Emergency pediatric imaging: changes over the years. Part II

[Radiological evaluation of acute abdomen in children]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Acute, non-traumatic abdominal pain is one of the main reasons for medical consultation in pediatric patients. Knowledge of different diseases and their age dependence is essential for correct diagnosis and treatment.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Ultrasonography is the imaging method of choice. X‑ray is only used in case of emergency, e. g., suspected perforation.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and elastography complement ultrasonography.

PERFORMANCE

Magnetic resonance imaging is of increasing relevance for differential diagnosis of unclear sonographic results.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The primary imaging modality in pediatric patients is ultrasonography. Cross-sectional imaging should only be used in cases of unclear sonographic findings.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acutely Limping Child Up To Age 5

Imaging plays in important role in the evaluation of the acutely limping child. The decision-making process about initial imaging must consider the level of suspicion for infection and whether symptoms can be localized. The appropriateness of specific imaging examinations in the acutely limping child to age 5 years is discussed with attention in each clinical scenario to the role of radiography, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Common causes of limping such as toddler's fracture, septic arthritis, transient synovitis, and osteomyelitis are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

[Imaging of acute abdomen in childhood and adolescence]

Acute abdominal pain in childhood is a frequent reason for a medical consultation. The main diseases that lead to the clinical situation of acute abdomen show a significant age dependency. It is reasonable to group such ailments into three age categories: (1) the neonatal and infant period, (2) toddlerhood to kindergarten and (3) school age children. The task of the pediatric radiological examination is the differential diagnostic correlation of symptoms to the respective diseases. In children ultrasound is the appropriate method of choice.

Diagnostic value of CT compared to ultrasound in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in children younger than 10 years old

To assess the diagnostic value of ultrasound compared to CT in evaluating acute abdominal pain of different causes in children 10 years of age and under, hospital records and imaging files of 4052 patients under age of 10 who had imaging for abdominal pain were reviewed. One-hundred-thirty-two patients (3 %), (74 males/58 females) who underwent ultrasound and CT within 24 h were divided by age: group I, ages 0-48 months (25 patients); group II, 49-84 months (53 patients); and group III, 85-120 months (54 patients). Diagnoses at ultrasound, CT, and discharge were compared. Cases of a change in diagnosis following CT and impact of the changed diagnosis on patient management were assessed. Non-diagnostic ultrasound or a diagnostic conundrum was present in a small percentage (3 %) of our patients. In the group of patients imaged with two modalities, CT changed the diagnosis in 73/132 patients (55.3 %). Patient management changed in 63/132 patients (47.7 %). CT changed the diagnosis in 46/64 patients with surgical conditions (71.8 %, p < 0.001). Among patients with surgical conditions, the difference between ultrasonography (US) and CT diagnoses was significant in groups 2 (p = 0.046) and 3 (p =  .001). The impact of the change in diagnosis in surgical patients imaged with two modalities was significant in the group as a whole and in each age group separately. Non-diagnostic or equivocal US in a small percentage of patients is probably sufficient to justify the additional radiation burden.

Emergency Pediatric Imaging: Current Status and Update

Imaging has undergone a major revolution. Many procedures performed 20 years ago are no longer performed and new ones have expanded our ability to diagnose previously hidden conditions and also our knowledge of these conditions. This communication deals both with modern imaging and how it is affecting our evaluation of certain diseases but yet underscores that plain film findings still are important and should not be cast by the wayside in favor of more modern cross sectional imaging.