Improved lenticule shape for hyperopic femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx FLEx): a pilot study

Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Hyperopic SMILE: A 4-Year Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate dynamic changes in corneal epithelial thickness (ET) after hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

This observational study included 18 eyes of 16 patients who were scheduled for hyperopic SMILE. High-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and a custom image segmentation algorithm were applied to measure corneal dynamic ET over a central 6 mm area. ET was analyzed among different corneal sectors (central, pericentral, and peripheral) at baseline and multiple postoperative time points (1 day, 1 month, 6 months, 2 years, and 4 years). Correlation analysis was performed between ET changes and preoperative and intraoperative parameters.

RESULTS

The mean spherical equivalent of hyperopia correction was +2.64 ± 1.00 D, and the average age of enrolled 16 patients was 32.4 ± 10.8 years. At the last follow-up, 72% of eyes kept or improved corrected distance visual acuity, with 2 eyes that lost 2 lines. 72% of eyes were within ±1.0 D of target refraction, and 56% were within ±0.5 D. Average ET decreased by 11.0% (5.9 ± 2.3 μm) from 53.2 ± 3.5 μm to 47.4 ± 4.2 μm 4 years postoperatively (P<0.001). The ET at center 2 mm decreased most significantly by 14.5% (7.9 ± 2.9 μm), followed by the pericentral area by 10.5% (5.6 ± 2.3 μm). ET and front corneal curvature stabilized 1 month after surgery. No correlation was found between refraction regression and ET changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperopic SMILE induced significant central ET thinning. ET remodeling in the 6 mm area stabilized after 1 month and did not underlie refractive changes.

SMILE for Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism: Results of a Prospective Multicenter 12-Month Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in patients who have hyperopia with or without astigmatism.

METHODS

This was a prospective multicenter trial including 374 eyes of 199 patients treated by SMILE for hyperopia using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). Inclusion criteria were sphere up to +6.00 diopters (D), cylinder up to 5.00 D, and maximum hyperopic meridian up to +7.00 D, with preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/25 or better. The optical zone was 6.3 mm with a transition zone of 2 mm. The minimum lenticule thickness was set at 25 µm in the center and at 10 µm at the edge. Patients were examined at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. Standard refractive surgery outcomes analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The preoperative spherical equivalent was +3.20 ± 1.48 D (range: +0.25 to +6.50 D). At the 12-month follow-up visit, 81% of eyes treated were within ±0.50 D and 93% of eyes were within ±1.00 D of intended correction. A total of 1.2% of eyes lost two or more lines of CDVA at the 12-month follow-up visit, and 83% were at least 20/20, corresponding to a safety index of 1.005 at 12 months. Of the 219 eyes with plano target, 68.8% had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better and 88% were at least 20/25 uncorrected at 12 months. There were no statistically significant changes in contrast sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE was found to be an effective treatment method for the correction of compound hyperopic astigmatism, demonstrating a high level of efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(12):760-769.].

Effective Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Calculated With Two Novel Methods

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effective optical zone (EOZ) following small incision lenticule extraction in myopic eyes using two novel methods and investigate factors influencing postoperative EOZ.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 45 patients (45 eyes) with a mean spherical equivalent of -5.82 ± 1.58 diopters underwent SMILE and were observed during a 6-month follow-up. Postoperative EOZ was calculated using custom software that automatically distinguishes EOZ on the tangential curvature difference map (EOZc) and total corneal refractive power map (EOZp) of the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). The agreement between the two methods, the difference between postoperative EOZ and programmed optical zone (POZ), and its relationship with parameters including corrected spheres, cylinders, ablation ratio (ablation depth/central cornea thickness), and Q-value change were investigated.

RESULTS

The EOZc area was 20.76 ± 2.43 mm² (diameter: 5.04 ± 0.60 mm) and the EOZp area was 20.22 ± 4.70 mm² (diameter: 5.13 ± 0.30 mm). Both were significantly smaller than POZ (P < .001). Bland-Altman plots showed 4.44% (2/45) points located outside the 95% limits of agreement. EOZc and EOZp reductions were negatively related to corrected cylinders (r = -0.631, P < .001 and r = -0.594, P < .001, respectively). EOZp reduction was positively correlated with corrected spheres (r = 0.336, P = .024). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in EOZc and EOZp reduction between low and high astigmatism groups despite myopia degree.

