Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens

Detection and pathogenic potential of Clostridium difficile in commercial meat and meat products in Brazil

The aims of this study were to evaluate the occurrence of Clostridium difficile in commercial raw meat and meat products commercialized in Brazil, and to determine the pathogenic potential and antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates. After selective enrichment, the isolation of C. difficile involved plating with and without an alcohol shock treatment onto C. difficile moxalactam agar (CDMNA). The toxigenic profile was determined through PCR for detection of tcdA, tcdB, cdtA and cdtB genes and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for toxin A/B. C. difficile was isolated from 8.9% (17 out of 192) of analyzed samples. Plating without alcohol treatment (sensitivity of 88.23%) was more efficient than with alcohol treatment (sensitivity of 29.41%) in C. difficile isolation. The profile A + B+CDT- was observed in 35.0% (28/80) of the isolates. The A/B toxin was tested in 44 isolates and 15.9% of them were positive. Resistance to clindamycin, ceftizoxime tetracycline, metronidazole, vancomycin, and ceftriaxone were observed among isolates. Multi-drug resistance was detected in 36.4% (8/22) of the isolates evaluated.

Consensus on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

In recent decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become a worldwide health problem. Mexico is no exception, and therefore the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología brought together a multidisciplinary group (gastroenterologists, endoscopists, internists, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists) to carry out the "Consensus on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection", establishing useful recommendations (in relation to the adult population) for the medical community. Said recommendations are presented herein. Among them, it was recognized that CDI should be suspected in subjects with diarrhea that have a history of antibiotic and/or immunosuppressant use, but that it can also be a community-acquired infection. A 2-step diagnostic algorithm was proposed, in which a highly sensitive test, such as glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), is first utilized, and if positive, confirmed by the detection of toxins through immunoassay or nucleic acid detection tests. Another recommendation was that CDI based on clinical evaluation be categorized as mild-moderate, severe, and complicated severe, given that such a classification enables better therapeutic decisions to be made. In mild-moderate CDI, oral vancomycin is the medication of choice, and metronidazole is recommended as an alternative treatment. In addition, fecal microbiota transplantation was recognized as an efficacious option in patients with recurrence or in the more severe cases of infection, and surgery should be reserved for patients with severe colitis (toxic megacolon), in whom all medical treatment has failed.

Discrimination of Human Pathogen Clostridium Species Especially of the Heterogeneous C. sporogenes and C. botulinum by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

Clostridium species cause several local and systemic diseases. Conventional identification of these microorganisms is in part laborious, not always reliable, time consuming or does not always distinguish different species, i.e., C. botulinum and C. sporogenes. All in, there is a high interest to find out a reliable, powerful and rapid method to identify Clostridium spp. not only on genus but also on species level. The aim of the present study was to identify Clostridium spp. strains and also to find differences and metabolic groups of C. botulinum by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). A total of 123 strains of Clostridium spp. (C. botulinum, n = 40, C. difficile, n = 11, C. tetani, n = 11, C. sordellii, n = 20, C. sporogenes, n = 18, C. innocuum, n = 10, C. perfringens, n = 13) were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS in combination with methods of multivariate statistical analysis. MALDI-TOF MS analysis in combination with methods of multivariate statistical analysis was able to discriminate between the different tested Clostridium spp., even between species which are closely related and difficult to differentiate by traditional methods, i.e., C. sporogenes and C. botulinum. Furthermore, the method was able to separate the different metabolic groups of C. botulinum. Especially, E gene-positive C. botulinum strains are clearly distinguishable from the other species but also from those producing other toxin types. Thus, MALDI-TOF MS represents a reliable and above all quick method for identification of cultivated Clostridium species.

[Clostridium difficile in visceral surgery]

BACKGROUND

For surgeons the early identification of patients with clostridium difficile infections (CDI) is important, because the incidence and virulence of this potentially life-threatening disease are increasing.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of CDI among surgical patients, to analyze which treatment was successful and to define which factors were associated with mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with CDI was performed.

RESULTS

From January 2004 to June 2012 the overall incidence of CDI among all departments at the St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum was 0.6 % (1669 out of 301,919 patients). In 2004 the number of surgical patients with CDI was 1 which increased to 41 in 2011. Before the diagnosis of CDI was made 84 % (151 out of 179) of patients had received an antibiotic treatment. Conservative management of CDI was performed with metronidazole in 75 % (134 out of 179), 60 % (107 out of 179) received vancomycin, while 44 % (79 out of 179) received a combination of metronidazole and vancomycin, tygecycline or fidaxomidin. The overall mortality was 7 % (12 out of 179). There was a significant association with mortality for patients with sepsis, readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU), requirement for vasopressor therapy and intubation with mechanical ventilation. In 4 % of patients (7 out of 179) colectomy was carried out. Despite maximum intensive care management, 86 % (6 out of 7) of patients who underwent colectomy ultimately died.

