Effect of light polymerization time, mode, and thermal and mechanical load cycling on microleakage in resin composite restorations

3D-2D microleakage assessment of preheated bulk-fill composite resin applied with different parameters: a micro-CT analysis

This study evaluated microleakage from class II cavities filled with bulk-fill composite preheated to different temperatures, applied at different thicknesses, and with different polymerization modes. A total of 60 mesio-occlusal cavity were drilled into the extracted human third molars at 2 mm and 4 mm thickness. Preheated bulk-fill composite resin (Viscalor; VOCO, Germany) was applied to the cavities at 68 °C and 37 °C after the adhesive resin was applied, and cured using standard and high-power light-curing modes of a VALO light-curing unit. An incrementally applied microhybrid composite was used as the control. The teeth were subjected to 2000 cycles of heating to 55 °C and cooling to 5 °C with a 30-s hold time. Then, they were immersed in a 50% silver nitrate solution for 24 h and scanned with micro-computed tomography. Scanned data were processed using the CTAn software. Two (2D) and three (3D) dimensional analyses of leached silver nitrate were performed. The data's normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test before comparisons using a three-way analysis of variance. In both 2D and 3D analysis, bulk-fill composite resin preheated to 68 °C and applied at 2 mm thickness showed less microleakage. In the 3D analysis, restorations applied at 37 °C and 4 mm thickness in high-power mode showed significantly higher values (p < 0.001). Preheated bulk-fill composite resin can be applied at 68 °C and effectively cured at both 2 mm and 4 mm thickness.

Microleakage and Bacterial Adhesion with Three Restorative Materials Used to Seal Screw-access Channels of Implant Abutments: An In vitro Study

Background:

Proper sealing of screw-access channels against microbial microleakage is advisable for the long-term success of screw-retained implant prosthesis.

Objective:

This study aimed to compare the bacterial adhesion and microleakage with three restorative materials, namely, composite resin, acrylic resin and bis-acryl, that are used to cover the access channels of screw-retained implant prostheses, using polytetrafluoroethylene tape as a spacer material.

Materials and Methods:

In this in vitro study, 18 titanium straight abutments (Hex-lock^® Zimmer) were torqued into implant analogs, which were then subdivided into three groups. The samples of each group were filled with polytetrafluoroethylene tape and sealed with the three restorative materials (Group A: composite resin; Group B: acrylic resin; Group C: bis-acryl). Measurements of surface bacterial adhesion and internal microleakage were then recorded. The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests.

Results:

No significant difference was found between the investigated materials in terms of their sealing effectiveness against microbial microleakage (P = 0.06). Regarding bacterial adhesion, composite resin showed the highest number of surface adhesion, but there was no significant difference between the three materials (P = 0.081).

Conclusion:

The results of this study suggest that composite resin, acrylic resin and bis-acryl materials could be used alternatively in sealing the implant access channel owing to no significant differences in terms of microleakage and bacterial adhesion.

Repair or Observation of Resin Margin Defects: Clinical Trial After Five Years

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of repair/resealing of stained composite margins as an alternative to controlled observation without treatment in a randomized clinical trial after five years.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Each patient recruited had from one to three composite restorations with visible margin discoloration. Initially, the characteristics of each defect were recorded with direct vision through a surgical microscope at 20× magnification. Clinical evaluation was done by two independent examiners using modified USPHS criteria for color, margin discoloration, and margin adaptation. Each restoration was then randomly assigned to a control or treatment group. Control restorations were observed yearly for the presence of recurrent caries; treatment restorations were resealed by exposing the margin with a ¼ round bur, removing all interfacial stain, acid etching, placing an adhesive bonding agent, and a flowable composite to restore margin integrity. There were 152 patients recruited, with 360 restorations (180 control and 180 treatment).

RESULTS

At five years, 104 patients were recalled (68%) with 271 restorations (76%): 136 untreated control and 135 resealed restorations. At that time, 61 restorations had been lost or replaced for nonrelated reasons. Clinical evaluation of the remaining 210 restorations determined penetrating discoloration (control = 81%, resealed = 46%) and margin crevice formation (control = 21%, resealed = 11%). Recurrent caries was diagnosed cumulatively in only six control and five treatment restorations (<5%). Microscopically, 49 control restorations (49%) and 36 resealed restorations (33%) had crevice formation. Discoloration was distributed as follows: 9% vs 47% with no discoloration, 30% vs 33% in the composite, 49% vs 18% in the interface, and 12% vs 2% in tooth structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Resealing of restorations with margin discoloration reduced the occurrence of penetrating stain from 81% in controls to 46% in resealed margins and crevicing from 21% to 11% after five years. Both controlled observation and resealing of margins resulted in a similar very low incidence (<6%) of recurrent caries.

Physical and photoelastic properties of bulk-fill and conventional composites

Purpose

This study evaluated the influence of thickness increment on degree of conversion (DC), Knoop microhardness (KHN), and polymerization-shrinkage stress (PSS) by photoelasticity of three dental composites.

Methods

For DC and KHN, 45 samples were prepared and divided into nine groups (n=5), according to composite (microhybrid [Filtek Z250 - Z250], bulk-fill flowable [SureFil SDR Flow - SDR], and nanohybrid composite [N’Durance - NDU]) and increment thickness (1, 1.5, and 3 mm). PSS was measured by photoelastic analysis. Composites were placed into a photo-elastic model cavity and light-cured. DC and KHN data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test. PSS results were qualitatively evaluated through Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

SDR showed the highest DC values. At top and bottom surfaces, the highest KHN was obtained by Z250. Z250 showed higher PSS than SDR in 1.5 mm increments. NDU showed higher PSS than SDR in 3 mm increments.

Conclusion

The bulk-fill composite demonstrated better DC and similar KHN and PSS in deeper layers compared to conventional composites. Bulk-fill composites may perform as well as conventional nanohybrid and microhybrid composites.