Routine placement of subdural drain after burr hole evacuation of chronic and subacute subdural hematoma: a contrarian evidence based approach

Quantitative Assessment of Brain Expansion After Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma as a Predictor of Recurrence

BACKGROUND

A lack of brain expansion is considered a risk factor for recurrence after evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). To the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported on objective measurement of brain expansion after evacuation of a CSDH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing 2 burr hole evacuation of a CSDH. We measured the depth of the brain surface from the frontal burr hole dural opening after hematoma evacuation using a specially devised measuring tool. Other predictors analyzed for recurrence of hematoma were age, gender, a history of hypertension, the use of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents, Glasgow coma scale score at presentation, unilateral or bilateral hematoma, computed tomography appearance, and hematoma thickness.

RESULTS

Among 88 patients who underwent hematoma evacuation, 3 (3.4%) underwent surgery for recurrence. The significant factors associated with recurrence were the presence of bilateral hematoma (P = 0.001), hematoma width >2.3 cm (P = 0.04), gradation type of hematoma on the computed tomography scan (P = 0.03), and the depth of the brain after hematoma evacuation (P = 0.02). The brain expanded less in those with recurrence, with a mean depth of the brain of 18 ± 6 mm versus 7.27 ± 7.8 mm in those without recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Evacuation of a CSDH through 2 burr holes, along with copious irrigation and bed rest for 3 days, resulted in a very low recurrence rate without the use of a drain. A lack of brain expansion might be a predictor of recurrence. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitatively measure the depth of the brain at surgery in patients undergoing surgery for CSDH.

Endovascular treatment of subdural haematoma in patient under anti-platelet therapy: a case report

Introduction

The incidence of chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) is relatively high among the elderly population. Other known risk factors for cSDH include male sex, dependency on anti-platelet or anticoagulant medication, and chronic alcoholism. Although, the standard mode of treatment for cSDH is surgery, embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA), either upfront or as an adjunct to surgical evacuation can be used for the treatment of cSDH.

Case presentation

The authors present a case of a 75-year-old female with prior history of posterior-lateral wall myocardial infarction (MI) eight years back presented to our centre with the chief complaints of a gradual onset of cough and headache for 2 months. The patient had no history of trauma, loss of consciousness, seizures, and vomiting. There was no history of diabetes, hypertension, pulmonary tuberculosis, and other chronic illness.

Discussion

The concurrent use of anti- platelet drug during a surgical procedure can make the treatment challenging. Endovascular treatment can be a primary treatment modality in such situation.

Conclusion

Elimination of blood supply by middle meningeal artery embolization is emerging as a safe, minimally invasive alternative to treat cSDH.

Efficacy analysis of neuroendoscopy-assisted burr-hole evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to compare neuroendoscopy-assisted burr-hole evacuation with conventional burr-hole evacuation in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), and to evaluate the curative effect of neuroendoscopy. This study follows PRISMA guidelines and uses the keywords "chronic subdural hematoma," "neuroendoscopies," "neuroendoscopy," "endoscopy," "endoscopic neurosurgery," and "neuroendoscopic surgery" to conduct an electronic search of online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. There were no restrictions on language or publication year. This meta-analysis involved 948 patients in six studies. The results showed that the recurrence rate in the neuroendoscopy group was significantly lower than that in the conventional burr-hole group (3.1% vs. 13.8%, P<0.001). Compared with the control group, the neuroendoscopy group had a longer operation time (P<0.001) and a shorter postoperative drainage time (P<0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference in hospital stay (P=0.14), mortality (P=0.39), postoperative morbidity (P=0.12), or 6-month neurological outcomes (P=0.32) between the two groups. It should be noted that the comparison of neurological outcomes was based on 269 patients (6/106 vs. 14/163). Compared with conventional burr-hole evacuation, neuroendoscopy-assisted burr-hole evacuation reduces the recurrence rate of CSDH and shortens the postoperative drainage time. However, the neuroendoscopy group did not have lower mortality or morbidity or better functional outcomes. In the future, randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopic surgery.

