The effect of filum terminale sectioning for Chiari 1 malformation treatment: systematic review

The Benefits of Cognitive Therapeutic Exercise in Symptomatic Arnold-Chiari Syndrome Type I: A Case Report on Gait, Balance, and Pain Management

BACKGROUND

Chiari malformation is a rare congenital condition in which the cerebellar tonsils herniate through the foramen magnum, causing symptoms related to compression of the surrounding structures. Rehabilitation plays a key role in the pre- and post-operative management of the syndrome, as it can improve strength, range of motion, motor coordination, pain management, and performance of activities of daily living.

METHODS

This article presents the case of a 43-year-old woman with Chiari malformation 1B who underwent resection of the filum terminale. She presented as an outpatient at the University Hospital "G. Martino" in Messina, complaining of difficulty walking, balance problems, lumbar pain, and heaviness in the lower limbs. Following a multidisciplinary assessment, she underwent an 11-month rehabilitation protocol based on cognitive therapeutic exercise.

RESULTS

The patient achieved significant improvements in pain, mental confusion, and quality of life after treatment and at the 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study highlight the significant benefits of cognitive therapeutic exercises in Chiari malformation, with improvements in several key areas, including quality of life, pain management, and ability to perform activities of daily living.

Anatomical Implications of Chiari I and Basilar Invagination (Type B) in the IV Ventricle and Cisterna Magna

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the anatomical changes of the IV ventricle and cisterna magna in the Chiari malformation I (CMI) and basilar invagination (type B).

METHODS

This is a controlled study with 161 exams of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of adults grouped into control (n = 37), basilar invagination (BI; n = 31), Chiari malformation I (CMI; n = 37), and CMI+BI (n = 56). The MRIs were analyzed using the visualization software Osirix (Pixmeo, Bernex, Geneva, version 3.8.2). The morphometric variables were: distance from the obex to the McRae line; length of the IV ventricle floor; and the area and volume of the cisterna magna. The univariate ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test was applied to evaluate the difference between the groups. The difference between sexes was evaluated by the t test for each group.

RESULTS

Alterations in the cisterna magna and IV ventricle were more evident only in the CMI and CMI+BI groups. For both sexes, the CMI and CMI+BI groups showed: a reduction in the CSF space (P < 0.001), cisterna magna with volume reduction (P < 0.001), low position of the obex (P < 0.001), and IV ventricle more elongated (male P = 0.007 and female P < 0.001). The BI group had no significant change in the analysis by sex.

CONCLUSIONS

The CMI (isolated and associated with BI) showed a low obex position and elongation of the IV ventricle due to traction towards the spinal canal. The reduction of cisterna magna volume added to the occupation of the cerebellar tonsils can impact in the cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. The BI when isolated was not related to alterations in the parameters of cerebrospinal fluid spaces studied.

Reoperation in Chiari-1 Malformations

(1) Background: The issue of unsuccessful surgery for Chiari-1 malformation (CM-1), as well as its potential causes and possible solutions, remains poorly documented and studied. (2) Methods: From a retrospective review of a personal series of 98 patients undergoing treatment for CM-1 during the past 10 years, we created two study groups. Group 1: 8 patients (8.1%) requiring additional surgeries owing to postoperative complications (7 cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 1 extradural hematoma); 7 patients (7.1%) undergoing reoperations for failed decompression during the follow-up. Group 2: During the same period, we also managed 19 patients who had previously been operated on elsewhere: 8 patients who required adequate CM-1 treatment following extradural section of the filum terminale; 11 patients requiring reoperations for failed decompression. Failed decompression was managed by adequate osteodural decompression, which was associated with tonsillectomy (6 cases), subarachnoid exploration (8 cases), graft substitution (6 cases), and occipito-cervical fixation/revision (1 case). (3) Results: There was no mortality or surgical morbidity in Group 1. However, one patient's condition worsened due to untreatable syrinx. In Group 2, there were two cases of mortality, and surgical morbidity was represented by functional limitation and pain in the patient who needed revision of the occipitocervical fixation. Twenty patients improved (58.8%), 6 remained unchanged (32.3%), 1 worsened (2.9%) and 2 died (5.9%). (4) Conclusions: The rate of complications remains high in CM-1 treatment. Unfortunately, a certain rate of treatment failure is unavoidable, but it appears that a significant number of re-operations could have been avoided using proper indications and careful technique.

