Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

Comparisons in Postoperative Endoscopic Findings and Postoperative Weight Change Between Delta-Shaped Anastomosis and Circular-Stapled Anastomosis in Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy With B-I Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with Billroth I (B-I) reconstruction is frequently performed for gastric cancer. However, the difference between the circular stapler technique (CS) and delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) remains unclear, especially regarding the postoperative endoscopic physiological findings.

METHODS

Three hundred and one patients including 150 CS patients and 151 DA patients during LADG with B-I reconstruction between 2013 and 2019 at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were chosen as study subjects. Postoperative endoscopic findings (1-year post-surgery) in the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, and bile-reflux classification, and the first-year postoperative weight changes were also recorded.

RESULTS

The incidences of Grade 2 or higher remnant gastritis, bile reflux, and postoperative exacerbated reflux esophagitis were significantly higher in the DA group, while the amount of residual food was higher in the CS group. Multivariate analysis also revealed the higher risks of Grade 2 or higher gastritis and the postoperative existence or exacerbation of erosive reflux esophagitis in the DA group (OR [95% CI] was 2.737 [1.566-4.783], 3.533 [1.101-11.34], and 3.749 [1.021-13.76], respectively). However, none of these endoscopic differences but the broader extent of gastritis was the only endoscopic factor associated with severe postoperative weight loss.

CONCLUSION

There was a trend toward more exacerbation of residual gastritis and reflux esophagitis with the DA technique and more food remnants with the CS technique. Although the difference in the anastomotic technique did not directly result in weight loss, attention should be paid to prevent extensive residual gastritis.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

How to identify early complications in patients undergoing distal gastrectomy?

In this editorial we comment on the article by Zhang et al published in a recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Gastrectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection is still standard curative treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer. Several studies point out that gastric cancer surgery is a complex procedure that leads to a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Many factors can contribute to the onset of complications with consequent effects on prognosis and increased mortality. The complications can be divided in complications related to anastomosis, to motility and to surgical site infection. The study presented by Zhang B et al represent an interesting analysis on the possibility to prevent postoperative morbidity. The study was performed on 131 patients with distal gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Of these patients, 16% developed early postoperative complications. The univariate analysis showed that prealbumin level, hypertension, diabetes, history of abdominal surgery, R0 resection, and blood transfusion were factors influencing early postoperative complications after distal gastrectomy. Moreover, the inclusion of the above significant variables in the logistic regression analysis revealed that hypertension, diabetes, a history of abdominal surgery, and blood transfusion were independent predictors of postoperative complications. In conclusion, preoperative and intraoperative factors can be used to establish an early postoperative nomogram model. The results of the study presented by Zhang et al suggest that the prediction model can be used to guide the detection of postoperative complications and has clinical reference value.

FXR controls duodenogastric reflux-induced gastric inflammation through negatively regulating ER stress-associated TNXIP/NLPR3 inflammasome

Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) is closely associated with gastric inflammation and tumorigenesis; however, the precise mechanism is unclear. Hence, we aim to clarify this molecular mechanism and design an effective therapeutic strategy based on it. The present study found that DGR induced TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation and triggered pyroptosis in gastric mucosa in vitro and in vivo, in which endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress via PERK/eIF2α/CHOP signaling was involved. Mechanistically, farnesoid X receptor (FXR) antagonized the DGR-induced PERK/eIF2α/CHOP pathway and reduced TXNIP and NLRP3 expression. Moreover, FXR suppressed NLRP3 inflammasome activation by physically interacting with NLRP3 and caspase-1. Administration of the FXR agonist OCA protected the gastric mucosa from DGR-induced barrier disruption and mucosal inflammation. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the involvement of TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in DGR-induced gastric inflammation. FXR antagonizes gastric barrier disruption and mucosal inflammation induced by DGR. Restoration of FXR activity may be a therapeutic strategy for DGR-associated gastric tumorigenesis.

Higher incidence of cholelithiasis with Roux-en-Y reconstruction compared with Billroth-I after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Cholelithiasis occurs often after gastrectomy. However, no consensus has been established regarding the difference in the incidence of postgastrectomy cholelithiasis with different reconstruction methods. In this study, we examined the frequency of cholelithiasis after two major reconstruction methods, namely Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (R-Y) following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Among 696 gastric cancer patients who underwent LDG between April 2000 and March 2017, after applying the exclusion criteria, 284 patients who underwent B-I and 310 who underwent R-Y were examined retrospectively. The estimated incidence of cholelithiasis was compared between the methods, and factors associated with the development of cholelithiasis in the gallbladder and/or common bile duct were investigated.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 61.2 months, 52 patients (8.8%) developed cholelithiasis postgastrectomy; 12 patients (4.2%) after B-I and 40 (12.9%) after R-Y (p = 0.0002). Among them, choledocholithiasis was more frequent in patients who underwent R-Y (n = 11, 27.5%) vs. B-I (n = 1, 8.3%) (p = 0.0056). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that male sex, body mass index > 22.5 kg/m2, and R-Y reconstruction were significant predictors of the development of postLDG cholelithiasis.

CONCLUSION

Regarding cholelithiasis development, B-I reconstruction should be preferred whenever possible during distal gastrectomy.

Postoperative reflux esophagitis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction for gastric cancer: Nutritional effect and preoperative risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative reflux esophagitis represents a major complication of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with Billroth-I reconstruction (LDGBI). This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional effect and preoperative risk factors of postoperative reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing LDGBI for gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with (reflux [+]) and without (reflux [-]) postoperative reflux esophagitis who underwent LDGBI in our institution. Patient backgrounds, surgical outcomes, and perioperative nutritional status were compared. Preoperative risk factors for postoperative reflux esophagitis were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Between January 2009 and December 2016, 242 patients underwent LDG for gastric cancer. Of these, 218 underwent Billroth-I reconstruction. Seventy-three patients were excluded because of nutritional or oncological reasons. Finally, 23 patients were enrolled as the reflux (+) group and 122 as the reflux (-) group. Although the preoperative/postoperative bodyweight ratio and albumin and hemoglobin values plateaued beyond 6 months postoperatively in the reflux (-) group, these parameters continued to decrease beyond this time in the reflux (+) group. The mean ± SD bodyweight ratios at 3 years postoperatively were 82.83% ± 9.73% and 89.45% ± 8.04% for the reflux (+) and reflux (-) group, respectively (P = .0006). Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative reflux esophagitis was associated with postoperative body weight loss. Another multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hiatal hernia as an independent predictive factor for postoperative reflux esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

The risk of reflux esophagitis after LDGBI in patients with hiatal hernia should be considered when deciding therapeutic approaches for such patients.

