Demographics, presentation, and clinical outcomes after traumatic bifrontal contusions: a systematic review

Factors determining the requirement of surgical intervention and prognosis in cases of traumatic bifrontal contusions: A prospective observational study

Background

Traumatic brain injury, being a notorious cause of mortality and morbidity across the globe, presents with a variety of lesions. One of the distinct patterns of injury is characterized by contusions of both frontal lobes, labeled "traumatic bifrontal contusions" (TBCs). TBC is often associated with the presence of significant edema and mass effect leading to rapid clinical deterioration after a usually benign presentation at the time of first evaluation. Formulating a management plan in a patient with TBC is often more difficult than in a patient with a major intracranial hematoma.

Methods

A prospective observational study with aims and objectives to identify predictors of an unfavorable outcome, analysis of the evolution of TBC, evaluation of the specific indications for surgery, and determination of the prognosis. All head trauma patients harboring bifrontal contusions were included in the study. Patients with other associated operable injuries involving blunt trauma abdomen and orthopedic injuries, counter-coupe injuries, and obvious open fractures noted over calvaria were excluded from the study. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was recorded during the first assessment, followed by non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) Head.

Results

A total of 53 patients satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. The average GCS score recorded before surgical intervention was 9. The mean and median best motor response noted was M5. The interval from the time of injury to the first NCCT of the brain at the study hospital ranged from 3 h to 163 h, averaging 17.66 h. The median category w.r.t Marshall's CT classification observed was "Diffuse Injury IV." The volume of the contusions in each scan was estimated, and the average anterior cranial fossa volume observed was 125 mL. "Upfront surgery" ("Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy" or "unilateral Fronto-Temporo-Parietal [FTP] decompressive hemicraniectomy") was carried out on the day of admission based on the findings on the first NCCT brain. About 49% of patients at presentation needed surgical intervention as per existing protocols. The duration of observation for patients who were initially observed but eventually had to undergo surgery ranged from 1 to 5 days, with an average observation period of 2 days. The duration of observation in those who did not subsequently need surgery ranged from 7 to 10 days, with an average duration of 9 days.

Conclusion

What leads to the poorly predictable, delayed, and rapid deterioration that sets TBCs apart from other traumatic brain injuries is still unclear. Our study finds that having a low threshold for repeat CT imaging of the patient led to earlier identification of progression, and a low threshold for surgical intervention led to favorable outcomes.

Chinese Admission Warning Strategy for Predicting the Hospital Discharge Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective: To develop and validate an admission warning strategy that incorporates the general emergency department indicators for predicting the hospital discharge outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in China. Methods: This admission warning strategy was developed in a primary cohort that consisted of 605 patients with TBI who were admitted within 6 h of injury. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to develop the early warning strategy of selected indicators. Two sub-cohorts consisting of 180 and 107 patients with TBI were used for the external validation. Results: Indicators of the strategy included three categories: baseline characteristics, imaging and laboratory indicators. This strategy displayed good calibration and good discrimination. A high C-index was reached in the internal validation. The multicenter external validation cohort still showed good discrimination C-indices. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed the actual needs of this strategy when the possibility threshold was 0.01 for the primary cohort, and at thresholds of 0.02–0.83 and 0.01–0.88 for the two sub-cohorts, respectively. In addition, this strategy exhibited a significant prognostic capacity compared to the traditional single predictors, and this optimization was also observed in two external validation cohorts. Conclusions: We developed and validated an admission warning strategy that can be quickly deployed in the emergency department. This strategy can be used as an ideal tool for predicting hospital discharge outcomes and providing objective evidence for early informed consent of the hospital discharge outcome to the family members of TBI patients.