Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) directly from blood culture bottles

Using the CLSI rAST breakpoints of Enterobacterales in positive blood cultures

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to provide the clinic with rapid and accurate results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the treatment of patients with bloodstream infections. To achieve this, we applied the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) blood culture direct rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (rAST) to assess the susceptibility of the most common Enterobacterales found in blood cultures.

METHODS

In this study, we utilized the CLSI blood culture direct rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test to assess the susceptibility (rAST) of the most common Enterobacterales present in blood cultures. We chose this method for its simplicity in analysis, and our aim was to predict minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) using the rAST. As a benchmark, we assumed that Broth Macrodilution method (BMD) results were 100% accurate. For data evaluation, we employed the terms categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), and major errors (ME).

RESULTS

Our findings demonstrate that the CLSI rAST method is reliable for rapidly determining the in vitro susceptibility of Enterobacterales to common antimicrobial drugs in bloodstream infections. We achieved a concordance rate of 90% in classification within a 10-hour timeframe. We identified a total of 112 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) strains, and there was no significant difference in the detection rate of CRE at 6, 10, and 16 hours. This suggests that CRE can be identified as early as 6 hours.

CONCLUSION

The CLSI rAST is a valuable tool that can be utilized in clinical practice to quickly determine the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to antimicrobial drugs within 10 hours. This capability can greatly assist in the clinical management of patients with bloodstream infections.

Implementation of the EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (RAST) for carbapenemase/ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, and its effect on mortality

OBJECTIVES

With the rise in antimicrobial resistance, there is a growing demand for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST). In this study, we applied the EUCAST RAST method to ESBL/carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates without using advanced identification systems and analysed the effect of this method on mortality rates Also the clinical impact of this method on patients infected with these bacteria and its effect on mortality rates were investigated.

METHODS

RAST was used for clinical blood cultures containing carbapenemase/ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae without advanced identification systems (e.g. MALDI TOF), with preliminary identification by simple diagnostic tests (predicted RAST, or p-RAST), and its categorical agreement was investigated. The impact of the method on mortality was analysed by comparing the clinical data of patients whose blood cultures were subject to p-RAST (p-RAST group, n = 49) and those who were not subject to p-RAST (non-RAST group, n = 145).

RESULTS

p-RAST results were analysed based on 539 antibiotic-bacteria combinations. Total error rates at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were 2.9%, 3.9% and 3.8%, respectively. In the p-RAST group, patients who did not receive appropriate antibiotics (29/45, 59.1%) were switched to appropriate treatment within 8 h at the latest. In contrast, in the non-RAST group, treatment of patients who received inappropriate antibiotics (79/145, 54.5%) could be changed after at least 24 h. Mortality rates were lower in the p-RAST group than in the non-RAST group (28.6% versus 51.7%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

p-RAST can be used safely in hospital laboratories with high rates of antimicrobial resistance and can reduce mortality rates by shortening the transition time to appropriate treatment.

Bacterial Infections in Intensive Care Units: Epidemiological and Microbiological Aspects

Intensive care units constitute a critical setting for the management of infections. The patients' fragilities and spread of multidrug-resistant microorganisms lead to relevant difficulties in the patients' care. Recent epidemiological surveys documented the Gram-negative bacteria supremacy among intensive care unit (ICU) infection aetiologies, accounting for numerous multidrug-resistant isolates. Regarding this specific setting, clinical microbiology support holds a crucial role in the definition of diagnostic algorithms. Eventually, the complete patient evaluation requires integrating local epidemiological knowledge into the best practice and the standardization of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Clinical laboratories usually receive respiratory tract and blood samples from ICU patients, which express a significant predisposition to severe infections. Therefore, conventional or rapid diagnostic workflows should be modified depending on patients' urgency and preliminary colonization data. Additionally, it is essential to complete each microbiological report with rapid phenotypic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and information about resistance markers. Microbiologists also help in the eventual integration of ultimate genome analysis techniques into complicated diagnostic workflows. Herein, we want to emphasize the role of the microbiologist in the decisional process of critical patient management.

A prospective study evaluating the effect of a "Diagnostic Stewardship Care-Bundle" for automated blood culture diagnostics

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively implemented a diagnostic stewardship care-bundle checklist, 'Sepsis-48 DSB', with the aim of reducing intervening duration of key steps of automated blood culture diagnostics (aBCD).

