How many patients require brain mapping in an adult neuro-oncology service?

An update on tests used for intraoperative monitoring of cognition during awake craniotomy

PURPOSE

Mapping higher-order cognitive functions during awake brain surgery is important for cognitive preservation which is related to postoperative quality of life. A systematic review from 2018 about neuropsychological tests used during awake craniotomy made clear that until 2017 language was most often monitored and that the other cognitive domains were underexposed (Ruis, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 40(10):1081-1104, 218). The field of awake craniotomy and cognitive monitoring is however developing rapidly. The aim of the current review is therefore, to investigate whether there is a change in the field towards incorporation of new tests and more complete mapping of (higher-order) cognitive functions.

METHODS

We replicated the systematic search of the study from 2018 in PubMed and Embase from February 2017 to November 2023, yielding 5130 potentially relevant articles. We used the artificial machine learning tool ASReview for screening and included 272 papers that gave a detailed description of the neuropsychological tests used during awake craniotomy.

RESULTS

Comparable to the previous study of 2018, the majority of studies (90.4%) reported tests for assessing language functions (Ruis, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 40(10):1081-1104, 218). Nevertheless, an increasing number of studies now also describe tests for monitoring visuospatial functions, social cognition, and executive functions.

CONCLUSIONS

Language remains the most extensively tested cognitive domain. However, a broader range of tests are now implemented during awake craniotomy and there are (new developed) tests which received more attention. The rapid development in the field is reflected in the included studies in this review. Nevertheless, for some cognitive domains (e.g., executive functions and memory), there is still a need for developing tests that can be used during awake surgery.

Resection of Eloquent Located Brain Tumors by Mapping Only-A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with eloquently located cerebral lesions require surgery that usually employs mapping and monitoring techniques for the preservation of motor and language function. However, in many cases, mapping only might be sufficient, reducing the need for technical and personnel logistics. Here, we report our experiences using a device that can be operated by the surgeon independently, providing mapping techniques but omitting monitoring techniques.

METHODS

For monopolar and bipolar cortical/subcortical stimulation, pre-set programs were available and intraoperatively used-two enabling EMG real-time tracking of eight muscles for monopolar (cortical/subcortical) mapping, and two programs for 60 Hz stimulation, one with EMG and one without. Motor mapping was performed under continuous observation of the screened EMG signal and acoustic feedback by the surgeon. For the 60 Hz stimulation, a standard bipolar stimulation probe was connected through a second port. The preoperative application of the subdermal EMG needles, as well as the intraoperative handling of the device, were performed by the surgeons independently. Postoperatively, an evaluation of the autonomous handling and feasibility of the device for the chosen test parameters was conducted.

RESULTS

From 04/19-09/21, 136 procedures in patients with eloquently located cerebral lesions were performed by using the "mapping-only" device. Mapping was performed in 82% of the monopolar cases and in 42% of the bipolar cases. Regarding the setup and sufficiency for the cortical/subcortical mapping, the device was evaluated as independently usable for motor and language mapping in 129 procedures (95%). Gross total resection was achieved, or functional limit throughout resection was reached, in 79% of the patients. 13 patients postoperatively suffered from a new neurological deficit. At the 3-6-month follow-up, three patients showed persistent deficit (2%). All of them had language disturbances. The setup time for the device was less than 7 min.

CONCLUSIONS

The device was evaluated as sufficient in over 90% of cases concerning monopolar and bipolar mapping, and the setup and handling was sufficient in all patients. With the present data we show that in well-selected cases, a very simple system providing mapping only is sufficient to achieve gross total resection with the preservation of functionality.

Meningiomas of the rolandic region: risk factors for motor deficit and role of intra-operative monitoring

OBJECTIVE

Meningiomas of the rolandic region are associated to high risk of postoperative motor deficits. This study discusses the factors affecting motor outcome and recurrences from the analysis of a monoinstitutional case series and eight studies from a literature review.

METHODS

Data of 75 patients who underwent surgery for meningioma of the rolandic region were retrospectively reviewed. The analyzed factors included tumor location and size, clinical presentation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical findings, brain-tumor interface, extent of resection, postoperative outcome and recurrence. Eight studies from literature on rolandic meningiomas treated with or without intraoperative monitoring (IOM) were reviewed with the aim to define the impact of IOM on the extent of resection and motor outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 75 patients of the personal series, the meningioma was on the brain convexity in 34 (46%), at the parasagittal region in 28 (37%) and at the falx in 13 (17%). The brain-tumor interface was preserved in 53 cases (71%) at MRI and in 56 (75%) at surgical exploration. Simpson grade I resection was obtained in 43% of patients, grade II in 33%, grade III in 15% and grade IV in 9%. The motor function worsened postoperatively in 9 among 32 cases with preoperative deficit (28%) and in 5 among 43 with no preoperative deficit (11.5%); definitive motor deficit was evidenced in overall series at follow-up in 7 (9.3%). Patients with meningioma with lost arachnoid interface had significant higher rates of worsened postoperative motor deficit (p = 0.01) and seizures (p = 0.033). Recurrence occurred in 8 patients (11%). The analysis of the 8 reviewed studies (4 with and 4 without IOM) shows in the group without IOM higher rates of Simpson grades I and II resection (p = 0.02) and lower rates of grades IV resection (p = 0.002); no significant differences in postoperative immediate and long-term motor deficits were evidenced between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from literature review show that the use of IOM does not affect the postoperative motor deficit Therefore, its role in rolandic meningiomas resection remains to be determined and will be defined in further studies.

