Endovascular treatment versus intravenous thrombolysis alone in isolated M2 occlusion: a meta-analysis

Comparing Outcomes of Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis Based on Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Occlusion Features

BACKGROUND

Current evidence provides limited support for the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusion. We aim to investigate whether imaging features of M2 segment occlusion impact the effectiveness of EVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 2017 to January 2022, drawing data from the CASE II registry (Computer-Based Online Database of Acute Stroke Patients for Stroke Management Quality Evaluation), which specifically documented patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting with M2 segment occlusion undergoing reperfusion therapy. Patients were stratified into the intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) group (IVT alone) and EVT group (IVT plus EVT or EVT alone). The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included additional thresholds and distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores, 24-hour recanalization, early neurological deterioration, and relevant complications during hospitalization. Safety outcomes encompassed intracranial hemorrhagic events at 24 hours and mortality at 90 days. Binary logistic regression analyses with propensity score matching were used. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the anatomic site of occlusion, including right versus left, proximal versus distal, dominant/co-dominant versus nondominant, single versus double/triple branch(es), and anterior versus central/posterior branch.

RESULTS

Among 734 patients (43.3% were females; median age, 73 years) with M2 segment occlusion, 342 (46.6%) were in the EVT group. Propensity score matching analysis revealed no statistical difference in the primary outcome (odds ratio, 0.860 [95% CI, 0.611-1.209]; P=0.385) between the EVT group and IVT group. However, EVT was associated with a higher incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (odds ratio, 6.655 [95% CI, 1.487-29.788]; P=0.004) and pneumonia (odds ratio, 2.015 [95% CI, 1.364-2.977]; P<0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients in the IVT group achieved better outcomes when presenting with right, distal, or nondominant branch occlusion (Pall interaction<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed similar efficiency of EVT versus IVT alone in acute M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusion. This suggested that only specific patient subpopulations might have a potentially higher benefit of EVT over IVT alone.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04487340.

Reperfusion strategies in stroke with medium-to-distal vessel occlusion: a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) accounts for 30% of acute ischemic stroke cases. The risk/benefit profile of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or the combination of the two (bridging therapy (BT)) is still unclear in MeVO. Here, we compare reperfusion strategies in MeVO for clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective single center study enrolled consecutive patients with AIS due to primary MeVO undergoing IVT, EVT, or BT at a comprehensive stroke center. Primary outcome was good functional status, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 3-month follow-up. Additional outcomes included mortality, successful recanalization, defined as mTICI ≥ 2b, stroke severity at discharge, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) according to SITS-MOST criteria. Logistic regression was modeled to define independent predictors of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 180 consecutive people were enrolled (IVT = 59, EVT = 38, BT = 83), mean age 75. BT emerged as independent predictor of primary outcome (OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.08-7.07) together with age (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.9-0.97) and baseline NIHSS (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.95). BT associated with a 20% relative increase in successful recanalization compared to EVT (74.4 vs 56.4%, p = 0.049). Rates of sICH (1.1%) and procedural complications (vasospasm 4.1%, SAH in 1.7%) were very low, with no difference across groups.

DISCUSSION

BT may carry a higher chance of good functional outcome compared to EVT/IVT only in people with AIS due to MeVO, with marginally higher rates of successful recanalization. Randomized trials are needed to define optimal treatment tailoring for MeVO.

Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy for primary and secondary MeVO

BACKGROUND

Medium-vessel occlusions (MeVO) are emerging as a new target for endovascular treatment (EVT). Primary MeVO occur de novo, while secondary MeVO arise from large vessel occlusion (LVO) through clot migration or fragmentation - spontaneously, following intravenous thrombolysis or EVT. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of EVT in primary and EVT-induced secondary MeVO.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study on consecutive EVT-treated acute ischemic stroke, from 2019-to-2021. We considered: (1) exclusive-LVO, patients with LVO and - in case of residual distal occlusion - no rescue endovascular procedure; (2) primary MeVO: initial A2, A3, M2 non-dominant, M3, P2, P3 occlusions; (3) EVT-induced secondary MeVO, presenting LVO with subsequent (treated) EVT-induced MeVO. We compared (univariable/multivariable logistic regression) EVT efficacy (eTICI≥2b, 3-month modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and safety (EVT-complications [vessel dissection, perforation, persistent-SAH], symptomatic ICH) in all MeVO versus exclusive-LVO, primary MeVO versus exclusive-LVO, EVT-induced secondary MeVO versus exclusive-LVO and EVT-induced secondary MeVO versus primary MeVO.

RESULTS

We included 335 patients: 221 (66.0 %) exclusive-LVO and 114 (34.0 %) MeVO (55 [48.2 %] primary, 59 [51.8 %] secondary). Compared to exclusive-LVO, primary MeVO had higher rates of EVT complications (aOR 3.77 [95%CI 1.58-9.00],p=0.003), lower rates of eTICI≥2b (aOR 0.32 [95%CI 0.12-0.88],p=0.027) and mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.28 [95%CI 0.13-0.63],p=0.002). EVT-induced secondary MeVO had no major differences in efficacy and safety outcomes compared to exclusive-LVO, but a better mRS 0-2 (aOR 8.00 [95%CI 2.12-30.17],p=0.002) compared to primary MeVO.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary and EVT-induced secondary MeVO showed different safety/efficacy EVT-related profiles. Dedicated randomized data are needed to identify the best acute reperfusion strategy in the two categories.