METHODS

Sepsis-48 DSB was implemented for automated blood culture bottles (BCBs) received from adult intensive care units (AICUs) during the intervention period (P2; July 2020-June 2021) and intervening durations were compared with those during the retrospective, pre-intervention period (P1; March-June 2020). During both periods, provisional blood culture reports (pBCR) were issued wherein direct microbial identification (dID) was performed in BCBs with Gram-negatives by directly inoculating conventional biochemical tests and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing (dAST) using EUCAST RAST method. The results were compared with the standard of care (SoC) method (i.e. full incubation followed by identification and AST by VITEKⓇ-2 Compact).

RESULTS

During P2, significant reductions in loading time (LT; median: 63.5 vs. 32 minutes, P < 0.001), time to dID+dAST performance (TTD; 186 vs. 115 minutes, P = 0.0018) and an increase in compliance to bundle targets (LT ≤45: 44% vs. 66%, P = 0.006 and TTD ≤120: 34% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.03) were observed. Using dID+dAST method, results were read 694 minutes earlier than SoC method. Of 176 pBCR, 165 (94%) were concordant with SoC in microbial identification of species. Categorical agreement for any drug-bug combination was 92.7% (1079/1164) and corresponding major, very major, and minor error rates were 8.8% (19/216), 4.9% (45/921), and 1.8% (21/1164), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The 'diagnostic stewardship care-bundle' strategy was successfully implemented with considerable diagnostic accuracy leading to significant reductions in duration of targeted steps of aBCD.

Evaluation of the feasibility of EUCAST RAST using antimicrobial disks available in Japan

BACKGROUND

In November 2018, the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) established rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST), which could be performed directly on positive blood culture samples. Although concentrations of antimicrobial agents in several antimicrobial disks available in Japan are different from those recommended by the EUCAST, the feasibility of EUCAST RAST using antimicrobial disks available in Japan remains to be evaluated.

METHODS

Blood culture bottles spiked with 127 clinical isolates (65 Escherichia coli and 62 Klebsiella pneumoniae) were tested by RAST for cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem, and ciprofloxacin using antimicrobial disks available in Japan, and compared with a reference AST method using automated AST instrument (VITEK®2).

RESULTS

The overall category agreement (CA) for RAST using antimicrobial disks available in Japan was 96.3%, 96.8%, and 95.6% after 4, 6, and 8 h of incubations, respectively. However, the CAZ RAST for E. coli showed major error of 8.2% (8 h incubation) for the Sensi disk, 14.3% (6 h incubation), and 24.5% (8 h incubation) for the KB disk. The CTX RAST for K. pneumoniae showed 25% (4 h incubation) and 31.3% (4 h incubation) of very major error for the Sensi and KB disks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The EUCAST RAST results for E. coli and K. pneumoniae using antimicrobial disks available in Japan suggest their usefulness, although modified RAST breakpoints are required for several antimicrobial agents.

A prospective study evaluating the effect of a 'Diagnostic Stewardship Care-Bundle' for automated blood culture diagnostics

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively implemented a diagnostic stewardship care-bundle checklist, 'Sepsis-48 DSB', with the aim of reducing intervening duration of key steps of automated blood culture diagnostics (aBCD).

METHODS

Sepsis-48 DSB was implemented for automated blood culture bottles (BCBs) received from adult intensive care units (AICUs) during the intervention period (P2; July 2020-June 2021) and intervening durations were compared with those during the retrospective, pre-intervention period (P1; March-June 2020). During both periods, provisional blood culture reports (pBCR) were issued wherein direct microbial identification (dID) was performed in BCBs with Gram-negatives by directly inoculating conventional biochemical tests and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing (dAST) using EUCAST RAST method. The results were compared with the standard of care (SoC) method (i.e. full incubation followed by identification and AST by VITEKⓇ-2 Compact).

RESULTS

During P2, significant reductions in loading time (LT) [median: 63.5 vs. 32 minutes, P < 0.001], time to dID+dAST performance (TTD) [186 vs. 115 minutes, P = 0.0018] and an increase in compliance to bundle targets [LT ≤45: 44% vs. 66%, P = 0.006 and TTD ≤120: 34% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.03] were observed. Using dID+dAST method, results were read 694 minutes earlier than SoC method. Of 176 pBCR, 165 (94%) were concordant with SoC in microbial identification of species. Categorical agreement for any drug-bug combination was 92.7% (1079/1164) and corresponding major, very major, and minor error rates were 8.8% (19/216), 4.9% (45/921), and 1.8% (21/1164), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The 'diagnostic stewardship care-bundle' strategy was successfully implemented with considerable diagnostic accuracy leading to significant reductions in duration of targeted steps of aBCD.

