Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the treatment of central neurocytoma: a single-institution experience of 25 patients

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for central neurocytoma: a quantitative systematic review and metanalysis

Central neurocytomas (CN) are rare tumors within the central nervous system. Originating from the septum pellucidum and subependymal cells, they are typically found in the third and lateral ventricles. For this reason, they may lead to hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure. CNs are generally benign lesions that exhibit locally aggressive behavior and a high recurrence rate. Complete surgical resection is the preferred treatment; however, due to their anatomical location, this is often not feasible. Based on these findings, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been introduced for managing both residual and recurrent tumors and as an initial therapy in selected cases. This study aimed to systematically review the available knowledge regarding GKRS for CN. A systematic investigation of the scientific literature was undertaken through an exhaustive search across prominent databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, by employing precise MeSH terms such as "Central neurocytoma," "Radiosurgery," "Gamma Knife," and "Stereotactic Radiosurgery." A comprehensive quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis were meticulously conducted, focusing on cases of CN treated with GKRS for a thorough evaluation of outcomes and efficacy. Seventeen articles, including 289 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analysis estimates for disease control and local tumor control were 90% (95% CI 87-93%; I2 = 0%, p < 0.74) and 94% (95% CI 92-97%; I2 = 0%, p < 0.98), respectively. When considering only studies with at least 5 years of follow-up, progression-free survival was 89% (95% CI 85-94%; I2 = 0.03%, p < 0.74). The mean clinical control rate was 96%. This systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed the safety and efficacy of GKRS in managing CN.

Clinical prognostic factors for central neurocytoma and subgroup analysis of different treatment measures: A SEER database-based retrospective analysis from 2003 to 2019

Purpose

The study aimed to identify clinical prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) in patients with central neurocytoma (CN) and to determine independent prognostic factors in the subgroups of different treatment modalities using a retrospective analysis based on the SEER database from 2003 to 2019.

Materials and methods

Data regarding patients with CN, including basic clinical characteristics, treatment measures, and prognosis follow-up, were extracted from the SEER database. The prognostic variables for all patients were assessed using log-rank test as well as univariate and multivariate analyses based on the Cox proportional hazards model. The same statistical methods were used for analysis in different subgroups of gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR), no surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and no RT.

Results

In total, 413 patients were enrolled in this study. Tumor size, primary site surgery, and RT were independent prognostic factors in all patients with CN. In subgroup analyses, RT was not an independent prognostic factor in patients with GTR. However, sex and race were independent prognostic factors in patients with STR. Additionally, tumor size was an independent prognostic factor in patients who did not undergo surgery. Furthermore, sex and primary site were independent prognostic factors in patients who received RT. Size and primary site surgery were independent prognostic factors in patients without RT.

Conclusion

In our study, patients with small tumors or GTR or those who did not receive RT showed a better prognosis. GTR was the preferred treatment for CN. RT was not recommended for patients after GTR. Men and African American showed certain advantages after STR surgery. Tumors with a size of >4 cm were recommended for active treatment. In the RT subgroup, patients with tumors outside the ventricle or women had a poorer prognosis than those with tumors within the ventricle or men, respectively. These findings will help clinicians and patients understand the treatment and prognosis of CN visually and intuitively.

EANO - EURACAN - SNO Guidelines on circumscribed astrocytic gliomas, glioneuronal, and neuronal tumors

In the new WHO 2021 Classification of CNS Tumors the chapter "Circumscribed astrocytic gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors" encompasses several different rare tumor entities, which occur more frequently in children, adolescents, and young adults. The Task Force has reviewed the evidence of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, which is low particularly for adult patients, and draw recommendations accordingly. Tumor diagnosis, based on WHO 2021, is primarily performed using conventional histological techniques; however, a molecular workup is important for differential diagnosis, in particular, DNA methylation profiling for the definitive classification of histologically unresolved cases. Molecular factors are increasing of prognostic and predictive importance. MRI finding are non-specific, but for some tumors are characteristic and suggestive. Gross total resection, when feasible, is the most important treatment in terms of prolonging survival and achieving long-term seizure control. Conformal radiotherapy should be considered in grade 3 and incompletely resected grade 2 tumors. In recurrent tumors reoperation and radiotherapy, including stereotactic radiotherapy, can be useful. Targeted therapies may be used in selected patients: BRAF and MEK inhibitors in pilocytic astrocytomas, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, and gangliogliomas when BRAF altered, and mTOR inhibitor everolimus in subependymal giant cells astrocytomas. Sequencing to identify molecular targets is advocated for diagnostic clarification and to direct potential targeted therapies.