Safety and effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal intracranial aneurysm clipping: a systematic review

Perisellar Tumor Coexisting with Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm: Single-Stage or Staged Surgery?

OBJECTIVE

The coexistence of perisellar tumors and intracranial aneurysms was previously considered a rare phenomenon. In this study, we introduce our experience with surgical strategies for the treatment of such coexisting pathologies.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviews the medical records and intraoperative videos of patients with coexisting pathologies of perisellar tumors and aneurysms from Nov 2017 to Oct 2022.

RESULTS

Our study involved 20 patients, including 9 males and 11 females. Three patients selected the single-stage endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), including one with a type of MP trigeminal schwannoma with an anterior communicating aneurysm, 1 with a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma with a left internal carotid artery paraclinoid aneurysm, and 1 with a recurrent pituitary adenoma with a right internal carotid artery paraclinoid aneurysm. Thirteen patients chose tumor resection first through the EEA with embolization or aneurysm conservation. There were also 2 patients with irregularly shaped aneurysms who chose embolization before tumor resection. All tumors were completely removed, with only a few patients experiencing recurrence and postoperative complications, and the follow-up of the aneurysms was also stable. There were also 2 patients who chose conservative management for both tumors and aneurysms, but unfortunately, one of them suffered from aneurysm rupture and eventually died. No cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, severe intracranial infection, or surgical-related hemorrhage was found in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Staged surgery or conservative treatment for aneurysms can be considered a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of coexisting pathologies. However, in very selected cases, the single-stage EEA can be used as part of a comprehensive treatment for such coexisting pathologies.

Craniopharyngioma resection and aneurysm clipping performed simultaneously by pure endoscopic endonasal approach: A case report and literature review

Craniopharyngioma is one of the most challenging issues for neurosurgeons as a brain tumor. Among the approaches of neurosurgery, in comparison to craniotomy, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has risen in popularity over the last two decades; unruptured intracranial aneurysms are relatively commonly found in the general population. The EEA as a new paradigm in the treatment of aneurysm has been reported to successfully clip dozens of cases of intracranial aneurysm. However, when reviewing the domestic and foreign literature, it appeared that cases of craniopharyngioma complicated with intracranial aneurysm purely treated by EEA have not been reported so far. In the present study, the published literature regarding endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma and intracranial aneurysms was reviewed, accompanied with a case of craniopharyngioma complicated with intracranial aneurysm, both of which were simultaneously treated by EEA.

Extradural anterior clinoidectomy versus endoscopic transplanum-transcavernous approach to the paraclinoid region: quantitative anatomical exposure analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcranial anterior clinoidectomy is a conventional microsurgical approach for treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is an alternative method for clipping intracranial aneurysms. No analysis has been conducted to anatomically compare approaches with respect to treating paraclinoid aneurysms. The surgical anatomical exposures of the paraclinoid region during transcranial extradural anterior clinoidectomy (EAC) and the endoscopic endonasal transplanum-cavernous approach (EETC) are described and quantitatively assessed.

METHOD

Seven cadaveric heads underwent EAC and EETC. Measurements included the area of exposure, volume of surgical freedom, angle of attack, ophthalmic artery (OphA) origin, and coronal exposure angle of the internal carotid artery (ICA).

RESULTS

The EETC provided a larger area of exposure than the EAC (100.1±24.9 vs 76.1±12.9 mm², p = 0.04). The EAC provided a higher volume of surgical freedom and greater angle of attack than the EETC in all neurovascular parameters, including the OphA, superior hypophyseal artery (SHA), distal ICA, and distal dural ring (all p < 0.001). The OphA origin was intradural in 85.7% and extradural in 14.3% of specimens. With regard to the coronal angle of exposure, the EAC exposed the OphA and SHA in the upper lateral quadrant (67.9±7.8° and 80.6±4.5°, respectively) and the distal ICA in the upper medial and upper lateral quadrants (92±7.5°). The EEA exposed the OphA, SHA, and distal ICA in the upper medial and lower medial quadrants (130.4±10.7°, 68.4±10.8°, and 58±11.4°, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The EAC and EETC each offer specific advantages for paraclinoid region exposure. The EAC is appropriate for paraclinoid aneurysms that occur at the dorsolateral surface of the paraclinoid ICA. The EETC is an alternative approach for aneurysms that occur along medial surface of the paraclinoid ICA (e.g., carotid cave and SHA aneurysms). The EETC provides greater surgical exposure to the medial aspect of the paraclinoid ICA.

