Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

Diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is the most common type of tuberculosis (TB). Rapid diagnosis of PTB can help in TB control. Although the use of molecular tests (such as the GeneXpert MTB/RIF) has improved the ability to rapidly diagnose PTB, there is still room for improvement. Nanopore sequencing is a novel means of rapid TB detection. The purpose of this study was to establish a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol for evaluating the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for the rapid diagnosis of PTB.

METHODS

We completed this protocol according to the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) statement and registered on the PROSPERO platform. We will screen studies related to nanopore sequencing for diagnosis of PTB by searching through PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library using English, and Wanfang database, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) using Chinese. Eligible studies will be screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in the study protocol. We will evaluate the methodological quality of the individual included studies using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). We will use Stata (version 15.0) with the midas command and RevMan (version 5.3) for meta-analysis and forest plots and SROC curves generation. A p < 0.05 was treated as a statistically significant difference. When significant heterogeneity exists between studies, we will explore sources of heterogeneity through meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis of nanopore sequencing for the diagnosis of PTB. We hope that this study will find a new and effective tool for the early diagnosis of PTB.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023495593.

Evaluation of Nanopore Sequencing for Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis Using Negative Smear Clinical Specimens

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanopore sequencing for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) using smear-negative clinical specimens.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study based on a review of patient medical records to assess the accuracy of nanopore sequencing as a diagnostic tool for smear-negative PTB. Compared with clinical diagnosis, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of nanopore sequencing.

Results

A total of 647 patients were evaluated. Nanopore sequencing demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 91.7%, specificity of 85.3%, PPV of 95.1%, NPV of 76.4%, and AUC of 0.88. Notably, the overall diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing was significantly higher than that of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture technique.

Conclusion

Nanopore sequencing exhibited satisfactory overall diagnostic accuracy for smear-negative PTB, regardless of MTB culture status. Therefore, if conditions permit, nanopore sequencing is recommended as a diagnostic method for smear-negative PTB.

Determination of the diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis

PURPOSE

The early and efficient diagnosis of patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for PTB diagnosis using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples and compared it with other techniques such as acid-fast bacilli smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and CapitalBio Mycobacterium reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (MTB RT-PCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 195 patients with suspected PTB who were admitted to our hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these assays were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of nanopore sequencing were 90.70%, 84.85%, 92.13%, 82.35%, and 0.88; those of acid-fast bacilli smear were 12.40%, 98.48%, 94.12%, 36.52%, and 0.55; those of culture were 36.43%, 100%, 100%, 44.59%, and 0.68; those of Xpert MTB/RIF were 41.09%, 100%, 100%, 46.48%, and 0.71; and those of CapitalBio MTB RT-PCR were 34.88%, 98.48%, 97.83%, 43.62%, and 0.67, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The nanopore sequencing assay using BALF samples showed the best diagnostic accuracy for sputum-scarce PTB. Moreover, it can improve the clinical diagnosis of PTB.

How We Treat Drug-Susceptible Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and pulmonary TB (PTB) is the main variant responsible for fueling transmission of the infection. Effective treatment of drug-susceptible (DS) TB is crucial to avoid the emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-resistant strains. In this narrative review, through a fictional suggestive case of DS PTB, we guide the reader in a step-by-step commentary to provide an updated review of current evidence in the management of TB, from diagnosis to post-treatment follow-up. World Health Organization and Centre for Diseases Control (CDC) guidelines for TB, as well as the updated literature, were used to support this manuscript.

Diagnostic validity of MRI for central nervous system tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Central nervous system tuberculosis (CNSTB) is a severe condition, sometimes associated with a poor prognosis. Early diagnosis of CNSTB remains challenging, considering that conventional methods lack sensitivity or might lead to certain side effects. Herein, we presented a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic efficacy of MRI for CNSTB.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SinoMed, Wanfang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PubMed will be searched to identify studies reporting on the use of MRI in the diagnosis of CNSTB from database inception to December 2023. The following keywords will be applied: 'Intracranial tuberculosis', 'Cerebral tuberculosis', 'Central nervous system tuberculosis', 'Spinal tuberculous arachnoiditis' and 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging'. Studies that evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of CNSTB and report clear reference criteria will be included. Studies from which full true positive, false positive, false negative and true negative values cannot be extracted, those published in languages other than English or Chinese, abstracts not reporting the full text, and case reports will be excluded. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) will be used to evaluate the methodological quality of each included study. Stata V.15.0 and RevMan V.5.3 will be used to perform a meta-analysis and generate forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. In case of significant heterogeneity between studies, possible sources of heterogeneity will be explored through subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This research is based on public databases and does not require ethical approval. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023415690.

