Perceived quality of life (QOLIE-31-P), depression (NDDI-E), anxiety (GAD-7), and insomnia in patients with epilepsy attended at a refractory epilepsy unit in real-life clinical practice

Effectiveness of CBT for reducing depression and anxiety in people with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with epilepsy suffer from depression and anxiety that reduces quality of life. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) among various non pharmacological treatment recommended for depression and anxiety. Since there are several articles reporting CBT treatment for depression in patients with epilepsy, we conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of CBT for adult patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Four electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane library searched for relevant studies. A detailed "RISK of bias" assessment has been done for included studies. Funnel plot was used for assessing publication Bias. R Software- RStudio 2022 was used to calculate standard mean difference (SMD). The study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023447655).

RESULTS

Eventually, a Total 13 studies involving 1222 patients met the eligibility criteria. There was decline in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) [SMD = -0.42, 95 % CI = -0.63 to -0.22], Neurologic Disorder Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) [SMD = -0.53, 95 % CI = -0.75 to -0.31], Beck depression Inventory (BDI) [SMD = -0.69, 95 % CI = -1.08 to -0.30], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) [SMD = -0.73 , 95 % CI = -0.94 to -0.52] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) [SMD = -0.66, 95 % CI = -0.87 to -0.45] score of the CBT group than that of the control group at post-intervention. The results showed that the improvement in QOLIE-31 score of the CBT group than that of the control group [SMD = 0.67, 95 % CI = 1.33] at post-intervention.

CONCLUSION

The result of our study showed that Cognitive behavioral therapy is a superior therapy for treating anxiety and depression in epilepsy patients. CBT was effective in improving Quality of life in patients with epilepsy. However, the sample size varied across the trials, additional high-quality studies are needed in the future.

The effect of sleep disorders on quality of life in patients with epilepsy: A multicenter study from Turkey

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate sleep disorders in patients with epilepsy (PWE) and to investigate the effects of sleep disorders on quality of life.

METHODS

In our multicenter study conducted in Turkey, 1358 PWE were evaluated. The demographic and clinical data of the patients were recorded. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-10 (QOLIE-10) were administered.

RESULTS

The mean age of 1358 patients was 35.92 ± 14.11 (range, 18-89) years. Seven hundred fifty-one (55.30 %) were women. Some 12.7 % of the patients had insomnia (ISI > 14), 9.6 % had excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS > 10), 46.5 % had poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5), and 354 patients (26.1 %) had depressive symptoms (BDI > 16). The mean QOLIE-10 score was 22.82 ± 8.14 (10-48). Resistant epilepsy was evaluated as the parameter with the highest risk affecting quality of life Adjusted odds ratio (AOR = 3.714; 95 % confidence interval (CI): [2.440-5.652] < 0.001)). ISI (AOR = 1.184; 95 % CI: [1.128-1.243]; p < 0.001), ESS (AOR = 1.081; 95 % CI: [1.034-1.130]; p < 0.001), PSQI (AOR = 0.928; 95 % CI: [0.867 - 0.994]; p = 0.034), BDI (AOR = 1.106; 95 % CI: [1.084-1.129]; p < 0.001), epilepsy duration (AOR = 1.023; 95 % CI: [1.004-1.041]; p = 0.014), were determined as factors affecting quality of life.

SIGNIFICANCE

Sleep disorders are common in PWE and impair their quality of life. Quality of life can be improved by controlling the factors that may cause sleep disorders such as good seizure control, avoiding polypharmacy, and correcting the underlying mood disorders in patients with epilepsy.

The burden of chronic drug-refractory focal onset epilepsy: Can it be prevented?

Despite the many therapeutic options for epilepsy available today, a third of patients still have poorly controlled epilepsy. Over the years, their transition through lines of treatment exposes them to increased risk of disease progression, mortality, morbidity, mental distress, and not least significantly impaired quality of life (QoL). The present review explores the multiple factors contributing to the impairment of health-related QoL in PWE-including both seizure-related and non seizure-related. The analysis aims to identify potential areas of intervention and strategies for a more holistic approach to epilepsy care and inform policy-makers and healthcare providers in their approach to this condition.

The impact of epilepsy and antiseizure medications on sleep: Findings from a large European survey in adults with epilepsy and matched controls

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of epilepsy and antiseizure medications (ASMs) on sleep quality in people with epilepsy (PWE).