Reflux Esophagitis After Laparoscopic Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG) is performed for cT1N0 gastric cancer as a function-preserving surgery, but reflux esophagitis can develop as a mid- to long-term complication postoperatively. We aimed to clarify the incidence rate of this complication and the factors correlated with it.

METHODS

Patients with gastric cancer who underwent LPPG between 2005 and 2017 were analyzed. Postoperative reflux esophagitis was evaluated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy; patients were diagnosed as having reflux esophagitis with erosive esophagitis using the modified Los Angeles classification. The incidence rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis was estimated; factors correlated with postoperative reflux esophagitis were analyzed using the logistic regression model.

RESULTS

During the study period, 813 patients underwent LPPG for gastric cancer, and 127 (15.6%) of them developed grade B or more severe postoperative reflux esophagitis. The factors correlated with postoperative reflux esophagitis were male sex (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-4.05; P < 0.001), preoperative grade A reflux esophagitis (odds ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-7.27; P = 0.012), body mass index of ≥ 23 kg/m² at 1 year postoperatively (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.53; P = 0.002), postoperative hiatal hernia (odds ratio, 4.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-8.04; P < 0.001), and long-term stasis (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.47; P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Careful attention should be paid in performing LPPG and in postoperative management after LPPG for gastric cancer patients with those risk factors.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Late complication after gastrectomy for clinical stage I cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG0912

BACKGROUND

Late complications following gastric cancer surgery, including postgastrectomy syndromes, are complex problems requiring a solution. Reported risk factors for developing late complications include surgery-related factors, such as the surgical approach and the extent of resection and reconstruction. However, this has not been assessed in a prospective study with a large sample size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications. Data from the JCOG0912 trial were used. It compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

This study included 881/921 patients enrolled in the JCOG0912 trial. The incidence of late complications was compared between the ODG and the LADG arms. In addition, associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications were assessed by multivariable analyses using the proportional odds model to identify relevant risk factors.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the type or number of patients with late complications between the LADG and the ODG arms. The multivariable analysis for each late complication revealed that the Billroth-I reconstruction (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a lower risk of cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.187, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.905, P = 0.037] or ileus (OR 0.116, 95%CI 0.033-0.406, P < 0.001), and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.371-8.176, P = 0.008). The surgical approach was not a risk factor for any late complications.

CONCLUSION

Differences in surgical approaches did not constitute a risk for developing late complications after gastrectomy. Billroth-I reconstruction reduced the risk of ileus and cholecystitis, but pylorus-preserving gastrectomy carried a risk for reflux esophagitis.

Comparison of the gastric microbiome in Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy

The changes in gastric microbiota following reconstruction after gastrectomy have not been reported. This study aimed to compare the gastric microbiota following Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy. We enrolled 71 gastrectomized patients with gastric cancer; 31 and 40 underwent Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions, respectively. During upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, gastric fluid was collected immediately before and 6 months after distal gastrectomy. Deoxyribonucleic acid isolated from each sample was evaluated using 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid metagenomic analysis. Analysis revealed that the gastric microbiota’s species richness (expressed as the alpha diversity) was significantly lower after than before distal gastrectomy (operational taxonomic units, p = 0.001; Shannon index, p = 0.03). The interindividual diversity (beta diversity) was significantly different before and after distal gastrectomy (unweighted UniFrac distances, p = 0.04; weighted UniFrac distances, p = 0.001; Bray–Curtis, p = 0.001). Alpha and beta diversity were not significantly different between Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions (observed operational taxonomic units, p = 0.58; Shannon index, p = 0.95; unweighted UniFrac distances, p = 0.65; weighted UniFrac distances, p = 0.67; Bray–Curtis, p = 0.63). Our study demonstrated significant differences in gastric microbiota diversity, composition, and community before and after distal gastrectomy but no difference between Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy.

Optimal Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Objectives

Although laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has been widely used for distal gastric cancer, the best functional reconstruction type has not yet been established. Based on previous experience, we propose a modified uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of different intracorporeal anastomoses after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Methods

From April 2015 to August 2020, the data of 215 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was collected. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the digestive tract reconstruction method, Billroth-I, Billroth-II, Roux-en-Y, and the modified uncut Roux-en-Y. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgery details, short-term outcomes, and postoperative nutritional status were analyzed.

Results

The operation time of Billroth-I anastomosis was significantly shorter (216.2 ± 25.8 min, P < .001) than that of other methods. There was no difference in postoperative complications and OS among the 4 reconstruction methods. The incidences of esophagitis, gastritis, and bile reflux were significantly lower in the Roux-en-Y and uncut Roux-en-Y group (P < .001) 1 year after surgery. And the postoperative albumin and PNI levels in uncut Roux-en-Y group were higher than those in other groups(P < .05). On multivariate analysis, age and reconstruction type were independently related to esophagitis, gastritis, and bile reflux. Serum albumin and the prognostic nutritional index were significantly higher in the uncut Roux-en-Y group than other groups (P < .05).

Conclusions

All 4 reconstruction techniques are feasible and safe. The Roux-en-Y and uncut Roux-en-Y are superior to Billroth-Ⅰ and Billroth-Ⅱ+Braun in terms of reflux esophagitis, gastritis, and bile reflux. Uncut Roux-en-Y may result in better PNI than the others.

Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy Reduced Endoscopic Reflux Esophagitis in Older Adults: Propensity Score–Matching Analysis

Objective

This study aimed to examine the functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y (RY) and Billroth I (BI) reconstruction methods following distal gastrectomy in patients ages ≥75 years with gastric cancer.

Summary of background data

RY and BI reconstructions are commonly performed after distal gastrectomy. However, no study has compared the 2 procedures in older adults.

Methods

We identified older patients who underwent RY (n = 103) or BI (n = 71) reconstruction following distal gastrectomy from 2011 to 2018 in our database. Patients in the RY and BI groups were matched by propensity scores, and each group included 62 patients. We compared short-term surgical outcomes and clinical findings at 1 year postoperatively. Additionally, risk factors for endoscopic reflux esophagitis following distal gastrectomy were evaluated.

Results

Reflux esophagitis, bile reflux, and remnant gastritis were significantly less frequent in RY reconstruction than in BI reconstruction. Moreover, both BI reconstruction and preoperative hiatus hernias were independent risk factors for postoperative endoscopic reflux esophagitis. Although the incidence of postoperative surgical complications following RY and BI was similar, RY was found to cause delayed gastric emptying more frequently than BI.

