Barriers and facilitators and the need for a clinical guideline for microbiological diagnostic testing in the hospital: a qualitative and quantitative study

Self-perceived knowledge, influencing factors and proposed educational interventions for diagnostic stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: The experience of Irish paediatric doctors

BACKGROUND

Lab users should display an understanding of microbiology tests and avoid inappropriate requests which may yield negative clinical consequences. Our research addressed diagnostic stewardship education and the perspectives of paediatric hospital doctors on their (1) self-perceived knowledge, (2) motivators for test ordering, (3) proposed educational interventions and (4) preferred teaching modalities.

METHODS

An anonymous, mixed-methods, 34-item online questionnaire was distributed to paediatric doctors across three Irish hospital sites from March to May 2023. Descriptive statistics summarised Likert-scale responses and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse open-ended items. Subgroup analyses examined differences between consultants and non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs).

RESULTS

The analysis included 100 respondents (n = 45 consultants, n = 55 NCHDs, 24% response rate). Consultants scored higher than NCHDs in self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Patient comorbidity, clinical status, local guidelines and accuracy of microbiological tests were the strongest motivators for test-ordering. Consultants were more likely to be influenced by accuracy (p = 0.03), costs (p = 0.01) and laboratory workload (p = 0.01). Only 27% reported formal teaching on diagnostic stewardship. NCHDs demonstrated increased willingness to engage in educational interventions (p = 0.024), and a comparatively higher interest in in-person teaching (p = 0.002) and gamification (p = 0.02). Respondents indicated a preference for formal guidelines on microbiology testing, in-person teaching, cost familiarisation and e-learning modules. Novel methods (peer-to-peer programmes, simulation and gamification) were less favoured. Dominant themes included; collaborative learning, increased microbiology presence, accessibility to education, barriers and administrative issues.

CONCLUSION

Formal diagnostic stewardship educational programmes should be integrated into post-graduate curriculums for both NCHDs and consultants. Focuses for educational interventions include; development of local diagnostic stewardship guidelines, teaching on the cost and accuracy of microbiology tests, senior supervision and role-modelling.

The pre-analytical process management status and influencing factors of laboratory test before prescribing antimicrobial in developing country

INTRODUCTION

The results of laboratory testing are crucial basis for clinicians to prescribe antimicrobial. Laboratory testing is a highly complex process, and increasing evidence suggests that errors and obstacles in the pre-analytical process (PP) will affect reasonable antimicrobial use. However, PP was an easily neglected link in hospital infection management and the current situation of it and the influencing factors of management are not clear.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the department of clinical, specimen collection, transportation, and inspection in 109 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Central China. The rate of antimicrobial susceptibility test request (AST) and related indexes of above departments were calculated to describe the situation. Management characteristics (frequency of training etc.) were described as proportions and fractional probit regression analysis was used to determine the influencing factors.

RESULTS

The average rate of non restricted-use antimicrobial was 63%, the restricted-use was 86%, the special-use was 95%. The zero obstacle rate of specimen collection was 27.3%, of specimen transportation was 19.4% and of inspection feedback was 61.7%. There was a difference between the secondary and tertiary hospitals on non restricted-use (X² = 22.968, P < 0.001); restricted-use (X² = 29.466, P < 0.001); special-use (X² = 27.317, P < 0.001). Taking non restricted-use as an example, training (OR = 0.312, 95%CI: 0.148,0.429), low-frequency appraisal (OR = 0.153, 95%CI: 0.082,0.224), guidance (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.237,0.403) and information technology (OR = 0.104, 95%CI: 0.009,0.199) were positive factors.

CONCLUSIONS

There were substantial differences in the rate of AST request in clinical department between secondary and tertiary hospitals. The zero obstacle rate in collection, transportation and inspection department were still low. In most departments, training and performance appraisal were positive factors, guidance and information technology were positive supporting factors.

Guideline Adherence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Could Be Improved among General Practitioners in The Netherlands: A Survey Study

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a common finding in certain populations. This study assessed general practitioners’ (GPs’) knowledge about ASB and their current clinical practice regarding urine testing. Methods: An online survey was used for GPs in the Netherlands from October to December 2020. Results: In total, 99 surveys were included in the analyses. All GPs strongly agreed with the statements about their knowledge and self-confidence regarding urine diagnostics and treatment of ASB. The median knowledge score was 4 out of 6 (IQR 2 to 6). Most GPs (64 of 92; 70%) followed the guideline for the choice of urine diagnostics and reported appropriate indications for urine testing. However, 71/94 (75.5%) GPs would treat patients for ASB if they have diabetes mellitus. Further, 34 (37%) of 92 participants would inappropriately repeat a urine test after a patient was treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI). One-third of the GPs responded that ASB was insufficiently addressed within the guidelines for UTI. Conclusion: These results indicate that knowledge about ASB could be improved in primary care in the Netherlands, mainly in diabetic patients that have ASB, as well as for follow-up tests after treatment for UTI.