METHODS

An online survey was conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK among PWE taking >1 ASM and matched controls. Sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Associations between sleep quality (global PSQI) and overall quality of life (QoL; assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Survey [SF-12]) and sleep quality and depressive symptoms (assessed using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy [NDDI-E]) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 500 PWE and 500 matched controls were included. PWE had significantly greater mean global PSQI scores than controls (9.32 vs 7.56; p < 0.0001), with 80% reporting a score >5 versus 66% of controls (p < 0.001). PWE experienced significantly more problems with most PSQI components than controls. Mean global PSQI scores in PWE receiving 2 versus ≥3 ASMs were 9.03 and 10.18, respectively (p < 0.004); global PSQI scores >5 were reported in 76% versus 90%, respectively (p = 0.001). Regimens containing lamotrigine or phenobarbital were associated with poorer sleep quality than those without these ASMs. In PWE, negative correlations were identified between global PSQI scores and both the SF-12 physical and mental components (Pearson's correlation coefficient [PCC], -0.61 and -0.40, respectively); NDDI-E and global PSQI scores were positively correlated (PCC, 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

PWE experience significantly worse sleep quality than people without epilepsy, with some ASMs contributing to poorer sleep. QoL and physical and mental health were all affected by sleep quality in PWE.

Improvement in health perception but not quality of life with an antiseizure medication intervention in people with epilepsy in Guinea: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study assesses perceptions of quality of life (QOL) and overall health in people with epilepsy (PWE) in Guinea after a clinical intervention providing modified and new antiseizure medicine (ASM) regimens.

METHODS

Participants 12 years and older diagnosed with active epilepsy were prospectively and consecutively enrolled at two health centers in the Republic of Guinea (one urban, one rural) in 2022. 95% of participants were prescribed new/increased ASM doses, and interviewed for QOL and overall health perceptions at enrollment and three- and six-month follow ups. Univariate and linear mixed models were used to evaluate effects on QOL and overall health over time.

RESULTS

The mean QOLIE-31 score (±SD) among 148 Guinean PWE (82 male, 66 female; mean age 27.3; 137 with >1 seizure in prior year) was 51.7 ± 12.8 at enrollment, 57.6 ± 16.0 after three months (n = 116), and 52.2 ± 9.9 after six months (n = 87). Overall health scores were 53.1 ± 26.9, 72.6 ± 21.5, and 65.7 ± 20.2 respectively. After three months, PWE had improved overall health and QOLIE-31 scores (p<0.0001, p = 0.003), but these improvements persisted for overall health and not QOLIE-31 after six months (p = 0.001, p = 0.63). Seizure freedom (prior 30 days) was 26% initially, and 62 (42%) of the remaining PWE experiencing seizures achieved seizure freedom at either the first or second follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

A noticeable discrepancy exists between Guinean PWE's self-rated perceptions of QOL and overall health. Purely clinical interventions may not be sufficient to improve QOL, especially in people that experience severe, previously-untreated epilepsy in lower income settings.

Determinants of quality of life in adults with epilepsy: a multicenter, cross-sectional study from Germany

BACKGROUND

Assessment of quality of life (QoL) has become an important indicator for chronic neurological diseases. While these conditions often limit personal independence and autonomy, they are also associated with treatment-related problems and reduced life expectancy. Epilepsy has a tremendous impact on the QoL of patients and their families, which is often underestimated by practitioners. The aim of this work was to identify relevant factors affecting QoL in adults with epilepsy.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted at four specialized epilepsy centers in Germany. Patients diagnosed with epilepsy completed a standardized questionnaire focusing on QoL and aspects of healthcare in epilepsy. Univariate regression analyses and pairwise comparisons were performed to identify variables of decreased QoL represented by the overall Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) score. The variables were then considered in a multivariate regression analysis after multicollinearity analysis.

RESULTS

Complete datasets for the QOLIE-31 were available for 476 patients (279 [58.6%] female, 197 [41.4%] male, mean age 40.3 years [range 18-83 years]). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significant associations between low QoL and a high score on the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP; beta=-0.28, p < 0.001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression subscale (HADS-D; beta=-0.27, p < 0.001), Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy (NDDI-E; beta=-0.19, p < 0.001), revised Epilepsy Stigma Scale (beta=-0.09, p = 0.027), or Seizure Worry Scale (beta=-0.18, p < 0.001) and high seizure frequency (beta = 0.14, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Epilepsy patients had reduced QoL, with a variety of associated factors. In addition to disease severity, as measured by seizure frequency, the patient's tolerability of anti-seizure medications and the presence of depression, stigma, and worry about new seizures were strongly associated with poor QoL. Diagnosed comorbid depression was underrepresented in the cohort; therefore, therapeutic decisions should always consider individual psychobehavioral and disease-specific aspects. Signs of drug-related adverse events, depression, fear, or stigmatization should be actively sought to ensure that patients receive personalized and optimized treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022024; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1252-5331).