CONCLUSIONS

EOZ after incision lenticule extraction, measured using two novel methods, was smaller than POZ. The reduction of EOZ was negatively correlated with the corrected cylinders. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(7):414-421.].

Corneal densitometry after allogeneic small-incision intrastromal lenticule implantation for hyperopia correction

Purpose

To evaluate corneal densitometry after allogeneic corneal small-incision intrastromal lenticule implantation (SILI) for hyperopia.

Methods

A retrospective study. Thirty-one hyperopic eyes of 24 patients who underwent SILI were enrolled in this study. Examinations took place preoperatively and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Corneal densitometry (CD) from different concentric radial zones (0–2, 2–6, and 6–10 mm annulus) and layers (anterior, central, and posterior) were obtained using Scheimpflug imaging. The association between CD changes and the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), central corneal thickness (CCT) and K value were examined.

Results

No serious intraoperative complications occurred during SILI. The mean total CD increased postoperatively compared to preoperatively (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were found among the four subsequent follow-up time points (P > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, the CD values showed an increase of 2.71 ± 2.52, 2.23 ± 2.25, and 1.87 ± 2.46 at the 0–2, 2–6, and 6–10 mm annuli, respectively (all at P < 0.01). The anterior 120 μm displayed the highest densitometry before and after surgery (all at P < 0.01). No significant increase was found within the posterior 60 μm of the cornea (P > 0.05). No correlation was found between the CD and relevant parameters(all at P > 0.05).

Conclusions

SILI resulted in an increase in CD within the surgically altered area, however such change has no significant correlation with visual outcomes.

Hyperopic SMILE Versus FS-LASIK: A Biomechanical Comparison in Human Fellow Corneas

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical properties of ex vivo human paired corneas after hyperopic correction via cap-based versus flap-based laser-assisted refractive surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective experimental study, 13 pairs of human corneas unsuitable for transplantation were equally divided into two groups. The pachymetry was performed in each eye just before the laser procedure. Corneas from the right eye were treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), whereas corneas from the left eye of the same donor were treated with femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). All corneas were subjected to a refractive correction of +6.00 diopters (D) sphere with a 6.5-mm zone under a 120-µm cap (SMILE) or a 7-mm zone under a 110-µm flap (FS-LASIK). For two-dimensional biomechanical measurements, the corneoscleral buttons underwent two testing cycles (preconditioning stress-strain curve from 0.03 to 9.0 N and stress-relaxation at 9.0 N during 120 seconds) to analyze the elastic and viscoelastic material properties. The effective elastic modulus was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with a confidence interval of 95%.

RESULTS

In stress-strain measurements, the effective elastic modulus was not significantly different (P > .311) between SMILE (13.5 ± 12.8 MPa) and FS-LASIK (7.56 ± 17.9 MPa). In stress-relaxation measurements, the remaining stress was not significantly different (P = .841) between SMILE (124 ± 20 kPa) and FS-LASIK (126 ± 21 kPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike myopic correction, after hyperopic correction the cap-based procedure (SMILE) and the flap-based technique (FS-LASIK) may be considered equivalent in terms of biomechanical stability when measured experimentally in ex vivo human fellow eye corneas. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(12):810-815.].

Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of corneal stroma lenticule for keratoconus

Purpose

To review recent progress, challenges, and future perspectives of stromal keratophakia for the treatment of advanced keratoconus.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature in the PubMed database, last update June 30, 2020. No language restriction was applied. The authors checked the reference lists of the retrieved articles to identify any additional study of interest.

Results

Several techniques have been proposed for the treatment of keratoconus in order to avoid or delay keratoplasty. This was primarily due to the lack of accessibility to donor corneas in many countries. The ease and predictability of the more advanced femtosecond lasers used to correct ametropias by stromal lenticule extraction lead to hypothesize that generated refractive lenticules could be implanted into corneal stromal layers to restore volume and alter the refractive properties of the cornea in patients with corneal ectasias. At the same time, new techniques for preservation, customization, and cellular therapy of the corneal stromal have been developed, directing to the valorization of otherwise discarded byproducts such as donor corneas unsuitable for either lamellar of penetrating keratoplasty.

