A meta-analysis on the prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: exposing critical treatment gaps

Appraising the causal association among depression, anxiety and intracranial aneurysms: Evidence from genetic studies

BACKGROUND

The risk of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is increased in individuals with depression and anxiety. This indicates that depression and anxiety may contribute to the development of physical disorders. Herein, to investigate the association between genetic variants related to depression and anxiety and the risk of IA, two-sample Mendelian randomization was performed.

METHODS

The genome-wide association study (GWAS) comprised genome-wide genotype data of 2248 clinically well-characterized patients with anxiety and 7992 ethnically matched controls from four European countries. Sex-specific summary-level outcome data were obtained from the GWAS of IA, including 23 cohorts with a total of 10,754 cases and 306,882 controls of European and East Asian ancestry. To improve validity, five varying Mendelian randomization techniques were used in the analysis, namely Mendelian randomization-Egger, weighted median, inverse variance weighted, simple mode, and weighted mode.

RESULTS

The inverse variance weighted results indicated the causal effect of depression on IA (P = 0.03, OR = 1.32 [95 % CI, 1.03-1.70]) and unruptured IA (UIA) (P = 0.02, OR = 1.68 [95 % CI, 1.08-2.61]). However, the causal relationship between depression and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) was not found (P = 0.16). We identified 43 anxiety-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms as genetic instruments and found no causal relationship between anxiety and IA, UIA, and SAH.

LIMITATIONS

Potential pleiotropy, possible weak instruments, and low statistical power limited our findings.

CONCLUSION

Our MR study suggested a possible causal effect of depression on the increased risk of UIAs. Future research is required to investigate whether rational intervention in depression treatment can help to decrease the societal burden of IAs.

Major depressive disorder and aneurysm: A genetic study of association and causality

BACKGROUND

Association between depression and aneurysm has been implicated but the specific role of depression in aneurysm remains unclear. We aimed to comprehensively characterize the relation of major depressive disorder (MDD) with aneurysm by subtype.

METHODS

Harnessing summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (Ncase/Ncontrol = 7603/317,899 for aortic aneurysm; 7321/317,899 for thoracic aortic aneurysm; 3201/317,899 for abdominal aortic aneurysm; 1788/317,899 for cerebral aneurysm; and 246,363/561,190 for major depressive disorder), we estimated the genetic correlation between MDD and each of four aneurysm subtypes via LD Score Regression and tested the causality via various estimators under the bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR) framework.

RESULTS

Positive genetic correlation of statistical significance, ranging between 0.15 (with thoracic aortic aneurysm, P = 0.005) and 0.25 (with abdominal aortic aneurysm, P = 0.001), was consistently observed for MDD with each aneurysm subtype. In the MR analysis of MDD as an exposure, genetic liability to MDD causally increased the risk of cerebral (odds ratio: 1.71; 95 % confidence interval: 1.26-2.34) but not aortic aneurysm. Replication analysis of an independent dataset (Ncase/Ncontrol = 6242/59,418) corroborated this signal. In contrast, causal effect was not evident for any neurysm subtype on susceptibility to MDD.

LIMITATIONS

Aneurysm could have been underdiagnosed if asymptomatic, leading to an underestimated causal impact on MDD. Non-linearity of the causal effect was not tested due to the lack of individual-level data.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression and aneurysm may share common pathomechanisms. Screening depressed population and improving the clinical management for depression may benefit the primary prevention of cerebral aneurysm.