New photobiomodulation protocol prevents oral mucositis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients—a retrospective study

Proposal of a prophylactic photobiomodulation protocol for chemotherapy-induced oral and oropharyngeal mucositis: a randomized clinical trial

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is widely used in oncology settings, but lack of assessment standardization is the main barrier to optimization of clinical protocols. This study analyzed three PBMT protocols for preventing oral and oropharyngeal mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing chemotherapy (CT) and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This is a preliminary randomized blind clinical trial. Group 1 received intraoral prophylactic PBMT, Group 2 received intraoral and oropharyngeal PBMT, and Group 3 received intraoral, oropharyngeal, and extraoral PBMT. The applications were from the first day of CT to day + 10. Clinicodemographic data, CT regimens, types of HSCT, hematological exams, occurrence/severity of OM, odynophagia, and OM-related opportunistic infections were assessed. Sixty participants (age range: 18-74 years) were included; 70% of them underwent CT and 30% HSCT. About 43.3% of patients had OM, while odynophagia was reported by 23.3%. Both Groups 1 and 2 revealed better results. Multivariate analysis showed that HSCT directly influenced the occurrence of OM. Individuals who had undergone allogeneic HSCT were 1.93 times more likely to develop OM (p < 0.001). Group 3 exhibited a higher frequency of OM, albeit of lower grades. This group consisted of half the population who had undergone HSCT, had the highest percentage of melphalan use, and had the lowest mean leukocyte count. The three proposed protocols were effective in preventing and reducing OM, with good tolerance and no reported adverse effects. PBMT is a safe and effective approach to OM prophylaxis in adults undergoing CT/HSCT.

Twenty-year analysis of photobiomodulation clinical studies for oral mucositis: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to review the first 20 years of photobiomodulation (PBM) clinical studies for oral mucositis (OM) mitigation.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review screened controlled clinical studies. The PBM devices, protocols, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The first study dated from 1992, and the term "PBM" was first published in 2017. Public services, placebo-controlled randomized trials, and patients with head and neck chemoradiation were predominant among included studies. Prophylactic red intraoral laser protocols were mostly used. Comparing the outcomes of all protocols was unfeasible due to missing treatment parameters and nonhomogeneous measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The main barrier to optimizing clinical protocols of PBM for OM was the lack of standardization in clinical studies. Although PBM use is now globally present in oncology settings and generally marked by good outcomes reported, additional randomized clinical trials with well-described methods are necessary.

Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022

Disclaimer

This article is based on recommendations from the 12th WALT Congress, Nice, October 3-6, 2018, and a follow-up review of the existing data and the clinical observations of an international multidisciplinary panel of clinicians and researchers with expertise in the area of supportive care in cancer and/or PBM clinical application and dosimetry. This article is informational in nature. As with all clinical materials, this paper should be used with a clear understanding that continued research and practice could result in new insights and recommendations. The review reflects the collective opinion and, as such, does not necessarily represent the opinion of any individual author. In no event shall the authors be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the proposed protocols.

Objective

This position paper reviews the potential prophylactic and therapeutic effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) on side effects of cancer therapy, including chemotherapy (CT), radiation therapy (RT), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Background

There is a considerable body of evidence supporting the efficacy of PBM for preventing oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer (HNC), CT, or HSCT. This could enhance patients’ quality of life, adherence to the prescribed cancer therapy, and treatment outcomes while reducing the cost of cancer care.

Methods

A literature review on PBM effectiveness and dosimetry considerations for managing certain complications of cancer therapy were conducted. A systematic review was conducted when numerous randomized controlled trials were available. Results were presented and discussed at an international consensus meeting at the World Association of photobiomoduLation Therapy (WALT) meeting in 2018 that included world expert oncologists, radiation oncologists, oral oncologists, and oral medicine professionals, physicists, engineers, and oncology researchers. The potential mechanism of action of PBM and evidence of PBM efficacy through reported outcomes for individual indications were assessed.

