Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures

Getting Up to Speed: Rapid Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics in Sepsis

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Time to receive effective therapy is a primary determinant of mortality in patients with sepsis. Blood culture is the reference standard for the microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections, despite its low sensitivity and prolonged time to receive a pathogen detection. In recent years, rapid tests for pathogen identification, antimicrobial susceptibility, and sepsis identification have emerged, both culture-based and culture-independent methods. This rapid narrative review presents currently commercially available approved diagnostic molecular technologies in bloodstream infections, including their clinical performance and impact on patient outcome, when available. Peer-reviewed publications relevant to the topic were searched through PubMed, and manufacturer websites of commercially available assays identified were also consulted as further sources of information. We have reviewed data about the following technologies for pathogen identification: fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes (Accelerate PhenoTM), microarray-based assay (Verigene®), multiplex polymerase chain reaction (cobas® eplex, BioFire® FilmArray®, Molecular Mouse, Unyvero BCU SystemTM), matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Rapid MBT Sepsityper®), T2 magnetic resonance (T2Bacteria Panel), and metagenomics-based assays (Karius©, DISQVER®, Day Zero Diagnostics). Technologies for antimicrobial susceptibility testing included the following: Alfed 60 ASTTM, VITEK® REVEALTM, dRASTTM, ASTar®, Fastinov®, QuickMIC®, ResistellTM, and LifeScale. Characteristics, microbiological performance, and issues of each method are described, as well as their clinical performance, when available.

Performance of ePlex® blood culture identification panels in clinical isolates and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities

We assessed the performance of GenMark's ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for overall agreement of organism identification and resistance mechanism detection with standard microbiologic methods. This study included patients with a positive blood culture from May 2020 to January 2021. The primary outcomes were to assess concordance of ePlex® organism identification with standard identification methods and concordance of ePlex® genotypic resistance mechanism detection with standard phenotypic susceptibility testing. Secondary outcomes included panel specific performance and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities. The overall identification concordance rate in 1276 positive blood cultures was 98.1%. The overall concordance for the presence of resistance markers was 98.2% and concordance for the absence of resistance markers was 100%. A majority of ePlex® results (69.5%) represented opportunities for potential antimicrobial stewardship intervention. High concordance rates between the ePlex® BCID panels and standard identification and susceptibility methods enable utilization of results to guide rapid antimicrobial optimization.

Clinical impact and cost-consequence analysis of ePlex® blood culture identification panels for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections: a single-center randomized controlled trial

To assess clinical impact and perform cost-consequence analysis of the broadest multiplex PCR panels available for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2019 to February 2021 at a French University hospital with an institutional antimicrobial stewardship program. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with optimized antimicrobial treatment 12 h after transmission of positivity and Gram stain results from the first positive BC. This percentage was significantly higher in the multiplex PCR (mPCR) group (90/105 = 85.7% %, CI95% [77.5 ; 91.8] vs. 68/107 = 63.6%, CI95% [53.7 ; 72.6]; p < 10- 3) at interim analysis, resulting in the early termination of the study after the inclusion of 309 patients. For patients not optimized at baseline, the median time to obtain an optimized therapy was much shorter in the mPCR group than in the control group (6.9 h, IQR [2.9; 17.8] vs. 26.4 h, IQR [3.4; 47.5]; p = 0.001). Early optimization of antibiotic therapy resulted in a non-statistically significant decrease in mortality from 12.4 to 8.8% (p = 0.306), with a trend towards a shorter median length of stay (18 vs. 20 days; p = 0.064) and a non-significant reduction in the average cost per patient of €3,065 (p = 0.15). mPCR identified all the bacteria present in 88% of the samples. Despite its higher laboratory cost, the use of multiplex PCR for BSI diagnosis leads to early-optimised therapy, seems cost-effective and could reduce mortality and length of stay. Their impact could probably be improved if implemented 24/7.

Assessing the Interpretation of Molecular Test Results in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections

A retrospective study at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland, assessed PCR testing alongside blood cultures to guide antimicrobial therapy decisions in hospitalized patients, to determine how much time the results of the molecular tests preceded conventional methods. Among 118 patients, Staphylococcus aureus (37%) and Escherichia coli (21%) were the most common bloodstream infection agents. Blood cultures utilized the BacT/ALERT 3D system, and molecular diagnostics were conducted using the FilmArray platform with the BIOFIRE BCID2 panel. Methicillin susceptibility was observed in 66% of S. aureus strains, while 26% of Gram-negative bacilli exhibited an ESBL phenotype. Therapeutic decisions based on molecular test results were often incorrect for S. aureus infections, particularly MSSA (64.5%), but generally accurate for Gram-negative bacilli. The median times from positive blood culture to BCID2 and pathogen identification/susceptibility were 10 h and 52 h, respectively. Molecular diagnostics facilitated faster initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy, highlighting the need to educate medical staff on proper interpretation. Consulting within an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) could enhance the benefits of implementing molecular methods in bloodstream infection diagnostics.

