Rapid molecular diagnostic tests in patients with bacteremia: evaluation of their impact on decision making and clinical outcomes

Molecular rapid diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections: Nanopore targeted sequencing with pathogen-specific primers

BACKGROUND

Nanopore sequencing, known for real-time analysis, shows promise for rapid clinical infection diagnosis but lacks effective assays for bloodstream infections (BSIs).

METHODS

We prospectively assessed the performance of a novel nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) assay in identifying pathogens and predicting antibiotic resistance in BSIs, analyzing 387 blood samples from December 2021 to April 2023.

RESULTS

The positivity rate for NTS (69.5 %, 269/387) nearly matches that of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) (74.7 %, 289/387; p = 0.128) and surpasses the positivity rate of conventional blood culture (BC) (33.9 %, 131/387; p < 0.01). Frequent pathogens detected by NTS included Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 54), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 36), Escherichia coli (n = 36), Enterococcus faecium(n = 30), Acinetobacter baumannii(n = 26), Staphylococcus aureus(n = 23), and Human cytomegalovirus (n = 37). Against a composite BSI diagnostic standard, NTS demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 84.0 % (95 % CI 79.5 %-87.7 %) and 90.1 % (95 % CI 81.7 %-88.5 %), respectively. The concordance between NTS and mNGS results (the percentage of total cases where both either detected BSI-related pathogens or were both negative) was 90.2 % (359/387), whereas the consistency between NTS and BC was only 60.2 % (233/387). In 80.6 % (50/62) of the samples with identical pathogens identified by both NTS tests and BCs, the genotypic resistance identified by NTS correlated with culture-confirmed phenotypic resistance. Using NTS, 95 % of samples can be tested and analyzed in approximately 7 h, allowing for early patient diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

NTS is rapid, sensitive, and efficient for detecting BSIs and drug-resistant genes, making it a potential preferred diagnostic tool for early infection identification in critically ill patients.

Potential impact of real-time processing and rapid susceptibility testing of blood samples in Gram-negative bloodstream infections in intensive care patients

INTRODUCTION

Timely and appropriate therapy is critical in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSI). Most bacteriology laboratories process blood specimen in the daytime, during laboratory operating hours, and use conventional culture for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). We simulated the potential impact of real-time processing and rapid AST (7 hours) on early adaptation of the antibiotic regimen in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with GNBSI.

METHODS

All GNBSI episodes occurring in the ICUs of 2 hospitals in Paris were included. Data were collected. For each episode of bacteremia, we simulated the impact of three strategies: (1) Real-time processing coupled with conventional techniques (Gram stain and standard AST); (2) Standard processing coupled with rapid AST; and (3) Real-time processing coupled with rapid AST.

RESULTS

We included 109 episodes in 98 patients. Forty-two patients (48%) died during ICU stay. AST results led to a change of the antibiotic regimen in 66 (61%) episodes, mainly de-escalation (54/109, 55%). In standard care, median time from sample collection to definitive AST result was 65.9 hours (±26.7). The three strategies would have reduced time-to-result by 9.2 hours (±7.1), 30.8 hours (±19.7) and 40.0 hours (±20.6) respectively. Compared to standard care, strategies 1, 2 and 3 would have avoided 20, 69 and 90 patient-days of broad-spectrum antibiotics respectively.

CONCLUSION

In addition to real-time processing of blood samples, rapid AST would be the most effective strategy to shorten time-to-result in critical patients with GNBSI.

Assessing the Utility of Multiplexed Polymerase Chain Reaction in Detecting Microorganisms Causing Infections in Critically ill Patients