Results

There is a large body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of PBM for preventing OM in certain cancer patient populations, as recently outlined by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). Building on these, the WALT group outlines evidence and prescribed PBM treatment parameters for prophylactic and therapeutic use in supportive care for radiodermatitis, dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia, trismus, mucosal and bone necrosis, lymphedema, hand-foot syndrome, alopecia, oral and dermatologic chronic graft-versus-host disease, voice/speech alterations, peripheral neuropathy, and late fibrosis amongst cancer survivors.

Conclusions

There is robust evidence for using PBM to prevent and treat a broad range of complications in cancer care. Specific clinical practice guidelines or evidence-based expert consensus recommendations are provided. These recommendations are aimed at improving the clinical utilization of PBM therapy in supportive cancer care and promoting research in this field. It is anticipated these guidelines will be revised periodically.

An Overview of Clinical Oncology and Impact on Oral Health

As the incidence of cancer continues to increase, so too will the use of various forms of cancer therapeutics and their associated oral and dental complications. Although many of the acute and chronic oral toxicities of cancer therapy are largely unavoidable, appropriate and timely management of these complications has the potential to alleviate morbidity and improve outcomes. Undoubtedly, the substantial short- and long-term impacts of cancer therapy on the health of the oral cavity requires increased awareness, prevention, and treatment by multidisciplinary healthcare teams consisting of medical oncologists, dentists, and other oral healthcare specialists. This mini review provides a brief purview of the current state of clinical oncology and its impact on oral health. The topics introduced here will be further investigated throughout the remainder of the “Oral Complications in Cancer Patients” mini-review series.

Oral mucositis in paediatric cancer patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation preventively treated with professional dental care and photobiomodulation: Incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis (OM) is an important side effect related to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and it has been associated with a significative reduction of quality of life. A negative impact of OM in paediatric patients could result in increased use of parenteral feeding and opioids, longer periods of hospitalization, and a higher risk of systemic infection.

AIM

To investigate the clinical features and clinical outcomes associated with OM development and severity in hematological cancer paediatric patients undergoing allo-HSCT who underwent professional dental care (PDC) and photobiomodulation (PBM) as prophylactic treatment.

DESIGN

Medical data and OM presentation were retrieved retrospectively from all patients younger than 18 years who received allo-HSCT between 2013 and 2016. The incidence of OM was assessed and graded by two oral medicine specialists following the WHO guidelines, and it was correlated with clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Forty-nine consecutive paediatric patients were included. OM was diagnosed in 73.5% of patients, and in 36.1% of patients, OM was classified as severe. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a primary diagnosis and the use of a myeloablative regimen were associated with OM development. The primary diagnosis and use of total body irradiation (TBI) were associated with aggressive OM. Neither the incidence nor the severity of OM affected the overall survival, whereas only the use of a myeloablative regimen and a high body mass index (BMI) were determinants of lower OM-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

A myeloablative conditioning and a high BMI were observed to be independent prognostic determinants of a lower OMFS rate. The cluster analysis allowed us to outline patient profiles with greater susceptibility to the development and severity of oral mucositis, which seems to be a useful tool to determine the risk of OM in paediatric patients.

Wound healing process with different photobiomodulation therapy protocols to treat 5-FU-induced oral mucositis in hamsters

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of three different Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) protocols in the treatment of 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in hamsters.

DESIGN

60 hamsters were divided into five groups: group "C", which did not receive oral mucosa scratching, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or PBMT; group "Ch", which received anesthesia, superficial oral mucosa scratching and 5-FU (oral mucositis induction); and three groups that received oral mucositis induction and a PBMT protocol: groups ChLI, ChLII and ChLIII that received 0.24 J (one point), 1 J (one point) and 1.2 J (five points of 0.24 J) of energy, respectively. The laser equipment used had λ = 660 nm and 0.04 cm² of spot area (0.226 cm diameter). The animals were euthanized on days 7 and 10 of the experiment, and their oral mucosas were removed for histological (light microscopy and collagen staining), immunohistochemical (NF-kB and TNF-α), and biochemical (TNF-α, NF-kB and hydroxyproline) analysis.

