Nuancing the role of transorbital endoscopic approaches in skull base surgery

Neuroanatomical perspectives on transorbital approaches: A meta-analysis

Background

Transorbital approaches represent a paradigm shift in skull base surgery, focusing on minimally invasive techniques that prioritize patient outcomes and surgical precision. The scientific community, recognizing the significance of these advances, necessitates a possible review and meta-analysis to encapsulate the collective efficacy, safety, and developmental trajectory of these approaches.

Methods

This was a literature review targeting literature in the past 10 years to present evidence for studies on surgical approaches transorbital. The included articles were analyzed. In addition, the references list of the included papers was searched for further articles.

Results

Studies based on the endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach have emphasized that it is minimally invasive; on the other hand, it offers an advantage to maximal resection success in the case of skull base tumors with advanced endoscopic skills. Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery was criticized for being highly technical and narrow in its scope, with reduced morbidity. Superior Eyelid Approach involves a direct access with hidden incisions, potential for eyelid complications. Lateral orbitotomy entailed some inherent risks, such as muscle and nerve injury, but it gave excellent exposure to lesions that are lateral in the orbit. The transorbital endoscopic intraconal approach and the transconjunctival approach give direct advantages but are, however, limited to the type of lesion and location.

Conclusion

The main technique focused on in this overview is the approaches through orbits, which greatly contribute to further innovation brought into the surgical panorama of skull base interventions. All such techniques do have their characteristics and applications, keeping them moving toward less invasiveness.

A Frontal Route to Middle and Posterior Cranial Fossa: Quantitative Study for the Lateral Transorbital Endoscopic Approach and Comparison with the Subtemporal Approach

BACKGROUND

Skull base lesions within the middle cranial fossa (MCF) remain challenging. Recent reports suggest that transorbital endoscopic approaches (TOEAs) might be particularly suitable to access the MCF and expose the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus and the Meckel's cave.

METHODS

The present study was developed to compare the nuances of the subtemporal approach (STA) with those of the lateral TOEA (LTOEA) to the MCF and posterior cranial fossa (PCF) in cadaveric specimens. After orbital craniectomy, interdural opening of the cavernous sinus lateral wall (CSlw), exposure of the Gasserian ganglion, and extradural elevation of the temporal lobe was performed. Next, anterior endoscopic petrosectomy was performed and the PCF was accessed. We quantitatively analyzed and compared the angles of attack and distances between LTOEA and STA to different structures at the CSlw, petrous apex (PA), and PCF.

RESULTS

Cadaveric dissection through the LTOEA completely exposed the CSlw and PA. LTOA exhibited larger distances than the STA to all targets. Importantly, these differences were greater at the PA and its surrounding key anatomic landmarks. The horizontal and vertical angles of attack allowed by the LTOA were smaller both for the CSlw and PA. However, these differences were not significant for the vertical angle of attack at the CSlw.

CONCLUSIONS

LTOEA provides a direct ventral route to the medial aspect of MCF, PA, and PCF. Although TOEAs are versatile approaches, the unfamiliar surgical anatomy and limited instrument maneuverability demand extensive cadaveric dissection before moving to the clinical setting.