Conclusions

Femtosecond laser-assisted stromal keratophakia could be a suitable therapeutic option for the treatment of corneal ectasias, especially in patients with advanced keratoconus, providing biomechanical support recovering the pachimetry to nearly normal value at the same time. The accuracy and predictability of the refractive outcome are yet a critical issue and the patient eligible for the procedure still has to be characterized.

Sterile Excimer Laser Shaped Allograft Corneal Inlay for Hyperopia: One-year Clinical Results in 28 Eyes

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the one-year clinical results of an allograft corneal inlay (ACI) implantation in a case series of 28 hyperopic eyes of 16 patients.Methods: Patients with manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) between +1.00 and +6.00 D and having a cylindrical refraction of less than 1 D were included in this prospective study. The refractive powers of excimer laser-shaped ACIs were determined based on the refractive error of the individual subject's eyes. After the creation of a femtosecond flap, the inlays were centered on the pupillary axis. Visual acuities, refractive results, and other clinical findings were reported for the 6- and 12-month follow-up exams.Results: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 36.2 ± 12.4 years (range 22-65 years). The mean pre-operative MSRE of 3.6 ± 1.51 D decreased to 0.21 ± 0.56 D (P < .001). The uncorrected distance and near visual acuity increased from 0.33 ± 0.22 and 0.17 ± 0.13 to 0.75 ± 0.22 (P < .001) and 0.72 ± 0.19 (P < .001), respectively. The corrected distance visual acuity remained unchanged (pre-OP: 0.79 ± 0.22; post-OP: 0.80 ± 0.21; P = .916), and the corrected near visual acuity increased from 0.78 ± 0.22 to 0.84 ± 0.20 (P = .003). The mean K-value and central corneal thickness increased from 42.57 ± 0.81 D and 557.5 ± 43.0 µm to 44.8 ± 1.4 D (P < .001) and 597.1 ± 58.1 µm (P < .001), respectively. No significant postoperative complications such as diffuse lamellar keratitis, epithelial ingrowth, or decentralization were observed.Conclusion: Excimer laser-shaped ACI offers an alternative treatment modality for patients with hyperopia. Acceptable visual results and similar regression rates were observed with ACI implantation compared with other laser refractive procedures.

A pilot study: lenticule quality of hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in rabbits

BACKGROUND

To evaluate lenticule surface characteristics of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia correction in rabbits.

METHODS

The left and right eyes of 8 rabbits were divided into two groups. The right eyes were assigned to a myopia group, and the left eyes to a hyperopia group. The rabbits received SMILE procedures with + 3.00 D and - 3.00 D correction for the hyperopia and myopia groups, respectively. Extracted lenticules were examined via scanning electron microscopy. Lenticules from odd-numbered rabbits were accessed with the anterior surface, and lenticules from even-numbered rabbits were observed with the posterior surface. A previously established scoring system was used to evaluate lenticule surface characteristics. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the scores between the two groups.

RESULTS

All procedures were performed successfully, and the lenticules were extracted smoothly. One myopia lenticule that was facing downward was handled failed in preparation for imaging, thus 15 lenticules were ultimately graded. Twelve lenticules exhibited smooth surfaces, and regularly arranged tissue bridges were observed in almost all regions. Three lenticules exhibited a partially rough surface and irregularities affecting more than 10% of the lenticules (2 in the hyperopia group and 1 in the myopia group). Rough lenticules occurred in twice as many lenticules in the hyperopia group compared to the myopia group.

CONCLUSIONS

Scan quality of lenticules after SMILE for hyperopia correction is comparable to that of myopia lenticules. The shape of hyperopic lenticule may increase the difficulty of surgical manipulation and result in surface roughness.

Future Developments in SMILE: Higher Degree of Myopia and Hyperopia

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a novel 1-step refractive procedure with femtosecond laser for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Although it has shown good clinical results in efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability, there are still some concerns. In this study, we review the published clinical outcomes of high myopia correction and exploration in hyperopia correction. Results have suggested that SMILE has acceptable outcomes in correction for high myopia <10.0 diopters (D), and it is a feasible and effective procedure for the treatment of hyperopia. However, it is unsuitable for the treatment of extremely high myopia because there is undercorrection and regression as existed in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and compound hyperopic astigmatism currently could not be corrected either. More technical and clinical improvements are required to make SMILE competitive.

