Comparison of blood cultures versus T2 Candida Panel in management of candidemia at a large community hospital

Clinical evaluation of the T2Candida assay for the rapid diagnosis of candidemia

We evaluated the clinical performance of the T2Candida assay. The overall agreement of the T2Candida assay results with the blood culture results was 95.3 % (121/127). The T2Candida assay detected three Candida albicans/tropicalis-positive specimens and one Candida krusei/glabrata-positive specimen; however, it did not detect two Candida glabrata specimens.

Culture independent detection systems for bloodstream infection

BACKGROUND

Sepsis and bloodstream infection are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and early effective antimicrobial therapy has been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes. Traditional culture-based methods, however, have several limitations which hamper a prompt diagnosis in bloodstream infection, including long turnaround times and limited sensitivity. In the last years, advances have been made in the development of several technologies which allow the identification of pathogens and their resistance markers directly from whole blood, possibly representing promising alternatives to conventional culture methods.

OBJECTIVES

To review the currently commercially available emerging assays for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections directly from whole blood, including their performance and the available data about their impact on patients' outcome.

SOURCES

Peer-reviewed publications relevant to the topic have been searched through PubMed; manufacturers' websites have also been consulted as a data source.

CONTENT

We have reviewed available data about the following technologies: multiplex real-time PCR working directly from whole blood (Magicplex Sepsis Real-Time test, Seegene), PCR combined with T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2Candida and T2Bacteria panel, T2Biosystem), and metagenomics-based assays (including SepsiTest, Molzym; iDTECT Dx Blood, PathoQuest; Karius NGS plasma Test, Karius). Performance characteristics, advantages and pitfalls of each method are described, and available data about their impact on patients' clinical outcomes are discussed.

IMPLICATIONS

The potential of rapid diagnostic tests applied on whole blood in improving the management of patients with bloodstream infection and sepsis is high, both in terms of reducing turnaround times and improving the sensitivity of pathogen and antimicrobial resistance detection. However, overall, there is still a scarcity of data about the real-life performance of such tests, and well-designed studies are awaited for assessing the impact of these emerging technologies on patients' outcomes.

Accuracy and Impact on Patient Management of New Tools for Diagnosis of Sepsis: Experience with the T2 Magnetic Resonance Bacteria Panel

The rapid and accurate identification of pathogens responsible for sepsis is essential for prompt and effective antimicrobial therapy. Molecular technologies have been developed to detect the most common causative agents, with high sensitivity and short time to result (TTR). T2 Bacteria Panel (T2), based on a combination of PCR and T2 magnetic resonance, can identify directly in blood samples Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, and Acinetobacter baumannii pathogens. This study evaluates the role of T2 in the diagnosis of sepsis and its impact on patient management, specifically in terms of TTR and the switch from empirical to directed therapy, comparing results of blood culture (BC) and T2 assay in 82 patients with sepsis. T2 significantly improved the detection of the causative agents of sepsis. For pathogens included in the panel, T2 sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 86.3–100.0), significantly higher than that of BC (54.8%, 95% CI 36.0–72.7). The TTR (median, IQR) of positive T2 (3.66 h, 3.59–4.31) was significantly shorter than that of the positive BC (37.58 h, 20.10–47.32). A significant reduction in the duration of empiric therapy and an increase in the percentage of patients with switched therapy was observed in patients with a positive T2 result. In conclusion, T2 can shorten and improve the etiological diagnosis of sepsis with a positive impact on patient management.