Clinical utility of multiplex PCR in the detection of pathogens from sterile body fluids

Rapid identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is essential for appropriate patient management, specifically antimicrobial therapy. Limited sensitivity and increased time to detection of traditional culture prompted us to evaluate additional testing to contribute to the diagnosis of infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels on positive body fluids inoculated into blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms. A total of 88 positive body fluids from blood culture bottles were analyzed using a Gram-Positive, Gram-Negative, and/or Fungal pathogen BCID Panel based on the Gram stain result. Each result was compared to routine culture performed from the positive bottle. When using culture as a reference standard, we found the ePlex multiplex panel performed with a positive percent agreement of 96.5% and a negative percent agreement of 99.8%. The use of multiplex PCR may be a useful supplement to routine culture for NSBF in blood culture bottles.

IMPORTANCE

The identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is performed using routine culture, the current gold standard. Limitations of this method include sensitivity and increased turnaround times which could potentially delay vital patient care, especially antimicrobial therapy. Adaptations of NSBF in blood culture bottles prompted us to consider the utility of additional methods to bridge the gap in diagnostic challenges for these life-threatening infections. Multiplex molecular panels have been manufactured for use with multiple specimen types including blood, cerebral spinal fluid, stool, and respiratory. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the off-label use of ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels on positive body fluids grown in blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms for research purposes.

Relationship between molecular pathogen detection and clinical disease in febrile children across Europe: a multicentre, prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The PERFORM study aimed to understand causes of febrile childhood illness by comparing molecular pathogen detection with current clinical practice.

METHODS

Febrile children and controls were recruited on presentation to hospital in 9 European countries 2016-2020. Each child was assigned a standardized diagnostic category based on retrospective review of local clinical and microbiological data. Subsequently, centralised molecular tests (CMTs) for 19 respiratory and 27 blood pathogens were performed.

FINDINGS

Of 4611 febrile children, 643 (14%) were classified as definite bacterial infection (DB), 491 (11%) as definite viral infection (DV), and 3477 (75%) had uncertain aetiology. 1061 controls without infection were recruited. CMTs detected blood bacteria more frequently in DB than DV cases for N. meningitidis (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.92-5.99), S. pneumoniae (OR: 3.89, 95% CI: 2.07-7.59), Group A streptococcus (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.13-6.09) and E. coli (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.02-6.71). Respiratory viruses were more common in febrile children than controls, but only influenza A (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.46), influenza B (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.37) and RSV (OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06-0.36) were less common in DB than DV cases. Of 16 blood viruses, enterovirus (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.72) and EBV (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.90) were detected less often in DB than DV cases. Combined local diagnostics and CMTs respectively detected blood viruses and respiratory viruses in 360 (56%) and 161 (25%) of DB cases, and virus detection ruled-out bacterial infection poorly, with predictive values of 0.64 and 0.68 respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Most febrile children cannot be conclusively defined as having bacterial or viral infection when molecular tests supplement conventional approaches. Viruses are detected in most patients with bacterial infections, and the clinical value of individual pathogen detection in determining treatment is low. New approaches are needed to help determine which febrile children require antibiotics.

FUNDING

EU Horizon 2020 grant 668303.

Diagnostic efficiency of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction. The FilmArray blood culture identification panel (BCID) panel is a multiplex PCR assay with high sensitivity and specificity to identify the most common pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs).Hypothesis. We hypothesize that the BCID panel has good diagnostic performance for BSIs and can be popularized in clinical application.Aim: To provide summarized evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of the BCID panel for the identification of positive blood cultures.Methodology. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases through March 2021 and assessed the efficacy of the diagnostic test of the BCID panel. We performed a meta-analysis and calculated the summary sensitivity and specificity of the BCID panel. Systematic review protocols were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021239176).Results. A total of 16 full-text articles were eligible for analysis. The overall sensitivities of the BCID panel on Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi were 97 % (95 % CI, 0.96-0.98), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.98-01.00) and 99 % (95 % CI, 0.87-1.00), respectively. The pooled diagnostic specificities were 99 % (95 % CI, 0.97-1.00), 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) and 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, respectively.Conclusions. The BCID panel has high rule-in value for the early detection of BSI patients. The BCID panel can still provide valuable information for ruling out bacteremia or fungemia in populations with low pretest probability.