Influence of prior intravenous thrombolysis in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for M2 occlusions: insight from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for proximal occlusions has recently been questioned through randomized trials. However, few patients with M2 occlusions were included. We investigated the influence of prior IVT for patients presenting M2 occlusions treated with MT in comparison with MT alone.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry, a multicenter observational study. Data from consecutive patients treated with MT for M2 occlusions between January 2015 and January 2022 at 26 comprehensive stroke centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Outcomes were compared using propensity score approaches. We also performed sensitivity analysis in relevant subgroups of patients.

RESULTS

Among 1132 patients with M2 occlusions treated with MT, 570 received prior IVT. The two groups were comparable after propensity analysis. The rate of favorable functional outcome was significantly higher in the IVT+MT group compared with the MT alone group (59.8% vs 44.7%; adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.75, P=0.008). Hemorrhagic and procedural complications were similar in both groups. In sensitivity analysis excluding patients with anticoagulation treatment, favorable recanalization was more frequent in the IVT+MT group (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.70, P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of M2 occlusions, prior IVT combined with MT resulted in better functional outcome than MT alone, without increasing the rate of hemorrhagic or procedural complications. These results suggest the benefit of IVT in patients undergoing MT for M2 occlusions.

5F SOFIA intermediate catheter in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

We herein report our experience with the 5F SOFIA (Soft Torqueable catheter Optimized for Intracranial Access) intermediate catheter for endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) both in distal middle vessel occlusions (DMVOs) and in large vessel occlusions (LVOs) with unfavorable anatomy.

METHODS

Records of forty-seven patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy with 5F SOFIA between September 2020 and March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographic data, clinical presentation, treatment details, and complications were recorded from the medical record. The primary outcomes were successful revascularization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia, mTICI ≥2b) and good clinical outcome at 3 months (modified rankin scale, mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes were complication rates and switch to alternative techniques. Our institutional review board approved this study.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with AIS treated with 5F SOFIA were examined. In eighteen (38%) cases the occlusion was located on a large vessel while in 29 (61.7%) on a distal-medium vessels. Median national institutes of health strokes scale (NIHSS) score was 16 at admission. Successful revascularization to mTICI 2b-3 was achieved in 14 of 18 patients (77.7%) with LVOs and in 24/29 cases with DMVOs (82.7%) respectively. mRS score 0-2 at three months (3 months-mRS 0-2) was 66.6% for LVOs and 68.9% in DMVOs respectively. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) occurred in 2 (4.2%) patients.

CONCLUSION

5F SOFIA intermediate catheter could be a safe and effective treatment for AIS and a viable alternative to 6 F conventional intermediate catheters in selected cases.

A review of acute ischemic stroke caused by distal, medium vessel occlusions

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) is increasingly recognized as the next frontier for mechanical thrombectomy. Distal, medium vessel occlusions are typically defined as an occlusion in the following arteries: anterior cerebral artery, M2-M4 segments of the middle cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, and superior cerebellar artery. It is estimated that 25-40% of all AIS is due to DMVO. Because of the large burden of DMVO, the frequency of literature published regarding these occlusions has greatly increased in recent years. Furthermore, treatment modalities have been created specifically for DMVOs. Due to the rapidly evolving literature on this topic, remaining up to date on DMVO definitions, anatomy, management, imaging, and clinical course is difficult. In this review article, we synthesized existing literature regarding the aforementioned topics and discussed future directions.

Endovascular treatment achieves better outcomes than best medical management in patients with M2 occlusion and high stroke severity: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The lack of randomized evidence makes it difficult to establish reliable treatment recommendations for patients with M2 occlusion. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) with best medical management (BMM) in patients with M2 occlusion, and to investigate whether the optimal treatment varies according to stroke severity.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature retrieval was conducted to identify studies that directly compared the outcomes of EVT and BMM. According to stroke severity, the study population were classified into those with moderate-severe stroke and those with mild stroke. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ≥ 6 was defined as moderate-severe stroke, and NIHSS scores 0-5 as mild stroke. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to measure the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 72 h, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-2 and the mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS

Totally, 20 studies were identified, including 4358 patients. In the moderate-severe stroke population, the EVT had 82% higher odds for mRS scores 0-2 (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.34-2.49) and a 43% lower odds for mortality (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.82) compared with the BMM. However, no difference was found in the sICH rate (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.77). In the mild stroke population, no differences were observed in the mRS scores 0-2 (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59-1.10) or mortality (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.10) between EVT and BMM, whereas EVT was associated with higher sICH rate (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.86-9.49).

CONCLUSION

EVT may be only beneficial for patients with M2 occlusion and high stroke severity, but not for those with NIHSS scores 0-5.