EBUS-GS with the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of isolated pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the use of endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) combined with Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection in isolated pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

Patients who had isolated pulmonary nodules and unknown diagnoses at our institution from October 2020 to December 2021 were prospectively examined using EBUS-GS and Xpert. The diagnostic values of using EBUS-GS or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) with acid-fast staining, MGIT 960 culture, pathological examination, and Xpert for isolated pulmonary nodules caused by MTB infection were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

There were 135 patients, 64 with isolated pulmonary tuberculomas and 71 with non-tuberculous lesions. The sensitivity of EBUS-GS with Xpert was significantly higher than BALF with Xpert (57.81% vs. 34.78%, P = 0.017). Use of EBUS-GS with Xpert and MGIT 960 culture further increased the sensitivity to 62.50% (95%CI 50.64-74.36) and increased the specificity to 100%. The AUC values of BALF with MGIT 960 culture was 0.663(95%CI 0.543-0.783) and BALF with Xpert was 0.674 (95%CI 0.556-0.792). The AUC values of EBUS-GS with MGIT 960 culture was 0.680 (95%CI 0.554-0.743), with pathological examination was 0.713 (95%CI 0.573-0.760), and with Xpert was 0.789 (95%CI 0.655-0.829).

CONCLUSION

Use of EBUS-GS with Xpert had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of isolated pulmonary tuberculoma. This method has significant potential for use in clinical practice.

The value of histopathology combined with CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction test for diagnosing spinal tuberculosis

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (CapitalBio test) in spinal tuberculosis (STB). The value of histopathology combined with the CapitalBio test in diagnosing STB was also assessed.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical information of suspected STB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of histopathology, CapitalBio test, and histopathology combined with CapitalBio test were calculated to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with a composite reference standard.

Results

A total of 222 suspected STB patients were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of histopathology for STB were recorded to be 62.0, 98.0, 97.4, 68.3%, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the CapitalBio test were 75.2, 98.0, 97.9, 76.7%, and 0.87, respectively, while that of histopathology combined with the CapitalBio test was 81.0, 96.0, 96.1, 80.8%, and 0.89, respectively.

Conclusion

Histopathology and CapitalBio test exhibited high accuracy and are recommended in diagnosing STB. Histopathology combined with the CapitalBio test might give the best efficacy in STB diagnosis.

Clinical application of Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay using various specimens for the rapid detection of lymph node tuberculosis: A diagnostic accuracy study

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Capital Bio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction assay Capital Bio assay for lymph node (LN) tuberculosis (LNTB), and to further compare the effect of different types of LN specimens on the detection capability of the test. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of LNTB patients who met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve of Capital Bio assay were calculated to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared with the final clinical diagnosis as reference standard. Three hundred sixty-four patients were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve of the Capital Bio assay for LNTB were 74.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 34.9%, and 0.87, respectively. For the pus specimens, these values for Capital Bio assay were 93.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 27.3%, 0.97, respectively. For the core needle biopsy specimens, these values were 65.9%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 33.3%, and 0.83, respectively. For the fine-needle aspiration specimens, these values were 60.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 53.9%, and 0.80, respectively. For the tissue, these values were 59.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 33.3%, 0.80, respectively. The Capital Bio assay had good effective for the diagnosis of LNTB. Compared to LN fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy specimens and tissue specimens, pus specimens were more suitable for molecular testing and had the best diagnostic efficacy.

EBUS-GS with the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of isolated pulmonary nodules.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2571545/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Objective Investigate the use of endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) combined with Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection in isolated pulmonary nodules. Methods Patients who had isolated pulmonary nodules and unknown diagnoses at our institution from October 2020 to December 2021 were prospectively examined using EBUS-GS and Xpert. The diagnostic values of using EBUS-GS or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) with acid-fast staining, MGIT 960 culture, pathological examination, and Xpert for isolated pulmonary nodules caused by MTB infection were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results There were 135 patients, 64 with isolated pulmonary tuberculomas and 71 with non-tuberculous lesions. The diagnostic sensitivity of EBUS-GS was significantly higher than that of BALF with Xpert (57.81% vs. 25%, P < 0.001), MGIT 960 culture (35.94% vs. 23.44%, P = 0.039), and acid-fast staining (17.19% vs. 6.25%, P = 0.016). Use of EBUS-GS with Xpert and MGIT 960 culture further increased the sensitivity to 62.50% (95%CI: 50.64–74.36) and increased the specificity to 100%. The AUC values of BALF with MGIT 960 culture was 0.617 (95%CI: 0.521–0.713) and BALF with Xpert was 0.625(95%CI: 0.529–0.721). The AUC values of EBUS-GS with MGIT 960 culture was 0.680 (95%CI: 0.554–0.743), with pathological examination was 0.713 (95%CI: 0.573–0.760), and with Xpert was 0.789 (95%CI: 0.655–0.829). Conclusion Use of EBUS-GS with Xpert had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of isolated pulmonary tuberculoma. This method has significant potential for use in clinical practice.