Conclusion

RY reconstruction is a favorable procedure to prevent reflux esophagitis in older patients, particularly in those with hiatal hernia.

Recanalization in Uncut Roux-en-Y Reconstruction: An Animal Experiment and a Clinical Study

Background: Because of the challenge of jejunal closure recanalization, uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of recanalization after uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction in pigs and a small number of patients.

Methods: Twenty miniature pigs were subjected to distal gastrectomy and uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction using various rows of linear staplers to block the intestine. The pigs were sacrificed, and the incidence of recanalization was investigated 1 month after the operation. From December 2018 to June 2019, 10 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone elective laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction were included in this study. The primary study outcome was recanalization of the afferent limb, demonstrated by gastrointestinal radiography 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Various numbers of staple lines across the afferent jejunal limb were applied for closure: 2 staple lines in 2 pigs, 4 staple lines in 6 pigs, 6 staple lines in 8 pigs, and 8 staple lines in 4 pigs.

Results: Complete recanalization was detected in all 20 pigs 1 month postoperatively. Recanalization was detected in five cases (50%) by gastrointestinal radiography. Among them, 1 case of recanalization was found in the 1st month after the operation, 2 cases were found in the 3rd month, and another 2 cases were found in the 6th month. Bile reflux was detected by endoscopy in 2 patients with recanalization.

Conclusions: The occurrence of afferent limb recanalization after uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction is high, and using additional staplers alone cannot decrease the incidence of recanalization. Based on our study, uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction is not recommended.

Comparison of the Long-term Outcome Between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Various reconstruction methods have been performed following distal gastrectomy; however, each reconstruction method has its own advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes between Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 459 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy (B-I: 166, RY: 293) were included. Postoperative endoscopic findings and biliary tract stone formation were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, gastric residue was more common in the RY group, gastritis was similar between groups, and bile reflux was more common in the B-I group. At 5 years postoperatively, gastric residue was similar between the groups, while gastritis and bile reflux were more common in the B-I group. Gastroesophageal reflux was more common in the B-I group at 1 year postoperatively, but gastroesophageal reflux became not significantly different between the groups at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Gallstone formation was more common in the RY group and in patients aged ≥ 65 years.

CONCLUSION

During long-term follow-up, RY reconstruction was associated with lower incidence of bile reflux and gastritis, and higher incidence of gallstone formation than B-I reconstruction. The incidence of gastric residue was more common in the RY reconstruction group in the early postoperative period and became not significantly different between the two groups over time. For aged patients with RY reconstruction, cholecystectomy is recommended concurrently as gastrectomy.

The Usefulness of Preoperative Evaluation for Intractable Slow Transit Constipation by Computed Tomography

Objectives:

Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is the gold standard surgical procedure for patients with slow transit constipation (STC). This operation's outcomes are highly variable; however, predictors of postoperative outcomes after surgical treatment of intractable STC remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of preoperative evaluation for intractable STC by computed tomography (CT) in predicting postoperative outcomes.

Methods:

From January 2011 to December 2018, 22 patients with intractable STC underwent laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis at the Kashiwa Hospital, Jikei University. They were divided into two groups, eighteen patients in the colonic inertia type (CI) group, and four patients in the spastic constipation type (SC) group, by preoperative CT according to specific criteria.

Results:

There were no significant differences in the mean age, gender, mean operation time, or mean intraoperative blood loss. The SC group's postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer than that of the CI group. Postoperative gastric outlet obstruction occurred in two patients (11%) who underwent distal partial gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction after the surgery in the CI group but no patients in the SC group. Postoperative pelvic outlet obstruction occurred in all four patients who underwent ileostomy within a year after surgery in the SC group but no patients in the CI group.

Conclusions:

The outcomes of total colectomy in the treatment of intractable STC are highly variable. Preoperative evaluation for intractable STC by CT seems to be a useful predictor of postoperative outcomes.

Endoscopic detorsion for early postoperative Roux limb torsion after laparoscopic gastrectomy: A case report and literature review

Various types of obstruction can occur after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer. If proper treatment is not performed, such obstructions can lead to serious conditions. Early postoperative Roux limb torsion is a rare complication, and few reports of endoscopic treatment for this complication have been made. In the present report, we describe the endoscopic detorsion of Roux limb torsion in two patients. The first case was a 77-year-old woman who underwent a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction for early gastric cancer and a laparoscopic ileocecal resection (ICR) for early colorectal cancer. On the 12^th day after the gastrectomy, a Roux limb torsion was observed. Endoscopic detorsion was performed, and the patient recovered. She was discharged on postoperative day 40. The second case was a 73-year-old man who underwent a laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy with a R-Y reconstruction for early gastric cancer. On the 8^th day after the gastrectomy, a Roux limb torsion occurred at the Y-shaped anastomosis (Y-anastomosis). Endoscopic detorsion was performed, and the patient recovered. He was discharged on postoperative day 17. In summary, we experienced two cases in which an endoscopic reduction of a Roux limb torsion was performed at the Y-anastomosis after gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction. This study presents a further review of these cases and a summary of the existing literature.

Easy fixation effects the prevention of Peterson’s hernia and Roux stasis syndrome

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer has been progressed and popular in Japan, since it was first described in 1994. Several reconstruction methods can be adopted according to remnant stomach size, and balance of pros and cons. Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction is a one of standard options after LDG. Its complications include Petersen’s hernia and Roux stasis syndrome. Here we report our ingenious attempt, fixation of Roux limb and duodenal stump, for decreasing the development of Petersen’s hernia and Roux stasis syndrome.

AIM

To develop a method to decrease the development of Petersen’s hernia and Roux stasis syndrome.

METHODS

We performed ante-colic R-Y reconstruction after LDG. After R-Y reconstruction, we fixed Roux limb onto the duodenal stump in a smooth radian. Via this small improvement in Roux limb, Roux limb was placed to the right of the ligament of Treitz. This not only changed the anatomy of the Petersen’s defect, but it also kept a fluent direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis and avoided a cross-angle after jejunojejunostomy. 31 patients with gastric cancer was performed this technique after R-Y reconstruction. Clinical parameters including clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, postoperative complication and follow-up data were evaluated.

RESULTS

The operative time was (308.0 ± 84.6 min). This improvement method took about 10 min. Two (6.5%) patients experienced pneumonia and pancreatitis, respectively. No patient required reoperation or readmission. All patients were followed up for at least 3 year, and none of the patients developed postoperative complications related to internal hernia or Roux stasis syndrome.

