Dimensional changes in free gingival grafts: scalpel versus Er:YAG laser—a preliminary study

Clinical Outcomes of Free Gingival Graft Following Recipient Bed Preparation with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Versus Scalpel: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective: Free gingival graft (FGG) procedure is accompanied with a considerable rate of graft shrinkage. This study was aimed to assess the dimensional changes of FGG after recipient site preparation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser and surgical scalpel. Materials and methods: This split-mouth randomized clinical trial evaluated 11 patients with bilateral lack of keratinized gingiva in mandibular premolars. The test side in each patient was prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser (3 W power, 300 mJ energy, 10 Hz frequency, long-pulsed mode), whereas the control side was prepared by surgical scalpel. All FGGs were harvested from the palate with standard dimensions of 14 × 9 mm. The graft width, length, surface area, and shrinkage and color match were measured after 1, 3, and 6 months. Postoperative complications, including pain and bleeding were also evaluated using a questionnaire. Results: In both groups, the surface area and width of graft significantly decreased at all time points compared with baseline but the difference in this respect was not significant between the two groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, maximum shrinkage occurred within the first 3 months. In control group, the surface shrinkage in 3 months was significantly greater than the first month (p = 0.025) without significant difference between groups (p = 0.79). The two groups were not significantly different regarding pain score and bleeding score either. On the day of surgery, the test group had slightly lower pain score and higher bleeding score in comparison to the control group without significant difference. The pain and bleeding scores reduced in both groups with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Er,Cr:YSGG laser has promising results for preparation of FGG recipient site and yields results comparable to those of surgical scalpel.

Prospective study assessing three-dimensional changes of mucosal healing following soft tissue augmentation using free gingival grafts

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to assess the three-dimensional changes following soft tissue augmentation using free gingival grafts (FGG) at implant sites over a 3-month follow-up period.

METHODS

This study included 12 patients exhibiting deficient keratinized tissue (KT) width (i.e., <2 mm) at the vestibular aspect of 19 implants who underwent soft tissue augmentation using FGG at second stage surgery following implant placement. Twelve implants were considered for the statistical analysis (n = 12). The region of interest (ROI) was intraorally scanned before surgery (S0), immediately post-surgery (S1), 30 (S2) and 90 (S3) days after augmentation. Digital scanned files were used for quantification of FGG surface area (SA) and converted to standard tessellation language (STL) format for superimposition and evaluation of thickness changes between the corresponding time points. FGG shrinkage (%) in terms of SA and thickness was calculated between the assessed time points.

RESULTS

Mean FGG SA amounted to 91 (95% CI: 63 to 119), 76.2 (95% CI: 45 to 106), and 61.3 (95% CI: 41 to 81) mm² at S1, S2, and S3, respectively. Mean FGG SA shrinkage rate was 16.3% (95% CI: 3 to 29) from S1 to S2 and 33% (95% CI: 19 to 46) from S1 to S3. Mean thickness gain from baseline (S0) to S1, S2, and S3 was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.4), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.5 to 1.12), and 0.37 (0.21 to 0.5) mm, respectively. FGG thickness shrinkage was of 38% (95% CI: 17.6 to 58) from S1 to S2 and 71.8% (95% CI: 60 to 84) from S1 to S3. Dimensional changes from S1 to S3 were statistically significant, P <0.017. Soft tissue healing was uneventful in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The present three-dimensional assessment suggests that FGG undergo significant dimensional changes in SA and thickness over a 3-month healing period.

Free gingival graft adjunct with low-level laser therapy: a randomized placebo-controlled parallel group study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in terms of enhancing wound healing, reducing free gingival graft (FGG) shrinkage and postoperative pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive either FGG + LLLT (test, n = 15) or FGG + plasebo LLLT (control, n = 15). In the test group, a diode laser (810 nm, 0.1 W, energy density 6 J/cm²) was applied immediately after surgery and 1, 3, 7, and 14 days later. Measurements of the graft surface areas of the groups were made with an image-analyzing software at baseline and first, third, and sixth months. Complete wound epithelialization and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain score were evaluated after surgery.

RESULTS

Shrinkage of the graft was statistically higher in the control than the test group at third and sixth months (p < 0.05). In terms of epithelization of the graft area, the test and control groups did not show any significant difference during the 28-day period (p > 0.05). Besides this, statistically significant differences were observed for VAS pain score and the number of analgesic used (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an 810-nm diode laser provided additional benefits to FGG in terms of less shrinkage of the graft dimensions and postoperative pain.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Low-level laser therapy reduced the shrinkage of free gingival graft's surface area after 6 months and enhanced postoperative pain relief.

Laser Surgery of Soft Tissue in Orthodontics: Review of the Clinical Trials

Introduction: Recently, a wide variety of procedures have been done by laser application in orthodontics. Apart from the mentioned range of various treatments, laser has become a tool for many soft tissue surgeries as an alternative to conventional scalpel-based technique during orthodontic treatments in the management of soft tissue. Due to scarce information in the latter subject, this study was designed in order to include clinical trials that included soft tissue ablation by laser in orthodontics. Methods: Literature was searched based on PubMed and Google Scholar databases in 5 years (2010-2015) with English language restriction and clinical trial design. Studies that performed soft tissue application of laser during orthodontic treatment were extracted by the authors. Results: Only eight studies met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found between laser ablation and conventional scalpel technique in the matter of treatment outcome. However, few issues remained to clarify the differences in the mentioned procedures. Conclusion: Laser performance can be recommended in case of preceding less bleeding and discomfort during surgical procedure. There are still quandaries among clinical application of scalpel-based surgery in aesthetic region with bracket-bonded teeth. Precaution and knowledge regarding the characteristics of laser beam such as wavelength, frequency, power and timing is extremely needed.