Application of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA for the Rapid Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis Using Different Specimens

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-RNA in the rapid diagnosis of lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB). Moreover, the difference in the diagnostic accuracy of MTB-RNA using different specimens was determined.

Methods

We included patients with suspected LNTB who met the inclusion criteria and retrospectively analyzed their clinical data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), negative-predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of MTB-RNA and culture were calculated and its diagnostic accuracy for LNTB was evaluated in comparison with the final clinical diagnosis.

Results

Overall, 285 patients were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of MTB-RNA were 40.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 17.0%, and 0.70, respectively. These values were 30.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 16.0%, and 0.65, respectively, for tissue specimens; 34.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 24.6%, and 0.67, respectively, for puncture specimens; and 57.14%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 5.3%, and 0.79, respectively, for pus specimens. These values of culture were 24.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 13.9%, and 0.62, respectively, for all specimens; 17.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 13.8%, and 0.59, respectively, for tissue specimens; 25.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 22.4%, and 0.63, respectively, for puncture specimens; and 31.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 3.3%, and 0.65, respectively, for pus specimens.

Conclusion

The diagnostic efficacy of MTB-RNA for the rapid diagnosis of LNTB was moderate, but its sensitivity was low. The lymph node pus specimens were the most sensitive for MTB-RNA testing, followed by puncture specimens; tissues were the least sensitive. Pus specimens should be preferably obtained in case only this test is to be used for diagnosis.

Comparing Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA Accuracy in Various Respiratory Specimens for the Rapid Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Objective

To evaluate the rapid diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA (TB-RNA) for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in a large patient sample and to evaluate the difference in TB-RNA diagnostic accuracy in various respiratory specimens.

Methods

Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear and TB-RNA to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy against final clinical diagnosis.

Results

Of the 2336 patients ultimately included, 1123 provided 1 sputum specimen each and 1213 provided 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimen each. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 36.2%, 86.4%, 90.6%, 27.3%, and 0.61, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of TB-RNA for the rapid detection of PTB were 57.4%, 99.4%, 99.7%, 39.3%, and 0.78, respectively. When sputum and BALF specimens were used for AFB smear testing, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 44.5%, 81.5%, 87.5%, 33.5%, and 0.63; and 29.2%, 92.7%, 94.8%, 22.5%, and 0.61, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of TB-RNA for the rapid detection of PTB using sputum were 49.6%, 99.3%, 99.5%, 40.4%, and 0.74, respectively; whereas those of TB-RNA determined using BALF were 63.9%, 99.5%, 99.8%, 38.0%, and 0.82, respectively.

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for PTB was moderate and considerably better than that of the AFB smear. The diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for various respiratory specimens differed; the diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for BALF specimens was substantially better than that for sputum samples, and BALF specimens were more suitable for TB-RNA.

Diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing using respiratory specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the role of nanopore sequencing using respiratory specimens in the early diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and simultaneously compare it head-to-head with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture, and Xpert MTB/rifampin (RIF).

METHODS

The clinical data of 164 patients with suspected PTB were retrospectively reviewed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, MTB culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and nanopore sequencing and assess their diagnostic accuracy compared with culture combined with clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 27.6%, 87.5%, 84.2%, 33.3%, and 0.58, respectively; for MTB culture, these values were 57.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 49.5%, and 0.79, respectively; for Xpert MTB/RIF, these values were 62.9%, 97.9%, 98.7%, 52.2%, and 0.80, respectively; and for nanopore sequencing, these values were 94.8%, 97.9%, 99.1%, 88.7%, and 0.96, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing was excellent in terms of PTB diagnosis and was considerably better than that of the Xpert MTB/RIF and MTB culture. Nanopore sequencing could be an effective alternative to Xpert MTB/RIF for the initial detection of PTB to improve the accuracy of PTB diagnosis.