Early sepsis diagnosis is crucial for implementing adequate antibiotic therapy and for patient survival. This study investigated whether using multiplexed PCR for detecting microorganisms in critical septic patients affects initial antibiotic treatment and compared it to microbiological culture. It also explored scenarios where PCR is more effective in clinical practice. One hundred nineteen specimens (83 blood and 36 respiratory specimens) belonging to 93 patients were analyzed. Multiplexed PCR determinations were performed using the FA-BCID Panel (bioMérieux) for blood samples and the FA-Pneumo for respiratory samples. The mean turnaround times were 1.7 h for the FA-BCID and 1.5h for the FA-Pneumo. Conversely, they were 96.1 h for blood cultures and 72.3 h for respiratory cultures. FA-BCID showed a mean sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 100%. FA-Pneumo showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90%. However, the positive predictive value was only 39%. Discrepancies were common in polymicrobial samples. Based on the PCR results, initial empirical treatment should have been changed in 71% of patients with bloodstream infections and 61% with respiratory infections. We conclude that multiplexed PCR improves the response time in identifying germs with a high degree of coincidence for blood cultures and moderate for respiratory cultures. These results highlight the importance of PCR in choosing an appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Shortening identification times: comparative observational study of three early blood culture testing protocols

Background

While early appropriate antibiotic therapy is a proven means of limiting the progression of infections, especially bacteremia, empirical antibiotic therapy in sepsis is ineffective up to 30%. The aim of this study was to compare early blood culture testing protocols in terms of their ability to shorten the delay between blood sampling and appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Methods

In this french observational study, we compared three blood culture testing protocols. Positive blood cultures were tested using either GenMark ePlex panels (multiplex PCR period), a combination of MRSA/SA PCR, β-Lacta and oxidase tests (multitest period), or conventional identification and susceptibility tests only (reference period). Conventional identification and susceptibility tests were performed in parallel for all samples, as the gold standard.

Results

Among the 270 patients with positive blood cultures included, early and conventional results were in good agreement, especially for the multitest period. The delay between a blood culture positivity and initial results was 3.8 (2.9-6.9) h in the multiplex PCR period, 2.6 (1.3-4.5) h in the multitest period and 3.7 (1.8-8.2) h in the reference period (p<0.01). Antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted in 68 patients based on early analysis results. The proportion of patients receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy within 48 h of blood sampling was higher in the multiplex PCR and multitest periods, (respectively 90% and 88%) than in the reference period (71%).

Conclusion

These results suggest rapid bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance tests are feasible, efficient and can expedite appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Evaluation of XGEN Multi Sepsis Flow Chip Molecular Assay for Early Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infection

Among healthcare-associated infections that can affect a critically ill patient, bloodstream infections are one of the most frequent causes of mortality, especially in hospitalized patients. The objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of the XGEN Multi Sepsis Flow Chip for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections compared with conventional tests. In total, 101 positive blood culture samples were included, and the results obtained by the phenotypic conventional method (culture with susceptibility profile) were compared with results obtained by the XGEN Multi Sepsis Flow Chip. This molecular assay allows the simultaneous detection of the main bloodstream infection pathogens, and their most common antibiotic resistance markers in a short period of time. It was possible to observe substantial agreement between the methods for identifying the genus of pathogens. Considering species, the agreement was excellent. In relation to susceptibility, excellent agreement was noted between the detected resistance genes and susceptibility profile obtained through conventional antibiograms. The evaluated assay presented very early and satisfactory results for identification and detection of resistance genes of the main pathogens involved in bloodstream infections.

24/7 workflow for bloodstream infection diagnostics in microbiology laboratories: the first step to improve clinical management

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the impact of an uninterrupted workflow regarding blood cultures on turnaround time and antibiotic prescription.

METHODS

Monomicrobial episodes of bacteremia were retrospectively evaluated before and after a continuous 24/7 workflow was implemented in our clinical microbiology laboratory (pre- and post-intervention periods; PREIP and POSTIP). Primary outcome was the time from specimen collection to the first change in antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included the time from specimen collection to effective antibiotic therapy and to antibiotic susceptibility testing results (or turnaround time), as well as hospital length of stay and all-cause mortality at 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 548 episodes of bacteremia were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in PREIP and POSTIP regarding patient characteristics and causative bacteria. In POSTIP, the mean time to the first change in antibiotic therapy was reduced by 10.4 h (p<0.001). The time to effective antibiotic therapy and the turnaround time were respectively reduced by 4.8 h (p<0.001) and 5.1 h (p=0.006) in POSTIP. There was no difference in mean hospital length of stay or mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Around the clock processing of blood cultures allows for a reduction in turnaround time, which in turn reduces the delay until effective antibiotic therapy prescription.

