1
|
Girod PP, Lener S, Kögl N, Hartmann S, Abramovic A, Krismer L, Santer M, Ortler M, Thomé C. Health-related quality of life 2 years after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for sagittal imbalance: a single-center experience of 65 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:3521-3527. [PMID: 37715821 PMCID: PMC10624731 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05787-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) as an invasive procedure with high reoperation and complication rates in an often elderly population has often been questioned. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of PSO for sagittal imbalance (SI) on patient-reported outcomes including self-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life 2 years postoperatively. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent correction of their spinal deformity by thoracolumbar PSO were assessed using self-reporting questionnaires 2 years postoperatively. Outcome was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D scores. Additionally, a Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI) rated in four grades (A: very satisfied to D: not satisfied), walking range, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test were evaluated. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were included, and each parameter was assessed preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. The intervention led to significant improvements in back pain (8.1 ± 1.2 vs. 2.9 ± 1.9; p < 0.001), as well as ODI scores (57.7 ± 13.9 vs. 32.6 ± 18.9; p < 0.001), walking range (589 ± 1676 m vs. 3265 ± 3405 m; p < 0.001), and TUG (19.2 s vs. 9.7 s; p < 0.05). 90.7% of patients (n = 59/65) reported a PSI grade "A" or "B" 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION Patient satisfaction 24 months after PSO for SI is high. Quality of life improved significantly by restoring sagittal balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Pascal Girod
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sara Lener
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Nikolaus Kögl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sebastian Hartmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anto Abramovic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Laura Krismer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Markus Santer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin Ortler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinik Landstraße, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Halm-Lutterodt NI, Al-Saidi NN, Mandalia K, Mesregah MK, Ghanem KM, Storlie NR, Huang WH, Chen WC, Bartels-Mensah M, Chen XY, Ye Z, Zhang Y, Pan A, Kim SS, Lonner B, Alanay A, Hai Y. Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2023; 13:1646-1657. [PMID: 36548436 PMCID: PMC10448105 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221146502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE Compilation of complication outcomes data from the surgical management of severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients using VCR-based vs non-VCR-based corrective maneuvers is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to compare complication outcomes between those classified osteotomy approaches. METHODS Thorough literature review and meta-analysis were conducted between January 2000 and September 2021. The selection criteria were studies: i) reporting major curve Cobb angle of ≥80° and flexibility of <25% or 30%; ii) comparing VCR or ≥ Type V Schwab osteotomy defined as VCR-based vs [non-VCR-based] techniques, (any osteotomy or technique other than VCR); iii) published in English with ≥10 patients; iv) reporting complication rates; and v) having minimum of 2-year follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Significance level was set at (P < .05). RESULTS Of the 174 patients included, 52.30% (n = 91) and 47.70% (n = 83) were VCR-based and non-VCR-based, respectively. The incidence of dural tears/nerve injuries/significant intraoperative-neuromonitoring changes was significantly higher; [OR = 6.78, CI= (1.75 to 26.17), I2 = 0%, (P = .006)] in the VCR-based group than the non-VCR-based group. The 'overall surgical and medical' complication rate was significantly higher in the VCR-based group, [OR = 1.94, CI= (1.02 to 3.67), I2 = 31%, (P = .04)]. CONCLUSION Both VCR-based and non-VCR-based surgical techniques for management of severe rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis patients pose comparable overall surgical complication rates, while a significantly higher perioperative neurological complication incidence was associated with VCR-based technique compared to the non-VCR-based techniques. The VCR-based technique was associated with 6.78 times higher incidence of neurological complications compared to non-VCR-based techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Ishmael Van Halm-Lutterodt
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, Inspired Spine Health, Burnsville, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Mohamed Kamal Mesregah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Menoufia University Faculty of Medicine, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| | | | | | - Wei-Hsun Huang
- Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated-Capital Medical University, China
| | - Wei-Cheng Chen
- Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated-Capital Medical University, China
| | | | - Xin Yuan Chen
- Department of Arts and Sciences, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ziyang Ye
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, Inspired Spine Health, Burnsville, MN, USA
- Department of Business Analytics, University of Chicago, IL, USA
- Tristate Brain, and Spine Institute, Alexandria, MN, USA
| | - Yangpu Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, China
| | - Aixing Pan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, China
| | - Sunny Sik Kim
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, Inspired Spine Health, Burnsville, MN, USA
- Tristate Brain, and Spine Institute, Alexandria, MN, USA
| | - Baron Lonner
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahmet Alanay
