Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography

MRI versus Dual-Energy CT in Local-Regional Staging of Gastric Cancer

Background Preoperative local-regional tumor staging of gastric cancer (GC) is critical for appropriate treatment planning. The comparative accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) versus dual-energy CT (DECT) for staging of GC is not known. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of personalized mpMRI with that of DECT for local-regional T and N staging in patients with GC receiving curative surgical intervention. Materials and Methods Patients with GC who underwent gastric mpMRI and DECT before gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy were eligible for this single-center prospective noninferiority study between November 2021 and September 2022. mpMRI comprised T2-weighted imaging, multiorientational zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging, and extradimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Dual-phase DECT images were reconstructed at 40 keV and standard 120 kVp-like images. Using gastrectomy specimens as the reference standard, the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI and DECT for T and N staging was compared by six radiologists in a pairwise blinded manner. Interreader agreement was assessed using the weighted κ and Kendall W statistics. The McNemar test was used for head-to-head accuracy comparisons between DECT and mpMRI. Results This study included 202 participants (mean age, 62 years ± 11 [SD]; 145 male). The interreader agreement of the six readers for T and N staging of GC was excellent for both mpMRI (κ = 0.89 and 0.85, respectively) and DECT (κ = 0.86 and 0.84, respectively). Regardless of reader experience, higher accuracy was achieved with mpMRI than with DECT for both T (61%-77% vs 50%-64%; all P < .05) and N (54%-68% vs 51%-58%; P = .497-.005) staging, specifically T1 (83% vs 65%) and T4a (78% vs 68%) tumors and N1 (41% vs 24%) and N3 (64% vs 45%) nodules (all P < .05). Conclusion Personalized mpMRI was superior in T staging and noninferior or superior in N staging compared with DECT for patients with GC. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05508126 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Méndez and Martín-Garre in this issue.

Value of orthogonal axial MR images in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the value of orthogonal axial images (OAI) of MRI in gastric cancer T staging.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 133 patients (median age, 63 [range, 24-85] years) with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent both CT and MRI followed by surgery. MRI lacking or incorporating OAI and CT images were evaluated, respectively. Diagnostic performance (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) for each T stage, overall diagnostic accuracy and rates of over- and understaging were quantified employing pathological T stage as a reference standard. The McNemar's test was performed to compare the overall accuracy.

RESULTS

Among patients with pT1-pT4 disease, MRI with OAI (accuracy: 88.7-94.7%, sensitivity: 66.7-93.0%, specificity: 91.5-100.0%) exhibited superior diagnostic performance compared to MRI without OAI (accuracy: 81.2-88.7%, sensitivity: 46.2-83.1%, specificity: 85.5-99.1%) and CT (accuracy: 88.0-92.5%, sensitivity: 53.3-90.1%, specificity: 88.7-98.1%). The overall accuracy of MRI with OAI was significantly higher (83.5%) than that of MRI without OAI (67.7%) (p < .001). However, there was no significant difference in the overall accuracy of MRI with OAI and CT (78.9%) (p = .35). The over- and understaging rates of MRI with OAI (12.0, 4.5%) were lower than those of MRI without OAI (21.8, 10.5%) and CT (12.8, 8.3%).

CONCLUSION

OAI play a pivotal role in the T staging of gastric cancer. MRI incorporating OAI demonstrated commendable performance for gastric cancer T-staging, with a slight tendency toward its superiority over CT.

Whether the use of intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound can improve the accuracy of T stage diagnosis of gastric cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether the use of intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of T stage of gastric cancer on the basis of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound (OCEUS).

METHODS

Eighty-one patients with gastric cancer who underwent preoperative CEUS. Criteria for T staging was AJCC Stage 8th Edition. To compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of OCEUS and CEUS for T staging of gastric cancer using pathological results as the gold standard.

RESULTS

There were differences in the diagnostic accuracy of T2 (P = 0.048), T3(P = 0.002) and T4 (P = 0.000) between OCEUS and CEUS. And there was no difference in diagnostic accuracy for T1 (P = 0.118). CEUS significantly improved diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in T3 (42.86% to 61.90% for sensitivity, 86.96% to 93.75% for specificity), and T4 (64.71% to 76.47% for sensitivity, 78.33% to 95.74% for specificity).

CONCLUSION

Compared with OCEUS, CEUS did improve the diagnostic accuracy of T2, T3, and T4 stages of gastric cancer.

Imaging in Gastric Cancer: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Gastric cancer represents one of the most common oncological causes of death worldwide. In order to treat patients in the best possible way, the staging of gastric cancer should be accurate. In this regard, endoscopy ultrasound (EUS) has been considered the reference standard for tumor (T) and nodal (N) statuses in recent decades. However, thanks to technological improvements, computed tomography (CT) has gained an important role, not only in the assessment of distant metastases (M status) but also in T and N staging. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can contribute to the detection and staging of primary gastric tumors thanks to its excellent soft tissue contrast and multiple imaging sequences without radiation-related risks. In addition, MRI can help with the detection of liver metastases, especially small lesions. Finally, positron emission tomography (PET) is still considered a useful diagnostic tool for the staging of gastric cancer patients, with a focus on nodal metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis. In addition, it may play a role in the treatment of gastric cancer in the coming years thanks to the introduction of new labeling peptides. This review aims to summarize the most common advantages and pitfalls of EUS, CT, MRI and PET in the TNM staging of gastric cancer patients.

Prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations for different T-stages in gastric cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment of gastric cancer. Extent of lymphadenectomy may differ depending on T-stage, as the rate of lymph node metastases may differ. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate and compare the prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages.