Six-Month Outcomes After High Hyperopia Correction Using Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis With a Large Ablation Zone

PURPOSE

To evaluate refractive and visual outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to treat high hyperopia using an aberration-neutral profile and large ablation zone.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive observational case series at Helios Ophtalmologie, St. Jean-de-Luz, France. One hundred forty-six consecutive eyes of 77 patients who underwent LASIK with mechanical microkeratome to correct hyperopia with correction in the maximum hyperopic meridian strictly higher than +5 D (mean + 6.6 ± 1.0 D) were included. Procedures were performed with an Amaris 750S excimer laser (Schwind eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany) using an aberration-neutral profile, a 6.7 ± 0.1 mm optical zone, and a 9.2 ± 0.1 mm total ablation zone. Refractive results, predictability, safety, and efficacy were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 6 months postsurgery, the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was -0.06 ± 0.83 D and the mean cylinder was 0.42 ± 0.35 D. Sixty-six percent of eyes were within ±0.50 D of the attempted spherical equivalent correction. Six months postoperatively, 60% of eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Ten percent of eyes lost 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity and 4% gained a line. No eyes lost more than 2 Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity at any follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

High hyperopia correction with LASIK using an aberration-neutral profile and large ablation zone provides good efficacy, safety, predictability, and visual outcomes.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Hyperopia: 3-Month Refractive and Visual Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia.

METHODS

This prospective study of vertex-centered hyperopic SMILE used the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Inclusion criteria were maximum attempted hyperopic meridian of between +1.00 and +7.00 diopters (D) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/40 or better. Lenticule parameters were 6.3- to 6.7-mm diameter, 2-mm transition zone, 30-µm minimum thickness, and 120-µm cap thickness. Standard outcomes analysis was performed for the 3-month data, including contrast sensitivity using the Functional Vision Analyzer.

RESULTS

For 93 eyes treated, 3-month data were available for 82 (88%). Attempted spherical equivalent refraction was +5.62 ± 1.20 D (range: +1.00 to +6.90 D) and cylinder was -0.91 ± 0.68 D (range: 0.00 to -3.50 D). For eyes targeted for emmetropia (n = 36), uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 89%. Spherical equivalent refraction relative to target was -0.17 ± 0.85 D (range: -2.20 to +3.00 D), with 59% within ±0.50 D and 76% within ±1.00 D. There was one line loss of CDVA in 17% of eyes, and one eye lost three lines (1.2%) but recovered to one line lost at 9 months. There was no clinically significant change in contrast sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive and visual outcomes 3 months after SMILE for hyperopia were promising, given the high degree of hyperopia corrected and relatively reduced CDVA in this population. Undercorrection of more than 1.00 D in 5 eyes might be partly explained by latent hyperopia in these young patients. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(1):24-30.].

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) techniques: patient selection and perspectives

Refractive lenticule extraction is becoming the procedure of choice for the management of myopia and myopic astigmatism owing to its precision, biomechanical stability, and better ocular surface. It has similar safety, efficacy, and predictability as femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and is associated with better patient satisfaction. The conventional technique of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) involves docking, femtosecond laser application, lenticule dissection from the surrounding stroma, and extraction. It has a steep learning curve compared to conventional flap-based corneal ablative procedures, and the surgical technique may be challenging especially for a novice surgeon. As SMILE is gaining worldwide acceptance among refractive surgeons, different modifications of the surgical technique have been described to ease the process of lenticule extraction and minimize complications. Good patient selection is essential to ensure optimal patient satisfaction, and novice surgeons should avoid cases with low myopia (thin refractive lenticules), difficult orbital anatomy, high astigmatism, or uncooperative, anxious patients to minimize complications. A comprehensive MEDLINE search was performed using “small incision lenticule extraction,” “SMILE,” and “refractive lenticule extraction” as keywords, and we herein review the patient selection for SMILE and various surgical techniques of SMILE with their pros and cons. With increasing surgeon experience, a standard technique is expected to evolve that may be performed in all types of cases with optimal outcomes and minimal adverse effects.

[SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) among the corneal refractive surgeries in 2018 (French translation of the article)]

Refractive surgery is a field in constant evolution. In recent years, a new procedure has appeared under the name SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction). This technique, carried out solely with a femtosecond laser, should make it possible to better preserve corneal innervation and biomechanics. After a detailed review of the technique itself, we then focus on the scientific evidence for the safety and efficacy of SMILE and its current indications. Advantages of SMILE will be discussed in comparison to disadvantages of the conventional techniques, particularly concerning dry eye and the risk of corneal ectasia with LASIK. Lastly, the current limitations of SMILE (indications, retreatment) are discussed, and future applications are considered regarding improvements in the technique.

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Stromal Lenticule Addition Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Advanced Keratoconus: A Preliminary Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the in vivo effect of a novel femtosecond laser-assisted procedure termed stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus.

METHODS

Ten patients with stage III and IV stable keratoconus were included. Negative meniscus-shaped stromal lenticules were produced from corneoscleral eye bank buttons with a refractive lenticule extraction procedure with a 500-kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Recipient corneas underwent a modified femtosecond laser flap-cut procedure to produce an intrastromal pocket and lenticules were implanted. Patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery with determination of uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, subjective refraction and topographic corneal curvature changes, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and in vivo confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

Comparison of preoperative and 6-month postoperative UDVA and CDVA showed statistically significant improvements (P = .024 and .007, respectively) from 1.58 ± 0.36 to 1.22 ± 0.37 and from 1.07 ± 0.17 to 0.70 ± 0.23 logMAR. Eight of 10 eyes showed an improvement in UDVA (P < .001) that ranged between one and three lines, whereas all but one eye presented improved CDVA. Corneal topography documented a decrease between preoperative and 6-month postoperative anterior mean curvature (AVG-K at 3 mm) and anterior Q values (P = .005). AS-OCT showed a significant increase in thickness of the central and mid-peripheral cornea produced by the lenticule implantation (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty procedure was clinically efficient in improving the corneal shape and vision in patients with keratoconus. Negative meniscus-shaped lenticule addition induced a flattening of the cone while increasing corneal thickness. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(1):36-44.].

SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) among the corneal refractive surgeries in 2018

Refractive surgery is a field in constant evolution. In recent years, a new procedure has appeared under the name SMILE (SMall Incision Lenticule Extraction). This technique, carried out solely with a femtosecond laser, should make it possible to better preserve corneal innervation and biomechanics. After a detailed review of the technique itself, we then focus on the scientific evidence for the safety and efficacy of SMILE and its current indications. Advantages of SMILE will be discussed in comparison to the conventional techniques, particularly concerning dry eye and the risk of corneal ectasia related to LASIK. Lastly, the current limitations of SMILE (indications, retreatment) are discussed, and future applications are considered regarding new improvements in the technique.

Higher-Order-Aberrations Following Hyperopia Treatment: Small Incision Lenticule Extraction, Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Lenticule Implantation

Purpose

To compare the postoperative higher-order-aberrations (HOAs) after hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and lenticule implantation for correction of hyperopia.

Methods

Eighteen monkeys were divided to six groups: +2.00 D and +4.00 D hyperopic SMILE, +2.00 D and +4.00 D hyperopic LASIK (n = 6 eyes for each), and lenticule implantation with a −2.00 D and −4.00 D lenticule (n = 3 eyes for each). The corneal HOAs were evaluated preoperatively and 3-month postoperatively.

Results

At 3-month postoperatively, the spherical aberrations significantly increased toward negative direction in all +4.00 D groups (all P < 0.05). There was a significant change toward more negative values in the third-order vertical coma in the SMILE +4.00 D and LASIK +4.00 D groups (P = 0.026 and P = 0.036, respectively). There were also significant changes in the third-order horizontal trefoil (P = 0.034) and oblique secondary astigmatism (P = 0.012) in the LASIK +4.00 D group. In the eyes that underwent +4.00 D lenticule implantation, the fourth-order horizontal quatrefoil significantly increased (P = 0.029). In low hyperopia correction (+2.00 D), treatment with lenticule implantation tended to have less changes in HOAs, compared to the other two groups.