Determining Contemporary Barriers to Effective Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Neurological Surgery: A Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

The integration of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) for neurosurgical care has been accepted worldwide. Our objective was to review the literature for the limiting factors to MDTMs that may introduce bias to patient care.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis was used to perform a literature review of MDTMs for neuro-oncology, pituitary oncology, cerebrovascular surgery, and spine surgery and spine oncology. Limiting factors to productive MDTMs and factors that introduce bias were identified, as well as determining whether MDTMs led to improved patient outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 1264 manuscripts from a PubMed and Ovid Medline search, of which 27 of 500 neuro-oncology, 4 of 279 pituitary, and 11 of 260 spine surgery articles met our inclusion criteria. Of 224 cerebrovascular manuscripts, none met the criteria. Factors for productive MDTMs included quaternary/tertiary referral centers, nonhierarchical environment, regularly scheduled meetings, concise inclusion of nonmedical factors at the same level of importance as patient clinical information, inclusion of nonclinical participants, and use of clinical guidelines and institutional protocols to provide recommendations. Our review did not identify literature that described the use of artificial intelligence to reduce bias and guide clinical care.

CONCLUSIONS

The continued implementation of MDTMs in neurosurgery should be recommended but cautioned by limiting bias.

Review of Intraoperative Adjuncts for Maximal Safe Resection of Gliomas and Its Impact on Outcomes

Maximal safe resection is the mainstay of treatment in the neurosurgical management of gliomas, and preserving functional integrity is linked to favorable outcomes. How these modalities differ in their effectiveness on the extent of resection (EOR), survival, and complications remains unknown. A systematic literature search was performed with the following inclusion criteria: published between 2005 and 2022, involving brain glioma surgery, and including one or a combination of intraoperative modalities: intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), awake/general anesthesia craniotomy mapping (AC/GA), fluorescence-guided imaging, or combined modalities. Of 525 articles, 464 were excluded and 61 articles were included, involving 5221 glioma patients, 7(11.4%) articles used iMRI, 21(36.8%) used cortical mapping, 15(24.5%) used 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) or fluorescein sodium, and 18(29.5%) used combined modalities. The heterogeneity in reporting the amount of surgical resection prevented further analysis. Progression-free survival/overall survival (PFS/OS) were reported in 18/61(29.5%) articles, while complications and permanent disability were reported in 38/61(62.2%) articles. The reviewed studies demonstrate that intraoperative adjuncts such as iMRI, AC/GA mapping, fluorescence-guided imaging, and a combination of these modalities improve EOR. However, PFS/OS were underreported. Combining multiple intraoperative modalities seems to have the highest effect compared to each adjunct alone.

Electromagnetic Navigation Systems and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring: Reliability and Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

A recent influx of intraoperative technology is being used in neurosurgery, but few reports investigate the accuracy and safety of these technologies when used simultaneously.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ability to use an electromagnetic navigation system alongside multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM).

METHODS

Single-institution prospective cohort study of patients requiring craniotomy for brain tumor resection operated using an electromagnetic navigation system (AxiEM, Medtronic®). motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), electroencephalography, and electromyography were recorded and analyzed with AxiEM on (with/without filters) and off. The neurological outcomes of the patients were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients were included (8 males/7 females, mean age 52.13 yr). Even though the raw acquisition is affected by the electromagnetic field (particularly SSEPs), no significant difference was detected in the morphology, amplitude, and latency of the different monitoring modalities (AxiEM off vs on) after the appropriate software filter application. Adjustments to the frequency of SSEP stimulation and number of averages, and reductions to the low-pass filters were applied. Notch filters were used appropriately and changes to the physical setup of the IONM and electromagnetic navigation system equipment reduced noise. Postoperatively, none of the patients developed new focal deficits; 7 patients showed improvement in their motor deficit (4 recovered fully).

CONCLUSION

The information provided by the IONM in intracranial neurosurgery patients whilst also using electromagnetic navigation systems is reliable for monitoring, mapping, and detecting intraoperative complications, provided that the appropriate software filters and tools are applied.

Low-Grade Glioma Case Series: Lessons Learned from an Evolving 10-Year Single-Institution Multidisciplinary Team Practice

BACKGROUND

Low-grade gliomas are a heterogeneous group with significant changes in their management during the last decade.

OBJECTIVE

To assess how our multidisciplinary team approach to the management of low-grade glioma has evolved over the past 10 years and its implications for outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center cohort study of adult patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of World Health Organization grade II glioma between 2009 and 2018. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic data were collected.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included. There was a statistically significant difference in the surgical approach, with more patients having gross total resection (45.7% vs. 18.4%) and fewer patients having a biopsy (21.8% vs. 49.0%) (P = 0.002) after 2014. There was a significantly better overall survival after 2014 (<2014, 16.3%; ≥2014, 0 deaths; P = 0.010) measured at the mean time of follow-up. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.045) and radiotherapy (P = 0.001) significantly decreased after 2014. A subgroup analysis showed that the impact of extent of surgical resection was the greatest for survival in the 1p19q noncodeleted tumors (P = 0.029) and for seizure outcomes in the 1p19q codeleted group (P = 0.018). There was no statistically significant increase in neurologic disability with more radical surgery, incorporating intraoperative neuromonitoring, as measured by modified Rankin Scale score (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

More radical surgery was associated with increased survival, less need for postoperative adjuvant therapy and better seizure control, without significant morbidity. Molecular markers are useful tools for stratification of benefits after such surgery.