METHODS

Data reporting and structure of this systematic review follows the PRISMA checklist. The Medline and PubMed databases were systematically searched. The search included the following Mesh terms: "Stomach Neoplasms", "Lymphatic Metastasis" and "Lymph Node Excision". The primary outcome was the highest prevalence of nodal metastases per T-stage.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 175 eligible articles. Five articles met the inclusion criteria and were accordingly analyzed. Concerning the lymph node stations 1 to 7, the lymph nodes along the lesser gastric curvature (station 3) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 5.5%, T2: 21.9%, T3: 41.9%, T4: 71.0%). Concerning the lymph node stations 8 to 20, the lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery (station 8) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 0.8%, T2: 7.9%, T3: 14.0%, T4: 28.2%).

CONCLUSION

An overall low prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas endorse a more tailored approach based on the different gastric T-stages. In addition, a less extensive lymphadenectomy seems justified in early T1 carcinoma.

SYNOPSIS

This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of nodal metastases for the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages, showing an overall low prevalence in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in the more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas.

Obstructive Jaundice as the Initial Manifestation of Gastric Adenocarcinoma

A 52-year-old female presented with epigastric pain, yellowing of the sclera, and vomiting for three weeks. Laboratory investigations revealed markedly elevated serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels, accompanied by a modest rise in transaminases. A clinical diagnosis of obstructive jaundice was established. Ultrasound of the abdomen depicted a mass in the region of the head of the pancreas. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen revealed an infiltrative gastric mass spreading across the gastroduodenal junction and involving the ampulla of Vater. Owing to comorbid conditions and widespread lymphadenopathy, a palliative gastrojejunostomy with excision biopsy was performed. Histopathology confirmed an undifferentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

Tumor-Targeted Polydopamine-Based Nanoparticles for Multimodal Mapping Following Photothermal Therapy of Metastatic Lymph Nodes

Purpose

Lymphadenectomy with lymph node (LN) mapping is essential for surgical removal of solid tumors. Existing agents do not provide accurate multimodal mapping and antitumor therapy for metastatic LNs; therefore, we fabricated a polydopamine (PDA) nanoparticle (NP)-based tumor-targeted LN mapping agent capable of multimodal mapping and guided photothermal therapy (PTT) for metastatic LNs.

Materials and Methods

PDA NPs modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG) were obtained by polymerization under alkaline conditions. The PEG-PDA NPs were loaded with the circular tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp (cRGD) to achieve tumor-targeting capacity and with the fluorescent dye IR820 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast Gd(NH₂)₂ for in situ detection. The resulting cRGD-PEG-PDA@IR820/Gd(NH₂)₂ (cRGD-PPIG) NPs were tested for their biosafety and metastatic LN mapping ability. They were drained specifically into LNs and selectively taken up by gastric MKN45 cells via α_vβ3 integrin-mediated endocytosis.

Results

This phenomenon enabled MR/optical/near-infrared fluorescence multimodal metastatic LN mapping, guiding the creation of accurate and highly efficient PTT for gastric cancer metastatic LNs in mice.

Conclusion

In summary, we fabricated tumor-targeted cRGD-PPIG NPs with MR/optical/near-infrared fluorescence multimodal metastatic LN mapping capacity for surgery and efficient PTT guidance post-surgery.

Development and validation of multivariate models integrating preoperative clinicopathological and radiographic findings to predict HER2 status in gastric cancer

The combination of trastuzumab and chemotherapy is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive advanced gastric cancers (GCs). Successful trastuzumab-induced targeted therapy should be based on the assessment of HER2 overexpression. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of multivariate models based on hematological parameters, endoscopic biopsy, and computed tomography (CT) findings for assessing HER2 overexpression in GC. This retrospective study included 183 patients with GC, and they were divided into primary (n = 137) and validation (n = 46) cohorts at a ratio of 3:1. Hematological parameters, endoscopic biopsy, CT morphological characteristics, and CT value-related and texture parameters of all patients were collected and analyzed. The mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration value, morphological type, 3 CT value-related parameters, and 22 texture parameters in three contrast-enhanced phases differed significantly between the two groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate models based on the regression analysis and support vector machine algorithm achieved areas under the curve of 0.818 and 0.879 in the primary cohort, respectively. The combination of hematological parameters, CT morphological characteristics, CT value-related and texture parameters could predict HER2 overexpression in GCs with satisfactory diagnostic efficiency. The decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility.

A novel DNA methylation signature associated with lymph node metastasis status in early gastric cancer

Background

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important factor for both treatment and prognosis of early gastric cancer (EGC). Current methods are insufficient to evaluate LNM in EGC due to suboptimal accuracy. Herein, we aim to identify methylation signatures for LNM of EGC, facilitate precision diagnosis, and guide treatment modalities.

Methods

For marker discovery, genome-wide methylation sequencing was performed in a cohort (marker discovery) using 47 fresh frozen (FF) tissue samples. The identified signatures were subsequently characterized for model development using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples by qPCR assay in a second cohort (model development cohort, n = 302, training set: n = 151, test set: n = 151). The performance of the established model was further validated using FFPE samples in a third cohorts (validation cohort, n = 130) and compared with image-based diagnostics, conventional clinicopathology-based model (conventional model), and current standard workups.

Results

Fifty LNM-specific methylation signatures were identified de novo and technically validated. A derived 3-marker methylation model for LNM diagnosis was established that achieved an AUC of 0.87 and 0.88, corresponding to the specificity of 80.9% and 85.7%, sensitivity of 80.6% and 78.1%, and accuracy of 80.8% and 83.8% in the test set of model development cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Notably, this methylation model outperformed computed tomography (CT)-based imaging with a superior AUC (0.88 vs. 0.57, p < 0.0001) and individual clinicopathological features in the validation cohort. The model integrated with clinicopathological features demonstrated further enhanced AUCs of 0.89 in the same cohort. The 3-marker methylation model and integrated model reduced 39.4% and 41.5% overtreatment as compared to standard workups, respectively.