Conclusions

In hyperopic SMILE, hyperopic LASIK or lenticule implantation surgery, significant induction of third- and fourth-order HOAs were seen in moderate hyperopia correction but not in low hyperopia correction. In low hyperopia treatment, lenticule implantation might offer a favorable trend in the aspect of HOAs.

Translational Relevance

The results provided the knowledge of surgically induced HOAs and understanding of the effects of surgery in different types of hyperopic correction.

Hyperopic refractive correction by LASIK, SMILE or lenticule reimplantation in a non-human primate model

Hyperopia is a common refractive error, apparent in 25% of Europeans. Treatments include spectacles, contact lenses, laser interventions and surgery including implantable contact lenses and lens extraction. Laser treatment offers an expedient and reliable means of correcting ametropia. LASIK is well-established however SMILE (small-incision lenticule extraction) or lenticule implantation (derived from myopic laser-correction) are newer options. In this study we compared the outcomes of hyperopic LASIK, SMILE and lenticule re-implantation in a primate model at +2D/+4D treatment. While re-implantation showed the greatest regression, broadly comparable refractive results were seen at 3-months with SMILE and LASIK (<1.4D of intended), but a greater tendency to regression in +2D lenticule reimplantation. Central corneal thickness showed greater variation at +2D treatment, but central thickening during lenticule reimplantation at +4D treatment was seen (-17± 27μm LASIK, -45 ± 18μm SMILE and 28 ± 17μm Re-implantation; p <0.01) with expected paracentral thinning following SMILE. Although in vivo confocal microscopy appeared to show higher reflectivity in all +4D treatment groups, there were minimal and inconsistent changes in inflammatory responses between modalities. SMILE and lenticule re-implantation may represent a safe and viable method for treating hyperopia, but further optimization for lower hyperopic treatments is warranted.

A Pilot Study of SMILE for Hyperopia: Corneal Morphology and Surface Characteristics of Concave Lenticules in Human Donor Eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the corneal morphology and surface characteristics of concave lenticules after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia.

METHODS

SMILE procedures were performed on two human autopsy corneas in vitro to correct +4.00 diopters of hyperopia. Slit-lamp microscopy and anterior optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed after lenticule creation and extraction. The extracted lenticules and modified corneas were sent for transmission electron microscopy imaging.

RESULTS

Interlamellar gas bubbles were detected at 3 minutes and almost burst at 30 minutes after lenticule creation. A few interlamellar bubbles were detected after lenticule extraction. There was an obvious interlamellar concave gap under OCT. Transmission electron microscopy showed the front and back surfaces of the lenticules were smooth, with some tissue bridges, cavities, and grooves.

CONCLUSIONS

A good quality concave lenticule can be created via SMILE for hyperopia. The impact of interlamellar gap on visual quality needs further investigation. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):713-716.].

Intraoperative centration during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

To evaluate intraoperative decentration from pupil center and kappa intercept during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and its impact on visual outcomes.This was a retrospective noncomparative case series. A total of 164 eyes that underwent SMILE at the Singapore National Eye Center were included. Screen captures of intraoperative videos were analyzed. Preoperative and 3 month postoperative vision and refractive data were analyzed against decentration.The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.84 ± 1.77. The mean decentration from the pupil center and from kappa intercept were 0.13 ± 0.06 mm and 0.47mm ± 0.25 mm, respectively. For efficacy and predictability, 69.6% and 95.0% of eyes achieved a visual acuity (VA) of 20/20 and 20/30, respectively, while 83.8% and 97.2% of eyes were within ±0.5D and ±1.0D of the targeted SE. When analyzed across 3 groups of decentration from the pupil center (<0.1 mm, 0.1-0.2 mm, and >0.2 mm), there was no statistically significant association between decentration, safety, efficacy, and predictability. When analyzed across 4 groups of decentration from kappa intercept (<0.2 mm, 0.2-<0.4 mm, 0.4-<0.6 mm, and ≥0.6 mm), there was a trend toward higher efficacy for eyes with decentration of kappa intercept between 0.4 and <0.6 mm (P = .097). A total of 85.4% of eyes in the 0.4 to <0.6 mm group had unaided distance VA of 20/20 or better, as compared to only 57.8% of eyes in ≥0.6 mm group.Decentration of 0.13 mm from the pupil center does not result in compromised visual outcomes. Decentration of greater than 0.6 mm from the kappa intercept may result in compromised visual outcomes. There was a trend toward better efficacy in eyes which had decentered treatment from 0.4 to <0.6 mm from the kappa intercept. Patients with a large kappa intercept (>0.6 mm) should have their lenticule created 0.4 to 0.6 mm from the kappa intercept and not close to the pupil.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Hyperopia: Optical Zone Centration

