Spinal and paraspinal pneumococcal infections—a review

Streptococcus pneumoniae Spinal Epidural Abscess in an Immunocompetent Patient

Epidural abscesses are a rare diagnosis in immunocompetent patients. The most common risk factors linked with spinal epidural abscesses are intravenous drug use, diabetes mellitus, hepatitis, and iatrogenic factors like prior surgery and catheter usage. The thoracic and lumbar spine are the most common sites of these abscesses. Clinical presentation can include back pain, fever, and neurologic deterioration, with back pain occurring in almost two-thirds of patients. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common causative pathogen. We present a 50 male with no significant past medical or family history who presented with progressive back pain for greater than one week, chills and malaise. Cervical and lumbar spinal CT scans identified epidural abscesses at C6/7 and L5/S1. Blood cultures and surgical cultures from washout of the epidural space grew Streptococcus pneumoniae. The patient was treated successfully with a prolonged course of cefazolin for six weeks. S. pneumoniae is a rare cause of epidural abscesses, especially in patients with no known risk factors for invasive disease. This case demonstrates that invasive pneumococcal disease should remain on the differential diagnosis even in immunocompetent patients.

Epidural abscess secondary to Streptococcus pneumoniae. A case report and review of the literature

While spinal epidural abscess is a well described disease process, this condition is rarely caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. This case describes a case of spinal epidural abscess secondary to S. pneumoniae in an otherwise healthy, immunocompetent 61-year-old female without a history of spinal procedures, obvious source of hematogenous seeding, or clear risk factors for invasive pneumococcal infection. She was treated with IV and oral antibiotic therapy and made a full recovery.

Invasive pneumococcal disease: a diagnostic challenge due to multiple portals of causative bacteria

A 64-year-old woman was transferred to our hospital because of fever, painful swelling in upper jaw, back pain and dysuria. She was in shock and physical examinations revealed tenderness on maxillary sinus, cellulitis in the right foot, hypoesthesia in both lower extremities and groin, mild weakness in both lower extremities, and bladder and rectal dysfunctions. Blood examination showed elevated white cell count and C reactive protein, and urinalysis revealed urinary tract infection. Spinal MRI detected spondylodiscitis with epidural abscess. After detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae by cultures of blood and fluid from lumbar abscess, she was consequently diagnosed with invasive pneumococcal disease likely secondary to acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis. Pyogenic spondylitis or epidural abscess is a rare but serious complication of invasive pneumococcal disease. Furthermore, S. pneumoniae should be suspected as a causative organism when seeing a patient with severe infectious diseases complicated with sinusitis.

A rare aetiology of spinal epidural abscess

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) due to Streptococcus pneumoniae is a rare entity, but it is associated with high mortality. Here, we describe a rare case of pneumococcal SEA in an immunocompetent adult who presented with fever, lower back pain and paresis. Central nervous system examination revealed a decreased power in bilateral lower limbs. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine showed loculated pus collection in the epidural space at the level of L4-L5 vertebrae. Pus obtained following L4-L5 decompression along with blood cultures grew S. pneumoniae. The patient was treated with clindamycin and cefoperazone-sulbactam for 6 weeks, and no relapse was noted on 11 months follow-up.

Diagnostic challenges in pyogenic spinal infection: an expanded role for FDG-PET/CT

In a preliminary investigation of FDG-PET/CT for assessment of therapy response of pyogenic spine infection, it was concluded that activity confined to the margins of a destroyed or degenerated joint with bone-on-bone contact represents nonseptic inflammation, regardless of the intensity of uptake. Only activity in bone, soft tissue, or within the epidural space represents active infection. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the performance of these pattern-based interpretation criteria in a series of problem cases of proven or suspected spine infection. Eighty-two FDG-PET/CTs were done for initial diagnosis because other imaging failed to provide a definitive diagnosis and 147 FDG-PET/CTs were done to assess treatment responses. Pattern-based interpretations were compared with the clinical diagnosis based on bacterial cultures and outcomes after cessation or withholding of antibiotic therapy. Pattern-based interpretation criteria achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 98 and 100%, respectively, for initial diagnosis and a specificity of 100% for assessment of treatment response. The same data was analyzed using intensity of activity as the primary factor. Sensitivity and specificity using the intensity-based criteria were 93 and 68%, respectively, for initial diagnosis, and the specificity of a negative interpretation for therapy response was 55%. Differences from pattern-based criteria are highly significant. Pattern-based criteria perform well in problem cases with equivocal MR and for treatment response because they correctly eliminate activity from nonspecific inflammation associated with destroyed joints with bone-on-bone contact. Response occurs within a timeframe that is useful for managing antibiotic therapy.

Pneumococcal Vertebral Osteomyelitis after Epidural Injection: A Rare Event

Streptococcus pneumoniae vertebral infections have rarely been reported. Herein, we report a case of pneumococcal vertebral osteomyelitis with paraspinal and epidural abscesses as well as concomitant bacteremia following epidural injection. This will be the second case in the literature reporting pneumococcal vertebral osteomyelitis related to epidural manipulation.

Infected epidural hematoma of the lumbar spine associated with invasive pneumococcal disease

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) and spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) are neurologic emergencies with distinct etiologies and treatment. Despite similarities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), their differentiation is usually possible with meticulous history taking and neurologic examinations. We report an unusual case of SEA that developed from preceding SEH, posing a diagnostic challenge to physicians. A 65-year-old diabetic man suddenly experienced back pain and weakness of both legs when he lifted heavy luggage. He was afebrile, and his laboratory tests were mostly unremarkable. Spinal MRI consisting of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fat-suppressed T2-weighted images revealed an epidural mass over the L2-L4 spinous process. He was diagnosed with SEH based on his symptoms and MRI findings, and was treated conservatively using steroid pulse therapy. Despite initial improvement, he suddenly developed into septic shock and coma on the 10^th hospital day, and died shortly thereafter. An autopsy revealed massive pus accumulation in the lumbar epidural space and brain, and a postmortem diagnosis of infected SEH associated with invasive pneumococcal disease was established. Serial MRI studies, including diffusion-weighted and/or gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images are warranted in patients with a presumed diagnosis of SEH receiving steroid therapy to detect such infectious transformation.

Spinal epidural abscess

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) remains a relatively infrequent diagnosis. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common organism identified, and the infectious source in SEA emanates from skin and soft tissue infections in about 20 % of instances. The thoracic spine is most often involved followed by the lumbar spine. The classic triad of fever, spinal pain, and neurological deficit is present in but a minority of patients. The appearance of neurological deficits with SEA has a significant impact on the prognosis; therefore, early diagnosis is imperative. Magnetic resonance imaging has permitted earlier diagnosis, although significant delays in diagnosis are common due to the nonspecific symptoms that frequently attend the disorder. Due to the rarity of this condition, there have been few randomized controlled trials to evaluate new treatment strategies, and most recommendations regarding treatment are based on case series studies often derived from the experiences at a single center.