Conclusions

A novel 3-marker methylation model was established and validated that shows diagnostic potential to identify LNM in EGC patients and thus reduce unnecessary gastrectomy in EGC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-021-01219-x.

Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics

Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.

Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastric Cancer Staging

Gastric cancer remains a health problem, with treatment indications varying with the TNM stage. We aimed in this study to highlight the role of EUS in GC patients and also to calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS for T and N staging in our group of patients with this disease. In this study, we included 41 GC patients, and individual values for every T stage accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, correct staging, understaging, and overstaging were calculated. EUS overall accuracy for T staging was 58.53%, with the highest sensitivity reached for the T4 stage, 95.83%. For N+vs. N-staging, EUS accuracy was 68.29%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 44.44%. The positive and negative predicted values for the presence or absence of nodal disease were 82.75%, respectively 33.33%. In conclusion, this study confirmed the importance of EUS for the assessment of GC T and N stage and highlighted the role of this tool in the detection of liver micrometastasis unrevealed by other imaging techniques like abdominal ultrasound or MSCT.

Development and evaluation of a ceMDCT-based preoperative risk stratification model to predict disease-free survival after radical surgery in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate a preoperative risk stratification model for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) based on contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (ceMDCT) images in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing radical surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with GC who underwent ceMDCT followed by radical surgery. A preoperative risk stratification model was constructed (including risk factor selection, risk status scoring, and risk level assignment) using Cox proportional hazard regression and log-rank analyses in the training cohort; the model was tested in the validation cohort. A nomogram was used to compare the preoperative risk stratification model with a postoperative DFS prediction model.

RESULTS

A total of 462 patients (training/validation: 271/191) were included. The ceMDCT features of T category (score of 0 or 2), N category (0, 1, 2, or 3), extramural vessel invasion (0 or 2), and tumor location (0 or 1) were selected to construct the preoperative risk stratification model, with 4 risk levels defined based on risk score. There were significant differences in DFS among the risk levels in both cohorts (p < 0.001). The predictive value of the preoperative model was similar to that of the postoperative model, with concordance indices of 0.791 (95% CI, 0.743-0.837) and 0.739 (95% CI, 0.666-0.812), respectively, in the training cohort and 0.762 (95% CI, 0.696-0.828) and 0.738 (95% CI, 0.684-0.792), respectively, in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

A preoperative risk stratification model based on ceMDCT images could be used to predict DFS and thus classify GC cases into various risk levels.

A meta-analysis of the utility of transabdominal ultrasound for evaluation of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Clinical discovery/staging of gastric cancer (GC) is crucial in designing the treatment strategies and largely decides GC patients' survival. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) are 2 useful GC diagnosis tools. High doses of radiation associated with CT make its use limited, while the process of EUS is stressful, time-consuming, and challenging. Transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) is a promising candidate to address these shortcomings. This study aimed to meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of TAUS in discriminating between advanced and early GCs, as well as compare its utility with other imaging techniques.Methods: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to 2019. Data were analyzed using RevMan software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK), and pooled estimates of accuracy, sensitivity, and other features were acquired. Seven papers were eventually selected for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

TAUS had distinct diagnostic efficacies for early and advanced GC patients. The accuracy and sensitivity were significantly higher in the advanced group. A high color Doppler vascularity index and a lesion larger than 1 cm were 2 features of advanced GC. Moreover, TAUS had a comparable (but slightly higher) accuracy than CT and EUS.

CONCLUSIONS

TAUS is more accurate and sensitive in diagnosing advanced GC compared to early GC. More features of advanced GC are required to improve the recognition ability. At least, TAUS can be considered as a complementary imaging diagnostic tool to CT and EUS.

Potential survival benefits of open over laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients beyond three years after surgery: result from multicenter in-depth analysis based on propensity matching

BACKGROUND

The oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer (ADGC) beyond 3 years after surgery remain obscure.

METHODS

A total of 1256 patients with ADGC at two teaching institutions in China from April 2007 to December 2014 were enrolled. The general data of the two groups were identified to enable rigorous estimation of propensity scores. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) and Landmark analysis was used to compare survival.

RESULTS

After matching 461 patients each in the open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) groups, they were included into analysis. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were comparable in two groups. RMST-stratified analysis showed that the 3-year RMST of ODG group was similar to that of LDG group in patients with cT4a (- 1.38 years, p = 0.163) or with cT4a and tumor size > 5 cm, whereas the 5-year RMST had significant differences between groups in cT4a patients(- 8.36 years, P = 0.005) or cT4a and tumor size > 5 cm patients(4.67 years, P = 0.042). In patients with cT4a and tumors > 5 cm, the number of peritoneal recurrences was significantly fewer in the ODG group than in the LDG group (4 vs. 17, P = 0.033), and the peritoneal recurrence time and multiple-site recurrence time were both later in the ODG group.

CONCLUSION

By reducing recurrence, ODG achieves a better survival for GC patients with serous infiltration and tumors larger than 5 cm beyond 3 years after surgery. The present findings can serve as a reference for surgical options and the setting of follow-up time point for clinical studies.

Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer, with high morbidity and mortality rates, is one of the most heterogeneous tumors. Radical gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy are the standard treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) need to be confirmed by many trials before implementation, creating a bottleneck in development. Although clinical benefits of NAT have been observed, a series of problems remain to be solved. Before therapy, more contributing factors should be offered for choice in the intended population and ideal regimens. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning is usually applied to evaluate effectiveness according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), yet CT scanning results sometimes differ from pathological responses. After NAT, the appropriate time for surgery is still empirically defined. Our review aims to discuss the abovementioned issues regarding NAT for GC, including indications, selection of regimens, lesion assessment and NAT-surgery interval time.

