1
|
Tolstrup J, Loya A, Aggerholm-Pedersen N, Preisler L, Penninga L. Risk factors for recurrent disease after resection of solitary fibrous tumor: a systematic review. Front Surg 2024; 11:1332421. [PMID: 38357190 PMCID: PMC10864472 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1332421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare soft tissue tumor found at any site of the body. The treatment of choice is surgical resection, though 10%-30% of patients experience recurrent disease. Multiple risk factors and risk stratification systems have been investigated to predict which patients are at risk of recurrence. The main goal of this systematic review is to create an up-to-date systematic overview of risk factors and risk stratification systems predicting recurrence for patients with surgically resected SFT within torso and extremities. Method We prepared the review following the updated Prisma guidelines for systematic reviews (PRISMA-P). Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WHO international trial registry platform and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched up to December 2022. All English studies describing risk factors for recurrence after resected SFT were included. We excluded SFT in the central nervous system and the oto-rhino-laryngology region. Results Eighty-one retrospective studies were identified. Different risk factors including age, symptoms, sex, resection margins, anatomic location, mitotic index, pleomorphism, hypercellularity, necrosis, size, dedifferentiation, CD-34 expression, Ki67 index and TP53-expression, APAF1-inactivation, TERT promoter mutation and NAB2::STAT6 fusion variants were investigated in a narrative manner. We found that high mitotic index, Ki67 index and presence of necrosis increased the risk of recurrence after surgically resected SFT, whereas other factors had more varying prognostic value. We also summarized the currently available different risk stratification systems, and found eight different systems with a varying degree of ability to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high recurrence risk. Conclusion Mitotic index, necrosis and Ki67 index are the most solid risk factors for recurrence. TERT promoter mutation seems a promising component in future risk stratification models. The Demicco risk stratification system is the most validated and widely used, however the G-score model may appear to be superior due to longer follow-up time. Systematic Review Registration CRD42023421358.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Tolstrup
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anand Loya
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Louise Preisler
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luit Penninga
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ke X, Zhao J, Liu X, Zhou Q, Cheng W, Zhang P, Zhou J. Apparent diffusion coefficient values effectively predict cell proliferation and determine oligodendroglioma grade. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 46:83. [PMID: 37022533 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-01989-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the value of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in differentiating oligodendroglioma of various grades and explore the correlation between ADC and Ki-67. The preoperative MRI data of 99 patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grades 2 (n = 42) and 3 (n = 57) oligodendroglioma confirmed by surgery and pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional MRI features, ADCmean, ADCmin, and normalized ADC (nADC) were compared between the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate each parameter's diagnostic efficacy in differentiating the two tumor types. Each tumor's Ki-67 proliferation index was also measured to explore its relationship with the ADC value. Compared with WHO2 grade tumors, WHO3 grade tumors had a larger maximum diameter and more significant cystic degeneration/necrosis, edema, and moderate/severe enhancement (all P < 0.05). The ADCmin, ADCmean, and nADC values of the WHO3 and WHO2 grade tumors were significantly different, and the ADCmin value most accurately distinguished the two tumor types, yielding an area under the curve value of 0.980. When 0.96 × 10-3 mm2/s was used as the differential diagnosis threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two groups were 100%, 93.00%, and 96.96%, respectively. The ADCmin (r = -0.596), ADCmean (r = - 0.590), nADC (r = - 0.577), and Ki-67 proliferation index values had significantly negative correlations (all P < 0.05). Conventional MRI features and ADC values are beneficial in the noninvasive prediction of the WHO grade and tumor proliferation rate of oligodendroglioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoai Ke
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, China
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xianwang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, China
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qing Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, China
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wen Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Junlin Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
- Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, China.
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu X, Deng J, Sun Q, Xue C, Li S, Zhou Q, Huang X, Liu H, Zhou J. Differentiation of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from atypical meningioma using apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:2449-2456. [PMID: 35303202 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01771-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis in differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) from atypical meningioma (ATM). Retrospective analyzed the clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathological data of 20 and 25 patients with SFT/HPC and ATM, respectively. Histogram analysis was performed on the axial ADC images using MaZda software, and nine histogram parameters were obtained, including mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis, and the 1st (ADC1), 10th (ADC10), 50th (ADC50), 90th (ADC90), and 99th (ADC99) percentile ADC. Differences in ADC histogram parameters between SFT/HPC and ATM were compared by an independent t test or Mann-Whitney U test, while the statistically significant histogram parameters were further analyzed by drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the differential diagnostic performance. Among the nine ADC histogram parameters we extracted, the mean, ADC1, ADC10, ADC50, and ADC90 in the SFT/HPC group were greater than those of ATM, and significant differences were observed (all P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that the ADC1 generated the highest area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.920 in distinguishing the two tumors, when using 91.00 as the optimal threshold. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in distinguishing between SFT/HPC and ATM were 84.00%, 85.00%, 84.44%, 87.50%, and 81.00%, respectively. ADC histogram analysis can be a reliable tool to differentiate between SFT/HPC and ATM, with the ADC1 being the most promising potential parameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianwang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Juan Deng
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiu Sun
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Caiqiang Xue
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shenglin Li
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Qing Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyu Huang
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Junlin Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Chengguan District, Cuiyingmen No.82, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China. .,Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. .,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. .,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|