Analytical Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Blood Cultures after Four Hours of Incubation

EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) provides antibiotic susceptibility results after 4 to 8 h of incubation. This study assessed the diagnostic performance and clinical usefulness of EUCAST RAST after 4 h. This was a retrospective clinical study performed on blood cultures with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae complex (K. pneumoniae and Klebsiella variicola) at Karolinska University Laboratory (Stockholm, Sweden). The rate of categorized RAST results and the categorical agreement (CA) of RAST with the standard EUCAST 16-to-20-h disk diffusion (DD) method for piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin were analyzed, as well as the utility of RAST for adjusting the empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT) and the combination of RAST with a lateral flow assay (LFA) for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) detection. A total of 530 E. coli and 112 K. pneumoniae complex strains were analyzed, generating 2,641 and 558 readable RAST zones, respectively. RAST results categorized according to antimicrobial sensitivity/resistance (S/R) were obtained for 83.1% (2,194/2,641) and 87.5% (488/558) of E. coli and K. pneumoniae complex strains, respectively. The RAST result categorization to S/R for piperacillin-tazobactam was poor (37.2% for E. coli and 66.1% for K. pneumoniae complex). CA with the standard DD method was over 97% for all tested antibiotics. Using RAST, we detected 15/26 and 1/10 of the E. coli and K. pneumoniae complex strains that were resistant to the EAT. For patients treated with cefotaxime, RAST was used to detect 13/14 cefotaxime-resistant E. coli strains and 1/1 cefotaxime-resistant K. pneumoniae complex strain. ESBL positivity was reported the same day as blood culture positivity with RAST and LFA. EUCAST RAST provides accurate and clinically relevant susceptibility results after 4 h of incubation and can accelerate the assessment of resistance patterns. IMPORTANCE Early effective antimicrobial treatment has been shown to be crucial for improving the outcome of bloodstream infections (BSI) and sepsis. In combination with the rise of antibiotic resistance, this calls for accelerated methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) for effective treatment of BSI. This study assesses EUCAST RAST, an AST method that yields results in 4, 6, or 8 h after blood culture positivity. We analyzed a high number of clinical samples of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae complex strains and confirm that the method delivers reliable results after 4 h of incubation for the relevant antibiotics for treating E. coli and K. pneumoniae complex bacteremia. Furthermore, we conclude that it is an important tool for antibiotic treatment decision-making and early detection of ESBL-producing isolates.

Multicentre Evaluation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST) Extending Analysis to 16-20 Hours Reading Time

The aim of the study was to evaluate the EUCAST RAST method by extending analysis to 16−20 h reading time and performance with new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. A total of 676 positive blood cultures (BCs) were enrolled. Results at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 16−20 h were interpreted according to bacterial species using EUCAST RAST breakpoints (version 5.1). For species for which no breakpoints were available, tentative breakpoints were used. Categorical agreement with the Microscan microdilution system was analysed. Among the 676 BCs enrolled, 641 were monomicrobial and were included in the analysis. Categorical agreement ranged from 98.9% at 4 h to 99.4% at 16−20 h. The rates of very major errors were 3.3%, 3.7% and 3.4% at 4 h, 6 h and 8 h, respectively, and decreased to 1% at 16−20 h (p < 0.001). The number of major errors was low for each reading time (0.2% and 0.4% at 4 h and 6 h, respectively, and 0.3% at both 8 h and 16−20 h). The proportions of results in the area of technical uncertainty were 9.9%, 5.9%, 5% and 5.2% for readings at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 16−20 h, respectively. Tentative breakpoints proposed for Enterobacterales other than E.coli/K.pneumoniae and coagulase-negative staphylococci showed overall performances comparable to those observed for E. coli/K. pneumoniae and S. aureus. In conclusion, EUCAST RAST has been shown to be reliable to determine microbial susceptibility to main antimicrobials, including ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam. A poorer performance was observed for certain species/antimicrobial agent combinations. The better performance observed at 16−20 h compared to the early readings may confer to the method greater potential for antimicrobial de-escalation interventions.

A prospective study to reduce turnaround time of microbiologically positive blood cultures in patients with sepsis in intensive care unit

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of direct microbial identification (dID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (rAST) methodology from positively flagged blood culture bottles (BCBs) as well as reduction in turnaround time (TAT) compared to standard methodology.