Effect of Preoperative Tumour Under-Staging on the Long-Term Survival of Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative tumor staging deviation (PTSD) on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (RGGC).

Materials and Methods

Clinicopathological data of 2,346 patients who underwent RGGC were retrospectively analyzed. The preoperative tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) under-staging group (uTNM) comprised patients who had earlier preoperative TNM than postoperative TNM, and the no preoperative under-staging group (nTNM) comprised the remaining patients.

Results

There were 1,031 uTNM (44.0%) and 1,315 nTNM cases (56.0%). Cox prognostic analysis revealed that PTSD independently affected the overall survival (OS) after surgery. The 5-year OS was lower in the uTNM group (41.8%) than in the nTNM group (71.6%). The patients less than 65 years old, with lower American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, 2–5 cm tumor located at the lower stomach, and cT1 or cN0 preoperative staging would more likely undergo D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) in uTNM (p < 0.05). Logistic analyses revealed that tumor size > 2 cm and body mass index ≤ 22.72 kg/m² were independent risk factors of preoperative TNM tumor under-staging in patients with cT1N0M0 staging (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Underestimated tumor staging is not rare, which possibly results in inadequate LND and affects the long-term survival for patients undergoing RGGC. D2 LND should be carefully performed in patients who are predisposed to this underestimation.

Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used for staging and diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer. Recently, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET)/CT gained popularity as a diagnostic tool owing to advantages including dual functional and anatomical imaging, which may facilitate early diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT has been assessed in several studies but with variable results. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary TNM staging and the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancers. A systematic search of the PubMed Central, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception until January 2020 was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study-2 tool was used to determine the quality of the selected studies. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A total of 58 studies comprising 9,997 patients were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias. The sensitivity and specificity for nodal staging of gastric cancer were 49% (95% CI, 37-61%) and 92% (95% CI, 86-96%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 67% (95% CI, 57-76%) and 86% (95% CI, 81-89%) for CECT, respectively. For metastasis staging, the sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95% CI, 40-71%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. For diagnosing cancer recurrence, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI, 72-88%) and 83% (95% CI, 74-89%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. Both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT were deemed highly useful for diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer due to their high sensitivities and specificities. However, these techniques cannot be used to exclude or confirm the presence of lymph node metastases or recurrent gastric cancer tumors, but can be used for the confirmation of distal metastasis.

Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis

Gastric cancer preoperative staging is of outmost importance to assure proper management of the disease. Providing a relevant clinical stage relies on different imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis for gastric cancer clinical stage diagnostic tests, thus comparing the diagnostic accuracy of EUS vs. multidetector CT (MDCT) and EUS vs. EUS + MDCT. We plotted study estimates of pooled sensitivity and specificity on forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic space to explore between-study variation in the performance of EUS, MDCT and EUS + MDCT for T1–T4, N0–N3, M0–M1 when data were available. Exploratory analyses were undertaken in RevMan 5. We included twelve studies with 2047 patients. Our results suggest that EUS was superior to MDCT in preoperative T1 and N staging. MDCT is more specific for the M stage but no significant difference in sensitivity was obtained. When comparing EUS vs. EUS + MDCT for T1 both sensitivity and specificity were not relevant. No significant differences were observed in T2–T4 stages. Even though EUS helped differentiate between the presence of invaded nodules, N stages should be carefully assessed by both methods since there is not sufficient data.

Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging

BACKGROUND

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the quantitative parameter of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), is a measure for this restricted diffusion, and its role in gastric cancer (GC) including distinguishing malignant segments from healthy gastric wall, metastatic perigastric lymph nodes from benign nodes and evaluating response of GC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been investigated in previous studies. Evidence suggests that ADC may also be of help in assessment of aggressiveness and preoperative staging of gastric cancer, which needs to be explored in further studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of DW-MRI and its quantitative parameter, ADC in staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Forty-six patients (28 male, 18 female, mean age 62 years) with non-metastatic biopsy- proven GC who underwent abdominal DW-MRI before surgery were included in this retrospective study. Tumor invasion depth (T-stage) and nodal involvement (N-stage) were evaluated using signal increase on DW-MRI, and tumor ADC was measured. Diagnostic performance of these results was assessed by comparing them with postsurgical histopathology based on 8th TNM classification.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW-MRI in T-staging were 92.1%, 75%, 89.1% for ≤T2 vs. ≥T3; and 75%, 88.5%, 82.6% for ≤T3 vs. T4. However, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW-MRI in N-staging were 89.3%, 88.9%, 89.1% for ≤N1 vs. ≥N2; and 73.7%, 96.3%, 86.9% for ≤N2 vs. N3, respectively. Relative preoperative ADC values correlated with pT staging (r=-0.397, p=0.006). There was also a statistically significant difference of relative ADC values between ≤T3 and T4 stages, and a cut-off of 0.64 s/mm2 could differentiate these stages with an odds ratio of 7.714 (95% confidence interval, 1.479-40.243). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating ≤T3 and T4 stages was 0.725.

CONCLUSION

DW-MRI may contribute to the clinical staging of non-metastatic GC. In particular, relative ADC of DW-MRI can distinguish T4 gastric cancer from less advanced T-stages.

