1
|
Gong J, Yang J, Liu L, Chen X, Yang G, He Y, Sun R. Evaluation and clinical practice of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes of BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia panel in lower respiratory tract infections. Infection 2024; 52:545-555. [PMID: 38123753 PMCID: PMC10955009 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-023-02144-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing panels for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are slow and lack quantification of important pathogens and antimicrobial resistance, which are not solely responsible for their complex etiology and antibiotic resistance. BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia (PN) panels may provide rapid information on their etiology. METHODS The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of 187 patients with LRTIs was simultaneously analyzed using a PN panel and cultivation, and the impact of the PN panel on clinical practice was assessed. The primary endpoint was to compare the consistency between the PN panel and conventional microbiology in terms of etiology and drug resistance, as well as to explore the clinical significance of the PN panel. The secondary endpoint was pathogen detection using the PN panel in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). RESULTS Fifty-seven patients with HAP and 130 with CAP were included. The most common pathogens of HAP were Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae, with the most prevalent antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes being CTX-M and KPC. For CAP, the most common pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus, with the most frequent AMR genes being CTX-M and VIM. Compared with routine bacterial culture, the PN panel demonstrated an 85% combined positive percent agreement (PPA) and 92% negative percent agreement (NPA) for the qualitative identification of 13 bacterial targets. PN detection of bacteria with higher levels of semi-quantitative bacteria was associated with more positive bacterial cultures. Positive concordance between phenotypic resistance and the presence of corresponding AMR determinants was 85%, with 90% positive agreement between CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase gene type and phenotype and 100% agreement for mecA/C and MREJ. The clinical benefit of the PN panel increased by 25.97% compared with traditional cultural tests. CONCLUSION The bacterial pathogens and AMR identified by the PN panel were in good agreement with conventional cultivation, and the clinical benefit of the PN panel increased by 25.97% compared with traditional detection. Therefore, the PN panel is recommended for patients with CAP or HAP who require prompt pathogen diagnosis and resistance identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinru Gong
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiasheng Yang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lihong Liu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoxuan Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guangyu Yang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaowei He
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruilin Sun
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moerman A, De Waele JJ, Boelens J. An overview of point-of-care testing for infections in critically ill patients. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2024; 24:193-200. [PMID: 38414348 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2322146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Molecular diagnostic systems for point-of-care (POC) testing are nowadays routinely used and are part of many labs. Although often intended for bedside use outside of the microbiology lab, there is still room for expansion. AREAS COVERED This review discusses the two techniques that are currently the most widespread, real-time polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). An overview is provided of the various manufacturers and products as well as the evidence and current use in clinical practice. The article further sheds light on some newer techniques, such as CRISPR-based diagnostics and lab-on-a-chip, which are still in development. EXPERT OPINION With many new platforms and techniques still in the pipeline and their potential currently not yet fully exploited, we expect the use of molecular POC testing to increase in the years to come. However, even when used in hospital - in lab, the main advantages of the tests being fast and easy to perform already provide significant benefits in terms of patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alena Moerman
- Department of Medical microbiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Jan J De Waele
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Jerina Boelens
- Department of Medical microbiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Musuroi SI, Voinescu A, Musuroi C, Baditoiu LM, Muntean D, Izmendi O, Jumanca R, Licker M. The Challenges of The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Patients with Infectious Pathology in Emergency Medicine. J Pers Med 2023; 14:46. [PMID: 38248747 PMCID: PMC10821085 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The emergency department (ED) represents an important setting for addressing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing practices because of the time constraints and the duration of microbiological diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the etiology and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pattern of the community-acquired pathogens, as well as the epidemiological characteristics of patients admitted through the ED, in order to guide appropriate antibiotic therapy. METHODS A retrospective observational study was performed on 657 patients, from whom clinical samples (urine, purulent secretions, blood cultures, etc.) were collected for microbiological diagnosis in the first 3 days after presentation in the ED. The identification of pathogens and the antimicrobial susceptibility testing with minimum inhibitory concentration determination were carried out according to the laboratory protocols. RESULTS From the 767 biological samples analyzed, 903 microbial isolates were identified. E. coli was most frequently isolated (24.25%), followed by Klebsiella spp., S. aureus (SA), and non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli. E. coli strains maintained their natural susceptibility to most antibiotics tested. In the case of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp., increased rates of AMR were identified. Also, 32.3% of SA strains were community-acquired MRSA. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of rapid microbiological diagnostic methods in emergency medicine is imperative in order to timely identify AMR strains and improve therapeutic protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Ioana Musuroi
- Doctoral School, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (S.I.M.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital, 300254 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Adela Voinescu
- Doctoral School, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (S.I.M.)
- Microbiology Department, Multidisciplinary Research Center of Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.M.); (M.L.)
- Microbiology Laboratory, “Pius Brinzeu” County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Corina Musuroi
- Microbiology Department, Multidisciplinary Research Center of Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.M.); (M.L.)
- Microbiology Laboratory, “Pius Brinzeu” County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Luminita Mirela Baditoiu
- Epidemiology Department, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Delia Muntean
- Microbiology Department, Multidisciplinary Research Center of Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.M.); (M.L.)
- Microbiology Laboratory, “Pius Brinzeu” County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Oana Izmendi
- Doctoral School, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (S.I.M.)
- Microbiology Department, Multidisciplinary Research Center of Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.M.); (M.L.)
- Microbiology Laboratory, “Pius Brinzeu” County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Romanita Jumanca
- Romanian and Foreign Languages Department, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Monica Licker
- Microbiology Department, Multidisciplinary Research Center of Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.M.); (M.L.)
- Microbiology Laboratory, “Pius Brinzeu” County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The World Health Organization describes antimicrobial resistance as one of the biggest threats to global health, food security, and development with indiscriminate use of antimicrobials globally driving the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, resistant to 60% of antimicrobials in some countries. Infections with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) have increased in recent decades in patients with cirrhosis, who are frequently prescribed antibiotics, regularly undergo invasive procedures such as large volume paracentesis, and have recurrent hospitalizations, posing a particular risk in this already immunocompromised cohort of patients. In this review, we explore mechanisms underlying this vulnerability to MDRO infection; the effect of bacterial infections on disease course in cirrhosis; prevalence of MDROs in patients with cirrhosis; outcomes following MDRO infection; fungal infections; antibiotics and their efficacy; and management of MDRO infections in terms of detection, antimicrobial and nonantimicrobial treatments, prophylaxis, antibiotic stewardship, the gut microbiome, and technological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E Gallaher
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Debbie L Shawcross
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Institute of Liver Studies, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Recent Developments in Phenotypic and Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Antimicrobial Resistance Detection in Staphylococcus aureus: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12010208. [PMID: 35054375 PMCID: PMC8774325 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen responsible for a wide range of infections in humans, such as skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia, food poisoning or sepsis. Historically, S. aureus was able to rapidly adapt to anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and become resistant to several classes of antibiotics. Today, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a multidrug-resistant pathogen and is one of the most common bacteria responsible for hospital-acquired infections and outbreaks, in community settings as well. The rapid and accurate diagnosis of antimicrobial resistance in S. aureus is crucial to the early initiation of directed antibiotic therapy and to improve clinical outcomes for patients. In this narrative review, I provide an overview of recent phenotypic and molecular diagnostic methods for antimicrobial resistance detection in S. aureus, with a particular focus on MRSA detection. I consider methods for resistance detection in both clinical samples and isolated S. aureus cultures, along with a brief discussion of the advantages and the challenges of implementing such methods in routine diagnostics.
Collapse
|