CONCLUSION

Although conservative management is successful for most patients with CDI, the mortality is high for patients who require intensive care management secondary to CDI. Mortality after colectomy for CDI is almost 100 %, mostly because the operation is usually only performed as a last resort in patients with sepsis. The most important risk factor for CDI is a prior antibiotic therapy.

A novel subtyping assay for detection of Clostridium difficile virulence genes

This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the application of a novel nucleic acid detection platform to detect Clostridium difficile in subjects presenting with acute diarrheal symptoms. This method amplifies three genes associated with C. difficile infection, including genes and deletions (cdtB and tcdC) associated with hypervirulence attributed to the NAP1/027/BI strain. Amplification of DNA from the tcdB, tcdC, and cdtB genes was performed using a droplet-based sandwich platform with quantitative real-time PCR in microliter droplets to detect and identify the amplified fragments of DNA. The device and identification system are simple in design and can be integrated as a point-of-care test to help rapidly detect and identify C. difficile strains that pose significant health threats in hospitals and other health-care communities.

Bacterial enteritis in dogs and cats: diagnosis, therapy, and zoonotic potential

A variety of bacteria are known or suspected of being able to cause enteritis in dogs and cats. Campylobacter spp, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, and Salmonella spp are most commonly implicated, but many other organisms are likely involved. Poor understanding of the intestinal microflora and the fact that many, if not all, of these microorganisms can also be found in healthy individuals complicates testing, thereby affecting the use of specific treatments and assessment of potential infection control and zoonotic disease risks. An understanding of the strengths and limitations of various diagnostic options is important for the management of canine and feline enteritis.

Clinical outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis and co-existing Clostridium difficile infection

BACKGROUND

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection is increasing in the United States. The aim of our investigation is to compare short-term and long-term outcomes of patients admitted with an ulcerative colitis (UC) flare and co-existent C. difficile infection to those of non-infected patients.

METHODS

A historical cohort study was undertaken examining admissions at Mount Sinai Hospital between June 2004 and June 2005 using ICD-9 criteria for UC. Charts were abstracted for those patients for whom C. difficile testing was performed.

RESULTS

Of 288 admissions, 99 charts met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-two patients were C. difficile-negative and 47 were positive. Demographic data and laboratory values upon admission did not differ between the two groups. Patients who were C. difficile-positive had significantly more UC-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits in the year following initial admission (58 visits vs. 27, P = 0.001 and eight visits vs. 1 visit (P = 0.012), respectively). One year following the index admission, C. difficile patients had significantly higher rates of colectomy compared to C. difficile-negative patients (44.6% vs. 25%, P = 0.04). Length of hospitalization (11.7 vs. 11 days), use of cyclosporine therapy during index admission (48% vs. 47% of patients), and percentage requiring colectomy at initial admission (23.4% vs. 13.5%) did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that patients presenting with a UC flare who are infected with C. difficile have worse long-term clinical outcomes than those that are C. difficile-negative. C. difficile testing should be performed for all patients presenting with UC flare. Further studies are warranted to elucidate how infection can alter the natural history of UC.

Diagnostic value of repeated enzyme immunoassays in Clostridium difficile infection

OBJECTIVES

There has been a significant increase in the prevalence, severity, and mortality of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), with an estimated three million new cases per year in the United States. Yet diagnosing CDI remains problematic. The most commonly used test is stool enzyme immunoassay (EIA) detecting toxin A and/or B, but there are no clear guidelines specifying the optimal number of tests to be ordered in the diagnostic workup, although multiple tests are frequently ordered. Thus, we designed a study with the primary objective of evaluating the diagnostic utility of repeat second and third tests of stool EIA detecting both toxins A and B (EIA (A&B)) in cases with negative initial samples, and sought to describe the physicians' patterns of ordering this test in the workup of suspected CDI.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out using a database of all stool EIA (A&B) tests ordered for a presumptive diagnosis of CDI. All patients were adults admitted to a major teaching hospital over a three-and-a-half-year period (tests completed within 5 days of ordering the first test were grouped into a single episode, and only the first three samples per episode were analyzed). Age, gender, and results of stool EIA were tabulated. In addition, physicians' ordering patterns and proportion of positive stools relative to the number of tests ordered were also analyzed. A single positive EIA result was interpreted as evidence for the clinical presence of CDI.