Preoperative computed tomography-guided disease-free survival prediction in gastric cancer: a multicenter radiomics study

PURPOSE

Preoperative and noninvasive prognosis evaluation remains challenging for gastric cancer. Novel preoperative prognostic biomarkers should be investigated. This study aimed to develop multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT)-guided prognostic models to direct follow-up strategy and improve prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective dataset of 353 gastric cancer patients were enrolled from two centers and allocated to three cohorts: training cohort (n = 166), internal validation cohort (n = 83), and external validation cohort (n = 104). Quantitative radiomic features were extracted from MDCT images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized Cox regression was adopted to construct a radiomic signature. A radiomic nomogram was established by integrating the radiomic signature and significant clinical risk factors. We also built a preoperative tumor-node-metastasis staging model for comparison. All models were evaluated considering the abilities of risk stratification, discrimination, calibration, and clinical use.

RESULTS

In the two validation cohorts, the established four-feature radiomic signature showed robust risk stratification power (P = 0.0260 and 0.0003, log-rank test). The radiomic nomogram incorporated radiomic signature, extramural vessel invasion, clinical T stage, and clinical N stage, outperforming all the other models (concordance index = 0.720 and 0.727) with good calibration and decision benefits. Also, the 2-yr disease-free survival (DFS) prediction was most effective (time-dependent area under curve = 0.771 and 0.765). Moreover, subgroup analysis indicated that the radiomic signature was more sensitive in risk stratifying patients with advanced clinical T/N stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed MDCT-guided radiomic signature was verified as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer. The radiomic nomogram was a noninvasive auxiliary model for preoperative individualized DFS prediction, holding potential in promoting treatment strategy and clinical prognosis.

Esophagus and Stomach: Is There a Role for MR Imaging?

MR imaging has been increasingly used in the diagnostic work-up of benign and malignant conditions of the gastroesophageal tract. The use of an adequate MR imaging protocol is crucial, although standardization of imaging studies is still far from being implemented. Research on MR imaging-based biomarkers show promising results in assessing tumor aggressiveness and prognosis, and in the evaluation of response to treatment, both in esophageal and gastric cancers.

Endoscopic diagnosis of gastrointestinal melanoma

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) melanoma can be diagnosed by endoscopy combined with biopsy and subsequent pathological examination. However, the disease may be misdiagnosed due to the limited awareness of GI melanoma.Objective: We aimed to describe characteristics of GI melanoma that can be detected by endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with GI melanoma diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy or postoperative pathology between August 2008 and January 2017. Images of endoscopic examinations, including endoscopy and EUS, were reviewed to characterize GI melanomas.Results: A total of 21 patients (9 males, 12 females) with GI melanoma were enrolled in this study. Several types of melanoma were identified: anorectal melanoma (n = 15), esophageal melanoma (n = 3), gastric melanoma (n = 2), and melanoma of the small intestine (n = 1). EUS was performed for one case of esophageal melanoma, one case of gastric melanoma, and seven cases of anorectal melanoma.Conclusions: GI melanoma is a rare disease. Most GI melanomas showed typical endoscopic manifestations, including black plaques. EUS is a reliable tool for evaluating the depth of infiltration of GI melanoma.

Diagnostic performance in T staging for patients with esophagogastric junction cancer using high-resolution MRI: a comparison with conventional MRI at 3 tesla

BACKGROUND

To investigate and compare the diagnostic performance in T staging for patients with esophagogastric junction cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR MRI), as compared with conventional MRI at 3 Tesla.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients with pathologically confirmed esophagogastric junction cancer were included and underwent multiparameter HR MRI (Cohort 1, 62 patients) or conventional MRI (Cohort 2, 56 patients). T2-weighted, T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images of each patient were evaluated by two radiologists who determined the preoperative T staging by consensus. Using pathologic staging as the gold standard, the consistency between HR MRI and pathology and between conventional MRI and pathology in T staging was calculated and compared. The overall accuracy, overstatement and understatement of HR MRI and conventional MRI in T staging of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer were computed and compared. Moreover, the diagnostic performance of HR MRI and conventional MRI in T staging (≤ T1 and ≥ T4) of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.465) and sex (p = 0.175) between Cohorts 1 and 2. Excellent agreement was observed in the T staging of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer between pathology and HR MRI (kappa = 0.813), while moderate agreement was observed between pathology and conventional MRI (kappa = 0.486). Significant differences were observed in overall accuracy (88.7% vs 64.3%, p = 0.002) and understatement (1.6% vs 26.8%, p < 0.001) but not for overstatement (9.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.889) in T staging between HR MRI and conventional MRI techniques. For differentiating the T stages of ≤ T1 from ≥ T2 and the T stages of ≤ T3 from ≥ T4, no significant differences were observed between the imaging techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

HR MRI has good diagnostic performance and may serve as an alternative technique in the T staging of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer in clinical practice.

Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis in Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics

Objective: To develop and evaluate a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-based radiomic nomogram for lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.

Overall Study: This retrospective study was conducted with 146 consecutively included pathologically confirmed AGC patients from two centers. All patients underwent preoperative 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. The dataset was allocated to a training cohort (n = 71) and an internal validation cohort (n = 47) from one center along with an external validation cohort (n = 28) from another. A summary of 1,305 radiomic features were extracted per patient. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression and learning vector quantization (LVQ) methods with cross-validations were adopted to select significant features in a radiomic signature. Combining the radiomic signature and independent clinical factors, a radiomic nomogram was established. The MRI-reported N staging and the MRI-derived model were built for comparison. Model performance was evaluated considering receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: A two-feature radiomic signature was found significantly associated with LNM (p < 0.01, training and internal validation cohorts). A radiomic nomogram was established by incorporating the clinical minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and MRI-reported N staging. The radiomic nomogram showed a favorable classification ability with an area under ROC curve of 0.850 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.758–0.942] in the training cohort, which was then confirmed with an AUC of 0.857 (95% CI, 0.714–1.000) in internal validation cohort and 0.878 (95% CI, 0.696–1.000) in external validation cohort. Meanwhile, the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 0.846, 0.853, and 0.851 in internal validation cohort, and 0.714, 0.952, and 0.893 in external validation cohort, compensating for the MRI-reported N staging and MRI-derived model. DCA demonstrated good clinical use of radiomic nomogram.