RESULTS

Group ChLI (less energy), showed the most accelerated repair rates and a lower concentration of inflammatory biomarkers than group Ch. Comparing the three PBMT protocols for treatment of 5-FU-induced oral mucositis in hamsters, the one with low energy (0.24 J) showed better results, regarding reduction of inflammatory biomarkers and tissue repair, than the ones with higher energy (1 and 1.2 J).

Intraoral versus extraoral photobiomodulation therapy in the prevention of oral mucositis in HSCT patients: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial

To compare the efficacy of intraoral and extraoral photobiomodulation (PBM) protocols for the prevention of oral mucositis (OM) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. A total of 60 patients was randomized into intraoral PBM (IOPBM) and extraoral PBM (EOPBM) groups. Both PBM protocols were well tolerated and no side effects were observed. EOPBM session times were one fourth of IOPBM durations. Of 60 patients, 35 (58.3%) developed ulcerated OM between day +3 and day +12. No intergroup difference was observed in OM healing times (p = 0.424). The lateral border of the tongue was the most common site affected in both groups. However, the incidence of mucositis on buccal mucosa was significantly reduced in the EOPBM group (p = 0.021). Young patients (OR.5.35, 95%CI 0.94-30.4, p = 0.058) and those who had received myeloablative conditioning (OR.55.1, 95%CI 2.69-1129.3, p = 0.009) were more likely to develop ulcerated OM, whereas autologous HSCT recipients (OR 0.079, 95% CI 0.009-0.67, p = 0.021) had a lower probability of developing ulcerated OM independent of PBM protocol. EOPBM protocol was as effective as IOPBM in the management of OM in HSCT patients, with the advantage of shorter treatment sessions. Trial registration number: RBR-7nww56. Date of trial registration submission: 30th September 2019.

Incidence and risk factors for oral mucositis in pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and risk factors for oral mucositis (OM) in patients with childhood cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eight hundred and twenty-nine cycles of chemotherapy were evaluated in 112 patients with childhood cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Chemotherapy protocol, hematological, hepatic, and renal function parameters were collected and compared to presence and severity of OM, as graded by the World Health Organization (WHO) scale. Patients received counseling on oral hygiene and those who presented with OM (grade ≥1) received photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT).

RESULTS

Age ranged from 0 to 17 years (mean/SD, 8.58 ± 5.05) and fifty-one patients (45.54%) were females. The most common baseline diseases were leukemia (51%) followed by sarcomas (23%) and lymphomas (18%). Eight hundred and twenty-nine cycles of chemotherapy were evaluated, and OM was diagnosed in 527 cycles (63.57%). Higher incidence and severity of OM was observed in protocols using high-dose methotrexate (MTX-HD), MTX-HD cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin combination, and MTX-HD combined with cyclophosphamide (p <0.001). Patients with severe OM had lower levels of leukocytes (p = 0.003), hemoglobin (p = 0.005), platelets (p = 0.034), and higher levels of total bilirubin (p = 0.027), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p = 0.001), and creatinine (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The study contributes to the elucidation of the risk factors for OM in pediatric cancer patients. Chemotherapy protocols using MTX-HD, MTX-HD associated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and MTX-HD and cyclophosphamide a have higher incidence of severe grades of OM. Other toxicities such as hematological, hepatic, and renal also developed in patients with OM.

Oral mucositis in childhood cancer patients receiving high-dose methotrexate: Prevalence, relationship with other toxicities and methotrexate elimination

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the main adverse effects of the chemotherapeutic agent methotrexate (MTX).

AIM

To evaluate the relationship of OM with MTX metabolism time and other toxicities in childhood, cancer patients receiving high-dose of methotrexate (HD-MTX).

