Efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy to portal vein tumor thrombus in the main trunk or first branch in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Conversion therapy of a giant hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombus and inferior vena cava thrombus: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) combined with portal and hepatic vein cancerous thrombosis is poor, for unresectable patients the combination of targeted therapy and immune therapy was the first-line recommended treatment for advanced HCC, with a median survival time of only about 2.7-6 months. In this case report, we present the case of a patient with portal and hepatic vein cancerous thrombosis who achieved pathologic complete response after conversion therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

In our center, a patient with giant HCC combined with portal vein tumor thrombus and hepatic vein tumor thrombus was treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and was continuously given icaritin soft capsules for oral regulation. After 7 months of conversion therapy, the patient's tumor shrank and the tumor thrombus subsided significantly. The pathology of surgical resection was in complete remission, and there was no progression in the postoperative follow-up for 7 months, which provided a basis for the future strategy of combined conversion therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this case, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, icaritin soft capsules combined with radiotherapy and TACE had a good effect. For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with hepatic vein/inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, adopting a high-intensity, multimodal proactive strategy under the guidance of multidisciplinary team (MDT) is an important attempt to break through the current treatment dilemma.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation combined with lenvatinib plus camrelizumab as conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study

Background

The synergistic effect of locoregional therapy in combination with systemic therapy as a conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab (TACE + LEN + CAM) as conversion therapy for uHCC.

Methods

This single-arm, multicentre, prospective study was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Patients (aged 18-75 years) diagnosed with uHCC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG-PS) of 0-1 and Child-Pugh class A received camrelizumab (200 mg, every 3 weeks) and lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥60 kg: 12 mg/day; <60 kg: 8 mg/day) after TACE treatment. Surgery was performed after tumour was assessed as meeting the criteria for resection. Patients who did not meet the criteria for surgery continued to receive triple therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and safety. Secondary endpoints included the surgical conversion rate, radical (R0) resection rate, and disease control rate (DCR). This study was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050410).

Findings

Between Oct 25, 2021, and July 20, 2022, 55 patients were enrolled. As of the data cutoff on June 1, 2023, the median follow-up was 13.3 months (IQR 10.6-15.9 months). The best tumour response to triple therapy was complete response (CR) in 9 (16.4%) patients, partial response (PR) in 33 (60.0%) patients, stable disease (SD) in 5 (9.1%) patients, or progressive disease (PD) in 7 (12.7%) patients. The ORR was 76.4% (42/55, 95% CI, 65.2-87.6%), and the DCR was 85.5% (47/55, 95% CI, 76.2-94.8%) per mRECIST. Twenty-four (43.6%) of the 55 patients suffered from grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). No grade 5 TRAEs occurred. A total of 30 (30/55, 54.5%) patients were converted to resectable HCC and 29 (29/55, 52.7%) patients underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 96.6% (28/29). The major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the surgery population were 65.5% (19/29) and 20.7% (6/29), respectively. Only one patient developed a Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication (abdominal infection). No Clavien-Dindo IIIb-V complications occurred. The median OS and median PFS were not reached.

Interpretation

The triple therapy (TACE + LEN + CAM) is promising active for uHCC with a manageable safety. Moreover, triple therapy has good conversion efficiency and the surgery after conversion therapy is feasible and safe. To elucidate whether patients with uHCC accepting surgical treatment after the triple therapy can achieve better survival benefits than those who receive triple therapy only, well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed.

Funding

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2022J01691) and the Youth Foundation of Fujian Province Health Science and Technology Project, China (2022QNA035).

Effectiveness and Safety of the PD-1 Inhibitor Lenvatinib Plus Radiotherapy in Patients with HCC with Main PVTT: Real-World Data from a Tertiary Centre

Background

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT), especially type Vp-4, usually have a poor prognosis. However, the vast majority of Phase III clinical trials exclude this population based on the inclusion criteria. Lenvatinib plus a PD-1 inhibitor has shown promising antitumour activity and tolerable safety in patients with unresectable HCC in Asian populations. Radiotherapy has also demonstrated high response rates and favourable survival for HCC patients with PVTT. This study aimed to explore the preliminary clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus the PD-1 inhibitor combined with radiotherapy for HCC patients with main portal vein tumour thrombus.

Methods

Between 1 March 2018 and 31 October 2020, HCC patients with main PVTT who received lenvatinib plus a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab, nivolumab or sintilimab) combined with radiotherapy from Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital in China were reviewed for eligibility. The efficacy was evaluated by the survival and PVTT response rate, and the safety was evaluated by the frequency of key adverse events (AEs).

Results

In total, 39 eligible HCC patients with type Vp-4 PVTT who received triple therapy were included in this study. The 2-year OS rate was 15.4%, which was the primary end-point of our study. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 9.4 months (range 2.3 to 57.1) and 4.9 months (range 1.4 to 36.1), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) of PVTT based on mRECIST was 61.5%. AFP dropped to normal 3 months after radiotherapy and was an independent risk factor associated with OS. All AEs were controlled, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor combined with radiotherapy had a significant therapeutic effect and manageable AEs in HCC patients with type Vp-4 PVTT and may be a potential treatment option for advanced HCC.

