Clinical exome sequencing in neuromuscular diseases: an experience from Turkey

Utility of exome sequencing for the diagnosis of pediatric-onset neuromuscular diseases beyond diagnostic yield: a narrative review

Diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases (NMD) can be challenging because of the heterogeneity of this group of diseases. This review aimed to describe the diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing (WES) for pediatric-onset neuromuscular disease diagnosis, as well as other benefits of this approach in patient management since WES can contribute to appropriate treatment selection in NMD patients. WES increases the possibility of reaching a conclusive genetic diagnosis when other technologies have failed and even exploring new genes not previously associated with a specific NMD. Moreover, this strategy can be useful when a dual diagnosis is suspected in complex congenital anomalies and undiagnosed cases.

High diagnostic yield of targeted next-generation sequencing panel as a first-tier molecular test for the patients with myopathy or muscular dystrophy

Muscular dystrophies are a heterogeneous group of neuromuscular disorders with a wide range of the clinical and genetic spectrum. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has been on the rise to become the usual method of choice for molecular diagnosis in patients presenting with muscular dystrophy or congenital or metabolic myopathy phenotype. Here, we used a panel with 47 genes including not only muscular dystrophy but also myopathy-associated genes that had been used as a first-tier approach. A total of 146 patients who were referred to our clinic with the prediagnosis of muscular dystrophy and/or myopathy were included in the study. Dystrophin gene deletion/duplication was ruled out on the patients with a preliminary diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In this study, the molecular etiology of 67 patients was proved with the gene panel with a diagnostic yield of 46%. Causal variants were identified in 23 genes including CAPN3(11), DYSF(9), DMD(8), SGCA(5), TTN(4), LAMA2(3), LMNA(3), SGCB(3), COL6A1(3), DES (2), CAV3(2), FKRP(2), FKTN(2), ANO5, COL6A2, CLCN1, GNE, POMGNT1, POMGNT2, POMT2, SYNE1, TCAP, and FLNC with 16 novel variants. There were 27 patients with uncertain molecular results including the ones who had a variant of uncertain significance, who had only one heterozygous variant for an autosomal recessive disease, and the ones who had two variants in different genes. Molecular diagnosis in muscular dystrophy is essential to plan clinical management and choosing treatment options. Also, the results will affect the reproduction options. Targeted next-generation sequencing is a cost-effective method that reduces the WES requirements with a significant diagnostic rate.

Neuromuscular disorders: finding the missing genetic diagnoses

Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) are a wide-ranging group of diseases that seriously affect the quality of life of affected individuals. The development of next-generation sequencing revolutionized the diagnosis of NMD, enabling the discovery of hundreds of NMD genes and many more pathogenic variants. However, the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in NMD cohorts remains incomplete, indicating a large number of genetic diagnoses are not identified through current methods. Fortunately, recent advancements in sequencing technologies, analytical tools, and high-throughput functional screening provide an opportunity to circumvent current challenges. Here, we discuss reasons for missing genetic diagnoses in NMD, how emerging technologies and tools can overcome these hurdles, and examine future approaches to improving diagnostic yields in NMD.

Rapid Molecular Diagnosis of Genetically Inherited Neuromuscular Disorders Using Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies

Neuromuscular diseases are genetically highly heterogeneous, and differential diagnosis can be challenging. Over a 3-year period, we prospectively analyzed 268 pediatric and adult patients with a suspected diagnosis of inherited neuromuscular disorder (INMD) using comprehensive gene-panel analysis and next-generation sequencing. The rate of diagnosis increased exponentially with the addition of genes to successive versions of the INMD panel, from 31% for the first iteration (278 genes) to 40% for the last (324 genes). The global mean diagnostic rate was 36% (97/268 patients), with a diagnostic turnaround time of 4–6 weeks. Most diagnoses corresponded to muscular dystrophies/myopathies (68.37%) and peripheral nerve diseases (22.45%). The most common causative genes, TTN, RYR1, and ANO5, accounted for almost 30% of the diagnosed cases. Finally, we evaluated the utility of the differential diagnosis tool Phenomizer, which established a correlation between the phenotype and molecular findings in 21% of the diagnosed patients. In summary, comprehensive gene-panel analysis of all genes implicated in neuromuscular diseases facilitates a rapid diagnosis and provides a high diagnostic yield.

The utility of whole-exome sequencing in accurate diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders in consanguineous families in Jordan

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) encompass a large group of genetic and acquired diseases affecting muscles, leading to progressive muscular weakness. These disorders are frequently inherited in an autosomal-recessive (AR) pattern with extreme heterogeneity and various clinical presentations. Consanguinity increases the likelihood of AR disorders, with high rates of cousin inbreeding in Jordan and other Arab countries. In Jordan, the implementation of genetic diagnosis is limited, with delayed or misdiagnosis of genetic disorders. Thus, the lack of genetic counselling and specialized treatment options is frequently encountered in the country.

