Comparative in vitro surveillance of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and four oral comparators against 21232 clinical isolates from europe

New semiphysiological absorption model to assess the pharmacodynamic profile of cefuroxime axetil using nonparametric and parametric population pharmacokinetics

Cefuroxime axetil is widely used to treat respiratory tract infections. We are not aware of a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for cefuroxime axetil. Our objectives were to develop a semiphysiological population PK model and evaluate the pharmacodynamic profile for cefuroxime axetil. Twenty-four healthy volunteers received 250 mg oral cefuroxime as a suspension after a standardized breakfast. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used for drug analysis, NONMEM and S-ADAPT (results reported) were used for parametric population PK modeling, and NPAG was used for nonparametric population PK modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict the duration for which the non-protein-bound-plasma concentration was above the MIC (fT(>MIC)). A model with one disposition compartment, a saturable and time-dependent drug release from the stomach, and fast drug absorption from the intestine yielded precise (r > 0.992) and unbiased curve fits and an excellent predictive performance. The apparent clearance was 21.7 liters/h (19.8% coefficient of variation [CV]) and the volume of distribution 38.7 liters (18.3% CV). Robust (>or=90%) probabilities of target attainment (PTAs) were achieved by 250 mg cefuroxime given every 12 h (q12h) or q8h for MICs of <or=0.375 mg/liter or <or=0.5 mg/liter, respectively, for the bacteriostasis target fT(>MIC) of >or=40% and for MICs of <or=0.094 mg/liter or <or=0.375 mg/liter, respectively, for the near-maximal-killing target fT(>MIC) of >or=65%. For the >or=40% fT(>MIC) target, the PTAs for 250 mg cefuroxime q12h were >or=97.8% for Streptococcus pyogenes and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae. Cefuroxime at 250 mg q12h or q8h achieved PTAs below 73% or 92%, respectively, for Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae for susceptibility data from various countries. Depending on the MIC distribution, 250 mg oral cefuroxime q8h instead of q12h should be considered, especially for more-severe infections that require near-maximal killing by cefuroxime.

What are the most appropriate antibiotics for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A therapeutic outcomes model

OBJECTIVES

To predict the clinical efficacy of several antimicrobials in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

METHODS

A probability model (therapeutic outcomes model) was used to predict the likelihood of clinical success with particular antimicrobial agents in the treatment of patients with AECOPD, both in those clinically diagnosed (total patients with an AECOPD diagnosis regardless of the cause) and in those with bacterial AECOPD. The model took into account the following variables: (i) the proportion of patients with a clinical diagnosis of AECOPD and non-bacterial disease; (ii) likelihood of spontaneous resolution of a non-bacterial infection; (iii) prevalence of subcauses (different bacterial species) in bacterial AECOPD; (iv) rates of spontaneous resolution of bacterial AECOPD; and (v) antimicrobial efficacy of each antibiotic against each bacterial species (susceptibility based on PK/PD breakpoints).

RESULTS

Fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin), a new third-generation oral cephalosporin (cefditoren) and high doses of amoxicillin/clavulanate were the antimicrobials with the highest predicted clinical efficacy both in mild-moderate AECOPD and in severe AECOPD (rates of 89.2% to 90.5% and 80.3% to 88.1%, respectively), whereas cefaclor, azithromycin, erythromycin and clarithromycin had the lowest predicted clinical efficacy (rates of 79.1% to 81.3% and 51.8% to 55.6% for mild-moderate and severe AECOPD, respectively), which was not much higher than that predicted for placebo (73.6% and 45.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our model, fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin), cefditoren and amoxicillin/clavulanate are the most appropriate antibiotics for the treatment of patients with AECOPD in terms of predicted clinical efficacy, with wide differences with respect to other antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of these patients, such as clarithromycin and azithromycin.

Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 2000mg/125mg extended release (XR): a review of its use in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in adults

Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 2000mg/125mg extended release (Augmentin XR), referred to herein as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid XR, is a pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation designed to provide more effective therapy in adults and adolescents than conventional formulations against community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, with reduced susceptibility to amoxicillin. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid XR maintains plasma amoxicillin concentrations above 4 microg/mL for a mean of 49% of the dosing interval indicating that it would be highly effective against S. pneumoniae strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) above the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard's amoxicillin +/- clavulanic acid susceptibility breakpoint of < or =2 microg/mL. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid XR is at least as effective as conventional amoxicillin/clavulanic acid formulations, levofloxacin and clarithromycin in treating community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial sinusitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and has a tolerability profile comparable to that of conventional amoxicillin/clavulanic acid formulations. While the incidence of amoxicillin- or multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae is not currently sufficient in most regions to warrant the routine empirical use of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid XR, the drug would be extremely useful in those regions with a high incidence of resistant pathogens or in selected patients (i.e. those with S. pneumoniae isolates having amoxicillin MICs > or =2 microg/mL but < or =4 microg/mL).

Antibiotic susceptibility and REP-PCR fingerprints of Acinetobacter spp. isolated from a hospital ten years apart

The antibiotic susceptibility profiles and the repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (REP-PCR)-determined genotypes of 109 Acinetobacter strains collected from the University Malaya Medical Center (UMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in 1987 (N=21) and 1996-1998 (N=88) were established. Twelve antibiotic susceptibility profiles of antibiotics used at the UMMC were obtained. In descending order of effectiveness, imipenem, amikacin and ciprofloxacin were the most effective against the Acinetobacter strains. Compared with 1987 isolates, the isolates obtained in 1996-1998 had decreased susceptibility to these antibiotics and were tolerant to the antibiotics up to an MIC90 of > or =256 mg/L. REP-PCR DNA fingerprints of all the isolates revealed the presence of four Acinetobacter spp. lineages; 92% of all the isolates belonged to two dominant lineages (genotypes 1 and 4). Genotype 4 isolates predominant in 1987 showed increased resistance and antibiotic tolerance to imipenem, amikacin and ciprofloxacin compared with the 1996-1998 isolates. In contrast, genotype 1 isolates from 1996-1998 were mainly sensitive to these antibiotics. These findings demonstrate the presence of at least two independent Acinetobacter spp. lineages in the same hospital, and suggest the possibility that genotype 4 Acinetobacter spp. acquired the resistance phenotype in situ, whereas most of the genotype 1 isolates were probably introduced to the hospital in recent years.