New approaches to recovery after stroke

Efficacy and safety of using a unilateral lower limb exoskeleton combined with conventional treatment in post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

The incidence of hemiplegia caused by stroke is high. In particular, lower limb dysfunction affects the daily activities of patients, and lower limb robotic devices have been proposed to provide rehabilitation therapy to improve balance function in this patient population.

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of the LiteStepper® unilateral lower limb exoskeleton (ULLE) combined with conventional treatment for balance function training in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.

Methods

This multicenter randomized controlled trial, conducted in the convalescent rehabilitation ward of four hospitals, involved 92 patients in their post-stroke phase. Participants were randomized into an experimental group (EG) or a conventional group (CG). The EG adopted the LiteStepper® ULLE combined with conventional treatment for 21 days. The CG underwent a standard daily rehabilitation routine for 21 days. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Ambulation Category scale (FAC), 6-min walk test (6MWT), and Barthel Index (Barthel) were used for evaluations before and after 21 days of rehabilitative training.

Results

The BBS scores in EG was significantly elevated compared to CG, exhibiting a profound statistical difference (P< 0.0001). Notably, these disparities persisted at both day 21 (P < 0.0001) and day 14 (P < 0.0047) post-intervention, underscoring the efficacy of the treatment in the EG. The EG demonstrated a markedly greater improvement in BBS scores from pre-rehabilitation to 21 days post-training, significantly outperforming the CG. Furthermore, at both day 14 and day 21, functional assessments including the FAC, 6MWT, and Barthel revealed improvements in both groups. However, the improvements in the EG were statistically significant compared to the CG at both time points: day 14 (FAC, P = 0.0377; 6MWT, P = 0.0494; Barthel, P = 0.0225) and day 21 (FAC, P = 0.0015; 6MWT, P = 0.0005; Barthel, P = 0.0004). These findings highlight the superiority of the intervention in the EG in enhancing functional outcomes. Regarding safety, the analysis revealed a solitary adverse event (AEs) related to the LiteStepper®ULLE device during the study period, affirming the combination therapy's safety profile when administered alongside conventional balance training in post-stroke hemiplegic patients. This underscores the feasibility and potential of incorporating LiteStepper®ULLE into rehabilitation protocols for this patient population.

Discussion and significance

The LiteStepper® ULLE combined with conventional treatment is effective and safe for balance function training in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.

Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel on Rehabilitation Approaches and Unmet Needs for Chronic Stroke Walking Impairment and the Role of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation

INTRODUCTION

Walking or gait impairment is a common consequence of stroke that persists into the chronic phase of recovery for many stroke survivors. The goals of this work were to obtain consensus from a multidisciplinary panel on current practice patterns and treatment options for walking impairment after stroke, to better understand the unmet needs for rehabilitation in the chronic phase of recovery and to explore opportunities to address them, and to discuss the potential role of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) in gait rehabilitation.

METHODS

A panel of eight experts specializing in neurology, physical therapy, and physiatry participated in this three-part, modified Delphi study. Survey 1 focused on gathering information to develop statements that were discussed and polled during Survey 2 (interactive session), after which revised and new statements were polled in Survey 3. Consensus was defined as ≥75% (6/8 of panelists) agreement or disagreement with a statement.

RESULTS

Consensus agreement was ultimately reached on all 24 statements created and polled during this process. The panelists agreed that individuals with gait or walking impairment in the chronic phase of stroke recovery can achieve meaningful improvement in walking by utilizing various evidence-based interventions. Barriers to treatment included cost, access, participation in long-term treatment, and safety. Consensus was achieved for interventions that have the following features challenging, personalized, accessible, and engaging. Improvement of gait speed and quality, durability of effect, safety, affordability, and ability for home or community use also emerged as important treatment features. In addition to conventional treatments (e.g., physical therapy, including mobility-task training and walking/exercise therapy), RAS was recognized as a potentially valuable treatment modality.  Discussion: This panel highlighted limitations of current treatments and opportunities to improve access, participation, and outcomes through a consideration of newer treatment strategies and patient/healthcare provider education and engagement.

Efficacy of electrical stimulation for post-stroke motor dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of different electrical stimulation treatments for post-stroke motor dysfunction, and to quantitatively analyze the advantages between them and their possible benefits for patients.

METHODS

We will systematically search seven databases. All of them will be retrieved from inception to 15, April 2024. Two reviewers will evaluation the risk of bias in all included studies with the version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Data synthesis will be performed using a random-effects model of network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different electrical stimulation therapies. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to indicate the possibility of the pros and cons of the intervention. The strength of evidence will be assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide evidence that electrical stimulation therapy can effectively improve motor function in stroke patients and will also provide some valuable references for clinical decision-making and treatment guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459102.

Application of emerging technologies in ischemic stroke: from clinical study to basic research

Stroke is a primary cause of noncommunicable disease-related death and disability worldwide. The most common form, ischemic stroke, is increasing in incidence resulting in a significant burden on patients and society. Urgent action is thus needed to address preventable risk factors and improve treatment methods. This review examines emerging technologies used in the management of ischemic stroke, including neuroimaging, regenerative medicine, biology, and nanomedicine, highlighting their benefits, clinical applications, and limitations. Additionally, we suggest strategies for technological development for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ischemic stroke.

Guest Editorial Special Section on Functional Recovery and Brain Plasticity

The aim of rehabilitation after neurological damage is functional recovery, which includes motor, sensory, and cognitive aspects, which are closely interrelated [22].

Robot- and Technology-Boosting Neuroplasticity-Dependent Motor-Cognitive Functional Recovery: Looking towards the Future of Neurorehabilitation

The sequelae of neurological disorders are the leading causes of disability in all industrialized countries [...].