Comparison of the Accuracy of Two Different Molecular Tests for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Using Core Needle Biopsy Specimens: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (CapitalBio test) testing of core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens for tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBL) and to compare it with Xpert MTB/RIF.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical data on patients with suspected peripheral TBL. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the CapitalBio test, Xpert MTB/RIF, and parallel test (positive result for either of these two tests) were calculated to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with the final clinical diagnosis.

Results

The study included 114 patients. For diagnosing TBL using CNB samples, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were 65.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 28.6%, and 0.83, respectively, for the CapitalBio test; 72.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 33.3%, and 0.86, respectively, for Xpert MTB/RIF; and 82.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 43.8%, and 0.91, respectively, for the parallel test.

Conclusion

The accuracy of the CapitalBio test and Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing TBL using CNB specimens was moderate, while the sensitivity and NPV of these two tests were relatively low. The diagnostic accuracy of the CapitalBio test was slightly lower than that of Xpert MTB/RIF, but the difference between the two was not statistically significant. Parallel test might improve the diagnostic accuracy but not substantially over a single test.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR Detection Assay for Tuberculous Pericarditis

Purpose

We evaluated CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay diagnosing tuberculous pericarditis (TBP), performed a head-to-head comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF, and assessed the impact of a parallel test (positive result for either of these two tests).

Methods

We reviewed suspected TBP patients with Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Seventy-four patients were included. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay compared with culture were 50%, 91.1%, 64.3%, 85%, and 0.71, respectively. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP were 61.1%, 91.1%, 68.8%, 87.9%, and 0.76. Parallel test values were 72.2%, 91.1%, 72.2%, 91.1%, and 0.82. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF was higher than CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay but was not significant (P > 0.05). The parallel test could improve diagnostic accuracy, but it was not significant compared to single tests (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay had a moderate diagnostic accuracy, similar to Xpert MTB/RIF. The parallel test maximized diagnostic efficacy, but differences were not significant. CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay and Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP could be an initial option for early diagnosis.

The Role of Core Needle Biopsy Pathology Combined with Molecular Tests in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis

Background

Early lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB) diagnosis is still difficult. The majority of LN specimens require the undertaking of invasive and unpleasant procedures.

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of pathology when combined with molecular tests for the diagnosis of LNTB in core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens and to compare that diagnostic efficacy with that deriving from tissue specimens’ examination alone.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of LNTB patients who met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of pathology, molecular tests, and parallel test (positive result for either of these two assays) were calculated to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with a composite reference standard.

Results

A total of 289 patients were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of pathology, molecular tests, and parallel test were 94.5%, 97.2%, 99.6%, 71.4%, 0.96; 73.1%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 34.6%, 0.87; and 98.4%, 97.2%, 99.6%, 89.7%, 0.98, respectively. For CNB specimens, these values for pathology, molecular tests, and parallel test were 93.3%, 96.2%, 99.4%, 69.4%, 0.95; 76.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 40.0%, 0.88; and 99.4%, 96.2%, 99.4%,96.2%,0.98, while those same values for the tissue were 96.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 76.9%, 0.98; 67.1%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 25.6%, 0.84; and 96.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 76.9%,0.98, respectively.

Conclusion

The validity of pathology and molecular testing when using CNB specimens was similar to that of tissue specimens for relevant assessment approaches. For the LNTB diagnosis, CNB specimens were preferred for the simultaneous undertaking of pathological examination and molecular testing.

Diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell-free DNA for tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is still difficult. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for diagnosing of TB.

METHODS

We searched relevant databases for studies that used cfDNA to diagnose TB. We evaluated the accuracy of cfDNA compared with the composite reference standard (CRS) and culture. True positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative values for cfDNA were obtained first, then the estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) of cfDNA for diagnosing TB were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was determined using the I2 statistic. When the heterogeneity was obvious, the source of heterogeneity was further discussed.

RESULTS

We included 14 independent studies comparing cfDNA with the CRS, and 4 studies compared with culture. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, DOR, and AUC of the SROC were 68%, 98%,99%, 62%, 83, and 0.97 as compared with the CRS, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, DOR, and AUC of the SROC were 48%, 91%, 92%, 60%, 5, and 0.88 as compared with culture, respectively. The heterogeneity between studies was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of cfDNA testing for TB diagnosis was good compared with CRS and culture. cfDNA can be used for rapid early diagnosis of TB.