Shortening identification times: comparative observational study of three early blood culture testing protocols

Background

While early appropriate antibiotic therapy is a proven means of limiting the progression of infections, especially bacteremia, empirical antibiotic therapy in sepsis is ineffective up to 30%. The aim of this study was to compare early blood culture testing protocols in terms of their ability to shorten the delay between blood sampling and appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Methods

In this french observational study, we compared three blood culture testing protocols. Positive blood cultures were tested using either GenMark ePlex panels (multiplex PCR period), a combination of MRSA/SA PCR, β-Lacta and oxidase tests (multitest period), or conventional identification and susceptibility tests only (reference period). Conventional identification and susceptibility tests were performed in parallel for all samples, as the gold standard.

Results

Among the 270 patients with positive blood cultures included, early and conventional results were in good agreement, especially for the multitest period. The delay between a blood culture positivity and initial results was 3.8 (2.9-6.9) h in the multiplex PCR period, 2.6 (1.3-4.5) h in the multitest period and 3.7 (1.8-8.2) h in the reference period (p<0.01). Antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted in 68 patients based on early analysis results. The proportion of patients receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy within 48 h of blood sampling was higher in the multiplex PCR and multitest periods, (respectively 90% and 88%) than in the reference period (71%).

Conclusion

These results suggest rapid bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance tests are feasible, efficient and can expedite appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Performance of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 panel for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections

Background

Conventional blood cultures methods are associated with long turnaround times, preventing early treatment optimization in bloodstream infections. The BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel is a new multiplex PCR applied on positive blood cultures, reducing time to pathogen identification and resistant markers detection.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study including positive blood cultures from Intensive Care Units and Emergency Departments and performed BCID2 in addition to conventional testing. Concordance between the two methods was assessed and BCID2 performance characteristics were evaluated. Resistance markers detected by BCID2 were confirmed by in-house PCR. Whole genome sequencing was performed in discordant cases.

Results

Among 60 monomicrobial blood cultures, BCID2 correctly identified 55/56 (91.7%) on-panel pathogens, showing an overall concordance of 98%. In 4/60 cases BCID2 did not detect any target and these all grew BCID2 off-panel bacteria. Only one discordant case was found. Sensitivity and specificity for Gram-positive bacteria on monomicrobial samples were 100% (95% CI 85.8-100%) and 100% (95% CI 90.3-100%) respectively, while for Gram-negatives 100% (95% CI 87.7-100) and 96.9% (95% CI 83.8-99.9%), respectively. Among two polymicrobial blood cultures, full concordance was observed in one case only. BCID2 identified antimicrobial resistance genes in 6/62 samples, all confirmed by in-house PCR (3 mecA/C S. epidermidis, 3 bla _CTX-M E. coli). Estimated time to results gained using BCID2 as compared to conventional testing was 9.69 h (95% CI: 7.85-11.53).

Conclusions

BCID2 showed good agreement with conventional methods. Studies to assess its clinical impact are warranted.

The Impact of Fast Microbiology in Intensive Care Units in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: An Observational Retrospective Study

The increasing prevalence of multi-drug-resistant bacteria responsible for bloodstream infections (BSIs) makes therapeutic choices progressively more complex. Fast microbiology quickly detects the presence of pathogens and clinically relevant determinants of antibiotic resistance, offering the potential for early administration of antibiotics. In this retrospective observational study, we comparatively evaluated the performances of FilmArray and the current standard method using blood samples collected from intensive care unit (ICU) patients with suspected BSI. A full agreement with the standard was observed in 97/102 samples (95.1 ± 4.2%), a mismatch in 3/102 samples (2.9 ± 3.2%) and detection failure in 2/102 cases (1.96 ± 2.7%). Statistical analysis demonstrated a near-perfect/perfect level of agreement between the two methods, with an overall degree of agreement of 95%. The high performance demonstrated by the FilmArray could allow a "watch and wait" approach helping clinicians in decision-making processes related to choice and initiation of the antimicrobial therapy, thus avoiding ineffective and excessive use of drugs.