RESULTS

A total of 3,712 patients contributed to 5,865 separate diarrhea episodes (total stool EIA (A&B)=9,178), and 1,165 (19.9%) of these episodes were positive for CDI. Of the positive patients, 73.2% were over the age of 65 years and 54.2% of them were females. The most frequent ordering pattern for presumptive CDI was a single stool test (60.1%), followed by two more tests (23.2%). Three tests were still ordered in 16.6% of the cases. Of the 1,165 positive cases, 1,046 (89.8%) were diagnosed in the very first test, 95 (8.2%) in the second, and only 24 (2.0%) in the third test. In 1,934 instances, a second test was ordered after an initial negative result, of which 95 (4.91%) became positive. In 793 episodes, a third test was ordered after two negative samples, of which only 24 (3.03%) became positive.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the low diagnostic yield of repeat stool EIA (A&B) testing. Findings strongly support the utility of limiting the workup of suspected CDI to a single stool test with only one repeat test in cases of high clinical suspicion, and avoiding the routine ordering of multiple stool samples. As Clostridium difficile is becoming an endemic health-care problem resulting in major financial burdens for the US health-care system, clear guidelines specifying the optimal number of stool EIA (A&B) tests to be ordered in the diagnostic workup of suspected CDI must be established to assist physicians in the practice of evidence-based medicine.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea, a frequent complication in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia

Diarrhoea occurs frequently in neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia receiving chemotherapy and may be caused by either infection- or drug-induced cytotoxicity. Since Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhoea in non-haematologic patients, we were interested in its incidence in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In this retrospective study, we analysed 134 patients with AML receiving a total of 301 chemotherapy courses. Diarrhoea occurred during 33% of all courses in 58 patients. C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) occurred in 18% of all patients and 9% of all treatment courses. Almost one third of diarrhoea episodes were caused by C. difficile. CDAD was associated with older age (58 vs. 50 years), number of antibiotics administered (2 vs. 1), duration of antibiotic therapy (7 vs. 4 days), ceftazidime as the antibiotic of choice (75% vs. 54%) and duration of neutropenia (12 vs. 7 days) prior to onset of diarrhoea. An increased risk for CDAD was seen for prolonged neutropenia. CDAD responded well to oral metronidazole and/or vancomycin and no patient died of this complication. In conclusion, CDAD is common in patients with AML receiving chemotherapy. C. difficile enterotoxin testing of stool specimens should be included in all symptomatic patients.

New agents for Clostridium difficile-associated disease

BACKGROUND

Clostridia-derived diseases, in particular C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD), have been increasing in incidence, severity, and morbidity. The mainstay of treatment options has relied upon metronidazole and vancomycin, but these treatments routinely result in high relapse rates (20%) and, in the case of metronidazole, decreasing efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate and compare the current clinical and preclinical therapies of CDAD.

METHODS

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

The new antibiotics in development and preclinical development reflect next-generation versions of older drugs or two new mechanism-of-action class drugs (OPT-80, REP3123). Based on the current preclinical and clinical data, the next-generation drugs impart only a subtle difference from the intrinsic weaknesses of their genre. In contrast, OPT-80 and REP3123 seem to be differentiated.

Renewed interest in a difficult disease: Clostridium difficile infections--epidemiology and current treatment strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renewed interest in Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) is stimulating research into the pathogenesis and virulence factors for this pathogen. This review summarizes recent progress in the field, particularly in relation to the changing epidemiologic trends and new investigational treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elucidation of the role of different toxins of C. difficile (tcdA, tcdB and binary toxin) is deepening our understanding of CDI. Stain typing of C. difficile isolates is documenting the spread of an emergent strain (BI/NAP1/027) associated with large outbreaks of severe disease. Typing of isolates around the world shows global spread of this strain. Reliance upon metronidazole is questioned due to a lower response rate and newer investigational therapies are reported.

SUMMARY

After being considered a manageable pathogen for decades, C. difficile recently caused large outbreaks of severe disease. Refocused research is determining patients who are at risk for CDI, what methods are more effective in diagnosing CDI and what new treatments may be effective. This article reviews the recent findings in the literature regarding this difficult and challenging pathogen.