A bacteraemia risk prediction model: development and validation in an emergency medicine population

OBJECTIVE

Design a risk model to predict bacteraemia in patients attended in emergency departments (ED) for an episode of infection.

METHODS

This was a national, prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of blood cultures (BC) collected from adult patients (≥ 18 years) attended in 71 Spanish EDs from October 1 2019 to March 31, 2020. Variables with a p value < 0.05 were introduced in the univariate analysis together with those of clinical significance. The final selection of variables for the scoring scale was made by logistic regression with selection by introduction. The results obtained were internally validated by dividing the sample in a derivation and a validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 4,439 infectious episodes were included. Of these, 899 (20.25%) were considered as true bacteraemia. A predictive model for bacteraemia was defined with seven variables according to the Bacteraemia Prediction Model of the INFURG-SEMES group (MPB-INFURG-SEMES). The model achieved an area under the curve-receiver operating curve of 0.924 (CI 95%:0.914-0.934) in the derivation cohort, and 0.926 (CI 95%: 0.910-0.942) in the validation cohort. Patients were then split into ten risk categories, and had the following rates of risk: 0.2%(0 points), 0.4%(1 point), 0.9%(2 points), 1.8%(3 points), 4.7%(4 points), 19.1% (5 points), 39.1% (6 points), 56.8% (7 points), 71.1% (8 points), 82.7% (9 points) and 90.1% (10 points). Findings were similar in the validation cohort. The cut-off point of five points provided the best precision with a sensitivity of 95.94%, specificity of 76.28%, positive predictive value of 53.63% and negative predictive value of 98.50%.

CONCLUSION

The MPB-INFURG-SEMES model may be useful for the stratification of risk of bacteraemia in adult patients with infection in EDs, together with clinical judgement and other variables independent of the process and the patient.

Rapid versus standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide treatment of bloodstream infection

BACKGROUND

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests are expected to reduce the time to clinically important results of a blood culture. This might enable clinicians to better target therapy to a person's needs, and thereby, improve health outcomes (mortality, length of hospital stay), and reduce unnecessary prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics; thereby reducing antimicrobial resistance rates.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of rapid susceptibility testing versus standard susceptibility testing for bloodstream infections (BSIs).

SEARCH METHODS

To identify studies with selected outcomes, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, and two trials registries, between 1987 and October 2020. We used 'bloodstream infection' and 'antimicrobial susceptibility tests' as search terms. We had no language or publication status limitations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (with a time-to-result of ≤ 8 hours) versus conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing in people with a BSI caused by any bacteria, as identified by a positive blood culture.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened references, full-text reports of potentially relevant studies, extracted data from the studies, and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreement was discussed and resolved with a third review author. For mortality, a dichotomous outcome, we extracted the number of events in each arm, and presented a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to compare rapid susceptibility testing to conventional methods. We used Review Manager 5.4 to meta-analyse the data. For other outcomes, which are time-to-event outcomes (time-to-discharge from hospital, time-to-first appropriate antibiotic change), we conducted qualitative narrative synthesis, due to heterogeneity of outcome measures.  MAIN RESULTS: We included six trials, with 1638 participants. For rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing compared to conventional methods, there was little or no difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.46; 6 RCTs, 1638 participants; low-certainty evidence). In subgroup analysis, for rapid genotypic or molecular antimicrobial susceptibility testing compared to conventional methods, there was little or no difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.49; 4 RCTs, 1074 participants; low-certainty evidence). For phenotypic rapid susceptibility testing compared to conventional methods, there was little or no difference in mortality between groups  (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.35; 2 RCTs, 564 participants; low-certainty evidence). In qualitative analysis, rapid susceptibility testing may make little or no difference in time-to-discharge (4 RCTs, 1165 participants; low-certainty evidence). In qualitative analysis, rapid genotypic susceptibility testing compared to conventional testing may make little or no difference in time-to-appropriate antibiotic (3 RCTs, 929 participants; low-certainty evidence). In subgroup analysis, rapid phenotypic susceptibility testing compared to conventional testing may improve time-to-appropriate antibiotic (RR -17.29, CI -45.05 to 10.47; 2 RCTs, 564 participants; low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The theoretical benefits of rapid susceptibility testing have not been demonstrated to directly improve mortality, time-to-discharge, or time-to-appropriate antibiotic in these randomized studies. Future large prospective studies should be designed to focus on the most clinically meaningful outcomes, and aim to optimize blood culture pathways.