Management of Coincident Pituitary Macroadenoma and Cavernous Carotid Aneurysm: A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction  Pituitary adenomas are a common intracranial pathology with an incidence of 15 to 20% in the population while cerebral aneurysms are less common with a prevalence of 1:50 patients. The incidence of aneurysms in patients with pituitary adenoma has been estimated at 2.3 to 5.4% of patients; however, this remains unclear. Equally, the management of concomitant lesions lacks significant understanding. Methods  A case report is presented of a concomitant cerebral aneurysm and pituitary adenoma managed by minimally invasive endovascular and endoscopic methods, respectively. A systematic review of the literature for terms "pituitary adenoma" and "aneurysm" yielded 494 studies that were narrowed to 19 relevant articles. Results  We report a case of a 67-year-old patient with an enlarging pituitary macroadenoma, cavernous carotid aneurysm, and unilateral carotid occlusion. After successful treatment of the aneurysm by a pipeline flow diverter, the pituitary adenoma was surgically resected by an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. Conclusion  The use of a pipeline flow diverter and endonasal approach was feasible in the treatment of our patient. This is the first report to our knowledge of the use of pipeline flow diversion in the management of a cavernous carotid aneurysm prior to pituitary adenoma treatment.

Anatomic feasibility of endoscopic endonasal intracranial aneurysm clipping: a systematic review of anatomical studies

Clinical studies have suggested the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for aneurysm clipping as a feasible way to treat select intracranial aneurysms. Among neurosurgery, there is not a consensus on the utility of EEA aneurysm clipping. This review aims to define the anatomic feasibility of EEA for aneurysm clipping. Two databases (PubMed, Cochrane) were searched for anatomical studies assessing EEA for intracranial aneurysm clipping. Literature review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Quantitative anatomical studies were included. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Vascular exposure and clip placement on vessels of interest were possible, although only one study assessed these parameters with physical aneurysm models. Anterior circulation vessels, although accessible in over 90% of specimens, had low successful clipping rates in a small and large aneurysm models. Small and large model posterior circulation aneurysms were more readily clipped. Proximal and distal controls were readily attainable in posterior circulation aneurysms, but not anterior. This current literature review highlights the relevance of anatomical studies in assessing the feasibility of the EEA for clipping intracranial aneurysms. As such, anterior circulation aneurysms are poor candidates for EEA given difficulties in clip placement and obtaining proximal control and distal control in small and large aneurysms. While our results suggest that clipping of posterior circulation aneurysms is feasible from a technical stand of view, further clinical experience is required to assess its feasibility in terms of safety and efficacy, balancing the indications with endovascular treatment options.

Modern endoscopic skull base neurosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Since the early use of the endoscopic view for treating simple intrasellar pituitary adenomas, the skull base surgery has experienced an unprecedented revolution elevating the treatment of skull base lesions to the next level in proficiency and excellence of care.

METHODS

We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of the endoscope in the treatment of skull base lesions. In this article, we aim to discuss and provide a wide view of the current indications and future perspectives of the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and of the endoscopic transcranial approaches.

RESULTS

As in the development of any other technique, EEA have gone through a transformation process from theoretical anatomic models to a pragmatic clinical use. Along the way, EEA have required several modifications, as well as pushbacks in the application of this technique in some indications. This process has resulted in the provision of an additional tool to the current surgical armamentarium that allows the skull base surgeon to face most challenging lesions along the skull base.

CONCLUSIONS

The judicious combination of transcranial and endoscopic-transnasal approaches warrants highest chances of achieving satisfactory tumors resection with a reduced risk of complications.