DESIGN

Seventy-seven childhood patients receiving HD-MTX for treatment of leukaemia, osteosarcoma or lymphoma were evaluated. MTX serum level, hepatic and renal function parameters, and presence and intensity of OM were analysed.

RESULTS

The patients were submitted to 255 cycles of chemotherapy. OM was diagnosed in 191 (74.9%) cycles. Of these, 119 (46.6%) presented ulcerative lesions. Lymphoma was associated with severe OM (P = .01). OM was associated with higher serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (P = .006), alanine aminotransferase (P = .04) and creatinine (P = .008). Increase of one unit of total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin associated, respectively, with 11% and 39% higher prevalence of OM. For each increase of one unit of creatinine serum level, it was observed a 37% higher prevalence of OM in patients with lymphoma. No association was found between delayed excretion of MTX and OM development.

CONCLUSIONS

OM is a prevalent complication of childhood cancer patients receiving HD-MTX. Renal and hepatic toxicity could be considered risk factors for OM, especially in patients with lymphoma.

Effectiveness of phytotherapeutics in the prevention and treatment of 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in animal models: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review evaluated the effect of phytotherapeutics in the treatment and prevention of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced oral mucositis (OM) in animal models.

DESIGN

A search was performed in PubMed/Medline, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), EMBASE, and Web of Science, including studies published up to January 2020. Only articles investigating the chemoinduction of OM by 5-FU in animal models were included. Eligibility was evaluated and data were extracted from the eligible studies following the predefined PICO questions. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.

RESULT

A total of 503 articles were retrieved and 13 were included. The hamster was the animal model used in all included studies. The treatment method ranged from the topical application of ointment (n = 3), gel (n = 5) and extract (n = 3) to the oral ingestion of the phytotherapeutics (n = 3). Chamomilla recutita L. (n = 3) and Pistacia atlantica (n = 3) were the most used therapeutic agents. Although all studies were classified as high risk of bias, all of them reported promising results regarding the use of phytotherapeutics in the management of OM, including lower clinical and histopathological scores as well as healing, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high risk of bias of the studies, phytotherapy is a promising alternative for the treatment of 5-FU-induced OM, showing interesting results in terms of tissue healing and anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity.

Prophylactic photobiomodulation therapy using 660 nm diode laser for oral mucositis in paediatric patients under chemotherapy: 5-year experience from a Brazilian referral service

The use of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in the prevention of oral mucositis (OM) in paediatric care has increased. In this article, we report data of paediatric oncology/haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients treated with PBMT to prevent chemotherapy-induced OM. A retrospective study was conducted at a Brazilian referral service. Prophylactic PBMT was used in children and adolescents (≤ 17 years) following the protocol: InGaAIP, 660 nm, 100 mW, 2 J, 3.33 W/cm², and 20 s per point. Demographic data and OM severity scores were assessed. A regression model tested the association between OM with prophylactic PBMT and antineoplastic therapy. A total of 148 individuals who had undergone 358 chemotherapy cycles were analysed. A higher occurrence of OM was observed in HSCT and osteosarcoma (OS) patients. Except for HSCT, OM was associated with methotrexate (MTX) use in all disease groups. PBMT significantly reduced OM severity in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and OS patients. OM grade was 3.16 and 5.45 times higher among individuals with ALL and OS, who had not undergone prophylactic PBMT compared with those who had undergone prophylactic PBMT (p < 0.001). PBMT prevented chemotherapy-induced OM. Individuals who used MTX and did not undergo prophylactic PBMT were at increased risk of OM.

Comparison of photobiomodulation using either an intraoral or an extraoral laser on oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy in rats

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of intraoral (IO) and extraoral (EO) diode laser irradiation on oral mucositis (OM) induced by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in rats.

