GreenLight HPS 120-W laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate as early therapy for acute urinary retention in advanced prostate cancer patients

Influence of Prostate Cancer on Thulium Vapoenucleation of the Prostate-A Multicentre Analysis

Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common in elderly men. Data on the laser-based surgery known as thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) in PCa patients are rare. Our objective was to analyse the feasibility, safety and functional outcome of ThuVEP in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and PCa. Methods: Multicentre study, including 1256 men who underwent ThuVEP for LUTS. Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual volume (PVR) were measured perioperatively. The International Prostate Symptome Score (IPSS) was measured perioperatively and at follow-up (FU). Perioperative complications were captured. Reoperation rate was captured at FU. Results: Of 994 men with complete data, 286 (28.8%) patients had PCa. The most common Gleason score was 3 + 3 in 142 patients (49.7%). Most common was low-risk PCa (141 pts; 49.3%). PCa patients were older, had smaller prostates and had higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (all p < 0.001). Comparing non-PCa and PCa patients, no differences occurred perioperatively. IPSS, quality of life and PVR decreased (all p < 0.001) and Qmax improved (p < 0.001) in both groups. Reoperation rates did not differ. The results of low- vs. intermediate-/high-risk PCa patients were comparable. Conclusion: ThuVEP is a safe and long-lasting treatment option for patients with LUTS with or without PCa. No differences occurred when comparing low- to intermediate-/high-risk PCa patients.

Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate in the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of photoselective vaporization of the prostate in alleviating refractory lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients who are managed with active surveillance and to explore the association of this procedure with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and cancer progression rates.

METHODS

Between 2008-2018, active surveillance patients who had refractory symptoms and needed surgery were studied. Perioperative functional variables were collected and analyzed. Disease progression was defined as an upgrade or upstage on surveillance biopsies or multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging. Mean postop scores were estimated using locally-weighted methods. The risk of progression was reported using Kaplan-Meier's method.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were included in the study. The median age was 68 years and the median surveillance time before surgery was 4 years. At 12 months, there were substantial improvements in the mean International Prostate Symptom Score (18-5.9), maximum flow rate (6.8-14 mL/s), postvoid residual (240-73mL), PSA (8.1-5.2 ng/mL), and prostate volume (85-57mL). At 30-days, only 2 patients with grade-III complications. Late consequences included tissue regrowth in 4 and urethral stricture (requiring a single dilation) in 3 patients. PSA levels decreased by 36% at 12 months postoperatively. With a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 7 men progressed and received radical treatment. At 3 years, the probability of remaining on surveillance was 93% (95% CI 87%- 100%).

CONCLUSION

Photoselective vaporization of the prostate offers substantial relief of symptoms in active surveillance patients with refractory symptoms, without adverse effects on disease progression rates.

Optimal Monitoring of Prostate-Specific Antigen Detects Prostate Cancer at the Localized Stage after Photoselective Vaporization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Introduction

Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) does not provide prostate tissue for pathologic analysis. Here, we carried out early monitoring for prostate cancer by measuring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and assessing clinicopathological features after PVP.

Materials and Methods

Patients (n = 800) who underwent PVP and were followed-up for more than 12 months were analyzed retrospectively. After PVP, PSA levels were measured at 3 and 12 months and each year thereafter. Prostate biopsies were performed when PSA levels increased continuously. We assessed the characteristics of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 49 months. After PVP, 54 patients underwent biopsies, and 23 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Overall, 10, 10, and 3 patients had clinical stage T1c, T2a, and T2b disease, respectively, and there were no cases of stage T2c disease or greater.

Conclusions

We found that it was possible to diagnose prostate cancer at a localized stage under our optimal PSA monitoring schedule before and after PVP.

Treatment Recommendations for Urological Symptoms in Cancer Patients: Clinical Guidelines from the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine

BACKGROUND

Urological symptoms such as gross hematuria, lower and upper urinary tract symptoms, and bladder pain are common in and distressing for patients with advanced cancer. Although palliation of urological symptoms is important to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and their families and caregivers, clinical guidelines for managing urological symptoms in patients with cancer have not been published.

METHODS

Following the formal guideline development process, the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine (JSPM) developed comprehensive clinical guidelines for the management of urological symptoms in patients with cancer.

RESULTS

This article summarizes the recommendations and their rationales and provides a short summary of the development process of the JSPM urological symptom management guidelines. We established five recommendations, all of which were based on the best available evidence and expert consensus.

CONCLUSION

JSPM released the first edition of the "Clinical Guidelines for Urological Symptoms in Cancer Patients." Future clinical research and continuous guideline updates are required to improve the quality of managing urological symptoms in patients with cancer.

Review of current laser therapies for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

The gold standard for symptomatic relief of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia has traditionally been a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Over the past decade, however, novel laser technologies that rival the conventional TURP have multiplied. As part of the ongoing quest to minimize complications, shorten hospitalization, improve resection time, and most importantly reduce mortality, laser prostatectomy has continually evolved. Today, there are more variations of laser prostatectomy, each with several differing surgical techniques. Although abundant data are available confirming the safety and feasibility of the various laser systems, future randomized-controlled trials will be necessary to verify which technique is superior. In this review, we describe the most common modalities used to perform a laser prostatectomy, mainly, the holmium laser and the potassium-titanyl-phosphate lasers. We also highlight the physical and clinical characteristics of each technology with a review of the most current and highest-quality literature.