Digital histopathological images of biopsy predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

An integrated radiopathomics machine learning model to predict pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Accurately predicting the pathological response to chemotherapy before treatment is important for selecting the appropriate treatment groups, formulating individualized treatment plans, and improving the survival rates of patients with gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 151 patients diagnosed with GC who underwent preoperative chemotherapy and surgical resection at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2015 and June 2023. Both pretreatment-enhanced computer technology images and whole slide images of pathological hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were available for each patient. The image features were extracted and used to construct an ensemble radiopathomics machine learning model. In addition, a nomogram was developed by combining the imaging features and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 962 radiomics and 999 pathomics signatures were extracted from 106 patients in the training cohort. A fusion radiopathomics model was constructed using 13 radiomics and 5 pathomics signatures. The fusion model showed favorable performance compared to single-omics models, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.789 in the validation cohort. Moreover, a combined radiopathomics nomogram (RPN) was developed based on radiopathomics features and the Borrmann type, which is a classification method for advanced GC according to tumor growth pattern and gross morphology. The RPN showed superior predictive performance in the training (AUC 0.880) and validation cohorts (AUC 0.797). The decision curve analysis showed that RPN could provide favorable clinical benefits to patients with GC.

CONCLUSIONS

RPN was able to predict the pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy with high accuracy, and therefore provides a novel tool for personalized treatment of GC.

Deep learning or radiomics based on CT for predicting the response of gastric cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) models, clinical models (CM), and the integrated model (IM) are utilized to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer.

Objective

The objective is to identify the diagnostic test of the AI model and to compare the accuracy of AI, CM, and IM through a comprehensive summary of head-to-head comparative studies.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched until September 5, 2023, to compile English language studies without regional restrictions. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Forest plots were utilized to illustrate the findings of diagnostic accuracy, while Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were generated to estimate sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). Meta-regression was applied to analyze heterogeneity across the studies. To assess the presence of publication bias, Deeks' funnel plot and an asymmetry test were employed.

Results

A total of 9 studies, comprising 3313 patients, were included for the AI model, with 7 head-to-head comparative studies involving 2699 patients. Across the 9 studies, the pooled SEN for the AI model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66, 0.82), and SPE was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84). Meta-regression was conducted, revealing that the cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and gold standard might be sources of heterogeneity. In the head-to-head comparative studies, the pooled SEN for AI was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84) with SPE at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.85). For CM, the pooled SEN was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.77) with SPE at 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.64), while for IM, the pooled SEN was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.86) with SPE at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.79). Notably, there was no statistical difference, except that IM exhibited higher SEN than AI, while maintaining a similar level of SPE in pairwise comparisons. In the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis subgroup, the CT-based Deep Learning (DL) subgroup, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline subgroup, the AI model exhibited higher SEN but lower SPE compared to the IM. Conversely, in the training cohort subgroup and the internal validation cohort subgroup, the AI model demonstrated lower SEN but higher SPE than the IM. The subgroup analysis underscored that factors such as the number of cohorts, cohort type, cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and choice of gold standard could impact the reliability and robustness of the results.

Conclusion

AI has demonstrated its viability as a tool for predicting the response of GC patients to NACT Furthermore, CT-based DL model in AI was sensitive to extract tumor features and predict the response. The results of subgroup analysis also supported the above conclusions. Large-scale rigorously designed diagnostic accuracy studies and head-to-head comparative studies are anticipated.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, CRD42022377030.

Evaluating deep learning-based melanoma classification using immunohistochemistry and routine histology: A three center study

Pathologists routinely use immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained tissue slides against MelanA in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to improve their accuracy in diagnosing melanomas. The use of diagnostic Deep Learning (DL)-based support systems for automated examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition has been well studied in standard H&E-stained tissue slides. In contrast, there are few studies that analyze IHC slides using DL. Therefore, we investigated the separate and joint performance of ResNets trained on MelanA and corresponding H&E-stained slides. The MelanA classifier achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and 0.74 on out of distribution (OOD)-datasets, similar to the H&E-based benchmark classification of 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. A combined classifier using MelanA and H&E achieved AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on the OOD datasets. DL MelanA-based assistance systems show the same performance as the benchmark H&E classification and may be improved by multi stain classification to assist pathologists in their clinical routine.