (SCOPA) Motor Scale, cognitive assessment, the Hoehn and Yahr stage, Clinical Impression of Severity Index for Parkinson's Disease, Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale, Physical and Mental Fatigue, Parkinson's disease Sleep Scale, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8) and EQ-5D. Each one of these scales/questionnaires was performed at baseline and T1. For efficacy analyses, continuous variables were treated with descriptive statistics, using mean and standard deviations. A non-parametric test (the Friedman test) was carried out to evaluate the statistical significance of the results observed. We found a statistically significant reduction of the total score of NMS, of 6 domains out of 9, and 13 items out of 30. A statistically significant reduction of SCOPA Motor Scale, PDQ-8, and CISI was also detected. In conclusion, our data showed a positive effect of safinamide on NMS and confirm its positive effect on motor symptomatology.

Safinamide in the management of patients with Parkinson's disease not stabilized on levodopa: a review of the current clinical evidence

Safinamide (Xadago^®) is a novel medication with both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic effects, approved first by the European Commission and more recently by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunctive treatment to carbidopa/levodopa in patients with mid- to late-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. It works through multiple mechanisms, namely as a reversible selective monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor and through modulation of glutamate release. Safinamide is extensively metabolized via oxidation to several inactive metabolites that are excreted primarily through the urine. Several large Phase III clinical trials of patients with advanced PD with motor fluctuations have shown that safinamide, administered orally at doses of 50–100 mg daily, increased ON time with no or non-troublesome dyskinesia, decreased daily OFF time, improved overall motor function (as measured by Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] part III total score), and quality of life (as measured by Clinical Global Impression-Change and 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire). In large clinical trials of patients with early PD on a single dopamine agonist, safinamide administered orally at a dose of 100 mg daily improved overall motor function as measured by UPDRS part III total score; however, some of the results reported were exploratory. Safinamide is generally well-tolerated and safe, with few to no treatment-related adverse events. Safinamide does not cause new or worsening dyskinesia and may be able to reduce this symptom in patients reporting it at baseline. Evidence suggests that safinamide is a good option for add-on therapy to carbidopa/levodopa in patients with advanced PD with motor complications, but there is still insufficient evidence to recommend it as monotherapy or add-on therapy in patients with early PD.