Clinical impact of rapid susceptibility testing on Mueller-Hinton Rapid-SIR directly from urine specimens

Antibiotic management of urinary tract infections in the post-antibiotic era: a narrative review highlighting diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship

BACKGROUND

As one of the most common indications for antimicrobial prescription in the community, the management of urinary tract infections (UTIs) is both complicated by, and a driver of, antimicrobial resistance.

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the key clinical decisions involved in the diagnosis and treatment of UTIs in adult women, focusing on clinical effectiveness and both diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship as we approach the post-antimicrobial era.

SOURCES

Literature reviewed via directed PubMed searches and manual searching of the reference list for included studies to identify key references to respond to the objectives. A strict time limit was not applied. We prioritised recent publications, randomised trials, and systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) where available. Searches were limited to English language articles. A formal quality assessment was not performed; however, the strengths and limitations of each paper were reviewed by the authors throughout the preparation of this manuscript.

CONTENT

We discuss the management of UTIs in ambulatory adult women, with particular focus on uncomplicated infections. We address the diagnosis of UTIs, including the following: definition and categorisation; bedside assessments and point-of-care tests; and the indications for, and use of, laboratory tests. We then discuss the treatment of UTIs, including the following: indications for treatment, antimicrobial sparing approaches, key considerations when selecting a specific antimicrobial agent, specific treatment scenarios, and duration of treatment. We finally outline emerging areas of interest in this field.

IMPLICATIONS

The steady increase in antimicrobial resistance among common uropathogens has had a substantial affect on the management of UTIs. Regarding both diagnosis and treatment, the clinician must consider both the patient (clinical effectiveness and adverse effects, including collateral damage) and the community more broadly (population-level antimicrobial selection pressure).

A global perspective on improving patient care in uncomplicated urinary tract infection: Expert consensus and practical guidance

BACKGROUND

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) are a common problem in women. Management is mainly based on empirical prescribing, but there are concerns about overtreatment and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in patients with recurrent uUTIs.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of experts met to discuss diagnosis, treatment, prevention, guidelines, AMR, clinical trial design, and the impact of COVID-19 on clinical practice.

RESULTS

Symptoms remain the cornerstone of uUTI diagnosis, and urine culture is necessary only when empirical treatment fails, or rapid recurrence of symptoms or AMR is suspected. Specific antimicrobials are first-line therapy (typically nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and pivmecillinam; dependent on availability and local resistance data). Fluoroquinolones are not first-line options for uUTIs due primarily to safety concerns, but also rising resistance rates. High-quality data to support most non-antimicrobial approaches are lacking. Local AMR data specific to community-acquired uUTIs are needed, but representative information is difficult to obtain; instead, identification of risk factors for AMR can provide a basis to guide empirical antimicrobial prescribing. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted management of uUTIs in some countries and may have long-lasting implications for future models of care.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of uUTIs in women can be improved without increasing complexity, including simplified diagnosis, and empirical antimicrobial prescribing based on patient characteristics, including review of recent antimicrobial use and past pathogen resistance profiles, drug availability, and guidelines. Current data for non-antimicrobial approaches are limited. The influence of COVID-19 on telehealth could provide an opportunity to enhance patient care in the long term.

Envisioning Future UTI Diagnostics

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections in the United States and are a major driver of antibiotic use - both appropriate and inappropriate - across healthcare settings. UTI treatment has become complex due to antibacterial resistance; one quarter of urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli in the United States in 2017 were resistant to fluoroquinolones and one third to trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (1), agents with historically predictable activity against E. coli. As a result, more broad-spectrum antibiotics are being used to treat UTIs, contributing to selection of further antibiotic resistance.

Cotrimoxazole for community-acquired urinary tract infections leads to more adverse effects than fluoroquinolones

BACKGROUND

For several years, we applied an internal guideline for community-acquired urinary tract infections (cUTI), targeting the reduction of fluoroquinolone use (FQ) and thereby favouring cotrimoxazole (CTM) prescription. Our aim was to report adverse effects (AE) and outcome for patients presenting with cUTI and treated with these compounds.

METHODS

This cohort study was based on the dashboard of our department, bringing together 28 parameters for all patients, including diagnosis, microbiological data, antibiotic therapy, AE, length of hospital stay (LHS) and outcome. We included all patients with cUTI due to Enterobacteriaeae treated with CTM or FQ, and compared these 2 groups on in-hospital AE, LHS, and unfavourable outcome defined as intensive care requirement or death.

RESULTS

From June 2008 to June 2019, 640 cUTI due to Enterobacteriaeae were observed, among which 295 (46%) treated with CTM and 345 (54%) with a FQ. There were 25 AE (3.9%): 17 (5.7%) in the CTM group, and 8 (2.3%) in the FQ group (P=0.025). Adverse effects were associated with increased LHS compared to patients without AE: 11±6 vs. 7±4 days respectively, P<0.001, 11.4±6.2 days in the CTM group vs. 9.2±5.8 in the FQ group (relative LHS increase of 73.5% and 29.5%, respectively). Unfavorable outcome occurred for 1 patient (0.3%) in the CTM group, and 5 (1.4%) in the FQ group, P=0.297.

CONCLUSION

Favouring cotrimoxazole for cUTI due to Enterobacteriaceae was associated compared to FQ with more AE and prolonged LHS. A cost-effectiveness analysis to validate such therapeutic strategy is warranted.