Conclusions: This study put forward a DWI-based radiomic nomogram incorporating the radiomic signature, minimum ADC, and MRI-reported N staging for individualized preoperative detection of LNM in patients with AGC.

A Meta-Analysis And Systematic Review Of Accuracy Of Endoscopic Ultrasound For N Staging Of Gastric Cancers

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is widely used as a staging modality for gastric cancer. However, the results of studies on the use of EUS for N staging in gastric cancer vary. This study aimed at studying the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS for N staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Published studies were identified through searching the MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, SpringerLink and ScienceDirect databases. A bivariate random effect model was used to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROC) based on the pooled data was also computed.

RESULTS

Fifty studies (5223 patients) were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR of EUS for N staging were 0.82 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.85), 0.68 (0.63 to 0.73), 2.6 (2.2 to 3.0), 0.27 (0.22 to 0.32), and 10 (8 to 12), respectively. The area under the HSROC was 0.83.

CONCLUSION

The EUS may provide a clinically useful tool to guide physicians in the N staging of gastric cancer. However, physicians must note that the EUS has a relatively low specificity.

Gastric cancer and image-derived quantitative parameters: Part 2-a critical review of DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings

Abstract

There is yet no consensus on the application of functional imaging and qualitative image interpretation in the management of gastric cancer. In this second part, we will discuss the role of image-derived quantitative parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in gastric cancer, as both techniques have been shown to be promising and useful tools in the clinical decision making of this disease. We will focus on different aspects including aggressiveness assessment, staging and Lauren type discrimination, prognosis prediction and response evaluation. Although both the number of articles and the patients enrolled in the studies were rather small, there is evidence that quantitative parameters from DCE-MRI such as K^trans, V_e, K_ep and AUC could be promising image-derived surrogate parameters for the management of gastric cancer. Data from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies showed that standardised uptake value (SUV) is significantly associated with the aggressiveness, treatment response and prognosis of this disease. Along with the results from diffusion-weighted MRI and contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography presented in Part 1 of this critical review, there are additional image-derived quantitative parameters from DCE-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT that hold promise as effective tools in the diagnostic pathway of gastric cancer.

Key Points

• Quantitative analysis from DCE-MRI and¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT allows the extrapolation of multiple image-derived parameters.

• Data from DCE-MRI (K^trans, V_e, K_ep and AUC) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (SUV) are non-invasive, quantitative image-derived parameters that hold promise in the evaluation of the aggressiveness, treatment response and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI

Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer and the assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment is of importance for treatment and prognosis. Current imaging techniques, mainly endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET), have their limitations. Historically, the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in gastric cancer has been limited, but with the continuous technical improvements, MRI has become a more potent imaging technique for gastrointestinal malignancies. The accuracy of MRI for T- and N-staging of gastric cancer is similar to EUS and CT, making MRI a suitable alternative to other imaging strategies. There is limited evidence on the performance of MRI for M-staging of gastric cancer specifically, but MRI is widely used for diagnosing liver metastases and shows potential for diagnosing peritoneal seeding. Recent pilot studies showed that treatment response assessment as well as detection of lymph node metastases and systemic disease might benefit from functional MRI (e.g. diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement). Regarding treatment guidance, additional value of MRI might be expected from its role in better defining clinical target volumes and setup verification with MR-guided radiation treatment.

Gastric cancer and imaging biomarkers: Part 1 - a critical review of DW-MRI and CE-MDCT findings

Abstract

The current standard of care for gastric cancer imaging includes heterogeneity in image acquisition techniques and qualitative image interpretation. In addition to qualitative assessment, several imaging techniques, including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CE-MDCT), dynamic-contrast enhanced MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, can allow quantitative analysis. However, so far there is no consensus regarding the application of functional imaging in the management of gastric cancer. The aim of this article is to specifically review two promising biomarkers for gastric cancer with reasonable spatial resolution: the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DW-MRI and textural features from CE-MDCT. We searched MEDLINE/ PubMed for manuscripts published from inception to 6 February 2018. Initially, we searched for (gastric cancer OR gastric tumour) AND diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Then, we searched for (gastric cancer OR gastric tumour) AND texture analysis AND computed tomography. We collated the results from the studies related to this query. There is evidence that: (1) the ADC is a promising biomarker for the evaluation of the aggressiveness (T and N stage), treatment response and prognosis of gastric cancer; (2) textural features are related to the degree of differentiation, Lauren classification, treatment response and prognosis of gastric cancer. We conclude that these imaging biomarkers hold promise as effective additional tools in the diagnostic pathway of gastric cancer and may facilitate the multidisciplinary work between the radiologist and clinician, and across different institutions, to provide a greater biological understanding of gastric cancer.

Key Points

• Quantitative imaging is the extraction of quantifiable features from medical images for the assessment of normal or pathological conditions and represents a promising area for gastric cancer.

• Quantitative analysis from CE-MDCT and DW-MRI allows the extrapolation of multiple imaging biomarkers.

• ADC from DW-MRI and CE- MDCT-based texture features are non-invasive, quantitative imaging biomarkers that hold promise in the evaluation of the aggressiveness, treatment response and prognosis of gastric cancer.