CONCLUSION

This 10 min technique is a very effective method to decrease the development of Petersen’s hernia and Roux stasis syndrome in patients who undergo LDG.

Fluoroscopic balloon dilation for early jejunojejunostomy obstruction after gastrectomy with roux-en-Y reconstruction: a case series of three patients

BACKGROUND

Small bowel obstruction after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (R-Y reconstruction) is not a rare complication. However, patients who need re-operation for this complication have a high rate of postoperative complications. We report a case series of three patients who underwent fluoroscopic balloon dilation (FBD) for early jejunojejunostomy obstruction (JJO) after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (R-Y reconstruction).

CASE PRESENTATION

Three patients were referred to our hospital for surgery for gastric cancer. Robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection and antecolic R-Y reconstruction were performed in two patients, and robot-assisted total gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection and antecolic R-Y reconstruction was performed in one patient. The jejunojejunostomy was created as a side-to-side anastomosis using a linear 45-mm stapler. The entry hole was closed with a knotless barbed suture, and serosal-muscle layer suture reinforcement with an absorbable suture was performed at the jejunojejunostomy. Subsequently, all the patients were diagnosed with JJO by computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal series. The average time to JJO from gastrectomy was 5 days (range 2-7); initial clinical symptoms were vomiting in all three cases, with simultaneous upper abdominal pain in one case. We successfully performed FBD in all three cases after unsuccessful conservative treatment using an ileus tube. The clinical symptoms improved soon after FBD, and all the patients were able to avoid re-operation. The average period to FBD from JJO was 10 days (range 4-14). The average procedure time was 46 min (range 29-68), and the average duration to oral intake from FBD was 4 days (range 2-5). The average duration of hospital stay after FBD was 12 days (range 9-15). There were no complications in any of the cases.

CONCLUSION

FBD might be a feasible procedure to avoid surgery for early small bowel obstruction after gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction.

Billroth-I vs Roux-en-Y after distal gastrectomy: A comparison of long-term nutritional status and survival rates from a large-scale multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal standard reconstruction procedure after distal gastrectomy is controversial. No large-scale persuasive clinical studies from long-term perspectives on this topic have yet been conducted.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective multicenter study analyzed a database of 2510 consecutive patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer who underwent distal gastrectomy followed by Billroth-I (B-I) or Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis from 2006 to 2012. After adjusting for 30 potential confounding factors using propensity score matching, we compared the body weight loss and other nutritional status for 5 years as primary outcomes between the two groups. We also investigated surgical outcomes, endoscopic findings, and long-term survival rates as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

After matching the inclusion criteria, 940 patients (470 in each group) were enrolled. There was no marked difference in the body weight loss and other nutritional indicators. The incidence of grade ≥3 postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) or the incidence of gallstone formation was not markedly different between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay after surgery was significantly longer, and the readmission rate was significantly higher in the R-Y group than in the B-I group. An endoscopic examination revealed no trends regarding the incidence and severity of gastritis or residual food in the remnant stomach. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.6% in the B-I group and 91.8% in the R-Y group, with no significant difference (P = .379, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Roux-en-Y reconstruction may be nearly equal to Billroth-I with regard to the long-term nutritional perspectives.

Size-dependent differences in the proximal remnant stomach: how much does a small remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy work?

BACKGROUND

The application of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LsTG) in the management of early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach creates an extremely small remnant stomach (SRS). However, it is unclear whether retaining such an SRS improves patients' postoperative outcomes in a similar manner to a conventional remnant stomach (CRS).

METHODS

Four hundred and nine of 878 patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) between 2006 and 2012 underwent Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Among them, we selected 73 patients who underwent LsTG with an SRS (SRS group), and 83 patients with the tumor in the lower third of the stomach who underwent LDG with a CRS (CRS group). The surgical outcomes at 1 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

One year after gastrectomy, the postoperative:preoperative bodyweight ratio of the SRS group was 2% lower than that of the CRS group. Both groups had comparable total protein and albumin levels, and incidence of reflux esophagitis; however, hemoglobin was lower in the SRS group. This difference in hemoglobin level between the SRS and CRS groups became larger over time, although the total protein and albumin levels of the two groups remained similar.

CONCLUSION

An SRS slightly decreases bodyweight and hemoglobin level compared with a CRS. Several objective outcomes of the SRS group are almost equal to those of the CRS group, which suggests LsTG is worth performing even though its remnant stomach is very small.

Digestive tract reconstruction options after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

In addition to the popularity of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), many reconstructive procedures after LG have been reported. Surgical resection and lymphatic dissection determine long-term survival; however, the election of a reconstruction procedure determines the postoperative quality of life for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Presently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal reconstructive procedure. In this review, the current state of digestive tract reconstruction after LG is reviewed. According to the determining influence of the tumor site on the procedures of surgical resection and reconstruction, we divide these reconstruction procedures into three categories consistent with the resection procedures. We focus on the technical tips of every reconstruction procedure and examine the surgical outcomes (length of surgery and blood loss) and postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage and stricture) to facilitate gastrointestinal surgeons to understand the merits and demerits of every reconstruction procedure.

Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?

Background

An appropriate method of anastomosis is crucial for gastric cancer patients who require gastrojejunal anastomosis. Surgeons have proposed different types of modified gastrojejunostomies in the last two decades. We focused on two types of standard anastomosis, i.e., Uncut Roux-Y and Roux-Y gastrojejunostomies, and compared the differences in immediate postoperative complications between the two types.

Methods

This is a retrospective study on 236 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy with gastrojejunal Roux-Y or Uncut Roux-Y anastomosis for six consecutive years. Immediate postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The authors discussed the causes of the significant complications and their management.

Results

There was no difference in demographics between the two groups (92 Roux-y Versus 144 Uncut Roux-y). The overall complication rate was 20.8% with 1.4% anastomotic leakage in the Uncut Roux-Y group versus 33.7% with 7.6% anastomotic failures in the Roux-Y group (p < 0.05). More abdominal infections occurred in the Roux-Y anastomosis group compared with the Uncut Roux-Y anastomosis group (p < 0.05). Duration of postoperative stay was significantly longer in patients with Roux-y anastomosis group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Considering the surgical simplicity and postoperative complications, the Uncut Roux-Y is a better choice for anastomosis in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrojejunostomy. A well-designed large cohort in a multi-centre randomized controlled trial is necessary to support these findings and compare other aspects.

