Progressive in vivo development of resistance to cefiderocol in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In vitro activity of human defensins HNP-1 and hBD-3 against multidrug-resistant ESKAPE Gram-negatives of clinical origin and selected peptidoglycan recycling-defective mutants

The use of immune compounds as antimicrobial adjuvants is a classic idea recovering timeliness in the current antibiotic resistance scenario. However, the activity of certain antimicrobial peptides against ESKAPE Gram-negatives has not been sufficiently investigated. The objective of this study was to determine the activities of human defensins HNP-1 and hBD-3 alone or combined with permeabilizing/peptidoglycan-targeting agents against clinical ESKAPE Gram-negatives [Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), Enterobacter cloacae (EC), Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), and acute/chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA)]. Lethal concentrations (LCs) of HNP-1 and hBD-3 were determined in four collections of multidrug resistant EC, AB, KP, and PA clinical strains (10-36 isolates depending on the collection). These defensins act through membrane permeabilization plus peptidoglycan building blockade, enabling that alterations in peptidoglycan recycling may increase their activity, which is why different recycling-defective mutants were also included. Combinations with physiological lysozyme and subinhibitory colistin for bactericidal activities determination, and with meropenem for minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), were also assessed. HNP-1 showed undetectable activity (LC > 32 mg/L for all strains). hBD-3 showed appreciable activities: LC ranges 2-16, 8-8, 8->32, and 8->32 mg/L for AB, EC, KP, and PA, being PA strains from cystic fibrosis significantly more resistant than acute origin ones. None of the peptidoglycan recycling-defective mutants showed greater susceptibility to HNP-1/hBD-3. Combination with colistin or lysozyme did not change their bactericidal power, and virtually neither did meropenem + hBD-3 compared to meropenem MICs. This is the first study comparatively analyzing the HNP-1/hBD-3 activities against the ESKAPE Gram-negatives, and demonstrates interesting bactericidal capacities of hBD-3 mostly against AB and EC.

IMPORTANCE

In the current scenario of critical need for new antimicrobials against multidrug-resistant bacteria, all options must be considered, including classic ideas such as the use of purified immune compounds. However, information regarding the activity of certain human defensins against ESKAPE Gram-negatives was incomplete. This is the first study comparatively assessing the in vitro activity of two membrane-permeabilizing/peptidoglycan construction-blocking defensins (HNP-1 and hBD-3) against relevant clinical collections of ESKAPE Gram-negatives, alone or in combination with permeabilizers, additional peptidoglycan-targeting attacks, or the blockade of its recycling. Our data suggest that hBD-3 has a notable bactericidal activity against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacter cloacae strains that should be considered as potential adjuvant option. Our results suggest for the first time an increased resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from chronic infection compared to acute origin ones, and provide new clues about the predominant mode of action of hBD-3 against Gram-negatives (permeabilization rather than peptidoglycan-targeting).

Reduce susceptibility to cefiderocol in gram negative bacteria in children: Is hope already lost before it's even arrived?

BACKGROUND

In last years the diffusion of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is increasing worldwide, mainly due to the expression of carbapenemases. Cefiderocol has molecular characteristics that ideally confers activity against all CR-GNB, but resistant strains have already been identified. We describe cefiderocol susceptibility profile among multi-drug resistant Gram-negative isolated from pediatric patients.

METHODS

Prospective, single pediatric center study, 1st January 2020-15th June 2023. All GNB carbapenemases producers or phenotypically carbapenem-resistant isolated in the study period were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility. Clinical and microbiological data were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed, comparing the groups of cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB).

RESULTS

Forty-seven GNB were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility; 38% were cefiderocol-resistant: 16/30 (52%) among Enterobacterales and 2/17 (12%) among NF-GNB. None of the patients were previously exposed to cefiderocol. Looking at Enterobacterales, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was higher among cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible strains (62% vs 36%, respectively), as MBL expression (67% vs. 36%, respectively). Too few NF-GNB were cefiderocol-resistance to draw any conclusion. No difference in ICU admission and mortality was identified comparing cefiderocol-resistant vs. susceptible strains. Patients colonized/infected by cefiderocol-resistant strains had been previously hospitalized more frequently.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort cefiderocol resistance was mostly registered among Enterobacterales, and especially among MBL producers' strains (that were alongside resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam). This could be explained by the known possible cross resistance mechanism among ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. Also, correlation of cefiderocol-resistance with previous hospitalization could be associated with horizontal resistance transmission. Looking at our data, we believe that cefiderocol should be use cautiously, especially empirically and in monotherapy, due to the high resistance rate.