METHODS

It was a hospital based, prospective cohort study conducted over a period of 21 months from March 2020 to November 2021 in which positively flagged blood culture bottles were simultaneously processed by dID ​+ ​rAST and by VITEK®-2 Compact system or Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. TAT was calculated as the time (hours) taken from receipt of sample in bacteriology laboratory to release of clinical reports with complete identification and susceptibility testing results in both methods.

RESULTS

Of 301 dID ​+ ​rAST performed in study, 125 (41.5%) BCBs were identified as having one of the 8 reportable micro-organisms by EUCAST rAST standard. Amongst VITEK concordant BCBs with gram-negatives, mean reduction in TAT by dID ​+ ​rAST methodology was 23 ​± ​1.4 ​h. Amongst VITEK concordant gram-negatives, Categorical Agreement (CA) rates for any drug-bug combination were 94.4%, 94.5% and 93.6% and Very Major Error (VME) rates were 3.1%, 3.4% and 3.9% at 4-, 6- and 8-h reading time, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EUCAST rAST methodology can generate susceptibility testing reports a day earlier if incorporated into the laboratory workflow. For resource-limited settings, implementing EUCAST rAST approach can be used effectively in early reporting, which can reduce antimicrobial use and improve patient outcomes by promoting timely escalation or de-escalation of empirical antibiotic therapy.

Rapid determination of ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales directly from blood cultures: a comparative evaluation of EUCAST disc diffusion RAST and direct Etest® RAST

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of two rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) methods to determine ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility directly from blood cultures (BCs).

METHODS

A total of 246 Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were tested for ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility directly from BC bottles using EUCAST RAST and Etest® RAST. Results obtained after 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with those obtained by reference broth microdilution on pure overnight subcultures.

RESULTS

In total, the proportion of readable zones after 4 h of incubation was 96.7% and reached 100% after 6 and 8 h of incubation. EUCAST RAST yielded >98% of categorical agreement (CA) with all reading times. Major error (ME) and very major error (VME) rates were inferior to 3%, for each of the reading times. The proportion of results in the area of technical uncertainty (ATU) was almost similar (3.8%-4.1%) at the different reading times. DET-RAST yielded 97.5%, 98% and 99.6% of CA with readings at 4, 6 and 8 h, respectively. One (0.6%) ME was observed at each reading time, whereas five (5.9%) and four (4.5%) VMEs were observed analysing readings at 4 and 6 h, respectively. No VME was observed with readings at 8 h.

CONCLUSIONS

EUCAST RAST was accurate to determine ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli directly from BC bottles. DET-RAST has the advantage of determining MIC values and avoiding ATU results but showed to be an accurate method only with reading at 8 h.

Evaluation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Enterobacterales-Containing Blood Cultures in China

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is defined by the presence of microbes in the bloodstream and has high mortality. Early antimicrobial therapy is key to treating BSI patients. Because of potential antimicrobial resistance, rapid evaluation for the most suitable antimicrobial therapy is important for appropriate treatment. In China, the current workflow of microbiological diagnosis in BSI involves blood culture, species identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, which takes around 3 days. However, this delay could lead to worse symptoms. To rapidly and accurately assess antimicrobial susceptibility, in this study, we applied EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) to determine the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the most frequently detected Enterobacterales sampled in China, including Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Based on EUCAST guidelines, we evaluated its efficiencies with six commercially available antimicrobials, including imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), amikacin (30 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), with bacterium-spiked blood cultures. In addition, we developed potential breakpoints for a recently introduced antimicrobial, 30/20 μg ceftazidime-avibactam, which has high potential for treating multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. Our results showed that EUCAST RAST is a reliable method for rapidly determining the antimicrobial susceptibilities of BSI-causing bacteria in China, with an overall categorical agreement rate at 8 h of ≥90%. The breakpoints developed in this study can categorize the isolates sampled in this study with an accuracy of 93%. Results from our experiments can be applied to clinically determine the microbial susceptibility of BSI-causing bacteria within 8 h and benefit clinical diagnostics for BSI patients.

