1
|
Zhang Z, Liu Z, Chen Z. Comparison of Treatment Efficacy and Survival Outcomes Between Asian and Western Patients With Unresectable Gastric or Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:831207. [PMID: 35321436 PMCID: PMC8936077 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.831207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastric cancer and gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma are geographically heterogeneous diseases. Previous studies suggested that Asian and Western patients with late-stage gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma possess distinct survival outcomes. However, the interregional differences of multiple systemic therapies in unresectable diseases have not been comprehensively described. Materials and Methods We searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception to 31 October 2021 and reviewed major conference abstracts for controlled trials of systemic therapies in unresectable gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma that reported hazard ratios stratified by geographical region. The primary measurements were overall survival and progression-free survival. The pooled hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall survival and progression-free survival in Asian and Western populations were calculated using a random effect model. A linear regression model was adopted to compare the overall survival and progression-free survival between Asian and Western patients. Results A total of 9033 patients from 20 studies were included for analysis. Immunotherapy was associated with an improvement in the overall survival for both Asian (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.98) and Western (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.00) patients, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.32). Trends of survival benefit with anti-HER2 therapy and anti-angiogenic therapy versus control were observed in both Asian and Western patients, although statistical significance was not denoted. Subgroup analyses yielded a statistically superior overall survival of Asian versus Western patients in trials that investigated first-line immunotherapy (P = 0.04). Due to the linear regression analyses with scatter plot graphs, Asian patients showed a higher overall survival, but not progression-free survival, than Western patients irrespective of treatment type. Conclusion Asian and Western patients with unresectable gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma show similar responses to systemic therapies with limited interregional differences. Exceptionally, first-line immunotherapy could elicit superior survival among Asian populations. In addition, Asian patients with gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma display a superior OS compared with Western counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhening Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zining Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zeyang Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zeyang Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang B, Du C, Li L, Xie Y, Hu C, Li Z, Zhu Y, Yuan Y, Liu X, Lu N, Xue L. New substituted molecular classifications of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: characteristics and probable treatment strategies. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2022; 2:50-59. [PMID: 39035211 PMCID: PMC11256717 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is a heterogeneous tumor, and the accurate classification of GA is important. Previous classifications are based on molecular analysis and have not focused on GA with the primitive enterocyte phenotype (GAPEP), a unique subtype with a poor prognosis and frequent liver metastases. New substituted molecular (SM) classifications based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) are needed. Methods According to the IHC staining results, we divided 582 cases into six types: mismatch repair deficient (dMMR), Epstein-Barr virus associated (EBVa), the primitive enterocyte phenotype (PEP), the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype, not otherwise specified/P53 mutated (NOS/P53m) and not otherwise specified/P53 wild-type (NOS/P53w). We analyzed the clinicopathological features, the immune microenvironment (PD-L1, CD8) and expression of HER2 and VEGFR2 of those types. Results There were 31 (5.3%) cases of the dMMR type, 13 (2.2%) cases of the EBVa type, 44 (7.6%) cases of the PEP type, 122 (21.0%) cases of the EMT type, 127 (21.8%) cases of the NOS/P53m type and 245 (42.1%) cases of the NOS/P53w type. Patients with the dMMR type had the best survival (P < 0.001). Patients with the EBVa type were younger (P < 0.001) and had higher PD-L1 and CD8 expression (P < 0.001) than other patients. Patients with the EMT type exhibited poor differentiation and a higher rate of abdominal metastasis. Patients with the NOS/P53m and PEP types had the worst survival rates and the highest PD-L1/HER2/VEGFR2 expression levels among all patients (P < 0.001). Conclusion Different SM classifications have different clinicopathological features and expression patterns, which indicate the probable clinical treatment strategies for these subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingzhi Wang
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Chunxia Du
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yibin Xie
- Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Chunfang Hu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhuo Li
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yongjian Zhu
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yanling Yuan
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xiuyun Liu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ning Lu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Liyan Xue
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim S, Kim YJ, Chung WC. HER-2 positivity is a high risk of recurrence of stage I gastric cancer. Korean J Intern Med 2021; 36:1327-1337. [PMID: 34428882 PMCID: PMC8588971 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2020.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The treatment of gastric cancer remains unsatisfactory. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of immunohistochemical staining in gastric cancer. METHODS We analyzed 505 (279 early staged, 226 advanced-staged) gastric cancer tissues from patients who underwent radical gastric resection between January 2014 and December 2016. Available surgical specimens immunohistochemically stained for p53, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human EGFR 2 (HER-2), E-cadherin, and Ki-67 were reviewed. We evaluated the association between positivity to various biomarkers and disease recurrence, disease-free survival, lymph node metastasis, and microscopic lymphovascular invasion. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 32.5 months (range, 7 to 70). Advanced gastric cancer cases showed high Ki-67 expression; other cases showed unremarkable expression. Concerning disease recurrence, lymphatic invasion, and disease-free interval, all biomarkers had no prognostic effects. HER-2-positive stage I gastric cancer tended to occur in old patients and in the upper one-third of the stomach (p = 0.01). HER-2 positivity was significantly correlated with disease recurrence (p = 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.03), and vascular invasion (p = 0.03) in stage I cases. CONCLUSION Only HER-2 was associated with the recurrence of stage I gastric cancer. HER-2-positive stage I gastric cancer requires additional therapy despite curative resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seonhoo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Yeon-Ji Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Woo Chul Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|