Effect of postoperative tranexamic acid on recurrence rate and complications in chronic subdural hematomas patients: preliminary results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a frequent neurosurgical disease which mainly affects elderly patients. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been hypothesized as an oral agent to avoid CSDH progression and/or recurrence. We performed an evaluation to determine whether the postoperative use of TXA reduces recurrence rate. A prospective, randomized, and controlled trial. Patients with unilateral or bilateral chronic subdural hematoma undergoing surgical treatment by burr-hole were randomized as to whether or not to use TXA in the postoperative period. We evaluated image and clinical recurrence of CSDH at follow up of 6 months and potential clinical and/or surgical complications impact of TXA. Twenty-six patients were randomized to the control group (52%) and twenty-four patients to the TXA group (48%). Follow-up ranged from 3 to 16 months. There were no significant difference between baseline data in groups regarding to age, gender, use of antiplatelet or anticoagulants, smoking, alcoholism, systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hematoma laterality, hematoma thickness, and drain use. Clinical and radiological recurrence occurred in three patients (6%), being two cases in TXA group (8.3%) and 1 in control group (3.8%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients during follow-up (4%), being both cases in TXA group (8.3%), and none in the control group. Although TXA group had a higher recurrence rate (8.3%), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Moreover, TXA group had two complications while control group had no complications. Although limited by experimental nature of study and small sample, our current data suggest that TXA should not be used as a potential agent to avoid recurrences of CSDH and might increase complication odds.

Endoscope-Assisted Keyhole Surgery for Traumatic Subacute Subdural Hematoma Evacuation in Emergencies

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether a simple endoscopic method was effective for the evacuation of traumatic subacute subdural hematomas.

METHODS

A total of 51 patients with subacute subdural hematomas requiring surgery were enrolled in this study. An endoscopic hematoma evacuation was performed through a small bone window for 22 patients. Hematoma evacuation by open surgery was performed for 29 patients. The postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale scores improvement, surgery times, displacement of midline measurements, and intraoperative blood loss were recorded and analyzed for each patient.

RESULTS

The average time from the initial incision to suture completion was 38.41 ± 6.97 minutes for the endoscopic surgery group and 74.66 ± 9.54 minutes for the open-surgery group (P < 0.01). The average total blood loss was 41.36 ± 10.82 ml for the endoscopic group and 250.00 ± 58.25 ml for the open-surgery group (P < 0.01). No postoperative bleeding occurred in either group. The midline displacement measurement showed significant improvement on the day after surgery, with 5.21 ± 1.98 mm in the study group versus 6.75 ± 1.37 mm in the control group (P < 0.01). At the 1-month follow-up appointment, the midline measurement was normal in both groups. Computed tomography scans revealed almost no residual hematomas, representing an average evacuation rate of 100% in both groups. The average Glasgow Coma Scale scores improvement on the day after surgery were 1.77 ± 1.93 in the endoscopic surgery group and 1.66 ± 0.77 in the open-surgery group (P = 0.766).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic subacute subdural hematoma removal through a small bone window achieved satisfactory hematoma removal using a minimally invasive method when compared with an open-surgery method.

Surgical treatment and outcome of chronic subdural hematoma: a comparative study between Ethiopia and Norway

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. Here, we studied differences in demographics, treatment, and outcome for CSDH patients in low-income (Ethiopia) and high-income (Norway) countries and assessed potential outcome determinants.

METHODS

We included patients from Addis Ababa University Hospitals (AAUH) and Haukeland University Hospital (HUH) who had surgery for CSDH (2013-2017). Patients were included prospectively in Ethiopia and retrospectively in Norway.

RESULTS

We enrolled 314 patients from AAUH and 284 patients from HUH, with a median age of 60 and 75 years, respectively. Trauma history was more common in AAUH (72%) than in HUH patients (64.1%). More patients at HUH (45.1%) used anticoagulants/antiplatelets than at AAUH (3.2%). Comorbidities were more frequent in HUH (77.5%) than in AAUH patients (30.3%). Burr hole craniostomy under local anesthesia and postoperative drainage was the standard treatment in both countries. Postoperative CT scanning was more common at HUH (99.3%) than at AAUH (5.2%). Reoperations were more frequent at HUH (10.9%) than at AAUH (6.1%), and in both countries, mostly due to hematoma recurrence. Medical complications were more common at HUH (6.7%) than at AAUH (1.3%). The 1-year mortality rate at HUH was 7% and at AAUH 3.5%. At the end of follow-up (> 3 years), the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score was 8 in 82.9% of AAUH and 46.8% of HUH patients.

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment was similar at AAUH and HUH. The poorer outcome in Norway could largely be explained by age, comorbidity, medication, and complication rates.

Bedside single burr hole craniostomy drainage of chronic subdural hematoma in the emergency room: A useful option in resource challenged settings

Background

In resource challenged environments, the standard treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) in the theater may be delayed because of the endemic financial constraint and logistic problems with consequent negative impact on the outcome. An emergency bedside burr hole craniostomy with a local anesthetic at the accident and emergency ward may be lifesaving in patients presenting in extreme neurological conditions in these settings.

