1
|
Cammarota G, De Robertis E, Simonte R. Unexpected intensive care unit admission after surgery: impact on clinical outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024; 37:192-198. [PMID: 38390879 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review is focused on providing insights into unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery, including its causes, effects on clinical outcome, and potential strategies to mitigate the strain on healthcare systems. RECENT FINDINGS Postoperative unplanned ICU admission results from a combination of several factors including patient's clinical status, the type of surgical procedure, the level of supportive care and clinical monitoring outside the ICU, and the unexpected occurrence of major perioperative and postoperative complications. The actual impact of unplanned admission to ICU after surgery on clinical outcome remains uncertain, given the conflicting results from several observational studies and recent randomized clinical trials. Nonetheless, unplanned ICU admission after surgery results a significant strain on hospital resources. Consequently, this issue should be addressed in hospital policy with the aim of implementing preoperative risk assessment and patient evaluation, effective communication, vigilant supervision, and the promotion of cooperative healthcare. SUMMARY Unplanned ICU admission after surgery is a multifactorial phenomenon that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems without a clear impact on clinical outcome. Thus, the early identification of patient necessitating ICU interventions is imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianmaria Cammarota
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara
| | - Edoardo De Robertis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Rachele Simonte
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Banat M, Potthoff AL, Hamed M, Borger V, Scorzin JE, Lampmann T, Asoglu H, Khalafov L, Schmeel FC, Paech D, Radbruch A, Nitsch L, Weller J, Herrlinger U, Toma M, Gielen GH, Vatter H, Schneider M. Synchronous versus metachronous spinal metastasis: a comparative study of survival outcomes following neurosurgical treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:136. [PMID: 38502313 PMCID: PMC10951012 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05657-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with spinal metastases (SM) from solid neoplasms typically exhibit progression to an advanced cancer stage. Such metastases can either develop concurrently with an existing cancer diagnosis (termed metachronous SM) or emerge as the initial indication of an undiagnosed malignancy (referred to as synchronous SM). The present study investigates the prognostic implications of synchronous compared to metachronous SM following surgical resection. METHODS From 2015 to 2020, a total of 211 individuals underwent surgical intervention for SM at our neuro-oncology facility. We conducted a survival analysis starting from the date of the neurosurgical procedure, comparing those diagnosed with synchronous SM against those with metachronous SM. RESULTS The predominant primary tumor types included lung cancer (23%), prostate cancer (21%), and breast cancer (11.3%). Of the participants, 97 (46%) had synchronous SM, while 114 (54%) had metachronous SM. The median overall survival post-surgery for those with synchronous SM was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.1-15.8) compared to 13 months (95% CI 7.7-14.2) for those with metachronous SM (p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the timing of SM diagnosis (synchronous versus metachronous) does not significantly affect survival outcomes following neurosurgical treatment for SM. These results support the consideration of neurosurgical procedures regardless of the temporal pattern of SM manifestation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Banat
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Anna-Laura Potthoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Valeri Borger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jasmin E Scorzin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tim Lampmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Harun Asoglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Logman Khalafov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Paech
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Louisa Nitsch
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Johannes Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marieta Toma
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gerrit H Gielen
- Institute for Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mistry AM. Perioperative dexamethasone in high-grade gliomas: the short-term benefits and long-term harms. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1335730. [PMID: 38162484 PMCID: PMC10755919 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1335730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Dexamethasone has been commonly given to patients with a presumed new GBM in relatively large doses (6-16 mg daily for 1-2 weeks) since the 1960s without any rigorous evidence. This treatment with dexamethasone before the diagnosis and adjuvant therapy makes GBM patients unique compared to other newly diagnosed cancer patients. While dexamethasone may be beneficial, recent studies suggest that this potent immunosuppressant with pleiotropic effects is harmful in the long term. This perspective article summarizes the disadvantages of perioperative dexamethasone from multiple facets. It concludes that these growing data mandate rigorously testing the benefits of using perioperative dexamethasone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshitkumar M. Mistry
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schweppe JA, Potthoff AL, Heimann M, Ehrentraut SF, Borger V, Lehmann F, Schaub C, Bode C, Putensen C, Herrlinger U, Vatter H, Schäfer N, Schuss P, Schneider M. Incurring detriments of unplanned readmission to the intensive care unit following surgery for brain metastasis. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 46:155. [PMID: 37382699 PMCID: PMC10310600 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02066-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECT Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring is a common regime after neurosurgical resection of brain metastasis (BM). In comparison, unplanned secondary readmission to the ICU after initial postoperative treatment course occurs in response to adverse events and might significantly impact patient prognosis. In the present study, we analyzed the potential prognostic implications of unplanned readmission to the ICU and aimed at identifying preoperatively collectable risk factors for the development of such adverse events. METHODS Between 2013 and 2018, 353 patients with BM had undergone BM resection at the authors' institution. Secondary ICU admission was defined as any unplanned admission to the ICU during the initial hospital stay. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperatively identifiable risk factors for unplanned ICU readmission. RESULTS A total of 19 patients (5%) were readmitted to the ICU. Median overall survival (mOS) of patients with unplanned ICU readmission was 2 months (mo) compared to 13 mo for patients without secondary ICU admission (p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified "multiple BM" (p=0.02) and "preoperative CRP levels > 10 mg/dl" (p=0.01) as significant and independent predictors of secondary ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS Unplanned ICU readmission following surgical therapy for BM is significantly related to poor OS. Furthermore, the present study identifies routinely collectable risk factors indicating patients that are at a high risk for unplanned ICU readmission after BM surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justus August Schweppe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Anna-Laura Potthoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Muriel Heimann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefan Felix Ehrentraut
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Valeri Borger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Felix Lehmann
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Schaub
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Bode
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Putensen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Patrick Schuss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
- Current address: Department of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin gGmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|