Population-based genomic surveillance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing bloodstream infections in a large Canadian health region

PURPOSE

Population-based surveillance was undertaken to determine clinical factors, susceptibility patterns, and incidence rates (IR) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) in a Canadian region (2010-2018).

METHODS

We combined clinical data with genomics to characterize P. aeruginosa (BSIs) (n = 167) in a well-defined Canadian (Calgary) human population over a 9-year period (2010-2018).

RESULTS

The annual population IR per 100,000 patient years increased from 3.4/100,000 in 2010 to 5.9/100,000 in 2018, with the highest IRs in elderly males from the hospital setting. Over a quarter of patients presented with febrile neutropenia, followed by urinary tract infections and pneumonia. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and determinants were rare. The P. aeruginosa population was polyclonal consisting of three dominant sequence types (STs), namely ST244, ST111, and ST17. Antimicrobial-susceptible ST244 was the most common clone and belonged to three clades (A, B, C). The ST244 IR/100,000 increased over time due to the expansion of clade C. Multidrug-resistant ST111 was the second most common clone and IR/100,000 decreased over time. ST111 belonged to three clades (A, B, C) with clade C containing blaVIM-2. Different serotypes were linked to various STs. The IR/100,000 of P. aeruginosa that belonged to serotypes O6 increased significantly over time.

CONCLUSION

An effective multivalent vaccine consisting of five serotypes (O1, O3, O5, O6, O11) would confer protection to > 70% of Calgary residents with P. aeruginosa BSIs. This study has provided a unique perspective of the population dynamics over time of P. aeruginosa STs, clades, and serotypes responsible for BSIs.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol: which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the different present and future therapeutic β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) alternatives, namely aztreonam-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and sulbactam-durlobactam against clinical isolates showing reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were determined for 67, 9, and 11 clinical Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii isolates, respectively, showing MIC values of cefiderocol being ≥1 mg/L. If unavailable, the respective β-lactam breakpoints according to EUCAST were used for BL/BLI combinations.

RESULTS

For Enterobacterales, the susceptibility rates for aztreonam, cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem were 7.5%, 0%, 10.4%, and 10.4%, respectively, while they were much higher for cefepime-zidebactam (91%), cefiderocol-zidebactam (91%), meropenem-nacubactam (71.6%), cefiderocol-nacubactam (74.6%), and cefiderocol-taniborbactam (76.1%), as expected. For P. aeruginosa isolates, the higher susceptibility rates were observed for imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol-zidebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam (56% for all combinations). For A. baumannii isolates, lower susceptibility rates were observed with commercially or under development BL/BLI combos; however, a high susceptibility rate (70%) was found for sulbactam-durlobactam and when cefiderocol was associated to some BLIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Zidebactam- and nacubactam-containing combinations showed a significant in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol. On the other hand, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam showed the highest susceptibility rates against P. aeruginosa isolates. Finally, sulbactam-durlobactam and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were the only effective options against A. baumannii tested isolates.

Approaches to Testing Novel β-Lactam and β-Lactam Combination Agents in the Clinical Laboratory

The rapid emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens has driven the introduction of novel β-lactam combination agents (BLCs) to the antibiotic market: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and sulbactam-durlobactam. These agents are equipped with innovative mechanisms that confer broad Gram-negative activity, notably against certain challenging carbapenemases. While their introduction offers a beacon of hope, clinical microbiology laboratories must navigate the complexities of susceptibility testing for these agents due to their diverse activity profiles against specific β-lactamases and the possibility of acquired resistance mechanisms in some bacterial isolates. This review explores the complexities of these novel antimicrobial agents detailing the intricacies of their application, providing guidance on the nuances of susceptibility testing, interpretation, and result reporting in clinical microbiology laboratories.

