1
|
Sandes V, Figueras A, Lima EC. Pharmacovigilance Strategies to Address Resistance to Antibiotics and Inappropriate Use-A Narrative Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:457. [PMID: 38786184 PMCID: PMC11117530 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global challenge. Close and continuous surveillance for quick detection of AMR can be difficult, especially in remote places. This narrative review focuses on the contributions of pharmacovigilance (PV) as an auxiliary tool for identifying and monitoring the ineffectiveness, resistance, and inappropriate use of antibiotics (ABs). The terms "drug ineffective", "therapeutic failure", "drug resistance", "pathogen resistance", and "multidrug resistance" were found in PV databases and dictionaries, denoting ineffectiveness. These terms cover a range of problems that should be better investigated because they are useful in warning about possible causes of AMR. "Medication errors", especially those related to dose and indication, and "Off-label use" are highlighted in the literature, suggesting inappropriate use of ABs. Hence, the included studies show that the terms of interest related to AMR and use are not only present but frequent in PV surveillance programs. This review illustrates the feasibility of using PV as a complementary tool for antimicrobial stewardship activities, especially in scenarios where other resources are scarce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valcieny Sandes
- Postgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho-373, Rio de Janeiro 21941-170, RJ, Brazil;
- National Cancer Institute, Pr. da Cruz Vermelha-23, Rio de Janeiro 20230-130, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Elisangela Costa Lima
- Postgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho-373, Rio de Janeiro 21941-170, RJ, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loke YK, Mattishent K, Navaneetharaja N. New Adverse Drug Reaction Signals from 2017 to 2021-Genuine Alerts or False Alarms? PHARMACY 2024; 12:33. [PMID: 38392940 PMCID: PMC10892108 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy12010033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Spontaneous adverse events reporting systems are used internationally to flag new or unexpected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Disproportionality analysis is a recognised technique, but false alarms may arise. We aimed to determine whether these new ADR signals had subsequently been followed-up with detailed hypothesis-testing studies. We searched PubMed to identify published studies (years 2017-2021) where the authors reported findings of new ADR signals from disproportionality analyses. We used PubMed and forward citation tracking (Google Scholar) to identify any subsequent confirmatory studies of these ADR signals. We screened 414 titles and abstracts and checked the full-text articles of 57 studies. We found signals for 56 suspected new ADRs from 24 drugs. Google Scholar showed that the ADR studies had been cited a median of seven times (range 0-61). However, none of the suspected new ADRs had undergone detailed evaluation in the citing literature. Similarly, our PubMed search did not find any confirmation studies for the 56 suspected new ADRs. Although many suspected new ADR signals have been identified through disproportionality analysis, most signals have not been further verified as being either genuine ADRs or false alarms. Researchers must focus on follow-up studies for these new signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Kong Loke
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barbier F, Hraiech S, Kernéis S, Veluppillai N, Pajot O, Poissy J, Roux D, Zahar JR. Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care 2023; 13:65. [PMID: 37462830 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-023-01153-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues. METHODS A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022. RESULTS These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen. CONCLUSIONS New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Barbier
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, 14, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 45000, Orléans, France.
- Institut Maurice Rapin, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
| | - Sami Hraiech
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, and Centre d'Études et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de Vie, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Solen Kernéis
- Équipe de Prévention du Risque Infectieux, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, and INSERM/IAME, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nathanaël Veluppillai
- Équipe de Prévention du Risque Infectieux, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, and INSERM/IAME, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Pajot
- Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Victor Dupouy, Argenteuil, France
| | - Julien Poissy
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Inserm U1285, Université de Lille, and CNRS/UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France
| | - Damien Roux
- Institut Maurice Rapin, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
- DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Colombes, and INSERM/CNRS, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Ralph Zahar
- Institut Maurice Rapin, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
- Département de Microbiologie Clinique, Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny and INSERM/IAME, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
How to use new antibiotics in the therapy of serious multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2022; 35:561-567. [PMID: 36345853 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections are becoming more common and pose a serious threat to both individual patients and the population as a whole. Treatment of these infections can be difficult and result in significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss information and strategies for using new antibiotics to combat these infections. RECENT FINDINGS Eight new antibiotics represent possible means to treat multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections. Although no new mechanisms of action are present amongst these new antibiotics, novel additions to previously utilized mechanisms have been shown to be viable options for treatment of highly resistant organisms. SUMMARY The novel antibiotics considered in this review have varying data on their use as empiric treatment of patients at high risk for multidrug resistant organisms and as final therapy for identified multidrug resistant organisms. Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relabactam have the best support evidence for use in this patient population.