Accuracy of Broad-Panel PCR-Based Bacterial Identification for Blood Cultures in a Pediatric Oncology Population

Bloodstream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and result in significant costs to health care systems. Rapid identification of the causative agent of bloodstream infections is critical for patient treatment and improved outcomes. Multiplex PCR systems that provide bacterial identification directly from the blood culture bottle allow for earlier detection of pathogens. The GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels have an expanded number of targets for both identification and genotypic markers of antimicrobial resistance. The performance of the ePlex BCID Gram-negative (GN) and Gram-positive (GP) panels were evaluated in a predominantly pediatric oncology population. A total of 112 blood cultures were tested by the ePlex BCID GN and GP panels and results were compared to those from standard-of-care testing. Accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% (CI, 76% to 95%) for the Gram-positive panel, with four misidentifications and one not detected, and 93% (CI, 82% to 98%) for the Gram-negative panel, with two misidentifications and one not detected. The results showed good overall performance of these panels for rapid, accurate detection of bloodstream pathogens in this high-risk population. IMPORTANCE Bloodstream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and result in significant costs to health care systems. Rapid identification of the causative agent of bloodstream infections is critical for patient treatment and improved outcomes. Multiplex PCR systems that provide bacterial identification directly from the blood culture bottle allow for earlier characterization of pathogens. The GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels, recently cleared by the FDA, have an expanded number of targets for both identification and resistance, much larger than other, automated, broad-panel PCR assays. The performance of the ePlex BCID Gram-negative and Gram-positive panels was evaluated in a predominantly pediatric oncology population, providing a unique look at its performance in a high-risk group, where rapid diagnostic information for bloodstream infections could be of particular value for clinical care providers.

Diagnostic accuracy of the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification panel when used in critically ill patients with sepsis

Sepsis accounts for high mortality rates in critical care units. Prompt and accurate identification of causative pathogens and initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is critical for the appropriate management of patients in order to optimise clinical outcomes. The BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved rapid, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that is able to identify a variety of bacteria, fungi and antimicrobial resistance determinants directly from positive blood cultures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BioFire FilmArray BCID panel against the gold standard of blood cultures. Seventy-eight positive blood cultures obtained from critically ill patients suspected of having sepsis were included in the study. Each bottle was processed with the BioFire FilmArray BCID panel as well as conventional culture methods. Diagnostic accuracy of the BioFire FilmArray BCID panel was determined. The assay demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for pathogen identification of 96.5% (95% CI, 91.3-99.0) and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.3-99.9), respectively. The findings of this study support the role of the BioFire FilmArray BCID panel in the management of critically ill patients with sepsis.

Comparing the Clinical Utility of Rapid Diagnostics for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Using Desirability of Outcome Ranking Approach for the Management of Antibiotic Therapy (DOOR-MAT)

Decisions regarding which rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for bloodstream infections to implement remain challenging given the diversity of organisms detected by different platforms. We used the desirability of outcome ranking management of antimicrobial therapy (DOOR-MAT) as a framework to compare two RDT platforms on potential desirability of antimicrobial therapy decisions. An observational study was performed at University of Maryland Medical System comparing Verigene blood culture (BC) to GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture ID (BCID) (research use only) panels on blood cultures from adult patients. Positive percent agreement (PPA) between each RDT platform and Vitek MS was calculated for comparison of on-panel targets. Theoretical antimicrobial decisions were made based on RDT results, taking into consideration patient parameters, antimicrobial stewardship practices, and local infectious diseases epidemiology. DOOR-MAT with a partial credit scoring system was applied to these decisions, and mean scores were compared across platforms using a paired t test. The study consisted of 160 unique patients. The Verigene BC PPA was 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.1 to 99.8), and ePlex BCID PPA was 98% (95% CI, 94.3 to 99.6). Among the 31 organisms not on the Verigene BC panels, 61% were identified by the ePlex BCID panels. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) DOOR-MAT score for Verigene BC was 86.8 (28.5), while that for ePlex BCID was 91.9 (23.1) (P = 0.01). Both RDT platforms had high PPA for on-panel targets. The ePlex BCID was able to identify more organisms than Verigene, resulting in higher mean DOOR-MAT scores.

New Microbiological Techniques for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections and Sepsis in ICU Including Point of Care

Purpose of Review

The aim of this article is to review current and emerging microbiological techniques that support the rapid diagnosis of bacterial infections in critically ill patients, including their performance, strengths and pitfalls, as well as available data evaluating their clinical impact.