Four reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus regarding which reconstruction methods are superior after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study compared four reconstruction methods after LDG for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Literature in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library was screened to compare Billroth I (B-I), Billroth II (B-II), Roux-en-Y (RY), and uncut Roux-en-Y (URY) anastomoses after LDG for gastric cancer. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare these methods.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 4347 patients were eligible for our NMA. The operative time in RY anastomosis was longer than that in B-I and B-II anastomoses. Blood loss and risk of gastrointestinal motility dysfunction were greater with RY anastomosis than with URY or B-I anastomosis. Furthermore, URY anastomosis was superior to the other 3 reconstruction methods for preventing food residue. For remnant gastritis, RY anastomosis was significantly superior to B-I and B-II anastomoses, whereas URY anastomosis was significantly superior to B-II anastomosis. In addition, RY and URY anastomoses were better than B-I and B-II anastomoses for preventing bile reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

URY anastomosis tended to be a more favorable reconstruction method after LDG due to its operative simplicity and reduced long-term complications.

Comparison of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction After Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to explore the efficacy of delta-shaped Billroth I anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for digestive tract reconstruction, and provide clinical data for determining the most appropriate digestive tract reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 180 patients were randomly and prospectively selected from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University by random number table. These patients were randomly divided into three groups: Billroth I group, Billroth II group, and Roux-en-Y (RY) group.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in resection margin, blood nutrition, and the number of postoperative complications among these three groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the resection margin, blood nutrition status, and immunization of patients in these three groups were determined. Compared to the other groups, the RY group was better in terms of hematologic status, immunological index, and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Delta-shaped Billroth I anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for digestive tract reconstruction is simple and easy to perform, and has an advantage in postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery. RY reconstruction is superior to Billroth I and Billroth II in terms of postoperative complications.

Comparison of Quality of Life and Nutritional Status of Between Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I Reconstruction After Distal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: This paper purports to use a meta-analysis to compare the postoperative quality of life (QoL) and nutritional status of between Roux-en-Y (R-Y) and Billroth-I (B-I) reconstruction after distal gastrectomy.Methods: For this study, the following databases were searched for articles published from inception until December 2018: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library.Results: A total of 13 eligible studies, covering 3645 patients, were selected for a meta-analysis. The analysis showed that compared with B-I group in term of short-term outcomes, patients undergoing R-Y reconstruction did not only have significantly better physiological function (P = 0.02), but had significantly less pain (P = 0.04). In the long-term outcomes, the dyspnea and constipation in the B-I group were worse than that in the R-Y group (P = 0.004; P = 0.04, respectively). Patients in the B-I group had higher cholesterol than those in the R-Y group at 5 years postoperatively (P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in termof other nutritional indicators including total protein, cholesterol, albumin, hemoglobin and weight in short-term outcomes.Conclusions: The final conclusion was that R-Y may be superior to the B-I reconstruction in some aspects of QoL. Besides, R-Y reconstruction could reduce the patient's cholesterol level for a long time. For the short-term outcomes, there were no significant differences in other common nutritional indicators.

Uncut Roux-en-Y Reconstruction in a Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Study of 228 Consecutive Cases and Short-Term Outcomes

Aims. We have established a procedure for uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of the procedure for patients with distal gastric cancer according to the short-term outcomes. Methods. Two hundred and twenty-eight consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy from September 2014 to August 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. All the laparoscopic operations were performed successfully without conversion to open surgery. Results. The mean operative duration was 178.28 ± 32.82 minutes, the mean anastomotic process duration was 28.22 ± 7.50 minutes, the average blood loss was 48.97 ± 29.16 mL, and the overall number of lymph nodes harvested was 37.16 ± 11.47. The mean time of out-of-bed ambulation, anal exsufflation, liquid-diet intake, and duration of hospital stay were 41.99 ± 18.37 hours, 69.57 ± 23.17 hours, 5.06 ± 1.09 days, and 8.77 ± 2.42 days, respectively. Fifteen patients suffered postoperative complications, and the overall incidence rate was 6.58% (15/228). Seventeen patients experienced afferent recanalization, the mean time of which was 11 months after the operation. Conclusion. The laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction is safe and technically feasible, and it has inspiring short-term outcomes for patients undergoing distal gastrectomy.

Roux Stasis Syndrome and Gastric Food Stasis After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with Uncut Roux-en-Y Reconstruction in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (uRYGJ) was developed to prevent slow peristalsis in the Roux limb after Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (RYGJ). This study compared the incidence of Roux stasis syndrome (RSS) and severe gastric food stasis in gastric cancer patients who underwent RYGJ or uRYGJ after laparoscopic curative distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and June 2012, 319 patients underwent RYGJ or uRYGJ. After covariates were adjusted by propensity score matching, 39 patients in the RYGJ group and 65 patients in the uRYGJ group were included in the final analysis. RSS was defined as the presence of symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal fullness, requiring refasting without ileus or obstruction within 30 days post-surgery. Gastric food stasis was measured endoscopically at 1 and 3 years after gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Operative outcomes and morbidities were similar between the two groups, whereas the incidence of RSS was higher in the RYGJ group than in the uRYGJ group, although the difference was not significant (7.7 vs. 0%; odds ratio (OR) 0.157; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0-1.059, p = 0.111). Comparison of endoscopic findings revealed that severe gastric stasis 1 year after surgery was significantly less frequent in the uRYGJ group (46.2 vs. 13.8%; OR 0.247; 95% CI 0.102-0.599, p = 0.002). The same result was reproduced 3 years after surgery (39.4 vs. 15.5%; OR 0.279; 95% CI 0.088-0.882, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RYGJ, uRYGJ after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is a safe and effective procedure for preventing severe postoperative gastric food stasis.

The Development and Future of Digestive Tract Reconstruction after Distal Gastrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Billroth I, Billroth II, Roux-en-Y, and Un-cut Roux-en-Y are common reconstruction techniques of distal gastrectomy. Which of these techniques is better has yet to be established. We performed an indirect comparison to evaluate which technique was optimal for preventing reflux symptoms.

Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases were searched to identify clinical trials that compared at least two of the reconstruction skills among Billroth I, Billroth II, Roux-en-Y, and Un-cut Roux-en-Y. Data on reflux gastritis, intraoperative blood loss, bile reflux and postoperative hospital stays were extracted from the included clinical trials for meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

Results: Twenty-four articles that included 5419 individuals were assessed as eligible for meta-analysis. The indirect comparison suggested that Roux-en-Y reconstruction significantly reduces reflux gastritis, and it tended to rank first and had the highest probability of preventing bile reflux. No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stays.