Collapse
|
5
|
Fanton D'Andon C, Correia P, Rigaill J, Kably B, Perinel-Ragey S, Launay M. Ceftazidime dosing in obese patients: is it time for more? Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2022; 18:277-284. [PMID: 35583387 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2022.2080052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ceftazidime is used for the treatment of many bacterial infections, including severe P. aeruginosa infections. Like other beta-lactams, inter-individual variability in ceftazidime pharmacokinetics has been described. Due to its related pathophysiological modifications, obesity might influence ceftazidime pharmacokinetics. AREAS COVERED The objective of this review is to assess the current state of knowledge about the impact of obesity on ceftazidime treatment. A literature search was conducted on PubMed-MEDLINE (2016-2021) to retrieve pharmacokinetic studies published in English, matching the terms 'ceftazidime' AND 'pharmacokinetics.' EXPERT OPINION The impact of obesity on pharmacokinetics is generally poorly known, mainly because obese patients are often excluded from clinical studies. However, the published literature clearly shows that obese patients have significantly lower ceftazidime concentrations. This could be explained by increased volume of distribution and clearance. This low exposure represents a major factor of therapeutic failure, potentially fatal for critically ill patients. While further studies would be useful to better assess the magnitude and understanding of this variability, the use of higher doses of ceftazidime is needed in obese patients. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring for dose adaptation is of major interest for these patients, as the efficacy of ceftazidime seems to be directly related to its plasma concentration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornélie Fanton D'Andon
- - Gaz du Sang, Hôpital NordLaboratoire de Pharmacologie - Toxicologie , CHU de Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Patricia Correia
- Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation G, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Josselin Rigaill
- Department of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Benjamin Kably
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Perinel-Ragey
- Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation G, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Manon Launay
- - Gaz du Sang, Hôpital NordLaboratoire de Pharmacologie - Toxicologie , CHU de Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11020277. [PMID: 35203879 PMCID: PMC8868358 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.
Collapse
|
7
|
Roger C, Louart B. Beta-Lactams Toxicity in the Intensive Care Unit: An Underestimated Collateral Damage? Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9071505. [PMID: 34361942 PMCID: PMC8306322 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9071505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Beta-lactams are the most commonly prescribed antimicrobials in intensive care unit (ICU) settings and remain one of the safest antimicrobials prescribed. However, the misdiagnosis of beta-lactam-related adverse events may alter ICU patient management and impact clinical outcomes. To describe the clinical manifestations, risk factors and beta-lactam-induced neurological and renal adverse effects in the ICU setting, we performed a comprehensive literature review via an electronic search on PubMed up to April 2021 to provide updated clinical data. Beta-lactam neurotoxicity occurs in 10-15% of ICU patients and may be responsible for a large panel of clinical manifestations, ranging from confusion, encephalopathy and hallucinations to myoclonus, convulsions and non-convulsive status epilepticus. Renal impairment, underlying brain abnormalities and advanced age have been recognized as the main risk factors for neurotoxicity. In ICU patients, trough concentrations above 22 mg/L for cefepime, 64 mg/L for meropenem, 125 mg/L for flucloxacillin and 360 mg/L for piperacillin (used without tazobactam) are associated with neurotoxicity in 50% of patients. Even though renal complications (especially severe complications, such as acute interstitial nephritis, renal damage associated with drug induced hemolytic anemia and renal obstruction by crystallization) remain rare, there is compelling evidence of increased nephrotoxicity using well-known nephrotoxic drugs such as vancomycin combined with beta-lactams. Treatment mainly relies on the discontinuation of the offending drug but in the near future, antimicrobial optimal dosing regimens should be defined, not only based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets associated with clinical and microbiological efficacy, but also on PK/toxicodynamic targets. The use of dosing software may help to achieve these goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Roger
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes-Caremeau University Hospital, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, CEDEX 9, 30029 Nîmes, France;
- UR UM 103 IMAGINE, Faculty of Medicine, Montpellier University, 34090 Montpellier, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Benjamin Louart
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes-Caremeau University Hospital, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, CEDEX 9, 30029 Nîmes, France;
- UR UM 103 IMAGINE, Faculty of Medicine, Montpellier University, 34090 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Population Pharmacokinetics and Probability of Target Attainment of Different Dosing Regimens of Ceftazidime in Critically Ill Patients with a Proven or Suspected Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10060612. [PMID: 34063815 PMCID: PMC8224000 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10060612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Altered pharmacokinetics (PK) of hydrophilic antibiotics in critically ill patients is common, with possible consequences for efficacy and resistance. We aimed to describe ceftazidime population PK in critically ill patients with a proven or suspected Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and to establish optimal dosing. Blood samples were collected for ceftazidime concentration measurement. A population PK model was constructed, and probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed for targets 100% T > MIC and 100% T > 4 × MIC in the first 24 h. Ninety-six patients yielded 368 ceftazidime concentrations. In a one-compartment model, variability in ceftazidime clearance (CL) showed association with CVVH. For patients not receiving CVVH, variability in ceftazidime CL was 103.4% and showed positive associations with creatinine clearance and with the comorbidities hematologic malignancy, trauma or head injury, explaining 65.2% of variability. For patients treated for at least 24 h and assuming a worst-case MIC of 8 mg/L, PTA was 77% for 100% T > MIC and 14% for 100% T > 4 × MIC. Patients receiving loading doses before continuous infusion demonstrated higher PTA than patients who did not (100% T > MIC: 95% (n = 65) vs. 13% (n = 15); p < 0.001 and 100% T > 4 × MIC: 20% vs. 0%; p = 0.058). The considerable IIV in ceftazidime PK in ICU patients could largely be explained by renal function, CVVH use and several comorbidities. Critically ill patients are at risk for underexposure to ceftazidime when empirically aiming for the breakpoint MIC for P. aeruginosa. A loading dose is recommended.
Collapse
|