PURPOSE

To evaluate optical zone centration of hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

This prospective study of 60 consecutive hyperopic SMILE procedures used the VisuMax femtosecond laser and matched LASIK procedures with the VisuMax and MEL 80 excimer lasers (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Inclusion criteria were maximum attempted hyperopic meridian of between +1.00 and +7.00 diopters (D) and astigmatism up to 6.00 D. For SMILE, the optical zone was between 6.3 and 6.7 mm, with a 2-mm transition zone. Two LASIK control groups (6.5- and 7-mm optical zone) were generated matched for spherical equivalent treated. In SMILE, the corneal vertex of the coaxially fixating eye was aligned with the vertex of the curved contact glass. In LASIK, the treatment was centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex (first Purkinje image) with the contralateral eye (Seiler method). A tangential (instantaneous) curvature preoperative to 3 months postoperative difference map was generated for each eye. A fixed grid and set of concentric circles were superimposed on the difference map to measure the offset between the optical zone center and corneal vertex (0,0), and vector analysis was used for comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Mean attempted spherical equivalent was +5.61 ± 0.96 D (range: +3.20 to +6.50 D) and mean cylinder was -0.96 ± 0.62 D (range: 0.00 to -2.75 D) in the SMILE group. Mean age was 29 ± 7 years (range: 19 to 52 years) in the SMILE group. Mean centration offset was 0.23 ± 0.15 mm (range: 0 to 0.61 mm) for the SMILE group, 0.33 ± 0.14 mm (range: 0.14 to 0.85 mm) for the 6.5-mm LASIK group, and 0.31 ± 0.19 mm (range: 0.05 to 0.85 mm) for the 7-mm LASIK group. The mean centration offset for SMILE was less than that of both LASIK groups (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Optical zone centration of hyperopic SMILE was found to be similar to eye-tracker-centered hyperopic LASIK with the MEL 80 laser. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(3):150-156.].

Corneal thickening and central flattening induced by femtosecond laser hyperopic-shaped intrastromal lenticule implantation

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of the procedure and the modifications of the corneal curvature and profile obtained with a novel technique of stromal-lentoid implantation in ex vivo human corneas.

DESIGN

Experimental ex vivo study in human corneas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve stromal lentoids were produced by means of hyperopic femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) with the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with a refractive power of +8.00 D and optical zone of 6.0 (six lenticules) and 5.0 mm (six lenticules), respectively. The posterior surface of these stromal lentoids presented a higher curvature with respect to the anterior surface and, therefore, the thinnest point is located at the center of the lenticule, gradually thickening towards the periphery. Another 12 corneas underwent femtosecond laser intrastromal pocket creation at a depth of 115 microns, for lenticule insertion. After intrastromal lenticule implantation the changes of corneal profiles were evaluated by means of corneal topography and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).

RESULTS

The implantations of intrastromal lenticules were successful in all cases with proper distention and centration. A mid-peripheral forward shift of the anterior corneal surface along with a thickening (greater in periphery) was induced. There was a significant flattening of anterior corneal central areas of 7.31 ± 1.52 D (p = 0.002). Diameters of the flattening area were found to be consistently correlated with the optical zone diameter of the implanted lenticules (p = 0.006). Central flattening was similar in both groups. OCT pachymetry maps showed an increase of corneal thickness consistently correlated with implanted lentoid thickness and diameter.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of modified hyperopic-shaped intra-corneal stromal lentoid is a feasible and reproducible technique for achieving central corneal flattening while increasing thickness. Whether this procedure may be beneficial in the treatment of refractive errors or ectatic corneal disorders such as keratoconus merits further study.