CT textural analysis of gastric cancer: correlations with immunohistochemical biomarkers

To investigate the ability of CT texture analysis to assess and predict the expression statuses of E-cadherin, Ki67, VEGFR2 and EGFR in gastric cancers, the enhanced CT images of 139 patients with gastric cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The region of interest was manually drawn along the margin of the lesion on the largest slice in the arterial and venous phases, which yielded a series of texture parameters. Our results showed that the standard deviation, width, entropy, entropy (H), correlation and contrast from the arterial and venous phases were significantly correlated with the E-cadherin expression level in gastric cancers (all P < 0.05). The skewness from the arterial phase and the mean and autocorrelation from the venous phase were negatively correlated with the Ki67 expression level in gastric cancers (all P < 0.05). The width, entropy and contrast from the venous phase were positively correlated with the VEGFR2 expression level in gastric cancers (all P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the texture features and EGFR expression level. CT texture analysis, which had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.612 to 0.715, holds promise in predicting E-cadherin, Ki67 and VEGFR2 expression levels in gastric cancers.

Comparison of DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing preoperative N-staging in gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis

The diagnostic values of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) for N-staging of gastric cancer (GC) were identified and compared. After a systematic search to identify relevant articles, meta-analysis was used to summarize the sensitivities, specificities, and areas under curves (AUCs) for DWI and PET/CT. To better understand the diagnostic utility of DWI and PET/CT for N-staging, the performance of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) was used as a reference. Fifteen studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with 95% confidence intervals of DWI were 0.79 (0.73–0.85), 0.69 (0.61–0.77), and 0.81 (0.77–0.84), respectively. For PET/CT, the corresponding values were 0.52 (0.39–0.64), 0.88 (0.61–0.97), and 0.66 (0.62–0.70), respectively. Comparison of the two techniques revealed DWI had higher sensitivity and AUC, but no difference in specificity. DWI exhibited higher sensitivity but lower specificity than MDCT, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had lower sensitivity and equivalent specificity. Overall, DWI performed better than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative N-staging in GC. When the efficacy of MDCT was taken as a reference, DWI represented a complementary imaging technique, while ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had limited utility for preoperative N-staging.

Value and impact factors of multidetector computed tomography in diagnosis of preoperative lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) exhibited wide ranges of sensitivities and specificities for lymph node assessment of gastric cancer (GC) in several individual studies. This present meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the value of MDCT in diagnosis of preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) and to explore the impact factors that might explain the heterogeneity of its diagnostic accuracy in GC.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to collect all the relevant studies about the value of MDCT in assessing LNM of GC within the PubMed, Cochrane library and Embase databases up to Feb 2, 2016. Two investigators independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of included studies. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve (AUC) were pooled to estimate the overall accuracy of MDCT. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were carried out to identify the possible factors influencing the heterogeneity of the accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies with 6519 subjects were finally included. Overall, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), respectively. Meta-regression revealed that MDCT section thickness, proportion of serosal invasion, and publication year were the main significant impact factors in sensitivity, and MDCT section thickness, multiplanar reformation (MPR), and reference standard were the main significant impact factors in specificity. After the included studies were divided into 2 groups (Group A: studies with proportion of serosa-invasive GC subjects ≥50%; Group B: studies with proportion of serosa-invasive GC subjects <50%), the pooled sensitivity in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B (0.84 [95% CI: 0.75-0.90] vs 0.55 [95% CI: 0.41-0.68], P < .01). For early gastric cancer (EGC), the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.15-0.61), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86), respectively.

CONCLUSION

To summarize, MDCT tends to be adequate to assess preoperative LNM in serosa-invasive GC, but insufficient for non-serosa-invasive GC (particularly for EGC) owing to its low sensitivity. Proportion of serosa-invasive GC subjects, MDCT section thickness, MPR, and reference standard are the main factors influencing its diagnostic accuracy.

Predicting the nodal status in gastric cancers: The role of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram characteristic analysis

PURPOSE

To explore the application of histogram analysis in preoperative T and N staging of gastric cancers, with a focus on characteristic parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with gastric cancers underwent diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (b=0, 1000s/mm²), which generated ADC maps. Whole-volume histogram analysis was performed on ADC maps and 7 characteristic parameters were obtained. All those patients underwent surgery and postoperative pathologic T and N stages were determined.

RESULTS

Four parameters, including skew, kurtosis, s-sD_av and sample number, showed significant differences among gastric cancers at different T and N stages. Most parameters correlated with T and N stages significantly and worked in differentiating gastric cancers at different T or N stages. Especially skew yielded a sensitivity of 0.758, a specificity of 0.810, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.802 for differentiating gastric cancers with and without lymph node metastasis (P<0.001). All the parameters, except AUC_low, showed good or excellent inter-observer agreement with intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.710 to 0.991.

CONCLUSION

Characteristic parameters derived from whole-volume ADC histogram analysis could help assessing preoperative T and N stages of gastric cancers.

Endoscopic ultrasonography compared with multidetector computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The current study sought to perform a meta-analysis to compare the preoperative staging of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in gastric carcinoma.

Methods

Articles published between January 1, 2000, and April 1, 2016, that compared EUS with MDCT were included, and data were presented as 2 × 2 tables. The sensitivities, specificities and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for T and N staging were calculated using a bivariate mixed effects model. Data were weighted by generic variance and then pooled by random-effects modeling.

Results

Eight studies comprising 1736 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For T1 staging, the sensitivity value for EUS (82%) was significantly higher than that for MDCT (41%) (relative risk (RR): 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–3.94; P = 0.030). For lymph node involvement, the sensitivity value for EUS (91%) was also significantly higher than that for MDCT (77%) (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05–1.23; P = 0.001). However, the specificity values of both EUS and MDCT were quite low, at 49 and 63%, respectively. No significant differences in T2–4 staging between EUS and MDCT were noted.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicates that EUS may be superior to MDCT in preoperative T1 and N staging. Additionally, the low specificity values of EUS and MDCT for N staging merits attention.

