Pain assessment with the revised nociception coma scale and outcomes of patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: results from a pilot study

Neck muscle spasticity in patients with disorder of consciousness: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Disorder of consciousness (DOC) is a state of prolonged altered consciousness due to severe acquired brain injury (ABI). DOC can be differentiated into coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), or minimally conscious state (MCS) depending on the behavioral features observed and their relationship to the level of consciousness. Spasticity is one of the most frequently reported medical comorbidities in DOC patients. Since there is a critical lack of spasticity-focused studies and, in turn, of target treatment, we designed this pilot prospective study to evaluate cervical spine muscle spasticity and its effect on rehabilitation outcome in a large cohort of patients followed from the post-acute phase to 6 months after severe ABI.

AIM

To evaluate neck muscle spasticity and investigate its impact on neurological and functional outcome in a large cohort of adult patients with DOC followed from post-acute to 6 months after severe ABI.

DESIGN

Single-center prospective pilot study.

SETTING

Highly specialized inpatient neurorehabilitation clinic.

POPULATION

Patients with severe ABI admitted within 3 months after the acute event to our Neurorehabilitation Unit between May 21st, 2019 and April 23rd, 2020 for treatment of DOC as a part of their rehabilitation program.

METHODS

In this single-center prospective pilot study demographic data, etiology of ABI (traumatic versus non-traumatic), DOC evaluated with the revised Coma Recovery Scale (CRS-R), and neurological and functional outcome assessed respectively with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were considered. During cervical examination, we assessed spasticity with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), deviation of head alignment with a goniometer, and pain with the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R).

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients, 41.7% were diagnosed with UWS and 58.3% were in a minimally conscious state (MCS). We found spasticity of neck muscles in 91.7% of patients, with no difference in severity (assessed with MAS) between UWV and MCS. The NCS-R score at cervical spine examination was lower in UWS than MCS. Spasticity was severer in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to non-traumatic. At multiple linear regression analysis, younger age, hemisyndrome, and tetraparesis were independent predictors of severity of neck muscle spasticity in MCS. More severe spasticity was a predictor of worse neurological and functional outcome at discharge in UWS patients, independently of the other confounding variables at admission (e.g., age, severity of brain injury, functional assessment, and pain).

CONCLUSIONS

Spasticity of neck muscles frequently develops in patients with DOC and is more severe in those after TBI. UWV and MCS have different spasticity profiles as regards risk factors and neurological and functional outcome. Severity of neck muscle spasticity in UWV patients may represent an early indicator of worse neurological and functional outcome after inpatient rehabilitation.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Our findings could prompt clinicians to redefine the rehabilitation aims regarding spasticity and to estimate the functional outcome in patients undergoing intensive rehabilitation after severe ABI.

Long-term clinical evolution of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness due to severe anoxic brain injury: A meta-analytic study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The prognosis of prolonged (28 days to 3 months post-onset) disorders of consciousness (pDoC) due to anoxic brain injury is uncertain. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of post-anoxic pDoC and identify the possible predictive value of demographic and clinical information.

METHOD

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rates of mortality, any improvement in clinical diagnosis, and recovery of full consciousness at least 6 months after severe anoxic brain injury were evaluated. A cross-sectional approach searched for differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between survivors and non-survivors, patients improved versus not improved, and patients who recovered full consciousness versus not recovered.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were identified. The pooled rates of mortality, any clinical improvement and recovery of full consciousness were 26%, 26% and 17%, respectively. Younger age, baseline diagnosis of minimally conscious state versus vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, higher Coma Recovery Scale Revised total score, and earlier admission to intensive rehabilitation units were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of survival and clinical improvement. These same variables, except time of admission to rehabilitation, were also associated with recovery of full consciousness.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with anoxic pDoC might improve over time up to full recovery of consciousness and some clinical characteristics can help predict clinical improvement. These new insights could support clinicians and caregivers in the decision-making on patient management.

Pain in Persons with Disorders of Consciousness

Pain and suffering in persons with disorders of consciousness (DoC) remain poorly understood, frequently unaddressed or inadequately addressed, and controversial on numerous levels. This narrative literature review will address a number of critical issues germane to pain and suffering in this challenging group of patients, providing an introductory overview of the topic, perspectives on current knowledge regarding pain pathoanatomy and pathophysiology, and a review of common pain generators and factors that can lead to the chronifcation of pain. Caveats on bedside pain assessment challenges, as well as electrophysiologic and neuroimaging findings in these patients, will also be explored. Pain management techniques, including non-pharmacological and pharmacological, will be reviewed. Ethical considerations in the context of pain and suffering in persons with disorders of consciousness will round out the review prior to our concluding comments.

