Combined craniofacial resection of anterior skull base tumors: long-term results and experience of single institution

Second Free Flap Surgery for Skull Base Tumors: Case Report and Literature Review

Tumors of the skull base, such as meningiomas, tend to recur. With progress in free vascularized flap surgery, an increasing number of studies are investigating skull base reconstruction with free flaps after tumor removal. In this report, we discuss the results of second free flap surgery after skull base reconstructive surgery. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients treated at our center during the period from 2013 through 2017. All four patients identified had skull base anaplastic meningioma and had undergone radiotherapy. In all cases, the flap and donor blood vessel were sourced from sites that differed from those used in the previous surgeries. No complications developed, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, meningitis, wound infection, wound hemorrhage, or flap necrosis. Because the first flap was found to be unviable, it was difficult to preserve and was removed. Essential points in preventing complications are anchoring at the appropriate site, pinprick testing of the created flap, and use of multilayered countermeasures to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leakage.

Infratemporal fossa approach: the modified zygomatico-transmandibular approach

Background

The infratemporal fossa (ITF) is an anatomical lateral skull base space composed by the zygoma, temporal, and the greater wing of the sphenoid bone. Due to its difficult approach, surgical intervention at the ITF has remained a heavy burden to surgeons. The aim of this article is to review basic skull base approaches and ITF structures and to avoid severe complications based on the accurate surgical knowledge.

Methods

A search of the recent literature using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, and other online tools was executed using the following keyword combinations: infratemporal fossa, subtemporal fossa, transzygomatic approach, orbitozygomatic approach, transmaxillary approach, facial translocation approach, midface degloving, zygomatico-transmandibular approach, and lateral skull base. Aside from our Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) trial, there have been very few randomized controlled trials. The search data for this review are summarized based on the authors’ diverse clinical experiences.

Results

We divided our results based on representative skull base approaches and the anatomy of the ITF. Basic approaches to the ITF include endoscopic endonasal, transzygomatic, orbitozygomatic, zygomatico-transmandibular, transmaxillary, facial translocation, and the midfacial degloving approach. The borders and inner structures of the ITF (with basic lateral skull base dissection schemes) are summarized, and the modified zygomatico-transmandibular approach (ZTMA) is described in detail.

Conclusions

An anatomical basic knowledge would be required for the appropriate management of the ITF pathology for diverse specialized doctors, including maxillofacial, plastic, and vascular surgeons. The ITF approach, in conjunction with the application of microsurgical techniques and improved perioperative care, has permitted significant advances and successful curative outcomes for patients having malignancy in ITF.

Craniofacial resection of malignant tumors of the anterior skull base: a case series and a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Craniofacial resection (CFR) is still considered as the gold standard for managing sinonasal malignancies of the anterior skull base (ASB), while endoscopic approaches are gaining credibility. The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who underwent CFR at our institution and to compare our results to international literature.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing CFR between 1995 and 2017, and systematic literature review according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with sinonasal malignancy (81% with stage T4) of the ASB were included. There was no operative mortality. Complications were observed in 9 cases. We obtained 100% follow-up with mean observation of 100 months. Disease-specific survival rates were 90%, 74%, and 62% and recurrence-free survival was 85% at two, 72% at five, and 10 years follow-up, respectively. CFR as primary treatment, en bloc resection, and resection with negative margins correlated to better survival. Recursive partition analysis identified the latter as the most important prognostic factor, regardless of surgical technique. The relative risk of non-radicality was significantly higher after piecemeal resection compared to en bloc resection. Compared to 15 original articles, totaling 2603 patients, eligible for review, the present study has the longest follow-up time, the second highest 5-year OS, and the third highest 5-year DSS, despite having a higher proportion of patients with high-stage disease.

CONCLUSION

CFR in true en bloc fashion can still be considered as the treatment of choice in cases of advanced-stage sinonasal malignancies invading the ASB.

A simple classification of cranial-nasal-orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases

Cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors involving the anterior and middle skull base are among the most challenging to treat surgically, with high rates of incomplete resection and surgical complications. Currently, there is no recognized classification of tumors with regard to the choice of surgical approaches. From January 2004 to January 2014, we classified 32 cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors treated in our center into three types according to the tumor body location, scope of extension and direction of invasion: lateral (type I), central (type II) and extensive (type III). This classification considerably facilitated the choice of surgical routes and significantly influenced the surgical time and amount of hemorrhage during operation. In addition, we emphasized the use of transnasal endoscopy for large and extensive tumors, individualized treatment strategies drafted by a group of multidisciplinary collaborators, and careful reconstruction of the skull base defects. Our treatment strategies achieved good surgical outcomes, with a high ratio of total resection (87.5 %, 28/32, including 16 cases of benign tumors and 12 cases of malignant tumors) and a low percentage of surgical complications (18.8 %, 6/32). Original symptoms were alleviated in 29 patients. The average KPS score improved from 81.25 % preoperatively to 91.25 % at 3 months after surgery. No serious perioperative complications occurred. During the follow-up of 3 years on average, four patients with malignant tumors died, including three who had subtotal resections. The 3-year survival rate of patients with malignant tumors was 78.6 %, and the overall 3-year survival rate was 87.5 %. Our data indicate that the simple classification method has practical significance in guiding the choice of surgical approaches for cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors and may be extended to other types of skull base tumors.

[The clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of anterior craniofacial resection for the treatmentof disseminated tumours and pseudotumour lesions in the nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses, and the orbit]

The objective of the present work was to evaluate the outcomes of anterior craniofacial resection (ACFR) in the patients presenting with disseminated tumours and pseudotumour lesions in the nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses, and the orbit based on the results of dynamic clinical observations. A total of 24 patients with tumours and tumour-like lesions of these anatomical structures were involved in the study including 14 ones having benign neoplasms, 2 patients with pseudotumour lesion, and 8 patients having malignant tumours. In all the cases, the pathological processes in the form of destruction and infiltration encompassed the anterior portion of the base of the skull (mostly lamina cribrosae) and spread directly into the anterior cranial fossa. It was shown that ACRF ensured the radical elimination of the pathological process and the enhancement of the five-year survival rate in all the patients with benign tumours and pseudotumour lesions and in half of the patients presenting with disseminated malignant neoplasms.

[Craniofacial resection for tumors of paranasal sinuses involving the anterior skull base]

INTRODUCTION

Craniofacial resection is a treatment of choice for paranasal malignant and benign tumors invading the skull base.

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

In this article the authors present the experience in craniofacial resection for malignant tumors invading the anterior skull base.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The material consisted of four patients operated in the Department of Otolaryngology and Laryngology Oncology CM UMK between 2007 and 2010. The patients were treated for malignant neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses with anterior skull base involvement. THe age range of the group were between 60 and 75 years. Of these patients three were females and one male.

RESULTS

We performed a lateral rhinotomy for laryngological acces for the tumor. The neurosurgeon performed anterior skull base osteotomy at and appropriate site above. The patients recovered uneventfully. The follow up period ranged between 13 and 42 months. The overall 3-year survival for all patients in our series was 66,6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined craniofacial resection of tumors of the anterior skull base is an effective approach for the management of these pathologies. This type of approach in elderly patients over 70 years old could be associated with increased mortality and complications leading to poorer outcome.