Pre-treatment MDCT-based texture analysis for therapy response prediction in gastric cancer: Comparison with tumour regression grade at final histology

PURPOSE

An accurate prediction of tumour response to therapy is fundamental in oncology, so as to prompt personalised treatment options if needed. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of preoperative texture analysis from multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in the prediction of the response rate to neo-adjuvant therapy in patients with gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with biopsy-proven gastric cancer were examined by MDCT before neo-adjuvant therapy, and treated with radical surgery after treatment completion. Tumour regression grade (TRG) at final histology was also assessed. Image features from texture analysis were quantified, with and without filters for fine to coarse textures. Patients with TRG 1-3 were considered responders while TRG 4-5 as non- responders. The response rate to neo-adjuvant therapy was assessed both at univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen parameters were significantly different between the two subgroups at univariate analysis; in particular, entropy and compactness (higher in responders) and uniformity (lower in responders). According to our model, the following parameters could identify non-responders at multivariate analysis: entropy (≤6.86 with a logarithm of Odds Ratio - Log OR -: 4.11; p=0.003); range (>158.72; Log OR: 3.67; p=0.010) and root mean square (≤3.71; Log OR: 4.57; p=0.005). Entropy and three-dimensional volume were not significantly correlated (r=0.06; p=0.735).

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment texture analysis can potentially provide important information regarding the response rate to neo-adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer, improving risk stratification.

Apparent diffusion coefficient by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a sole biomarker for staging and prognosis of gastric cancer

Objective

To investigate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) when applied to the 7th TNM classification in the staging and prognosis of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

Between October 2009 and May 2014, a total of 89 patients with non-metastatic, biopsy proven GC underwent 1.5T DW-MRI, and then treated with radical surgery. Tumor ADC was measured retrospectively and compared with final histology following the 7th TNM staging (local invasion, nodal involvement and according to the different groups — stage I, II and III). Kaplan-Meier curves were also generated. The follow-up period is updated to May 2016.

Results

Median follow-up period was 33 months and 45/89 (51%) deaths from GC were observed. ADC was significantly different both for local invasion and nodal involvement (P<0.001). Considering final histology as the reference standard, a preoperative ADC cut-off of 1.80×10^–3 mm²/s could distinguish between stages I and II and an ADC value of ≤1.36×10^–3 mm²/s was associated with stage III (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the survival rates for the three prognostic groups were significantly different according to final histology and ADC cut-offs (P<0.001).

Conclusions

ADC is different according to local invasion, nodal involvement and the 7th TNM stage groups for GC, representing a potential, additional prognostic biomarker. The addition of DW-MRI could aid in the staging and risk stratification of GC.

Gastric cancer: texture analysis from multidetector computed tomography as a potential preoperative prognostic biomarker

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between preoperative texture analysis from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifty-six patients with biopsy-proved gastric cancer were examined by MDCT and treated with surgery. Image features from texture analysis were quantified, with and without filters for fine to coarse textures. The association with survival time was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analysis.

RESULTS

The following parameters were significantly associated with a negative prognosis, according to different thresholds: energy [no filter] - Logarithm of relative risk (Log RR): 3.25; p = 0.046; entropy [no filter] (Log RR: 5.96; p = 0.002); entropy [filter 1.5] (Log RR: 3.54; p = 0.027); maximum Hounsfield unit value [filter 1.5] (Log RR: 3.44; p = 0.027); skewness [filter 2] (Log RR: 5.83; p = 0.004); root mean square [filter 1] (Log RR: - 2.66; p = 0.024) and mean absolute deviation [filter 2] (Log RR: - 4.22; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Texture analysis could increase the performance of a multivariate prognostic model for risk stratification in gastric cancer. Further evaluations are warranted to clarify the clinical role of texture analysis from MDCT.

KEY POINTS

• Textural analysis from computed tomography can be applied in gastric cancer. • Preoperative non-invasive texture features are related to prognosis in gastric cancer. • Texture analysis could help to evaluate the aggressiveness of this tumour.

Advances in imaging of gastric cancer

Due to the advances in imaging technology, the diagnosis, staging, and efficacy evaluation of gastric cancer by imaging are continuously improving. This paper comprehensively analyzes different imaging methods in cancer research, focusing on new imaging techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, their advantages and limitations in clinical application, and the opportunities and challenges. Radiologists can take the initiative to collaborate with relevant clinical departments through a multidisciplinary platform with an open mind in the face of various problems presented clinically, understand the requirements for standardized diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, and fully communicate with imaging equipment providers and engineering and technical personnel to explore more methods and indicators to improve the diagnosis of this malignancy.

Endoscopic ultrasound for staging of colonic cancer proximal to the rectum: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Objectives:

Treatment of colonic cancer patients is highly dependent on the depth of tumor invasion (T-stage) as well as the extension of lymph node involvement (N-stage). We aimed to systematically review the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for staging of colonic cancer proximal to the rectum.

Patients and Methods:

Men and women with colonic adenocarcinomas were included in the study. EUS staging was compared to histopathology as the gold standard. Outcome measures were T- and N-staging accuracies. Articles were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and EMBASE.

Results:

Six studies were identified comparing EUS staging of colonic cancer to histopathology. The pooled-staging sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 and 0.98 for T1 tumors, 0.67 and 0.96 for T2 tumors, and 0.97 and 0.83 for T3/T4 tumors, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for N + disease were 0.59 and 0.78, respectively.

Conclusions:

EUS is a feasible method for T-staging of cancers of the colon proximal to the rectum. The accuracy of lymph node staging needs to be verified by prospective multicenter studies including larger patient populations.