Usefulness of BioFire FilmArray BCID2 for Blood Culture Processing in Clinical Practice

Rapid pathogen characterization from positive blood cultures (BC) can improve management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI). The FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) assay is a molecular test approved for direct identification of BSI causing pathogens from positive BC. A recently updated version of the panel (BCID2) comprises improved species identification characteristics and allows for the detection of one expanded-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and several carbapenemase-encoding genes. Here, the clinical performance of the BCID2 assay for species identification in 180 positive BCs was evaluated. BCID2 results were concordant with the standard of care (SOC) in 159/180 (88.3%) BCs; 68/74 (91.9%) and 71/74 (96.0%) of all samples growing monobacterial, Gram-positive or Gram-negative pathogens, respectively, were identified, in agreement with SOC results. Nonconcordance was related to the detection of additional pathogens by the BCID2 assay (n = 4), discrepant species identification (n = 4), or failure of BCID2 to detect on-panel pathogens (n = 1). A number (12/31; 38.7%) of discordant results became evident in polymicrobial BC specimens. BCID2 identified the presence of bla_CTX-M-carrying species in 12 BC specimens but failed to predict third-generation cephalosporin resistance in four isolates exhibiting independent cephalosporin resistance mechanisms. Carbapenem resistance related to the presence of bla_VIM-2 or bla_Oxa-48-like was correctly predicted in two isolates. In conclusion, the BCID2 assay is a reliable tool for rapid BC processing and species identification. Despite inclusion of common ESBL- or carbapenemase-encoding markers, the multifactorial nature of β-lactam resistance in Gram-negative organisms warrants combination of BCID2 with (rapid) phenotypic susceptibility assays.

Evaluation of the performance of rapid antibiotic susceptibility test results using the disk diffusion directly from the positive blood culture bottles

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the compliance of rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (RAST) and conventional laboratory procedures.

METHODS

The RAST was performed directly from the blood cultures of 71 Gram negative bacilli (GNB) and 38 Gram positive cocci (GPC) isolates. The results were evaluated at fourth, sixth and eighth hour. Categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), major error (ME) and minor error (mE) were calculated and compared with the results of conventional Vitek-2 system.

RESULTS

Categorical agreement was detected ≥90 in cefotaxime and meropenem at fourth hour in Escherichia coli isolates. An encourage positive CA results were obtained from meropenem, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin at the fourth hour in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. CA was compatible in imipenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa at sixth hour. CA was low (<90%) in piperacillin-tazobactam for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, and meropenem in P. aeruginosa isolates. A good CA (≥90) with all tested antibiotics were found at all hours for Acinetobacter baumannii and also very high CA (100%) was detected at sixth and eighth hour in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. CA remained below the standard criteria at fourth hour in vancomycin and high level gentamicin, in addition to imipenem at sixth hours in enterococci isolates. VME and ME were not detected and mE was 12.7% in GNB and 50% in GPC at eighth hour.

CONCLUSIONS

EUCAST RAST at eighth hour will be beneficial in urgent patients due to their high CA rate, easy preparation, inexpensive, and could be performed with the available equipment and personnel.

Applicability and performance of EUCAST's rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) on primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles in laboratory routine with total lab automation

Optimisation of microbiological diagnostics in primarily sterile body fluids is required. Our objective was to apply EUCAST’s RAST on primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles with total lab automation (TLA) and to compare results to our reference method Vitek2 in order to report susceptibility results earlier. Positive blood culture bottles (BACTEC™ Aerobic/Anaerobic/PEDS) inoculated with primarily sterile body fluids were semi-automatically subcultured onto Columbia 5% SB agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, Schaedler/KV agar and Mueller-Hinton agar. On latter, cefoxitin, ampicillin, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and ciprofloxacin were added. After 6 h, subcultures and RAST were imaged and MALDI-TOF MS was performed. Zone sizes were digitally measured and interpreted following RAST breakpoints for blood cultures. MIC values were determined using Vitek2 panels. During a 1-year period, 197 Staphylococcus aureus, 91 Enterococcus spp., 38 Escherichia coli, 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were found. Categorical agreement between RAST and MIC was 96.5%. Comparison showed no very major errors, 2/7 (28.6%) and 1/7 (14.3%) of major errors for P. aeruginosa and meropenem and ciprofloxacin, 1/9 (11.1%) for K. pneumoniae and ciprofloxacin, 4/69 (7.0%) and 3/43 (5.8%) for Enterococcus spp. and vancomycin and ampicillin, respectively. Minor errors for P. aeruginosa and meropenem (1/8; 12.8%) and for E. coli and ciprofloxacin (2/29; 6.5%) were found. 30/550 RAST measurements were within area of technical uncertainty. RAST is applicable and performs well for primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles, partially better than blood-based RAST. Official EUCAST evaluation is needed.

EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories

OBJECTIVES

When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe.

METHODS

RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16-20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated.

RESULTS

The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4-6 h of incubation.