Comprehensive Pathogen Identification, Antibiotic Resistance, and Virulence Genes Prediction Directly From Simulated Blood Samples and Positive Blood Cultures by Nanopore Metagenomic Sequencing

Bloodstream infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. We explored whether MinION nanopore sequencing could accelerate diagnosis, resistance, and virulence profiling prediction in simulated blood samples and blood cultures. One milliliter of healthy blood samples each from direct spike (sample 1), anaerobic (sample 2), and aerobic (sample 3) blood cultures with initial inoculation of ∼30 CFU/ml of a clinically isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae strain was subjected to DNA extraction and nanopore sequencing. Hybrid assembly of Illumina and nanopore reads from pure colonies of the isolate (sample 4) was used as a reference for comparison. Hybrid assembly of the reference genome identified a total of 39 antibiotic resistance genes and 77 virulence genes through alignment with the CARD and VFDB databases. Nanopore correctly detected K. pneumoniae in all three blood samples. The fastest identification was achieved within 8 h from specimen to result in sample 1 without blood culture. However, direct sequencing in sample 1 only identified seven resistance genes (20.6%) but 28 genes in samples 2–4 (82.4%) compared to the reference within 2 h of sequencing time. Similarly, 11 (14.3%) and 74 (96.1%) of the virulence genes were detected in samples 1 and 2–4 within 2 h of sequencing time, respectively. Direct nanopore sequencing from positive blood cultures allowed comprehensive pathogen identification, resistance, and virulence genes prediction within 2 h, which shows its promising use in point-of-care clinical settings.

Multicenter evaluation of a syndromic rapid multiplex PCR test for early adaptation of antimicrobial therapy in adult patients with pneumonia

Background

Improving timeliness of pathogen identification is crucial to allow early adaptation of antibiotic therapy and improve prognosis in patients with pneumonia. We evaluated the relevance of a new syndromic rapid multiplex PCR test (rm-PCR) on respiratory samples to guide empirical antimicrobial therapy in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP).

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in four French university hospitals. Respiratory samples were obtained from patients with clinical and radiological signs of pneumonia and simultaneously tested using conventional microbiological methods and the rm-PCR. A committee composed of an intensivist, a microbiologist, and an infectious diseases specialist retrospectively assessed all medical files and agreed on the most appropriate antimicrobial therapy for each pneumonia episode, according to the results of rm-PCR and blinded to the culture results. The rm-PCR-guided antimicrobial regimen was compared to the empirical treatment routinely administered to the patient in standard care.

Results

We included 159 pneumonia episodes. Most patients were hospitalized in intensive care units (n = 129, 81%), and episodes were HAP (n = 68, 43%), CAP (n = 54, 34%), and VAP (n = 37, 23%). Conventional culture isolated ≥ 1 microorganism(s) at significant level in 95 (60%) patients. The syndromic rm-PCR detected at least one bacteria in 132 (83%) episodes. Based on the results of the rm-PCR, the multidisciplinary committee proposed a modification of the empirical therapy in 123 (77%) pneumonia episodes. The modification was a de-escalation in 63 (40%), an escalation in 35 (22%), and undetermined in 25 (16%) patients. In microbiologically documented episodes (n = 95), the rm-PCR increased appropriateness of the empirical therapy to 83 (87%), as compared to 73 (77%) in routine care.

Conclusions

Use of a syndromic rm-PCR test has the potential to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial exposure and increase the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy in adult patients with pneumonia.

Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) for positive blood cultures in clinical practice using a total lab automation

Our objective was to evaluate EUCAST’s ‘rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing’ (RAST) directly from positive blood culture that delivers antimicrobial results within 6 h for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using total lab automation. Zone diameters from RAST were compared with MIC results. Furthermore, its influence on time to report was investigated. RAST was performed to all positive aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles by subculturing them, i.e. onto Mueller-Hinton agar and adding six antibiotic discs covering Gram-negative and Gram-positive therapy (cefoxitin, ampicillin, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and ciprofloxacin). RAST was automatically imaged after 6 h. Zone sizes were measured using a TLA software tool and interpreted according to EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Bacteria were identified using MALDI-TOF MS and MIC results were determined using Vitek2 panels. Categorial agreement between agar diffusion and MIC results was investigated. Additionally, time to RAST and time to Vitek were compared for 100 isolates (20 per species). Between November 2018 and April 2019, 3313 positive mono-bacterial blood culture bottles were collected of which 894 bottles with RAST-validated species were investigated. Among these bottles, 2029 individual antibiotic measurements were compared with MIC results from Vitek2 and 14 very major, 28 major and 12 minor errors were found. A median reduction of 17:30 h in time to report was observed. Introduction of RAST with automatic TLA imaging function could reduce time to report by 17:30 h. Excellent accordance between zone diameter and MIC results, particularly for cefoxitin, vancomycin and meropenem, was observed, but drawbacks due to ATU were seen.

Clinical relevance of in vitro synergistic activity of antibiotics for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to investigate the outcomes of patients infected with multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria following synergy-guided antibiotic combination therapy (SGACT).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. Published studies of any design reporting outcomes of patients with MDR Gram-negative bacteria treated with SGACT were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the relevancy and quality of the retrieved articles and extracted the available data.

RESULTS

Nineteen reports (530 patients) were included. Eleven case reports/series described 26 cases of systemic infection due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria treated with SGACT. Five deaths were reported, two of which were attributed to the infection. Six studies (including one randomised controlled trial) provided comparative data for patients treated with SGACT and those treated with unguided combination therapy (UCT) or active monotherapy. In the pooled analysis of unadjusted data from these studies (504 patients), there was no difference between SGACT and UCT or monotherapy (OR=0.47, 95% CI 0.21-1.04; I²=52%). Analysis of adjusted data showed that SGACT was significantly associated with survival (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.98; I²=54%).

CONCLUSION

These limited but promising findings warrant further investigation of SGACT in the outcome of patients with MDR Gram-negative infections in well-designed trials.

Impact of infectious diseases consultation on the outcome of patients with bacteraemia

Bacteraemia or bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with much morbidity and mortality. Management of patients with bacteraemia is complex, and the increase in immunosuppressed patients and multidrug-resistant organisms poses additional challenges. The objective of this review is to assess the available published information about the impact of different aspects of management on the outcome of patients with BSI, and, specifically, the importance of infectious diseases specialists (IDS) consultation. The impact of management by IDS on different aspects, including interpretation of newer rapid techniques, early evaluation and treatment, and follow up, are reviewed. Overall, the available data suggest that IDS intervention improves the management and outcome of patients with BSI, either through consultation or structured unsolicited interventions in the context of multidisciplinary bacteraemia programmes.

Rapid Diagnostics for Blood Cultures: Supporting Decisions for Antimicrobial Therapy and Value-Based Care

Bacteremia and sepsis are critically important syndromes with high mortality, morbidity, and associated costs. Bloodstream infections and sepsis are among the top causes of mortality in the US, with >600 deaths each day. Most septic patients can be found in emergency medicine departments or critical care units, settings in which rapid administration of targeted antibiotic therapy can reduce mortality. Unfortunately, routine blood cultures are not rapid enough to aid in the decision of therapeutic intervention at the onset of bacteremia. As a result, empiric, broad-spectrum treatment is common-a costly approach that may fail to target the correct microbe effectively, may inadvertently harm patients via antimicrobial toxicity, and may contribute to the evolution of drug-resistant microbes. To overcome these challenges, laboratorians must understand the complexity of diagnosing and treating septic patients, focus on creating algorithms that rapidly support decisions for targeted antibiotic therapy, and synergize with existing emergency department and critical care clinical practices put forth in the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines.