Recent Findings

Bacterial infections and sepsis are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit and their management is further complicated by the increase in the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. In this setting, new diagnostic methods able to overcome the limits of traditional microbiology in terms of turn-around time and accuracy are highly warranted. We discuss the following broad themes: optimisation of existing culture-based methodologies, rapid antigen detection, nucleic acid detection (including multiplex PCR assays and microarrays), sepsis biomarkers, novel methods of pathogen detection (e.g. T2 magnetic resonance) and susceptibility testing (e.g. morphokinetic cellular analysis) and the application of direct metagenomics on clinical samples. The assessment of the host response through new “omics” technologies might also aid in early diagnosis of infections, as well as define non-infectious inflammatory states.

Summary

Despite being a promising field, there is still scarce evidence about the real-life impact of these assays on patient management. A common finding of available studies is that the performance of rapid diagnostic strategies highly depends on whether they are integrated within active antimicrobial stewardship programs. Assessing the impact of these emerging diagnostic methods through patient-centred clinical outcomes is a complex challenge for which large and well-designed studies are awaited.

Identification of microorganisms directly from blood culture bottles with polymicrobial growth: comparison of FilmArray and direct MALDI-TOF MS

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are related to high mortality and morbidity. Rapid administration of effective antimicrobial treatment is crucial for patient survival. Recently developed rapid methods to identify pathogens directly from blood culture bottles speed up diagnosis of BSIs. The present study compares the performance of two rapid identification methods, FilmArray and direct MALDI-TOF MS, on identifying microorganisms directly from positive blood culture bottles with polymicrobial growth. FilmArray and direct MALDI-TOF MS were performed directly on positive clinical and simulated polymicrobial blood culture bottles. Assay results were compared with standard culture methods. In total, 110 polymicrobial blood culture samples, of which 96 samples contained two microorganisms while 14 samples contained three microorganisms, were studied. FilmArray was able to identify 215/234 (92.0%) of isolates detected by the standard culture method and successfully identified all microorganisms in 88/110 (80.0%) of blood culture bottles. In contrast, direct MALDI-TOF MS was only able to identify 65/234 (27.8%) of isolates and managed to identify all microoganisms in 2/110 (2.1%) of blood culture bottles. FilmArray is a rapid method for direct identification of polymicrobial blood culture samples that can complement the conventional identification methods. Direct MALDI-TOF MS has low performance with polymicrobial samples.

Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia

Molecular rapid diagnostic assays associated with antimicrobial stewardship have proven effective for the early adaptation of empiric therapy in bloodstream infections. The ePlex^® BCID (GenMark Diagnostics) Panels allow identification of 56 bacteria and fungi and 10 resistance genes in 90 min directly from positive blood cultures. We prospectively evaluated 187 sepsis episodes at Grenoble University Hospital and retrospectively analyzed the cases to measure the potential clinical impact of the ePlex BCID results. Identification of all pathogens was obtained for 164/187 (88%) bloodstream infections with 100% detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (17 bla_CTX-M , 1 vanA, and 17 mecA genes). Only 15/209 (7%) strains were not covered by the panels. Sensitivity for detection of micro-organisms targeted by the RUO BCID-GP, BCID-GN, and BCID-FP Panels was respectively 84/84 (100%), 103/107 (96%), and 14/14 (100%). Interestingly, accurate identification of all pathogens was achieved in 15/17 (88%) polymicrobial samples. Retrospective analysis of medical records showed that a modification of antimicrobial treatment would have been done in 45% of the patients. Treatment modifications would have been an optimization of empiric therapy, a de-escalation or an escalation in respectively 16, 17, and 11% of the patients. Moreover, 11% of the samples were classified as contaminants or not clinically relevant and would have led to early de-escalation or withdrawal of any antibiotic. Detection of resistance genes in addition to identification alone increased escalation rate from 4 to 11% of the patients. Absence of the ePlex result was considered a lost opportunity for therapy modification in 28% of patients.