Conclusion: This indirect comparison suggested some superiority of Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy. Further perspective clinical trials are required to provide evidence for the optimal reconstruction skill.

Comparison of the Physiological Effect of Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) is a widely used minimally invasive surgery. Following LDG, Billroth-I (B-I) provides physiological reconstruction by preserving the duodenal passage but results in a high incidence of reflux esophagitis that decreases postoperative quality of life. Because of this, Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction is often considered the first choice after LDG. However, very few studies have investigated differences in physiological function between B-I and R-Y after LDG. We hypothesized that B-I would outperform R-Y in clinical and physiological outcomes, including nutrition parameters.

METHODS

We compared hemoglobin, ferritin, serum iron, Vitamin B12, 25(OH)-Vitamin D (V-D), body weight, and gastric emptying after LDG in patients with either B-I or R-Y reconstruction.

RESULTS

The levels of hemoglobin in the B-I group were significantly higher than that in the R-Y group at all time points later than 6 months postsurgery. The ferritin levels were significantly higher in the B-I group at all time points later than 9 months postsurgery. The concentration of serum V-D in the B-I group was significantly higher than that in the R-Y group at 1 year 6 months, 1 year 9 months, and 2 years after surgery. Gastric emptying in the R-Y group was significantly slower than in the B-I group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that B-I leads to less postsurgical iron deficiency anemia and V-D deficiency compared with R-Y reconstruction. Furthermore, gastric emptying was preserved in B-I reconstruction compared with R-Y reconstruction. In conclusion, after LDG, B-I reconstruction seems to cause fewer nutritional complications than R-Y reconstruction.

Practicality and short-term outcomes of intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-centre retrospective study

Objective:

Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible because of improved approaches to laparoscopic surgery and the availability of a variety of surgical instruments. This study was designed to evaluate the practicality, safety and short-term operative outcomes of intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy in TLDG for gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods:

Medical records of patients with primary distal gastric cancer undergoing Billroth I (B-I) (n = 37) or B-II anastomosis (n = 41) in TLDG from February 2010 to November 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Perioperative data including the extent of lymph node dissection, number of stapler cartridges used, time required to create the anastomosis, operative time, estimated blood loss, proximal and distal margin length, and number of lymph nodes harvested were collected. Short-term post-operative outcomes evaluated during the initial 30 days after surgery included time to first flatus and earliest liquid consumption, length of post-operative hospital stay and incidence of post-operative complications.

Results:

B-I anastomosis was mainly applied to patients with carcinoma in the lower third of the gastric body (B-I, 81.08% vs. B-II, 31.71%; P < 0.001). Mean operating (B-I, 153.57 ± 18.25 min vs. B-II, 120.17 ± 11.74 min; P = 0.004) and anastomosis (B-I, 31.92 ± 6.10 min vs. B-II, 25.29 ± 3.84 min; P = 0.01) times were significantly longer for B-I anastomosis compared to B-II anastomosis. There were no significant differences in the number of stapler cartridges used, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus and liquid consumption, length of hospital stay or incidence of complications between these groups.

Conclusions:

TLDG with B-I or B-II anastomosis is safe and feasible for gastric cancer. B-II anastomosis may require less time than B-I anastomosis.

Intracorporeal Isosceles Right Triangle-shaped Anastomosis in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intracorporeal anastomosis with Billroth I, Billroth II, or Roux-en-Y reconstructions in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective, cohort study including 553 patients was conducted. Intracorporeal isosceles right triangle-shaped anastomosis without slack and torsion was created using linear staplers. Billroth I was primarily used. Surgical outcomes and perioperative nutritional status were assessed.

RESULTS

Morbidity was 11.5%. Postoperative early complications related to anastomosis occurred in 13 patients (2.4%). Operative time and reconstruction type (Billroth I vs. others) were the only significant independent risk factors determining postoperative early and late complications, respectively. No difference was observed in postoperative changes in nutritional status across the groups, although Billroth II increased reflux esophagitis requiring medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracorporeal isosceles right triangle-shaped anastomosis using linear staplers in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, in combination with our selection algorithm for type of reconstruction, is feasible and safe.

Comparative study of outcomes of Roux-en-Y reconstruction and Billroth Ⅰ reconstruction performed after radical distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Billroth Ⅰ (BⅠ) reconstruction and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction are both commonly performed after distal gastrectomy (DG). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate which is the better option.

METHODS

Included in our study were 162 patients who, between April 2011 and October 2015, underwent DG followed by BⅠ reconstruction (n = 93) or RY reconstruction (n = 69). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. We compared perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, endoscopic findings, and nutritional status between the 2 groups of patients.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, with the exception of the incidence of gastric body tumors, which was significantly higher in the RY group (73.9% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001). Operation time was significantly longer in the RY reconstruction group (p < 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in the grades of GI dysfunction (p = 0.122).The endoscopically determined RGB (Residual food, Gastritis, Bile reflux)scores were significantly better in the RY reconstruction group than in the BI reconstruction group (p = 0.027, p < 0.001,p < 0.001,respectively).There was also no significant between-group difference in the change (1-year postoperative value/preoperative value) in body weight, body mass index, serum albumin concentration, or total cholesterol concentration (p = 0.484,p = 0.613,p = 0.760,p = 0.890, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RY reconstruction appears not to be advantageous over BⅠ reconstruction in terms of GI function or nutritional status 1 year after surgery. RY reconstruction does appear to be superior in terms of preventing bile reflux but takes more operation time.

Long-term functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstructions after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Only a few reports discuss long-term functional outcomes and changes observed in patients over several years following a distal gastrectomy. We investigated long-term functional outcomes and changes after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy based on the analysis of postoperative conditions and endoscopic findings observed in patients.

METHODS

The study group comprised 159 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y reconstruction following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (R-Y group) between December 2008 and November 2012 and 78 patients who underwent Billroth I reconstruction (B-I group) between January 2002 and November 2012. To minimize bias between the two groups, propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model. The groups were compared with respect to postoperative conditions and endoscopic findings at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The B-I group demonstrated more frequent heartburn than the R-Y group at 3 and 5 years postoperatively. No significant differences were found in terms of loss of body weight and food intake. Endoscopic findings showed significantly lesser residual food and remnant gastritis in the R-Y group at each annual postoperative follow-up. The incidence of bile reflux and reflux esophagitis in the B-I group gradually increased over the years and showed a significant difference at the culmination of the 5-year postoperative follow-up, compared to the R-Y group.