Chiari Malformation Type 1 and Syringomyelia: Why Do Patients Claim for International Guidelines? Commentary on the 2021 Chiari and Syringomyelia Consensus Document

The diagnosis of Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) and Syringomyelia (Syr) has become increasingly common during the past few years. Contemporarily, the body of literature on these topics is growing, although randomized controlled studies on significant case series to drive guidelines are missing in the pediatric and adult populations. As a result of the different opinions about surgical indications and techniques raised by CM1-Syr, an increasing number of well-informed but disoriented patients is emerging. To bridge this gap, an International Consensus Conference on CM1-Syr held in Milan in November 2019 aimed to find a consensus among international experts, to suggest some recommendations that, in the near future, could lead to guidelines. Here, we comment on the most relevant recommendations about the definition, diagnosis, surgical management, failures and re-intervention, and outcome. We also focus on some "wrong" indications or techniques that, although widely disapproved by the experts, and negatively experienced by many patients, are still largely in use.

Evaluation of Adult and Pediatric Chiari Type 1 Malformation Patients: Do Consensus Documents Fit Everyday Practice?

The management of Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) and Syringomyelia (Syr) has shown many changes in surgical indications and techniques over time. The dedicated neurosurgical and neurological community recently planned to analyze the state of the art and find conduct uniformity. This led to international consensus documents on diagnostic criteria and therapeutic strategies. We aimed to evaluate, in a large, monocentric surgical series of adult and children CM1 patients, if the daily clinical practice reflects the consensus documents. Our series comprises 190 pediatric and 220 adult Chiari patients submitted to surgery from 2000 to 2021. The main indications for the treatment were the presence of Syr and symptoms related to CM1. While there is great correspondence with the statements derived from the consensus documents about what to do for Syr and symptomatic CM1, the accordance is less evident in CM1 associated with craniosynostosis or hydrocephalus, especially when considering the early part of the series. However, we think that performing such studies could increase the homogeneity of surgical series, find a common way to evaluate long-term outcomes, and reinforce the comparability of different strategies adopted in different referral centers.

Chiari Type 1 Malformation and Syringomyelia in Children: Classification and Treatment Options

Chiari type 1 malformation (CIM) is defined as tonsillar ectopia of >5 mm, while syringomyelia (SM) is defined as a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled cavity larger than 3 mm dissecting the spinal cord. Over the last decades, our understanding of these pathologies has grown; however, many controversies still exist almost in every aspect of CIM and SM, including etiology, indication for treatment, timing of treatment, surgical technique, follow-up regime, and outcome. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview on different aspects of CIM and SM and on the still existing controversies, based on the evidence presently available. Future directions for clinical research concerning CIM and SM treatment and outcome are elaborated and discussed as well.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Sectioning of the Filum Terminale for Treatment of Tethered Cord Syndrome Associated With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Introduction Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) was first reported as a potential complication of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome in 2009. However, there have been few publications on the subject since that time, and optimal treatment of TCS in the setting of the hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) population remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of surgical release of the filum terminale (FT) for the treatment of TCS in this patient population. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive hEDS patients with TCS who were treated with surgical release after providing informed surgical consent over a 4.5-year period by a single neurosurgeon. Eighty-four patients were identified and asked to complete surveys with items regarding pre and postoperative symptoms, pain levels, and satisfaction. Results Thirty patients with a mean age of 30.8 ± 11.9 years, all female, were included. Low back pain was significantly improved across the entire cohort. For patients with both pre and postoperative data available, the distance they were able to walk also improved significantly. The majority of patients were "highly satisfied" with surgery (66%), followed by 21% "satisfied", 10% "neutral", and one patient who was "dissatisfied". One patient required repair of a dural leak one week postoperatively, and no other complications were noted. Conclusions Surgical release of the FT for TCS in patients with hEDS was safe and effective in this cohort. For most patients, there was a significant improvement in low back pain, urinary symptoms, and ability to ambulate distance. The majority of respondents reported subjective satisfaction with this operation. A further prospective study is warranted.

Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation and syringomyelia in adults: international consensus document

BACKGROUND

Syringomyelia and Chiari malformation are classified as rare diseases on Orphanet, but international guidelines on diagnostic criteria and case definition are missing.

AIM OF THE STUDY

to reach a consensus among international experts on controversial issues in diagnosis and treatment of Chiari 1 malformation and syringomyelia in adults.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of the Chiari and Syringomyelia Consortium (4 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 neuroradiologist, 1 pediatric neurologist) appointed an international Jury of experts to elaborate a consensus document. After an evidence-based review and further discussions, 63 draft statements grouped in 4 domains (definition and classification/planning/surgery/isolated syringomyelia) were formulated. A Jury of 32 experts in the field of diagnosis and treatment of Chiari and syringomyelia and patient representatives were invited to take part in a three-round Delphi process. The Jury received a structured questionnaire containing the 63 statements, each to be voted on a 4-point Likert-type scale and commented. Statements with agreement <75% were revised and entered round 2. Round 3 was face-to-face, during the Chiari Consensus Conference (Milan, November 2019).