Case Description

We presented three patients (one male and two females) with CSDH who presented at our service in poor neurological condition. The patients were between 49 and 70 years. The Glasgow Coma Score ranged from 3 to 6. The three patients had respiratory and pupillary abnormalities at presentation. They all had bedside single frontal burr hole craniostomy drainage of the hematoma under local anesthesia at the accident and emergency unit of the hospital. Surgery was done within 1 h of review by the neurosurgical team in all cases. The duration of hospital stay ranged from 8 to 24 days. The outcome was good in all cases.

Conclusion

Bedside single burr hole craniostomy at the accident and emergency unit may be lifesaving in patients with CSDH who present in extreme neurological condition but in whom prompt standard surgical treatment in the theater is not feasible.

Systematic review of current randomised control trials in chronic subdural haematoma and proposal for an international collaborative approach

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a pathology that is frequently encountered by neurosurgeons. Nevertheless, there is a lack of guidelines based on solid evidence. There has been a recent and considerable increase in the interest on management and outcomes for CSDH. Therefore, we systematically reviewed all currently running randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in chronic subdural haematoma to understand the areas under investigation and plan future collaborative trials.

METHODS

Clinical trials databases (Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, WHO ICTRP and clinical trials.gov) were searched for trials relevant to chronic subdural haematoma. It was then established which trials were currently running and fulfilled robust research methodology for a RCT.

RESULTS

There are 26 currently running RCTs in CSDH, with the most common topics covering application of steroids (7), surgical techniques (5) and tranexamic acid (5). Further to this, there are trials running on other pharmacological agents (4), middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolisation (2) and peri-operative management (3).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological agents are a particular focus of CSDH management currently, and a wealth of studies on steroids will hopefully lead to more harmonised, evidence-based practice regarding this in the near future. Surgical techniques and new procedures such as MMA embolisation are also important focuses for improving patient outcomes. There is an on-going need for future RCTs and evidence-based guidelines in CSDH, particularly including low- and middle-income countries, and it is hoped that the establishment of the iCORIC (International COllaborative Research Initiative on Chronic Subdural Haematoma) will help address this.

Evacuation of chronic and subacute subdural hematoma via transcranial neuroendoscopic approach

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neuroendoscopic surgery for chronic or subacute subdural hematoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2016 and September 2018, neuroendoscopic surgery was performed on 25 patients with chronic and subacute subdural hematoma. Hematoma evacuation was performed with a 0°, 4 mm diameter rigid neuroendoscope via a transcranial neuroendoscopic approach.

RESULTS

All patients successfully underwent neuroendoscopic surgery, and no surgical complications or rebleeding was observed. Postoperative computed tomography scans showed that the hematoma was successfully evacuated. All patients had recovered well at discharge, the observed 30-day mortality rate was 0%, and no patients suffered recurrence for 2-26 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Neuroendoscopic surgery was a safe and effective approach for the treatment of chronic and subacute subdural hematoma. This approach has the advantages of decent visualization and minimal invasiveness and could reduce recurrence and the mortality rate.

Neurologic Deterioration Due to Brain Sag After Bilateral Craniotomy for Subdural Hematoma Evacuation

BACKGROUND

Intracranial hypotension from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypovolemia resulting in cerebral herniation is a rare but known complication that can occur after neurosurgical procedures, usually encountered in correlation with perioperative placement of a lumbar subarachnoid drain. Decrease in CSF volume resulting in loss of buoyancy results in downward herniation of the brain without contributing mass effect, causing a phenomenon known as brain sag. Unreported previously is brain sag occurring without concomitant occult CSF leak or lumbar drainage.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This case report describes a patient who underwent bilateral craniotomies for subacute on chronic subdural hematoma with successful decompression but experienced acute neurologic deterioration secondary to brain sag. Despite an initial improvement in neurologic function, he subsequently experienced progressive neurologic deterioration with evidence of cerebral herniation on neuroimaging, without evidence of continued mass effect on the brain parenchyma. After a diagnosis of brain sag was determined based on imaging criteria, the patient was placed in a flat position, which resulted in rapid improvement in his neurologic function without any further intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This case is unique in comparison with previous reports of intracranial hypotension after craniotomy in that the symptoms were completely reversed with positioning alone, without any evidence of active or occult CSF drainage. This report emphasizes that the diagnosis of brain sag should be taken into consideration when there is an unknown reason for neurologic decline after craniotomy, particularly bilateral craniotomies, if the imaging indicates herniation with imaging findings consistent with intracranial hypotension, without evidence of overlying mass effect.