Triplet regimen as a novel modality for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication, accounting for 44%-62.2% of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and often indicates the poor prognosis. There is no global consensus for the treatment of unresectable HCC with PVTT. In the present case, we reported a novel strategy of radiotherapy-antiangiogenesis-immune checkpoint blockade combination, which showed better response and prolonged survival.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old male diagnosed with HCC (Child-Pugh class A), chronic hepatitis B virus infection and Cheng's type III PVTT, was given radiotherapy to part of the lesion plus targeted therapy as the first-line therapy, and achieved partial remission. After radiotherapy, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was used as maintenance therapy, and complete remission was achieved. The patient remains alive 46 months after the diagnosis of the HCC with PVTT.

CONCLUSION

This case of unresectable HCC patient with PVTT treated by radiation-lenvatinib-pembrolizumab combination therapy shows apparent clinical efficacy, which demonstrates that local radiotherapy plus antiangiogenesis and immune checkpoint blockad could also benefit patients with advanced HCC.

Survival benefit of perioperative locoregional adjuvant treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To identify the optimal strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) by comparing the oncological prognosis of different perioperative locoregional adjuvant treatments.

METHODS

Electronic database were searched for relevant studies. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were pooled by pairwise and network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible trials with 1927 patients and covering four adjuvant treatments were included. All adjuvant therapies in combination with surgery were shown to be superior to surgery alone. Adjuvant therapy with radiotherapy had the lowest hazard ratio (HR) for both OS (HR: 0.38, 95% CrI: 0.25-0.57) and RFS (HR: 0.27, 95% CrI: 0.11-0.65) compared with other combination treatments, with estimated surface under the cumulative ranking of 93.2% and 82.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative locoregional adjuvant therapy provides OS benefits and reduces the risk of recurrence for patients suffering from HCC with PVTT. Radiotherapy is likely to be the most effective adjuvant regimen.

Phase 2 Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Centrally Located Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a special type of HCC whose outcome is unsatisfactory when treated with surgery alone. No standard adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for this disease has been established that improves clinical outcomes.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adding neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) before surgery in patients with centrally located HCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2, single-center, single-group prospective nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted between December 16, 2014, and January 29, 2019, at the Cancer Institute and Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences in Beijing, China. The last follow-up was on July 30, 2021. Patients with centrally located HCC who underwent neoadjuvant IMRT and surgery were included in the analysis.

Interventions

Neoadjuvant IMRT followed by hepatectomy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was 5-year overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were tumor response to IMRT, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

Thirty-eight patients (mean [SD] age, 55.6 [9.3] years; 35 male [92.1%] individuals) completed the prescribed neoadjuvant IMRT without interruption. Radiographic tumor response to IMRT before surgery included partial response (16 [42.1%]) and stable disease (22 [57.9%]). Thirteen patients (34.2%) achieved major pathological response, of which 5 (13.2%) achieved pathologic complete response. With a median follow-up of 45.8 months, the median OS was not reached, and the OS rates were 94.6% at 1 year, 75.4% at 3 years, and 69.1% at 5 years. The median DFS was 45.8 months, and DFS rates were 70.3% at 1 year, 54.1% at 3 years, and 41.0% at 5 years. Radiotherapy-related grade 3 adverse events were observed in 3 patients (7.9%). Nineteen operative complications developed in 13 patients (34.2%), including grade I to II complications in 12 patients (31.6%) and grade IIIa complication in 1 patient (2.6%). No grade IIIb or higher operative complications were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this trial suggest that neoadjuvant IMRT plus surgery is effective and well-tolerated in patients with centrally located HCC. These data may inform a future randomized clinical trial of this new treatment strategy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02580929.

Application of systemic treatment in conversion therapy options for liver cancer

Radical hepatectomy is the main treatment method to improve the prognosis of patients with intermediate and early-stage liver cancer. Most liver cancer patients in China are in the advanced stage at the initial diagnosis, losing the opportunity for surgical treatment. Therefore, it is essential to down-stage unresectable liver cancer to resectable liver cancer clinically, which is an important way to improve patients’ survival and a hotspot of current clinical research. In recent years, with the increase in effective treatment methods for liver cancer, the resection rate of conversion surgery for unresectable advanced liver cancer has been significantly improved, and a growing number of patients benefit from conversion therapy. This article mainly reviews the connotation of conversion therapy for liver cancer, the patient selection, the selection of conversion strategy, the timing of sequential operations, the scheme and safety, etc.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by low resection and high postoperative recurrence rates, and conventional treatment strategies have failed to meet clinical needs. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is widely employed in the routine management of several solid tumors because it increases resectability and reduces the rate of postoperative recurrence. However, a consensus has not been reached regarding the effects of NAT on HCC. As systemic therapy, particularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is given for HCC treatment, accumulating evidence shows that the "spring" of NAT for HCC is imminent. In the future, HCC researchers should focus on identifying biomarkers for treatment response, explore the mechanisms of resistance, and standardize the endpoints of NAT.