Comparison of the Fully Automated FilmArray BCID Assay to a 4-Hour Culture Test Coupled to Mass Spectrometry for Day 0 Identification of Microorganisms in Positive Blood Cultures

Rapid bacterial identification of positive blood culture is important for adapting the antimicrobial therapy in patients with blood stream infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the multiplex FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) assay by comparison to an in-house protocol based on MALDI-TOF MS identification of microcolonies after a 4-hour culture, for identifying on the same day the microorganisms present in positive blood culture bottles. One hundred and fifty-three positive bottles from 123 patients were tested prospectively by the 3 techniques of bacterial identification: 11 bottles yielding negative results by the 3 tests were considered false positive (7.2%). The reference MALDI-TOF MS technique identified 134 monomicrobial (87.6%) and 8 double infections (5.2%), which resulted in a total of 150 microorganisms. Globally, 137 (91.3%) of these 150 pathogens were correctly identified by the fully automated multiplex FilmArray BCID system at the species or genus level on day of growth detection, versus 117 (78.8%) by MALDI-TOF MS identification on nascent microcolonies after a 4-hour culture (P < 0.01). By combining the two approaches, 140 (93.5%) of the positive bottles were identified successfully at day 0. These results confirm the excellent sensitivity of the FilmArray BCID assay, notably in case of multimicrobial infection. Due to the limited number of targets included into the test, it must be coupled to another identification strategy, as that presented in this study relying on MALDI-TOF MS identification of microcolonies obtained after a very short culture period.

DNA extraction from primary liquid blood cultures for bloodstream infection diagnosis using whole genome sequencing

PURPOSE

Speed of bloodstream infection diagnosis is vital to reduce morbidity and mortality. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) performed directly from liquid blood culture could provide single-assay species and antibiotic susceptibility prediction; however, high inhibitor and human cell/DNA concentrations limit pathogen recovery. We develop a method for the preparation of bacterial DNA for WGS-based diagnostics direct from liquid blood culture.

METHODOLOGY

We evaluate three commercial DNA extraction kits: BiOstic Bacteraemia, Amplex Hyplex and MolYsis Plus. Differential centrifugation, filtration, selective lysis and solid-phase reversible immobilization bead clean-up are tested to improve human cells/DNA and inhibitor removal. Using WGS (Illumina/MinION), we assess human DNA removal, pathogen recovery, and predict species and antibiotic susceptibility inpositive blood cultures of 44 Gram-negative and 54 Staphylococcus species.Results/Key findings. BiOstic kit extractions yield the greatest mean DNA concentration, 94-301 ng µl^-1, versus 0-2.5 ng µl^-1 using Amplex and MolYsis kits. However, we note higher levels of inhibition (260/280 ratio 0.9-2.1) and human DNA (0.0-4.4×10⁶ copies) in BiOstic extracts. Differential centrifugation (2000 g, 1 min) prior to BiOstic extraction reduces human DNA by 63-89 % with selective lysis minimizing by a further 62 %. Post-extraction bead clean-up lowers inhibition. Overall, 67 % of sequenced samples (Illumina MiSeq) contain <10 % human DNA, with >93 % concordance between WGS-based species and susceptibility predictions and clinical diagnosis. If >60 % of sequencing reads are human (7/98 samples) susceptibility prediction becomes compromised. Novel MinION-based WGS (n=9) currently gives rapid species identification but not susceptibility prediction.

CONCLUSION

Our method for DNA preparation allows WGS-based diagnosis direct from blood culture bottles, providing species and antibiotic susceptibility prediction in a single assay.