High efficacy and enhanced synergistic activity of the novel siderophore-cephalosporin cefiderocol against multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from inpatients attending a single hospital in the United Arab Emirates

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore-cephalosporin, which usually penetrates the bacteria through the iron-uptake pathways. Data is limited on the factors affecting CFDC activity and methods for overcoming resistance development. Synergistic approaches are needed to tackle antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to determine CFDC activity on Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from patients attending a single hospital in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), to explore the effect of β-lactamases on CFDC activity and to enhance CFDC susceptibility in both iron-depleted and iron-enriched conditions.

METHODS

We investigated 238 K. pneumoniae strains from diverse clinical sources. β-lactamase genes were detected by PCR. Susceptibility to CFDC and 12 comparator antibiotics were tested. Combinations of CFDC with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) and/or an outer membrane (OM) permeabilizer (polymyxin B nonapeptide) were tested in iron-depleted and iron-enriched conditions.

RESULTS

CFDC exhibited efficacy of 97.9%, against multidrug-resistant (MDR), and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains, in addition to strains resistant to the last resort drugs such as colistin and tigecycline, including dual carbapenemase-producers (blaNDM and blaOXA-48-like) with MIC ≤ 0.06-8 µg/ml. It was effective in killing strains with single and multiple β-lactamases; however, it lost activity in iron-enriched conditions. Synergy was achieved with dual combination of CFDC and BLIs, especially avibactam, which caused a significant reduction in MICs even in iron-enriched conditions. A significant reduction was seen with the triple combination including an OM permeabilizer plus avibactam. Killing-kinetic studies proved that the combination therapy caused dose reduction and faster killing by CFDC than the monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

CFDC was deemed effective against MDR and XDR K. pneumoniae. Synergistic combination of CFDC with BLIs and OM permeabilizers could be effective to treat infections in iron-rich sites, but this should be investigated in vivo.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrating evolved resistance to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors

Background

Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent activity against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, the activity against isolates from patients previously treated with β-lactam agents is unknown. We aimed to determine the activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa collected before and after treatment with traditional β-lactams and new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors.

Methods

Cefiderocol MICs were determined in triplicate in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and compared with β-lactam MICs tested by standard methods. All isolates underwent WGS analysis to identify mutations associated with resistance.

Results

One hundred and seventy-eight P. aeruginosa isolates were evaluated; 48% (86/178) were non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam. The cefiderocol MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.12 and 1 mg/L, respectively. Median cefiderocol MICs did not vary against isolates classified as MDR, XDR, or those non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam when compared with non-MDR isolates. Against isolates collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol MICs were increased 4-fold compared with baseline. Cross-resistance to cefiderocol was identified in 21% (3/14) of patients who developed treatment-emergent resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Overall, 6% (11/178) of isolates demonstrated cefiderocol MICs ≥2 mg/L, which were disproportionately collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam (73%; 8/11). Isolates with reduced cefiderocol susceptibility harboured mutations in ampC, tonB-dependent receptors, the response regulator pirR and ftsI.

Conclusions

Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates exposed to other novel β-lactam agents; however, some exceptions were identified. Cross-resistance between cefiderocol and ceftolozane/tazobactam was evident, but not with ceftazidime/avibactam or imipenem/relebactam. Reduced cefiderocol susceptibility was mediated by mutations in ampC and tonB-dependent receptors.

A Selective Culture Medium for Screening Cefiderocol Resistance in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii

Cefiderocol (FDC) is a siderophore cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Acquired resistance to FDC has been already reported among Gram-negative isolates, thus highlighting the need for rapid and accurate identification of such resistant pathogens, in order to control their spread. Therefore, the SuperFDC medium was developed to screen FDC-resistant Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. After testing several culture conditions, a selective medium was set up by supplementing an iron-depleted agar medium with 8 μg/mL of FDC and evaluated with a collection of 68 FDC-susceptible and 33 FDC-resistant Gram-negative isolates exhibiting a variety of β-lactam resistance mechanisms. The sensitivity and specificity of detection of this medium were evaluated at 97% and 100%, respectively. In comparison with the reference broth microdilution method, only 3% very major errors were found. In addition, excellent detection performances were obtained by testing spiked stools with a lower limit of detection ranging between 100 and 103 CFU/mL. The SuperFDC medium allows detection of FDC-resistant Gram-negative isolates regardless of their corresponding resistance mechanisms.