Provider views on rapid diagnostic tests and antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are often inappropriately treated with antibiotics. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed with the aim of improving antibiotic prescribing but uptake remains low. The aim of this study was to examine provider knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding RDT use and their relationship to antibiotic prescribing decisions across multiple clinical departments in an urban safety-net hospital.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods sequential explanatory study. Providers with prescribing authority (attending physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) who had at least 20 RTI encounters from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Eighty-five providers completed surveys and 16 participated in interviews. We conducted electronic surveys via RedCap from April to July 2019, followed by semi-structured individual interviews from October to December 2019, to ascertain knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to RDT use and antibiotic prescribing.

RESULTS

Survey findings indicated that providers felt knowledgeable about antibiotic prescribing guidelines. They reported high familiarity with the rapid streptococcus and rapid influenza tests. Familiarity with comprehensive respiratory panel PCR (RPP-respiratory panel PCR) and procalcitonin differed by clinical department. Qualitative interviews identified four main themes: providers trust their clinical judgment more than rapid test results; patient-provider relationships play an important role in prescribing decisions; there is patient demand for antibiotics and providers employ different strategies to address the demand and providers do not believe RDTs are implemented with sufficient education or evidence for clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Prescribers are knowledgeable about prescribing guidelines but often rely on clinical judgement to make final decisions. The utility of RDTs is specific to the type of RDT and the clinical department. Given the low familiarity and clinical utility of RPP and procalcitonin, providers may require additional education and these tests may need to be implemented differently based on clinical department.

Impact of the implementation of a standard for preanalytical handling of samples for microbiological diagnostics on the quality of results at a neurocritical care unit

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programs intend to improve outcomes of nosocomial infections and to counteract the emergence of further antimicrobial resistances. At the anesthesiologic-neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Medical Center Regensburg (Germany) we implemented a standard operating procedure (SOP) with clear instructions for the preanalytical handling and storage of microbiological samples. We intended to find out whether the instructions given in the SOP led to a higher rate of ideal material being sent to the laboratory and to overall better quality of the received results.We retraced retrospectively all samples taken in cases of suspected pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bloodstream infection, catheter infection associated with a central venous or arterial catheter and ventriculitis due to external ventricular drainage as well as all smears taken for the screening for multi-resistant bacteria within a time period of 1 year before to 1 year after the implementation of the SOP.In the case of suspected pneumonia and urinary tract infection, large amounts of ideal material were sent to the microbiological laboratory. A remarkable improvement after the implementation of the SOP, however, could only be observed regarding the number of urine samples taken from older urinary catheters, which was significantly lower in the "SOP group". Samples for microbiological diagnostics were taken much more often in the daytime, although storage of the probes did not lead to worse results.Concrete instructions enable adequate preanalytical handling of microbiological probes. However, we could not recognize substantial improvements probably due to a preexisting high process quality on the ICU. Microbiological diagnostics during the night shift has to be improved.

Fundamentals and implementation of Microbiological Diagnostic Stewardship Programs

Microbiological diagnostic stewardship programs promote coordinated measures aimed at optimizing the use of diagnostic techniques, thus favouring the adoption of adequate and cost-effective therapeutic, clinical and preventive decisions. The implementation of microbiological diagnostic stewardship relies upon the creation of multidisciplinary committees led by clinical microbiologists for the design of diagnostic algorithms, the adequacy of the laboratory computer system to monitor the relevance of the requested diagnostic tests, the implementation of a quality control system, the design and performance of studies of cost-effectiveness, the training of the petitioner and the technical and nursing staff and the continuous evaluation of the program. The incorporation of microbiological diagnostic stewardship in routine care reports tangible benefits for the patient while strengthening the pivotal role of the clinical microbiologist in the management of infectious diseases.

Low Uptake of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Respiratory Tract Infections in an Urban Safety Net Hospital

Background

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed with the aim of providing accurate results in a timely manner. Despite this, studies report that provider uptake remains low.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of ambulatory, urgent care, and emergency department (ED) encounters at an urban safety net hospital with a primary diagnosis of an upper or lower respiratory tract infection (eg, bronchitis, pharyngitis, acute sinusitis) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We collected RDT type and results, antibiotics prescribed, demographic and clinical patient information, and provider demographics.

Results

RDT use was low; a test was performed at 29.5% of the 33494 visits. The RDT most often ordered was the rapid Group A Streptococcus (GAS) test (n = 7352), predominantly for visits with a discharge diagnosis of pharyngitis (n = 5818). Though antibiotic prescription was more likely if the test was positive (relative risk [RR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58–1.8), 92.46% of streptococcal pharyngitis cases with a negative test were prescribed an antibiotic. The Comprehensive Respiratory Panel (CRP) was ordered in 2498 visits; influenza was the most commonly detected pathogen. Physicians in the ED were most likely to order a CRP. Antibiotic prescription was lower if the CRP was not ordered compared with a negative CRP result (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.7–0.84). There was no difference in prescribing by CRP result (negative vs positive).

Conclusions

RDTs are used infrequently in the outpatient setting, and impact on prescribing was inconsistent. Further work is needed to determine barriers to RDT use and to address potential solutions.