Cumulative Effect of an Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostic Testing Bundle on Early Streamlining of Antimicrobial Therapy in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) enhances antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions in optimization of antimicrobial therapy. This quasi-experimental cohort study evaluated the combined impact of an ASP/RDT bundle on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) and time to de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents (BSAA) in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSI). The ASP/RDT bundle consisted of system-wide GNBSI treatment guidelines, prospective stewardship monitoring, and sequential introduction of two RDTs, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel. The preintervention period was January 2010 through December 2013, and the postintervention period followed from January 2014 through June 2015. The postintervention period was conducted in two phases; phase 1 followed the introduction of MALDI-TOF MS, and phase 2 followed the introduction of the FilmArray BCID panel. The interventions resulted in significantly improved appropriateness of EAT (95% versus 91%; P = 0.02). Significant reductions in median time to de-escalation from combination antimicrobial therapy (2.8 versus 1.5 days), antipseudomonal beta-lactams (4.0 versus 2.5 days), and carbapenems (4.0 versus 2.5 days) were observed in the postintervention compared to the preintervention period (P < 0.001 for all). The reduction in median time to de-escalation from combination therapy (1.0 versus 2.0 days; P = 0.03) and antipseudomonal beta-lactams (2.2 versus 2.7 days; P = 0.04) was further augmented during phase 2 compared to phase 1 of the postintervention period. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program and RDT intervention bundle in a multihospital health care system is associated with improved appropriateness of EAT for GNBSI and decreased utilization of BSAA through early de-escalation.

Performance of microbial identification by MALDI-TOF MS and susceptibility testing by VITEK 2 from positive blood cultures after minimal incubation on solid media

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a leading cause of patient morbidity and mortality. Rapid identification of organisms from BSIs is critical for initiating targeted antimicrobial therapy. Although many methods exist for rapid identification, they do not provide detailed or definitive susceptibility information. We assessed the utility of both the VITEK MS and Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers to identify organisms from a positive blood culture bottle after only 4 h of growth on solid media compared to identification from overnight growth using the VITEK MS. Additionally, we determined whether this limited growth could yield accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results compared to overnight growth using the VITEK 2 AST system. Overall, identifications using the VITEK MS and Biotyper had agreements of 127/150 (84%) and 133/150 (88%), respectively. For rapid AST, the overall categorical agreement was 1010/1017 (99.3%), where Gram-negative bacteria had concordant results for 743/750 (99.1%) organism-drug combinations and Gram-positive bacteria had concordant results for 265/267 (99.3%). Gram-negative bacteria had 4, 2, and 1 minor, major, and very major discrepancies, respectively, while Gram-positive bacteria had no minor errors, one major, and one very major discrepancy. In conclusion, organisms grown for only 4 h on solid media were accurately identified by MALDI-TOF MS and have concordant phenotypic AST profiles. This method can also be implemented using common commercial instruments, providing a way to improve upon identification and gain detailed susceptibility information without significant additional laboratory costs.

Evaluation of the Sepsis Flow Chip assay for the diagnosis of blood infections

Background

Blood infections are serious complex conditions that generally require rapid diagnosis and treatment. The big challenge is to reduce the time necessary to make a diagnosis with current clinical microbiological methods so as to improve the treatment given to patients.

Methods

In this study, we assess for the first time the Sepsis Flow Chip assay, which is a novel diagnostic assay for simultaneous rapid-detection of the vast majority of bloodstream pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, in the same assay, and for the detection of most common antibiotic resistance genes. The SFC assay is based on multiplex PCR and low density DNA arrays.

Results

Positive blood cultures from 202 consecutive bacteremia patients were analyzed by SFC assay and the results were compared with the results obtained by the gold standard methodology used in clinical microbiology diagnostic laboratories (EUCAST guidelines). SFC assay overall sensitivity and specificity for bacterial identification were 93.3% and 100% respectively and sensitivity and specificity for the identification of antibiotic genetic resistance determinants were 93.6% and 100% respectively.

Conclusions

This is the first evaluation of SFC assay in clinical samples. This new method appears to be very promising by combining the high number of distinct pathogens and genetic resistance determinants identified in a single assay. Further investigations should be done to evaluate the usefulness of this assay in combination with clinical multidisciplinary groups (stewardship), in order for the results to be applied appropriately to the management of patients`infectious processes.

Case report: when two and ½ men go camping…

Background

In patients, rapid identification of bacterial species may help to guide treatment at early stages. New protocols for the identification directly from positive blood culture flasks significantly helped in the presented case report.