METHODS

Animals (n = 78) were divided into the following groups: negative control (NC), positive control (PC), IO 6 J/cm², EO with 6 J/cm² (EO 6 J/cm²), and 12 J/cm² (EO 12 J/cm²). OM was induced with an intraperitoneal injection of 5-FU and scarification of the buccal mucosa. Over the following 14 days, animals received photobiomodulation (PBM) daily. Clinical and histological evaluation was done by scores at days 8, 10, and 14. The redox state was evaluated by reactive species levels, antioxidant network, and immunohistochemistry analysis.

RESULTS

Clinically, on day 8, PBM groups showed lower scores of OM with EO 6 J/cm² presenting a significantly lower degree compared to PC (p < 0.05). On days 10 and 14, all PBM groups exhibited improvement of OM compared to PC (p < 0.01). On day 8, all PBM groups exhibited an accelerated healing process compared to PC (p < 0.01) and reduction of reactive species (p < 0.001). Also, all PBM groups demonstrated higher levels of antioxidant GPx compared to PC (p < 0.001). Analysis of nitrotyrosine revealed that on day 14, this protein damage marker was significantly reduced in the EO 6 J/cm² group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An EO diode laser protocol promoted positive effects in the clinical, histopathological, and redox state in OM induced by 5-FU in rats. Among the EO protocols, EO 6 J/cm² showed the most encouraging results.

Tumor safety and side effects of photobiomodulation therapy used for prevention and management of cancer treatment toxicities. A systematic review

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), also known as low-level laser therapy (LLLT), has been increasingly used for the treatment of toxicities related to cancer treatment. One of the challenges for the universal acceptance of PBMT use in cancer patients is whether or not there is a potential for the light to stimulate the growth of residual malignant cells that evaded oncologic treatment, increasing the risk for tumor recurrences and development of a second primary tumor. Current science suggests promising effects of PBMT in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema and oral mucositis, among other cancer treatment toxicities. Nevertheless, this seems to be the first systematic review to analyze the safety of the use of PBMT for the management of cancer-related toxicities. Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Embase were searched electronically. A total of 27 articles met the search criteria. Selected studies included the use of PBMT for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis, lymphedema, radiodermatitis, and peripheral neuropathy. Most studies showed that no side effects were observed with the use of PBMT. The results of this systematic review, based on current literature, suggest that the use of PBMT in the prevention and management of cancer treatment toxicities does not lead to the development of tumor safety issues.

Review of a three-year study on the dental care of onco-hematological pediatric patients

The aim of this study was to provide an updated review of dental procedures undertaken at the dental unit of the Onco-hematology service of the Instituto da Criança at the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (ICr/HC-FMUSP). We retrospectively reviewed 565 of 1902 medical and dental records of patients diagnosed with onco-hematological diseases who were seen in a 3-year study (January 2015 to December 2017). We assessed data regarding population characteristics, onco-hematological diagnosis and dental procedures performed. Of the selected medical records, preventive dentistry was the most common procedure undertaken in this population, followed by oral maxillofacial surgeries, restorative dentistry and oral mucositis treatment. The most prevalent malignant diagnosis was acute lymphocytic leukemia, and the most prevalent nonmalignant diagnosis was sickle-cell anemia. Preventive dental procedures represent most of the dental procedures undertaken in hospitalized onco-hematological pediatric patients.

Photobiomodulation and Cancer: What Is the Truth?

BACKGROUND

Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy is a rapidly growing approach to stimulate healing, reduce pain, increase athletic performance, and improve general wellness.

OBJECTIVE

Applying PBM therapy over the site of a tumor has been considered to be a contraindication. However, since another growing use of PBM therapy is to mitigate the side effects of cancer therapy, this short review seeks to critically examine the evidence of whether PBM therapy is beneficial or harmful in cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched.

RESULTS

Although there are a few articles suggesting that PBM therapy can be detrimental in animal models of tumors, there are also many articles that suggest the opposite and that light can directly damage the tumor, can potentiate other cancer therapies, and can stimulate the host immune system. Moreover, there are two clinical trials showing increased survival in cancer patients who received PBM therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PBM therapy may have benefits in cancer patients and should be further investigated.