Fusion of subarachnoid hemorrhage data and computed tomography angiography data is helpful to identify the rupture source in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms

Management of ruptured aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with multiple basilar trunk aneurysms using a flow-diverter stent: A case report

Ruptured aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with multiple basilar trunk aneurysms represents a rare clinical condition. Endovascular intervention stands as the preferred therapeutic approach. We present the case of a 35-year-old patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage and three consecutive basilar trunk aneurysms. Utilizing a flow-diverter stent, we achieved simultaneous occlusion of all 3 aneurysms, performed 2 hours post dual antiplatelet therapy (comprising salicylic acid 300 mg and ticagrelor 180 mg). Sustained resistance to clopidogrel necessitated the subsequent 3 months, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. At the 1-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated a favorable clinical course, devoid of cerebral infarction, and evidenced unobstructed stent patency upon brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Identification of ruptured intracranial aneurysms using the aneurysm-specific prediction score in patients with multiple aneurysms with subarachnoid hemorrhages- a Chinese population based external validation study

Background

For patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAHs) and multiple intracranial aneurysms (MIAs), a simple and fast imaging method that can identify ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) may have great clinical value. We sought to use the aneurysm-specific prediction score to identify RIAs in patients with MIAs and evaluate the aneurysm-specific prediction score.

Methods

Between May 2018 and May 2021, 134 patients with 290 MIAs were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had an SAH due to IA rupture. CT angiography (CTA) was used to assess the maximum diameter, shape, and location of IAs to calculate the aneurysm-specific prediction score. Then, the aneurysm-specific prediction score was applied to RIAs in patients with MIAs.

Results

The IAs with the highest aneurysm-specific prediction scores had not ruptured in 17 (12.7%) of the 134 patients with 290 MIAs. The sensitivity, specificity, false omission rate, diagnostic error rate, and diagnostic accuracy of the aneurysm-specific prediction score were higher than those of the maximum diameter, shape, and location of IAs.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that the aneurysm-specific prediction score has high diagnostic accuracy in identifying RIAs in patients with MIAs and SAH, but that it needs further evaluation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02727-w.

Kissing Aneurysms: Radiological and Surgical Difficulties in 30 Operated Cases and a Proposed Classification

OBJECTIVE

The first aim of this study is to bring up the radiological and surgical difficulties of kissing aneurysms and to present solutions. The second aim is to develop a classification that can help to predict the difficulties encountered during surgery.

METHODS

The records of 817 patients who were operated on for aneurysm were reviewed retrospectively to identify kissing aneurysms. The radiological and clinical databases of these patients were evaluated in detail.

RESULTS

Kissing aneurysms were detected in 30 patients (3.6%). Radiologically correct diagnosis rate of kissing aneurysms was 80% throughout the series. The most common locations were the anterior communicating artery (12 cases, 40%) and the middle cerebral artery (12 cases, 40.0%). The ruptured aneurysm could not be detected preoperatively in 24% of the patients. Intraoperative rupture occurred in 4 patients (13.3%). Accompanying vascular anomaly/variation was seen in 16 patients (53.3%). As detailed in the text, kissing aneurysms were divided into 3 types according to their position with each other on the parent artery from the surgeon's point of view during surgery: type I (proximal/distal), type II (superior/inferior), and type III (right/left).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advanced angiographic techniques, even today, kissing aneurysms can be misinterpreted as a single bilobular aneurysm. The ruptured aneurysm may not be detectable preoperatively. These complex aneurysms have a high intraoperative rupture risk. Accompanying vascular anomalies are more common than expected. Clip selection and sequencing are important. Proposed classification helps the surgeon to be aware of intraoperative difficulties that he/she may encounter in advance.