Evaluation of the effect of analgesic treatment on signs of nociception-related behaviors during physiotherapy in patients with disorders of consciousness: a pilot crossover randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT

Neuro-orthopedic disorders are common in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) and can lead to potential pain. However, the patients' inability to communicate makes pain detection and management very challenging for clinicians. In this crossover randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, we investigated the effects of an analgesic treatment on the presence of nociception-related behaviors. At baseline, the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) was performed in 3 conditions: a non-noxious stimulation, a noxious stimulation, and during a physiotherapy session. Patients with a NCS-R total score during physiotherapy equal or above the score observed after the noxious stimulation could participate to the clinical trial, as well as patients with a score above 5. They received an analgesic treatment and a placebo on 2 consecutive days in a randomized order followed by an assessment with the NCS-R. Of the 18 patients, 15 displayed signs of potential pain during physiotherapy. Patients showed higher NCS-R scores during physiotherapy compared with the other conditions, suggesting that mobilizations were potentially painful. Of these 15 patients, 10 met the criteria to participate in the placebo-controlled trial. We did not find any effect of analgesic treatment on the NCS-R scores. This study highlights that physiotherapy may be potentially painful for patients with DOC, while analgesic treatments did not reduced NCS-R scores. Therefore, careful monitoring with appropriate assessment and treatment before and during mobilization should become a priority in clinical settings. Future studies should focus on the development of assessment tools sensitive to analgesic dosage to manage pain in DOC.

Nociceptive Response Is a Possible Marker of Evolution in the Level of Consciousness in Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome Patients

The Nociception Coma Scale (NCS) and its revised version (NCS-R) were used to evaluate behavioral responses to pain in non-communicative patients. We hypothesized that if patients demonstrate changes to their NCS(-R) scores over time, their evolving behavioral abilities could indicate a forthcoming diagnostic improvement with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Forty-three Vegetative State/Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (VS/UWS) patients were enrolled in the study. The patients were assessed weekly using the CRS-R and NCS(-R) for four consecutive weeks. The first assessment was within 10 days after hospitalization. The assessments were performed between 09:30 and 11:30 AM in a room with constant levels of humidity, light and temperature, as well as an absence of transient noise. Noxious stimuli were administered using a Newton-meter, with pressure applied to the fingernail bed for a maximum of 5 s unless interrupted by a behavioral response from subjects. Seventeen patients demonstrated improvements in their level of consciousness, 13 of whom showed significant behavioral changes through the NCS(-R) before being diagnosed with a Minimally Conscious State (MCS) according to the CRS-R. The behavioral changes observed using the NCS(-R) corresponded to a high probability of observing an improvement from VS/UWS to MCS. To characterize the increased likelihood of this transition, our results present threshold scores of ≥5 for the NCS (accuracy 86%, sensitivity 87%, and specificity 86%) and ≥3 for the NCS-R (accuracy 77%, sensitivity 89%, and specificity 73%). In conclusion, a careful evaluation of responses to nociceptive stimuli in DOC patients could constitute an effective procedure in assessing their evolving conscious state.

European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with acquired brain injury and acute or prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC) are challenging. Evidence to support diagnostic decisions on coma and other DoC is limited but accumulating. This guideline provides the state-of-the-art evidence regarding the diagnosis of DoC, summarizing data from bedside examination techniques, functional neuroimaging and electroencephalography (EEG).

METHODS

Sixteen members of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Scientific Panel on Coma and Chronic Disorders of Consciousness, representing 10 European countries, reviewed the scientific evidence for the evaluation of coma and other DoC using standard bibliographic measures. Recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The guideline was endorsed by the EAN.

RESULTS

Besides a comprehensive neurological examination, the following suggestions are made: probe for voluntary eye movements using a mirror; repeat clinical assessments in the subacute and chronic setting, using the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised; use the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score instead of the Glasgow Coma Scale in the acute setting; obtain clinical standard EEG; search for sleep patterns on EEG, particularly rapid eye movement sleep and slow-wave sleep; and, whenever feasible, consider positron emission tomography, resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), active fMRI or EEG paradigms and quantitative analysis of high-density EEG to complement behavioral assessment in patients without command following at the bedside.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized clinical evaluation, EEG-based techniques and functional neuroimaging should be integrated for multimodal evaluation of patients with DoC. The state of consciousness should be classified according to the highest level revealed by any of these three approaches.