Rapid detection of antimicrobial resistance markers with Allplex™ Entero-DR assay directly from positive blood culture bottles

A method for rapid detection of one extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and five carbapenemase-encoding genes as well as vancomycin resistance markers directly from blood cultures using the Allplex™ Entero-DR assay (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea) is presented. Altogether 28 previously well-characterized resistant Gram-negative bacilli and Enterococcus spp., and 142 clinical blood cultures containing Gram-negative bacilli or Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The method had 100% sensitivity and specificity for detecting bla_OXA-48-like, bla_KPC, bla_VIM, bla_IMP, bla_NDM, bla_CTX-M, vanA, and vanB. The lowest detectable amount of viable cells in blood culture samples were 5.39·10⁴ CFU/mL, 6.66·10⁴ CFU/mL, 5.13·10³ CFU/mL, 6.09·10⁴ CFU/mL, 6.66·10⁴ CFU/mL, 6.66·10⁴ CFU/mL, 3.12·10⁴ CFU/mL, and 5.34·10⁴ CFU/mL for the bla_KPC, bla_OXA-48-like, bla_VIM, bla_IMP, bla_NDM, bla_CTX-M, vanA, and vanB, respectively. The results were available within 90 min from signal positive blood cultures, as no separate DNA extraction steps were needed, and the assay showed no interference from blood or culture media used allowing reliable and simplified detection of the resistance markers.

Clinical Performance and Impact of Accelerate Pheno for Gram-negative Bacteremia in Hospitalized Children

PURPOSE

Accelerate Pheno provides rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs) of pathogens that cause blood stream infections (BSIs). The study objective was to assess the accuracy of the Accelerate Pheno platform and its impact on antimicrobial modification in children with gram-negative BSIs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients at a children's hospital with gram-negative BSIs from November 2018 to November 2019. Proportion of agreement between Accelerate Pheno and standard of care (SOC) was determined for organism identification (matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) and susceptibilities (MicroScan). Time from culture collection to Gram stain, identification and AST by the Accelerate Pheno method, and AST results by MicroScan were calculated. Antibiotic modifications and opportunities to optimize antimicrobial stewardship were recorded.

FINDINGS

Of 115 BSIs from 90 patients, 90 monomicrobial gram-negative BSIs with an organism included on the Accelerate Pheno panel were found. Compared with SOC, the organism was correctly identified in 90 patients (100%). Overall, 5 of 732 ASTs (0.7%) reported susceptible by Accelerate Pheno were resistant by SOC, and 8 of 109 (7.3%) reported resistant by Accelerate Pheno were susceptible by SOC. On the basis of the Accelerate Pheno AST results, antibiotic spectrum was increased in 10 of 11 instances to correct organism-drug mismatch and narrowed in 16 of 33 instances. Median times from culture collection to reporting of Gram stain, Accelerate Pheno identification, Accelerate Pheno AST, and SOC AST were 12.6, 14.6, 19.9, and 60.6 h, respectively. Median time to optimal therapy was 21.8 h for infections with actionable AST data.

IMPLICATIONS

Accelerate Pheno was accurate and decreased time to optimal therapy by almost 40 h for children with gram-negative BSIs. Antibiotic spectrum was increased in multiple instances, but opportunities to decrease spectrum were underused.

The clinical impact of implementing GenMark ePlex blood culture panels for around-the-clock blood culture identification; a prospective observational study

Background: Implementing rapid molecular blood culture diagnostics in the clinical management of sepsis is essential for early pathogen identification and resistance gene testing. The GenMark ePlex blood culture panels offer a broad microbial spectrum with minimal hands-on time and approximately 1.5 h to result. Therefore, ePlex can be utilized at times when the clinical microbiology laboratory is unavailable.Methods: From 23 October 2019 to 30 December 2019, consecutive non-duplicate positive blood cultures signalling microbial growth at the 24 h/7 days-a-week available clinical chemistry laboratory between 9 pm and 7 am were analysed with ePlex. All blood cultures were transported to the microbiology laboratory the following day for conventional identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing.Results: We used ePlex to test 91 blood cultures, of which 86 had confirmed microbial growth. Eighty-one were positive for ePlex target pathogens. The ePlex results were in complete agreement with conventional methods in 72/81 (88.9%) of cases and available within a median of 10.9 h earlier. Resistance gene targets (11 mecA and 1 CTX-M) were concordant with phenotypic susceptibility in all cases. In 18/86 (20.9%) of the patient cases, there was an opportunity to optimize antimicrobial therapy based on the ePlex result. The ePlex result affected clinical decision-making in 4/86 (4.7%) of the cases and reduced the average time to effective antimicrobial therapy by 8.9 h.Conclusions: Our implementation of ePlex is a feasible option to attain around-the-clock blood culture identification in many hospitals. It can significantly reduce time-to-pathogen identification and have an impact on clinical decision-making.