Metallo-β-lactamase-mediated antimicrobial resistance and progress in inhibitor discovery

Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is rapidly growing, substantially due to the spread of serine-β-lactamases (SBLs) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), which efficiently catalyse β-lactam hydrolysis. Combinations of a β-lactam antibiotic with an SBL inhibitor have been clinically successful; however, no MBL inhibitors have been developed for clinical use. MBLs are a worrying resistance vector because they catalyse hydrolysis of all β-lactam antibiotic classes, except the monobactams, and they are being disseminated across many bacterial species worldwide. Here we review the classification, structures, substrate profiles, and inhibition mechanisms of MBLs, highlighting current clinical problems due to MBL-mediated resistance and progress in understanding and combating MBL-mediated resistance.

An Overview of Cefiderocol's Therapeutic Potential and Underlying Resistance Mechanisms

Antimicrobial resistance continues to increase globally and treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTT) infections, mostly associated with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CR Acinetobacter baumannii, and CR- and third-generation-cephalosporins-resistant Enterobacterales remains a challenge for the clinician. The recent approval of cefiderocol has broaden the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with DTT infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin that has shown excellent antibacterial activity, in part due to its innovative way of cell permeation. It is relatively stable compared to most commonly found carbapenamases. However, some resistant mechanisms to cefiderocol have already been identified and reduced susceptibility has developed during patient treatment, highlighting that the clinical use of cefiderocol must be rational. In this review, we summarize the current available treatments against the former resistant bacteria, and we revise and discuss the mechanism of action of cefiderocol, underlying the biological function of siderophores, the therapeutic potential of cefiderocol, and the mechanisms of resistance reported so far.

Antibiotic stewardship in the ICU: time to shift into overdrive

Antibiotic resistance is a major health problem and will be probably one of the leading causes of deaths in the coming years. One of the most effective ways to fight against resistance is to decrease antibiotic consumption. Intensive care units (ICUs) are places where antibiotics are widely prescribed, and where multidrug-resistant pathogens are frequently encountered. However, ICU physicians may have opportunities to decrease antibiotics consumption and to apply antimicrobial stewardship programs. The main measures that may be implemented include refraining from immediate prescription of antibiotics when infection is suspected (except in patients with shock, where immediate administration of antibiotics is essential); limiting empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics (including anti-MRSA antibiotics) in patients without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens; switching to monotherapy instead of combination therapy and narrowing spectrum when culture and susceptibility tests results are available; limiting the use of carbapenems to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and new beta-lactams to difficult-to-treat pathogen (when these news beta-lactams are the only available option); and shortening the duration of antimicrobial treatment, the use of procalcitonin being one tool to attain this goal. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should combine these measures rather than applying a single one. ICUs and ICU physicians should be at the frontline for developing antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens

Gram-negative bacterial resistance to antimicrobials has had an exponential increase at a global level during the last decades and represent an everyday challenge, especially for the hospital practice of our era. Concerted efforts from the researchers and the industry have recently provided several novel promising antimicrobials, resilient to various bacterial resistance mechanisms. There are new antimicrobials that became commercially available during the last five years, namely, cefiderocol, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin. Furthermore, other agents are in advanced development, having reached phase 3 clinical trials, namely, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, sulopenem, tebipenem, and benapenem. In this present review, we critically discuss the characteristics of the above-mentioned antimicrobials, their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and the current clinical data.

What to Do with the New Antibiotics?

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related infections have become a real public health problem and have exposed the risk of a therapeutic impasse. In recent years, many new antibiotics have been introduced to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium. Among these new molecules, some are mainly of interest for the treatment of the multidrug-resistant infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam); others are for carbapenem-resistant infections associated with Enterobacterales (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam); and finally, there are others that are effective on the majority of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (cefiderocol). Most international guidelines recommend these new antibiotics in the treatment of microbiologically documented infections. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality of these infections, particularly in the case of inadequate therapy, it is important to consider the place of these antibiotics in probabilistic treatment. Knowledge of the risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (local ecology, prior colonization, failure of prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection) seems necessary in order to optimize antibiotic prescriptions. In this review, we will assess these different antibiotics according to the epidemiological data.