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Mehmet ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yong Hai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, China
| | - International Spinal Deformity Review Study Group (ISDRSG)
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, Inspired Spine Health, Burnsville, MN, USA
- Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mt. Pleasant, MI, USA
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Menoufia University Faculty of Medicine, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
- Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated-Capital Medical University, China
- Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated-Capital Medical University, China
- University of Debrecen School of Medicine, Hungary
- Department of Arts and Sciences, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Business Analytics, University of Chicago, IL, USA
- Tristate Brain, and Spine Institute, Alexandria, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Mehmet ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bourghli A, Boissiere L, Konbaz F, Larrieu D, Almusrea K, Obeid I. Domino connector for thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy reduction: surgical technique and patient series. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:1800-1809. [PMID: 36935453 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07650-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Different techniques have been previously described to close the pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) site for correction of sagittal malalignment; the use of a side-to-side domino connector as a correction tool in the thoracic spine has not been specifically studied. METHODS Twenty adult patients who underwent single-level thoracic PSO from T1 to T12 were included and retrospectively reviewed (two centers). Preoperative and postoperative full-body X-rays, perioperative data, clinical data and complications were recorded with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Surgical technique and the nuances in using the domino connector were described in detail. RESULTS Patients had a mean age of 40y; 40% were female. Two different techniques involving the domino were applied for closure of the PSO site depending on the type of kyphosis (smooth vs. angular deformity). Both techniques provided significant correction of the local kyphosis (from 48° to 18°) with reciprocal reduction of compensatory cervical lordosis (from 37.6° to 18.6°, p < 0.01) in upper thoracic PSO or lumbar lordosis (from 74.5° to 46.6°, p < 0.01) in lower thoracic PSO. Four patients presented postoperative complications that resolved (hemothorax, GI bleeding), and two patients presented transient neurological deficit. Oswestry Disability Index score improved in the majority of the patients (from 32.7 to 22.5, p < 0.05). There were no pseudarthroses, symptomatic instrumentation breakage, or surgical site infection. CONCLUSION Use of a side-to-side domino connector in combination with two different rod cantilever techniques is effective for the reduction of thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy achieving satisfactory radiological and clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouar Bourghli
- Spine Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Louis Boissiere
- Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Faisal Konbaz
- Spine Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Daniel Larrieu
- Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Khaled Almusrea
- Spine Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ibrahim Obeid
- Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bourghli A, Boissiere L, Cawley D, Larrieu D, Pizones J, Alanay A, PelIise F, Kleinstück F, Obeid I. Domino connector is an efficient tool to improve lumbar lordosis correction angle after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:2408-2414. [PMID: 35857129 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07322-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the radiological outcomes and complications of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) below L2 but categorized according to their construct where either a domino connector was applied for osteotomy correction or not. METHODS Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity database (5 sites). Inclusion criteria were adult patients who underwent PSO between L3 and L5 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Among 1243 patients in the database, 79 met the inclusion criteria, 41 in the no-domino (ND) group and 38 in the domino (D) group. The domino technique consisted of using 2 parallel rods connected by a domino on one side of the PSO in order to achieve gradual and controlled compression at the osteotomy site. Demographic data, operative parameters, spinopelvic parameters and complications were collected. RESULTS Demographic data and operative parameters were globally similar between both groups, and they showed a comparable preoperative sagittal malalignment. Segmental lordosis improved by 22° and 31° (p < 0.05) and L1S1 lordosis improved by 23° and 32° (p < 0.05) in the ND and D group, respectively. The use of multiple rods was similar between the groups (58% vs. 57%). Also, mechanical complications rate was globally similar between both groups with no statistically significant difference (22% vs. 28.9%). CONCLUSION Domino connector is a safe, powerful and efficient tool for pedicle subtraction osteotomy site closure. It improved the lumbar lordosis correction angle with an acceptable rate of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouar Bourghli
- Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery Department, Kingdom Hospital, P.O.Box 84400, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Louis Boissiere
- Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Daniel Larrieu
- Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Javier Pizones
- Spine Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ahmet Alanay
- Spine Surgery Unit, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ferran PelIise
- Spine Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Val Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ibrahim Obeid
- Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|