CONCLUSIONS

Roux-en-Y reconstruction was superior to Billroth I reconstruction in terms of frequency of occurrence of residual food, bile reflux, remnant gastritis, and reflux esophagitis in the long term. Differences between the two methods became more evident as the follow-up period lengthened.

Intraoperative Pancreatic Injury Gives Rise to Severe Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Results of a Review of Unedited Videos of the Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures

Objective

To examine risk factors for and causes of severe postoperative pancreatic fistula (sPOPF) after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG).

Summary of Background Data

There are few reports on POPF after LG.

Methods

Between February 2012 and March 2014, we examined 86 patients who underwent LG, comparing them with 33 patients who underwent open gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer. Risk factors for severe POPF (sPOPF) of Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa or higher were examined. To investigate causes of sPOPF, we reviewed unedited video recordings of laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Results

sPOPF occurred in 3 patients (3.5%) after LG and 1 patient (3.0%) after OG, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.901). Univariate analysis showed no significant risk factors for sPOPF after LG. By reviewing video recordings, all 3 patients with sPOPF after LG had direct pancreatic injury by ultrasonically activated device (USAD) during peripancreatic lymphadenectomy. In 2 patients, pancreas was injured while the contour of pancreas was obscured by bleeding. Durations of drain placement and postoperative hospitalization were longer for patients with sPOPF than for those without POPF or grades I and II POPF (P = 0.003, 0.018; respectively).

Conclusions

No risk factors for sPOPF after LG could be identified. USAD-induced direct pancreatic injury resulted in sPOPF, which significantly complicated the postoperative clinical course. Direct pancreatic injury can occur whether patient has previously reported risk factors (i.e., male, high body mass index, distal pancreatectomy) or not. To prevent pancreatic injury, surgeons should manage hemostasis and keep good surgical field to recognize the contour of pancreas accurately.

Reconstruction after laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy: technical tips and pitfalls

After the advent of the concept of laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG), the digestive reconstruction poses arguments among surgeons. There are three major different ways including Billroth I gastroduodenostomy, Billroth II gastrojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy, and each of them has its own trick. In this article, the technical tips and pitfalls of each reconstruction will be discussed based on studies and author's experience.

Incidence of gallstones after gastric resection for gastric cancer: a nationwide claims-based study

Purpose

Gallstone formation is one of the most common problems after gastrectomy. This retrospective cohort study used the South Korean nationwide claims database to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of gallstone after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer in South Korea in 2008-2010 were identified. Incidence of gallstone formation 5 years after gastrectomy in males and females, in various age groups, and after different types of gastrectomy was determined. Multivariate logistic regression analysis served to identify gallstone risk factors.

Results

Of the 47,752 patients, 2,506 (5.2%) developed gallstone during the 5-year follow-up period. At 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, the cumulative incidences were 1.2%, 2.2%, 3.3%, and 4.3%, respectively. Males had a higher incidence than females (5.8% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001). Older patients (60-89 years) had a higher incidence than younger patients (30-59 years) (6.1% vs. 4.3%, P < 0.001). Gallstone was most common after total gastrectomy (6.6%), followed by proximal gastrectomy (5.4%), distal gastrectomy (4.8%), and pylorus-preserving distal gastrectomy (4.0%) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.39), an older age (OR, 1.44), and total gastrectomy (OR, 1.40 vs. distal gastrectomy) were significant independent risk factors for postgastrectomy gallstone.

Conclusion

The cumulative incidence of gallstone 5 years after gastrectomy for gastric cancer was 5.2%. Male sex, an older age, and total gastrectomy were significant risk factors. More careful monitoring for gallstone may be necessary in patients with such risk factors.

Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus totally laparoscopic Billroth-II gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a matched-cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate feasibility and benefits of intracorporeal anastomosis, we compared short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) with Billroth-II (B-II) anastomosis for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Sixty patients underwent attempted B-II TLDG from 2011 through 2013. Patients who underwent B-II LADG prior to 2011 were matched to TLDG cases for demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, and TNM stage. Perioperative and short-term surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological characteristics of both groups were comparable. The B-II TLDG group had a shorter hospital stay (9.4 vs. 12.0 days, P = 0.038) and average incision size was smaller (3.5 vs. 5.4 cm, P = 0.030) than in the B-II LADG group. Anastomotic leakage was not recorded in either group, and there were no differences in the rates of perioperative complications and in inflammatory parameters between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that B-II TLDG is feasible, compared to B-II LADG, and that it has several advantages over LADG, including a smaller incision, a shorter hospital stay, and more convenience during surgery. However, prospective randomized controlled studies are still needed to confirm that B-II TLDG can be used as a standard procedure for LDG.

Treatment of biliary tract stones after gastrectomy in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

The incidence of biliary tract stones has widely been reported to be high after gastrectomy. Treatment of biliary tract stones in post-gastrectomy patients was examined retrospectively, particularly minimally invasive therapy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder stones and endoscopic bile duct lithotomy for common bile duct stones.

METHODS

Treatment of 122 post-gastrectomy patients with biliary tract stones was examined retrospectively from 1995 to April 2015.

RESULTS

Symptomatic biliary tract stones were found in 3.7% of post-gastrectomy patients. The frequency of bile duct stones was higher in post-gastrectomy patients with gallbladder stones (44%) than in the nongastrectomy patients (11%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out in 84% of the patients with gallbladder stones. Endoscopic bile duct lithotomy was feasible in 89% of patients with common bile duct stones.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was feasible for removing gallbladder stones after gastrectomy. Endoscopic bile duct lithotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy was a good option for patients in whom endoscopic intervention could be performed. On the other hand, choledochoenterostomy could be a good option for patients in whom endoscopic bile duct lithotomy cannot be performed, particularly considering the risk of recurrent bile duct stones.