Nose-to-brain delivery of perampanel formulated in a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system improves anticonvulsant and anxiolytic activity in mice

Perampanel (PER) is a potent third-generation antiepileptic drug only available for oral administration. Additionally, PER has shown potential in managing epilepsy comorbidities such as anxiety. Previously, we demonstrated that the intranasal (IN) administration of PER, loaded in a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS), improved brain-targeting and exposure in mice. Herein, we investigated PER brain biodistribution, its anticonvulsant and anxiolytic effects, and its potential olfactory and neuromotor toxicity after IN administration to mice (1 mg/kg). PER showed a rostral-caudal brain biodistribution pattern when administered intranasally. At short times post-nasal dosing, high PER concentrations were found in olfactory bulbs (olfactory bulbs/plasma ratios of 1.266 ± 0.183 and 0.181 ± 0.027 after IN and intravenous administrations, respectively), suggesting that a fraction of the drug directly reaches brain through the olfactory pathway. In maximal electroshock seizure test, IN PER protected 60% of mice against seizure development, a substantially higher value than the 20% protected after receiving oral PER. . PER also demonstrated anxiolytic effects in open field and elevated plus maze tests. Buried food-seeking test showed no signs of olfactory toxicity. Neuromotor impairment was found in rotarod and open field tests at the times of PER maximum concentrations after IN and oral administrations. Nevertheless, neuromotor performance was improved after repeated administrations. Compared with IN vehicle, PER IN administration decreased brain levels of L-glutamate (0.91 ± 0.13 mg/mL vs 0.64 ± 0.12 mg/mL) and nitric oxide (100 ± 15.62% vs 56.62 ± 4.95%), without interfering in GABA levels. Altogether, these results suggest that the IN PER delivery through the developed SMEDDS can be a safe and promising alternative to oral treatment, which support the design of clinical studies to evaluate the IN PER delivery to treat epilepsy and neurological-related conditions as anxiety.

Psychometric properties of the Lithuanian version of the patient-weighted inventory on quality of life in epilepsy

BACKGROUND

We aimed (1) to confirm that the Lithuanian version of the patient-weighted 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31-P) is a valid and reliable tool to be used among patients with epilepsy (PWE) in Lithuania and (2) to determine how the quality of life (QoL) is associated with demographic and clinical variables, adverse effects of antiseizure medication as well symptoms of depression and anxiety in this population.

METHODS

We used a translated and adapted Lithuanian version of the patient-weighted 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31-P) and conducted a cross-sectional anonymous survey among 303 adult PWE at a tertiary epilepsy center at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos. The questionnaire also included the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), the Generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 (GAD-7), and the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile scale (LAEP). Missing values were replaced after performing multiple imputation (MI).

RESULTS

QOLIE-31-P had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.933 for all items and α = 0.676 to 0.906 for individual subscales). Its factor structure (71.2% of variance explained) consisted of seven factors, some of which overlapped ("Emotional Well-Being" and "Overall QoL") or were split ("Social Function") in comparison to the pre-defined content of the subscales. Multitrait-scaling revealed that each item is better correlated with the subscale it is included in than other subscales, suggesting good convergent and discriminant validity. On average, PWE scored 69.9 ± 16.8 (n = 164, mean = 64.9 after MI) on the QOLIE-31-P. Results were higher among male PWE, those employed or studying and having a higher level of education. In a pooled multiple regression model (adjusted R¯² = 0.700, p < 0.001), the NDDIE (β_st = -0.230, p < 0.001), the GAD-7 (β_st = -0.226, p < 0.001), the LAEP (β_st = -0.406, p < 0.001), and seizure frequency (β_st = -0.156, p < 0.001) were statistically significantly associated with total QOLIE-31-P scores.

CONCLUSION

The Lithuanian version of the QOLIE-31-P demonstrates optimal reliability and construct validity to be applied in this population. It is strongly associated with seizure frequency as well as short instruments used to measure anxiety, depression, and adverse medication effects.