Case presentation

Two patients (a father and son) presented with diarrhea, malaise, and fever of 3 to 4 days duration. Blood cultures from both patients cultured short Gram-positive rods. MALDI-TOF based rapid identification protocol direct from positive blood culture identified Listeria monocytogenes as the cause of sepsis and could be confirmed with conventional methods. Listeria monocytogenes was identified 24 h later by conventional biochemical identification methods (VITEK 2). Antibiotic treatment was adjusted early in response to the MALDI-TOF based identification of bacteremia. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis confirmed the suspected relatedness of the father’s and son’s isolates.

Conclusions

MALDI-TOF based may provide a rapid identification of bacterial species directly from positive blood culture.

The Added Cost of Rapid Diagnostic Testing and Active Antimicrobial Stewardship: Is It Worth It?

Rapid diagnostic testing reduces the turnaround time for pathogen identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory, but the impact on patient care and hospital costs is a matter of speculation. Patel et al. (J. Clin. Microbiol. 55:60-67, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01452-16) investigate the impact of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in conjunction with active antimicrobial stewardship to determine if implementation is indeed worth the added costs.

Implementation of a Pharmacist-Directed Antimicrobial Stewardship Protocol Utilizing Rapid Diagnostic Testing

Background: Rapid identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants from blood cultures can reduce the time to optimal antibiotic therapy. Objective: This study evaluates the use of technology to rapidly identify gram-positive bacteria in combination with a pharmacist-directed antimicrobial stewardship protocol in a tertiary-care facility. Methods: Rapid diagnostic testing was performed on gram-positive blood cultures. Pharmacists were instructed to notify prescribers of results and recommend appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on targeted treatment chart. The primary outcomes were mean time to optimal antibiotic therapy, mean time antibiotics were avoided before traditional culture results, and percent of patients with time to optimal antibiotic therapy reached in less than or equal to 2 hours. Results: Inclusion criteria were met for 297 patients. Mean time to identify bacteria was 26.8 hours with nucleic acid assay versus 75.3 hours with traditional culture (difference = 48.5 hours, p < .0001). The rapid identification of gram-positive bacteria combined with accepted pharmacist intervention improved time to optimal antibiotic therapy (8.4 vs 15.4 hours, p = .0095). When contaminants were identified, antibiotics were avoided for 39.5 hours before traditional culture with pharmacist intervention versus 37.2 hours (p > .05). Antibiotic change occurred in less than or equal to 2 hours in more patients in the pharmacist intervention group (28% vs 10.5%, p = .0002). Conclusions: Rapid identification combined with pharmacist intervention significantly improved time to optimal antibiotic therapy and significantly increased the number of patients receiving optimal antibiotic therapy in less than or equal to 2 hours over rapid identification alone. A pharmacist-directed protocol combined with rapid identification enhanced antimicrobial stewardship.

Impact of MALDI-TOF-MS-based identification directly from positive blood cultures on patient management: a controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Rapid identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures (BC) in combination with an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) is associated with improved antibiotic treatment and outcomes, but the effect of each individual intervention is less clear. The current study investigated the impact of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) versus conventional identification on antibiotic management in a setting with a well-established ASP and low resistance rates.

METHODS

In this single-centre open label, controlled clinical trial 425 patients with positive BCs were allocated by weekday during a 1-year period to either MALDI-TOF directly from positive BCs or conventional processing. ASP was identical throughout the study period. The primary outcome was duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy and was analysed in an intention-to-treat approach.

RESULTS

In all, 368 patients were analysed (MALDI-TOF n = 168; conventional n = 200) with similar baseline characteristics. Mean duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy (12.9 versus 13.2 days, p 0.9) and length of stay (16.1 versus 17.9 days, p 0.3) were comparable. In the clinically significant bloodstream infection subgroup (n = 242) mean time from Gram-stain to active treatment was significantly shorter (3.7 versus 6.7 h, p 0.003). Admission to the intensive care unit after bloodstream infection onset was less frequent in the MALDI-TOF group (23.1 versus 37.2%, p 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid identification of contaminated BCs (n = 126) resulted in a shorter duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy (mean 4.8 versus 7.5 days, p 0.04). Rapid identification using MALDI-TOF directly from positive BCs did not impact on duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy, but provided fast and reliable microbiological results and may improve treatment quality in the setting of an established ASP.