Evaluation of enzyme immunoassays to detect Clostridium difficile toxin from anaerobic stool culture

Stool culture for Clostridium difficile, while necessary for strain typing and antimicrobial surveillance, cannot determine toxin production. We prospectively tested in triplicate 91 C difficile cultured isolates for toxin production by 2 enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Meridian Premier Toxins A&B, Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH; and TechLab Tox A/B II, TechLab, Blacksburg, VA) and cytotoxin neutralization bioassay (CTN). By CTN, 88% (80/91) were toxigenic. Reproducibility was 93% (85/91) for CTN, 80% (73/91) for Meridian EIA, and 79% (72/91) for TechLab EIA. Compared with CTN, sensitivities were 87.1% and 89.2% for the Meridian and TechLab EIAs, respectively. In an additional 115 stool specimens, CTN detected toxin more frequently from cultured isolates (96/115) than stool (84/115). For C difficile toxin detection from isolates, EIA was less reproducible than CTN. EIA methods can be falsely negative in 10% to 12% of isolates, and these should be tested by CTN or polymerase chain reaction. When positive, EIA is fast and reliable for detecting C difficile toxin from culture.

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review

Clostridium difficile can be a fatal hospital-acquired infection and its prevalence has increased. Accurate diagnosis of C difficile is essential for patient management, infection control, and for defining its epidemiology. We did a systematic review of commonly used commercial assays for detection of C difficile toxin (CDT) A and B in stool samples. By comparison of detection of CDT in cell culture with or without selective culture for C difficile, the median sensitivities and specificities (IQR) were as follows: Meridian Premier 0.95 (0.86-0.97) and 0.97 (0.95-0.98), TechLab Tox A/B II 0.83 (0.82-0.85) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), TechLab Tox A/B Quik Chek 0.84 (0.81-0.87) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00), Remel Xpect 0.82 (0.75-0.89) and 0.96 (0.95-0.98), Meridian Immunocard 0.90 (0.84-0.92) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), and BioMérieux VIDAS 0.76 and 0.93. If the prevalence of CDT A and B in stool samples is relatively low (<10%), the positive predictive value of these assays is unacceptably low (eg, <50% in some circumstances) and will vary depending on the assay and number of samples tested. This low positive predictive value impinges on clinical management, outbreaks, and makes epidemiological data unreliable. To improve diagnosis, we suggest a two-stage testing strategy for C difficile toxin with an initial highly sensitive rapid screening test to identify positive samples that are then confirmed by a reference method.

Evaluation of repeat Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay testing

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis, which have significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate and timely diagnosis is critical. Repeat enzyme immunoassay testing for C. difficile toxin has been recommended because of <100% sensitivity. All C. difficile tests between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for results and testing patterns. The Wampole C. difficile Tox A/B II enzyme immunoassay kit was used. There were a total of 8,256 tests from 3,112 patients; 49% of tests were repeated. Of the 3,749 initially negative patient tests, 96 were positive upon repeat testing within 10 days of the first test. Of repeat tests, 0.9% repeated on day 0 (same day as the first test), 1.8% on day 1, 3.8% on day 2, 2.6% on day 3, 5.4% on days 4 to 6, and 10.6% on days 7 to 10 were positive. Thirty-eight patients had a positive test within 48 h of an initial negative test, and based on chart review, 18 patients were treated empirically while 16 were treated following the new result. None had evidence of medical complications. Of initially positive patients, 91% were positive upon repeat testing on day 0, 75% on day 1, and 58% on day 2, to a low of 14% on days 7 to 10. Depending on the clinical setting, these data support not repeating C. difficile tests within 2 days of a negative result and limiting repeat testing to >/=1 week of a positive result.

Is a two-step glutamate dehyrogenase antigen-cytotoxicity neutralization assay algorithm superior to the premier toxin A and B enzyme immunoassay for laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile?

A two-step algorithm for the detection of Clostridium difficile by the use of C. Diff Quik Chek (TechLab, Blacksburg, VA) and a tissue culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay was found to be more sensitive than the widely used solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA), the Premier toxin A and B EIA (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH), and a newly developed, rapid single-test EIA for C. difficile toxins A and B (Tox A/B Quik Chek; TechLab).

Treatment strategies for recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

Clostridium difficile, the most common nosocomial infection of the GI tract, has become a bigger threat with the emergence of a hypervirulent strain. C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is usually a consequence of antibiotic therapy or chemotherapy, but sporadic cases occur, and an increase in severe sporadic cases is of great concern. Epidemics of CDAD with high morbidity and mortality have been documented in the USA, Canada and Europe, making accurate diagnosis, effective therapy and strategies for prevention more important than ever. Treatment of refractory and recurrent CDAD remain therapeutic challenges. Improved treatments are needed; several new drugs are currently in trials.