Determination of optimal time window for cortical mapping in awake craniotomy: assessment of intraoperative reaction speed

Effect of Decompressive Craniectomy with Stepwise Decompression of the Intracranial Compartment on Postoperative Neurologic Function, Hemodynamics, and Glasgow Outcome Scale Score of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

 We assess the effects of standard decompressive craniectomy with stepwise decompression of the intracranial compartment on the postoperative neurologic function, hemodynamics, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

METHODS

 One hundred sTBI patients admitted from July 2017 to February 2019 were enrolled and randomly divided into step and standard groups (n = 50) using a random number table. The standard group received traditional standard decompression during surgery, while the step group underwent multistep decompression during surgery. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured immediately after surgery (T0), 3 hours after surgery (T1), 6 hours after surgery (T2), and 12 hours after surgery (T3). The postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, neurologic function deficit score, and GOS score were evaluated.

RESULTS

 After treatment, the excellent/good rate of neurologic function improvement and GCS and GOS scores of the step group significantly exceeded those of the standard group (p < 0.05). Compared with the standard group, the HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP decreased significantly in the step group at T1, T2, and T3 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 Standard decompressive craniectomy under multistep decompression can markedly improve the neurologic function, hemodynamics, and prognosis of patients.

Intraoperative hand strength as an indicator of consciousness during awake craniotomy: a prospective, observational study

Awake craniotomy enables mapping and monitoring of brain functions. For successful procedures, rapid awakening and the precise evaluation of consciousness are required. A prospective, observational study conducted to test whether intraoperative hand strength could be a sensitive indicator of consciousness during the awake phase of awake craniotomy. Twenty-three patients who underwent awake craniotomy were included. Subtle changes of the level of consciousness were assessed by the Japan Coma Scale (JCS). The associations of hand strength on the unaffected side with the predicted plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol, the bispectral index (BIS), and the JCS were analyzed. Hand strength relative to the preoperative maximum hand strength on the unaffected side showed significant correlations with the Cp of propofol (ρ =  − 0.219, p = 0.007), the BIS (ρ = 0.259, p = 0.002), and the JCS (τ =  − 0.508, p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for discriminating JCS 0–1 and JCS ≥ 2 demonstrated that the area under the curve was 0.76 for hand strength, 0.78 for Cp of propofol, and 0.66 for BIS. With a cutoff value of 75% for hand strength, the sensitivity was 0.76, and the specificity was 0.67. These data demonstrated that hand strength is a useful indicator for assessing the intraoperative level of consciousness during awake craniotomy.

The Use of Standardized Intraoperative Language Tests in Awake Craniotomies: A Scoping Review

Assessment of speech and language functions is an essential part of awake craniotomies. Although standardized and validated tests have several advantages compared to homemade (or mixed) batteries, in the literature it is unclear how such tests are used or whether they are used at all. In this study, we performed a scoping review in order to locate standardized and validated intraoperative language tests. Our inquiry included two databases (PubMED and MEDLINE), gray literature, and snowball referencing. We discovered 87 studies reporting use of mixed batteries, which consist of homemade tasks and tests borrowed from other settings. The tests we found to meet the validation and standardization criteria we set were ultimately three (n = 3) and each one has its own advantages and disadvantages. We argue that tests with high sensitivity and specificity not only can lead to better outcomes postoperatively, but they can also help us to gain a better understanding of the neuroanatomy of language.