RESULTS

Thirty-one out of 32 Jury members (6 neurologists, 4 neuroradiologists, 19 neurosurgeons, and 2 patient association representatives) participated in the consensus. After round 2, a consensus was reached on 57/63 statements (90.5%). The six difficult statements were revised and voted in round 3, and the whole set of statements was further discussed and approved.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus document consists of 63 statements which benefited from expert discussion and fine-tuning, serving clinicians and researchers following adults with Chiari and syringomyelia.

Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 in children: the International Consensus Document

BACKGROUND

Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) is a rare condition where agreed classification and treatment are still missing. The goal of this study is to achieve a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of CM1 in children.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel formulated 57 provisional statements based on a review of the literature. Thirty-four international experts (IE) participated in a Delphi study by independently rating each statement on a 4-point Likert scale ("strongly disagree," "disagree," "agree," "strongly agree"). Statements that were endorsed ("agree" or "strongly agree") by < 75% of raters were re-formulated, or new statements were added, and another Delphi round followed (up to a maximum of three).

RESULTS

Thirty-five IE were contacted and 34 agreed to participate. A consensus was reached on 30/57 statements (52.6%) after round 1. Three statements were added, and one removed. After round 2, agreement was reached on 56/59 statements (94.9%). Finally, after round 3, which took place during the 2019 Chiari Consensus Conference (Milan, Italy), agreement was reached on 58/59 statements (98.3%) about four main sections (Definition and Classification, Planning, Surgery, Isolated Syringomyelia). Only one statement did not gain a consensus, which is the "definition of radiological failure 24 month post-surgery."

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus document consists of 58 statements (24 on diagnosis, 34 on treatment), serving clinicians and researchers following children with CM1. There is a clear need for establishing an international network and registry and to promote collaborative studies to increase the evidence base and optimize the long-term care of this patient population.

The management of Chiari malformation type 1 and syringomyelia in children: a review of the literature

In anticipation of the "Chiari and Syringomyelia Consensus Conference" held in Milan in 2019, we performed a systematic literature review on the management of Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) and syringomyelia (Syr) in children.We aimed to summarize the available evidence and identify areas where consensus has not been reached and further research is needed.In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we formulated seven questions in Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) format. Six PICOs concerned CM1 children with/without additional structural anomalies (Syr, craniosynostosis, hydrocephalus, tethered cord, and cranio-vertebral junction anomalies), and one PICO Syr without CM1. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and NICE databases from January 1, 1999, to May 29, 2019. Cohort studies, controlled and randomized clinical trials (CCTs, RCTs), and systematic reviews were included, all pertinent only to patients ≤ 18 years of age.For CM1, 3787 records were found, 460 full texts were assessed and 49 studies (46 cohort studies, one RCT, and two systematic reviews) were finally included. For Syr, 376 records were found, 59 full texts were assessed, and five studies (one RCT and four cohort studies) were included. Data on each PICO were synthetized narratively due to heterogeneity in the inclusion criteria, outcome measures, and length of follow-up of the included studies.Despite decades of experience on CM1 and Syr management in children, the available evidence remains limited. Specifically, there is an urgent need for collaborative initiatives focusing on the adoption of shared inclusion criteria and outcome measures, as well as rigorous prospective designs, particularly RCTs.

Comparative Assessment of Three Posterior Fossa Decompression Techniques and Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Syrinx Shunting and Filum Terminale Sectioning in Chiari Malformation Type I. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of posterior fossa decompression (PFD), posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), and posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils (PFDRT) in Chiari malformation type I (CMI). Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy of filum terminale sectioning (FTS), syringosubarachnoid shunting (SSS), and syringoperitoneal shunting (SPS) in CMI.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were screened for English-language studies published from inception until August 11, 2020. A total of 3593 studies were identified through the searching process. Fifteen cohort studies were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

No studies concerning FTS, SSS, and SPS were found eligible. Therefore, only PFD, PFDD, and PFDRT were compared. PFDD showed significantly higher incidence of complications (relative risk [RR], 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54-5.64) cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.33-40.78) and neurologic deficit (RR, 8.76; 95% CI, 2.08-36.90) than did PFD. Both PFDD and PFDRT achieved higher syringomyelia improvement (RR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 and RR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.15-1.51, respectively) and greater clinical improvement (RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.10-1.39 and RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.08-1.44, respectively) than did PFD. No differences were found between PFDD and PFDRT.

CONCLUSIONS

PFDD and PFDRT are superior to PFD, especially in patients with syringomyelia-Chiari complex, because of greater syringomyelia reduction and better clinical improvement. However, PFDD and PFDRT can be considered equally efficient. There is no evidence pleading in favor of SFT, SSS, and SPS over any PFD technique.