Comparison Between Billroth-II with Braun and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Billroth-II with Braun and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

From April 2010 to August 2012, 66 patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (Billroth-II with Braun reconstruction, 26; Roux-en-Y, 40). The patients' data were collected prospectively and reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean operation and reconstruction times were statistically shorter for Billroth-II with Braun reconstruction than Roux-en-Y (198.1 ± 33.0 vs. 242.3 ± 58.1 min, p = 0.001). One case of postoperative stricture was observed in each group. One case each of intra-abdominal abscess and delayed gastric emptying occurred in the Billroth-II with Braun group. At 1 year postoperatively, gastric residue and reflux esophagitis were not significantly different between the groups. Gastritis and bile reflux were more frequently observed in the Billroth-II with Braun group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). At 2 years postoperatively, gastric residue was not significantly different, but gastritis, bile reflux, and esophagitis were more frequent in the Billroth-II with Braun group (p = 0.029, p < 0.001, and p = 0.036, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative effectiveness of Roux-en-Y reconstruction may be superior to Billroth-II with Braun reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Durable Flap-Valve Mitigation of Duodenogastric Reflux, Remnant Gastritis and Dumping Syndrome Following Billroth I Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

We have reported the short-term results of pylorus reconstruction gastrectomy (PRG) that prevents duodenogastric reflux (DGR) and remnant gastritis after distal gastrectomy. We herein report the long-term results of the PRG.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PRG was performed in 37 patients (age 31 to 86 [mean 67.8 ± 12.3] years, male:female = 22:15) with gastric cancer from June 2006 through December 2013. We examined the long-term outcome in 28 patients (age 41 to 86 [mean 67.0 ± 10.7] years, male:female = 18:10) that passed over 3 years after surgery (LTR 44.1 ± 11.7 months), and compared with their short-term result after the operation (STR 13.1 ± 6.9 months). The adverse events of gastric surgery evaluated in this study consisted of the degree of remnant gastritis, the presence of dumping syndrome, and degree of weight loss (%).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the degree of DGR and remnant gastritis by gastroscopic finding between LTR and STR after PRG (P = 0.21). Statistically, there was no difference in the bile acid concentration of remnant gastric juice between LTR and STR (108.4 ± 254.1 vs. 94.0 ± 208.6 μmol/L, P = 0.33), and weight loss of LTR was the same as that of STR (5.67 ± 7.08 vs. 4.59 ± 5.63%, P = 0.34). There were few morphological changes in the reconstructed pylorus by the long-term course, but 2 patients showed mild atrophy.

CONCLUSION

The form of reconstructed pylorus and the effect that reduces side effects of Billroth I seem to last for a long time.

A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical and long-term functional outcomes of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 697 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for operable gastric cancer between January 2009 and December 2012. The patients were classified into three groups according to the reconstruction methods: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y. The parameters evaluated included patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Endoscopic findings of the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, bile (RGB) classification and the Los Angeles classification 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y were performed in 165 (23.7%), 371 (53.2%), and 161 patients (23.1%), respectively. Operation time was significantly shorter (173.4±44.7 minute, P<0.001) as was time to first flatus (2.8±0.8 days, P=0.009), time to first soft diet was significantly faster (4.3±1.0 days, P<0.001), and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (7.7±4.0 days, P=0.004) in Billroth I in comparison to the other methods. Postoperative complications higher than Clavien-Dindo grade III occurred in 61 patients (8.8%) with no statistically significant differences between groups (P=0.797). Endoscopic findings confirmed that gastric residue, gastritis, bile reflux, and reflux esophagitis were significantly lower in Roux-en-Y (P<0.001) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer is beneficial in terms of long-term functional outcome, whereas Billroth I reconstruction for distal-third gastric cancer has a superior short-term surgical outcome and postoperative weight change.

β-Shaped intracorporeal Roux-en-Y reconstruction after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The use of laparoscopic gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer has been increasing. Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy is now widely used to decrease leakage and prevent reflux. Owing to the need for a less invasive technique, we have developed a new technique for intracorporeal R-Y reconstruction (β reconstruction) after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG).

METHODS

In this report, we describe the β reconstruction technique and short-term outcomes of the initial 105 patients who underwent β reconstruction from December 2008 to March 2012.

RESULTS

The operative and β reconstruction times were 330 ± 61.3 and 29 ± 5.6 min (mean ± SD), respectively. Anastomotic leakage after gastrojejunostomy occurred in one patient (0.9 %), requiring reoperation. Four cases (3.8 %) of anastomotic stenosis required endoscopic balloon dilation. However, R-Y stasis was not noted.

CONCLUSIONS

We have indicated a technical description as well as the usefulness of β-shaped intracorporeal R-Y reconstruction after TLDG.

Uncut Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Can Be a Favorable Method in Terms of Gastritis, Bile Reflux, and Gastric Residue

Purpose

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of early gastric cancer. Several reconstruction methods can be adopted after LDG according to tumor characteristics and surgeon preference. This study aimed to compare the remnant gastric functions after different reconstructions.

Materials and Methods

In total, 221 patients who underwent LDG between March 2005 and October 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were classified into four groups based on the reconstructive procedure: Billroth I (BI) anastomosis, Billroth II (BII) with Braun anastomosis, Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction, or uncut RY reconstruction. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative endoscopic findings were reviewed and compared among groups.

Results

Endoscopic evaluations at 11.8±3.8 months postoperatively showed less frequent gastritis and bile reflux in the remnant stomach in the RY group compared to the BI and BII groups. There was no significant difference in the gastric residue among the BI, BII, and RY groups. The incidence of gastritis and bile reflux in the uncut RY group was similar to that in the RY group, while residual gastric content in the uncut RY group was significantly smaller and less frequently observed than that in the RY group (5.8% versus 35.3%, P=0.010).

Conclusions

RY and uncut RY reconstructions are equally superior to BI and BII with Braun anastomoses in terms of gastritis and bile reflux in the remnant stomach. Furthermore, uncut RY reconstruction showed improved stasis compared to conventional RY gastrojejunostomy. Uncut RY reconstruction can be a favorable reconstructive procedure after LDG.

Long-term effectiveness of preserved celiac branch of vagal nerve after Roux-en-Y reconstruction in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to clarify the effectiveness of preserving the celiac branch (CB) of the vagal trunk after the Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG).

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients with pathological stage I gastric cancer underwent R-Y reconstruction after LADG with D1 + β lymphadenectomy between January 2004 and March 2009 and were followed up for 5 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the preservation group (P-CB) and the resection group (R-CB). Evaluated variables included symptoms, endoscopic findings, nutritional status, and gallstone formation at 5 years after gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Gallstone formation was significantly less common in P-CB than in R-CB (16 vs. 33%, p = 0.035). One patient (2%) in P-CB and 4 (7%) in R-CB underwent surgery for symptomatic gallstones. On multivariate analysis of gallstone formation, R-CB was an independent risk factor for gallstone formation (odds ratio = 2.5, 95% confidential interval: 1.0-6.1, p = 0.049). Symptoms and endoscopic findings did not differ significantly between the groups. Relative values of body weight, serum albumin level, and total cholesterol level also did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Preserving the CB independently contributes to the prevention of gallstone formation during long-term follow-up after R-Y reconstruction following LADG.