METHODS

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted for eleven probands from ten Jordanian families who have been formerly diagnosed with limb-girdle dystrophy (LGMD) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT). The previous diagnoses were established principally on clinical examination in the absence of genetic testing. Additionally, Sanger sequencing and segregation analysis were used to validate the resulted pathogenic variants.

RESULTS

Multiple variants were identified using WES: For DYSF gene, a missense variant (c. 4076 T > C, p.Leu1359Pro) in exon 38; a nonsense variant (c. 4321C > T, p.Gln1441Ter) in exon 39; a single-nucleotide deletion (c. 5711delG, p.Gly1904AlafsTer101) in exon 51. Other variants included a missense variant (c. 122G > A, p.Arg41Gln) in exon 3 of MPV17 gene, a single-nucleotide deletion (c. 859 delC, p.Lue287Ser fs14*) in exon 6 of SGCB gene, a missense variant (c. 311G > A, p.Gly104Asp) in exon 2 of SLC25A46 gene, a nonsense variant (c. 496C > T, p.Arg166Ter) in exon 5 of SGCG gene, and a nonsense variant (c.3202C > T, p.Gln1068Ter) in exon 13 of SH3TC2 gene.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of WES is helpful to facilitate rapid and accurate NMDs diagnosis, complementing a thorough clinical evaluation. This approach can be invaluable to aid in the identification of genetic risks among consanguineous couples. Subsequently, well-informed genetic counselling and potential individualized treatment can be provided.

Mutation spectrum of hereditary myopathies in Turkish patients and novel variants

Hereditary myopathies are a heterogeneous disorder known to be associated with more than 100 genes. Although hereditary myopathy subgroups can be partially described with traditional methods such as muscle biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is essential to reveal the disease's underlying genetic etiology and molecular mechanisms. In this study, we performed clinical exome sequencing or whole-exome sequencing (CES/WES) in 20 unrelated Turkish patients. Thirteen pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, including five novel variantswere detected in the 16 known hereditary myopathy genes. We achieved a high rate of diagnosis (65%) compared to previous studies. The most common condition noticed was limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD), which should not be ignored in patients diagnosed with myopathy. CES or WES provides a certain molecular diagnosis from a broad perspective to demonstrate underlying genetic causes in heterogeneous disorders. Therefore, exome sequencing offers a higher and more complete diagnosis than the gene panel.

The Increasing Impact of Translational Research in the Molecular Diagnostics of Neuromuscular Diseases

The diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) has been progressively evolving from the grouping of clinical symptoms and signs towards the molecular definition. Optimal clinical, biochemical, electrophysiological, electrophysiological, and histopathological characterization is very helpful to achieve molecular diagnosis, which is essential for establishing prognosis, treatment and genetic counselling. Currently, the genetic approach includes both the gene-targeted analysis in specific clinically recognizable diseases, as well as genomic analysis based on next-generation sequencing, analyzing either the clinical exome/genome or the whole exome or genome. However, as of today, there are still many patients in whom the causative genetic variant cannot be definitely established and variants of uncertain significance are often found. In this review, we address these drawbacks by incorporating two additional biological omics approaches into the molecular diagnostic process of NMDs. First, functional genomics by introducing experimental cell and molecular biology to analyze and validate the variant for its biological effect in an in-house translational diagnostic program, and second, incorporating a multi-omics approach including RNA-seq, metabolomics, and proteomics in the molecular diagnosis of neuromuscular disease. Both translational diagnostics programs and omics are being implemented as part of the diagnostic process in academic centers and referral hospitals and, therefore, an increase in the proportion of neuromuscular patients with a molecular diagnosis is expected. This improvement in the process and diagnostic performance of patients will allow solving aspects of their health problems in a precise way and will allow them and their families to take a step forward in their lives.

Drug Repositioning Screen on a New Primary Cell Line Identifies Potent Therapeutics for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is a malignant brain cancer with limited treatment options and high mortality rate. While established glioblastoma cell line models provide valuable information, they ultimately lose most primary characteristics of tumors under long-term serum culture conditions. Therefore, established cell lines do not necessarily recapitulate genetic and morphological characteristics of real tumors. In this study, in line with the growing interest in using primary cell line models derived from patient tissue, we generated a primary glioblastoma cell line, KUGBM8 and characterized its genetic alterations, long term growth ability, tumor formation capacity and its response to Temozolomide, the front-line chemotherapy utilized clinically. In addition, we performed a drug repurposing screen on the KUGBM8 cell line to identify FDA-approved agents that can be incorporated into glioblastoma treatment regimen and identified Topotecan as a lead drug among 1,200 drugs. We showed Topotecan can induce cell death in KUGBM8 and other primary cell lines and cooperate with Temozolomide in low dosage combinations. Together, our study provides a new primary cell line model that can be suitable for both in vitro and in vivo studies and suggests that Topotecan can offer promise as a therapeutic approach for glioblastoma.