1
|
Böll B, Schalk E, Buchheidt D, Hasenkamp J, Kiehl M, Kiderlen TR, Kochanek M, Koldehoff M, Kostrewa P, Claßen AY, Mellinghoff SC, Metzner B, Penack O, Ruhnke M, Vehreschild MJGT, Weissinger F, Wolf HH, Karthaus M, Hentrich M. Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2020 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management, and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol 2021; 100:239-259. [PMID: 32997191 PMCID: PMC7782365 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04286-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Cancer patients frequently require central venous catheters for therapy and parenteral nutrition and are at high risk of central venous catheter-related infections (CRIs). Moreover, CRIs prolong hospitalization, cause an excess in resource utilization and treatment cost, often delay anti-cancer treatment, and are associated with a significant increase in mortality in cancer patients. We therefore summoned a panel of experts by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) and updated our previous guideline on CRIs in cancer patients. After conducting systematic literature searches on PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, video- and meeting-based consensus discussions were held. In the presented guideline, we summarize recommendations on definition, diagnosis, management, and prevention of CRIs in cancer patients including the grading of strength of recommendations and the respective levels of evidence. This guideline supports clinicians and researchers alike in the evidence-based decision-making in the management of CRIs in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Böll
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Enrico Schalk
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Medical Center, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Dieter Buchheidt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mannheim University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Justin Hasenkamp
- Clinic for Hematology and Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michael Kiehl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Frankfurt (Oder) General Hospital, Frankfurt/Oder, Germany
| | - Til Ramon Kiderlen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Vivantes Clinic Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Kochanek
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Koldehoff
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Philippe Kostrewa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Campus Fulda, Philipps-University Marburg, Fulda, Germany
| | - Annika Y Claßen
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sibylle C Mellinghoff
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Metzner
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Olaf Penack
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Ruhnke
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Helios Klinikum Aue, Aue, Germany
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Florian Weissinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Hans-Heinrich Wolf
- Department III of Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Hemostaseology, Südharzklinikum, Nordhausen, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology, Oncology & Palliative Care, Klinikum Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The immunocompromised host is a particularly vulnerable population in whom routine and unusual infections can easily and frequently occur. Prosthetic devices are commonly used in these patients and the infections associated with those devices present a number of challenges for both the microbiologist and the clinician. Biofilms play a major role in device-related infections, which may contribute to failed attempts to recover organisms from routine culture methods. Moreover, device-related microorganisms can be difficult to eradicate by antibiotic therapy alone. Changes in clinical practice and advances in laboratory diagnostics have provided significant improvements in the detection and accurate diagnosis of device-related infections. Disruption of the bacterial biofilm plays an essential role in recovering the causative agent in culture. Various culture and nucleic acid amplification techniques are more accurate to guide directed treatment regimens. This chapter reviews the performance characteristics of currently available diagnostic assays and summarizes published guidelines, where available, for addressing suspected infected prosthetic devices.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lamy B, Dargère S, Arendrup MC, Parienti JJ, Tattevin P. How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:697. [PMID: 27242721 PMCID: PMC4863885 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major cause of death in developed countries and the detection of microorganisms is essential in managing patients. Despite major progress has been made to improve identification of microorganisms, blood culture (BC) remains the gold standard and the first line tool for detecting BSIs. Consensus guidelines are available to ensure optimal BSI procedures, but BC practices often deviate from the recommendations. This review provides an update on clinical and technical issues related to blood collection and to BC performance, with a special focus on the blood sample strategy to optimize the sensitivity and specificity of BCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Lamy
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Montpellier Montpellier, France
| | | | - Maiken C Arendrup
- Unit for Mycology, Department of Microbiology & Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|