Chinese expert consensus on conversion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (2021 edition)

Recent advances in systemic and locoregional treatments for patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have resulted in improved response rates. This has provided an opportunity for selected patients with initially unresectable HCC to achieve adequate tumor downstaging to undergo surgical resection, a 'conversion therapy' strategy. However, conversion therapy is a new approach to the treatment of HCC and its practice and treatment protocols are still being developed. Review the evidence for conversion therapy in HCC and develop consensus statements to guide clinical practice. Evidence review: Many research centers in China have accumulated significant experience implementing HCC conversion therapy. Preliminary findings and data have shown that conversion therapy represents an important strategy to maximize the survival of selected patients with intermediate stage to advanced HCC; however, there are still many urgent clinical and scientific challenges for this therapeutic strategy and its related fields. In order to summarize and learn from past experience and review current challenges, the Chinese Expert Consensus on Conversion Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2021 Edition) was developed based on a review of preliminary experience and clinical data from Chinese and non-Chinese studies in this field and combined with recommendations for clinical practice. Sixteen consensus statements on the implementation of conversion therapy for HCC were developed. The statements generated in this review are based on a review of clinical evidence and real clinical experience and will help guide future progress in conversion therapy for patients with HCC.

External Beam Radiation Therapy for Primary Liver Cancers: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the indications and technique-dose of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC).

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the indications, techniques, and outcomes of EBRT in HCC and IHC. This guideline is intended to cover the definitive, consolidative, salvage, preoperative (including bridge to transplant), and adjuvant settings as well as palliative EBRT for symptomatic primary lesions. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Strong recommendations are made for using EBRT as a potential first-line treatment in patients with liver-confined HCC who are not candidates for curative therapy, as consolidative therapy after incomplete response to liver-directed therapies, and as a salvage option for local recurrences. The guideline conditionally recommends EBRT for patients with liver-confined multifocal or unresectable HCC or those with macrovascular invasion, sequenced with systemic or catheter-based therapies. Palliative EBRT is conditionally recommended for symptomatic primary HCC and/or macrovascular tumor thrombi. EBRT is conditionally recommended as a bridge to transplant or before surgery in carefully selected patients. For patients with unresectable IHC, consolidative EBRT with or without chemotherapy should be considered, typically after systemic therapy. Adjuvant EBRT is conditionally recommended for resected IHC with high-risk features. Selection of dose-fractionation regimen and technique should be based on disease extent, disease location, underlying liver function, and available technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of EBRT for HCC and IHC with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care. Future studies should focus on further defining the role of EBRT in the context of liver-directed and systemic therapies and refining optimal regimens and techniques.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Radiotherapy for Type III-IV Portal Vein Tumor Thrombi

Background:

Type Ⅲ and Ⅳ portal vein tumor thrombi (PVTT) cannot be removed through surgery, and no effective therapeutic procedure is available. Type Ⅲ/Ⅳ PVTT can be downstage to type I/II PVTT by using Radiotherapy, and can further be can be removed surgically. Thus, radiotherapy may be an effective treatment for type Ⅲ/Ⅳ PVTT. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy for type III-IV PVTT.

Methods:

This prospective study was conducted from August 1, 2017, to September 30, 2019, for patients with type Ⅲ and Ⅳ PVTT. Patients received radiotherapy with a target dose of 50Gy/25f or 59.5Gy/17 f. Advanced radiological technique such as image fusion technique for CT image and MRI image were utilized to produce more precise lesion localization, and limit the dose to organs at risk in order to get a better downstage rate and less adverse complications.

Results:

Nine (9) patients with type Ⅲ PVTT and 5 patients with type Ⅳ PVTT were included in this study. 12 patients received a radiotherapy dose of 50Gy/25f, 2 patients received 59.50Gy/17 f. After radiotherapy, 92.9% of patients with PVTT were successfully downstage to type II/I. In patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 patients (accounting 88.9%) achieved down-stage. 5 patients with other types of tumors achieved downstage which accounts 100%. In addition, none of the 14 patients observed radiation hepatitis and radiation liver failure. And none of the patients developed gastrointestinal ulcers and thrombocytopenia.

Conclusion:

Radiotherapy is a suitable treatment measure for type Ⅲ and Ⅳ PVTT to get downstage and make the opportunity for surgery. Image fusion technology for precise lesion location such as CT-MRI image fusion, and strict dose limitation of organ at risk, contributed to the improvement of radiotherapy efficiency and the significant decrease in adverse complications.

Hepatectomy Combined with Diaphragmatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diaphragmatic Involvement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

PURPOSE

We evaluated the short- and long-term surgical outcomes of hepatectomy combined with diaphragmatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with diaphragmatic involvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes of HCC patients with diaphragmatic resection (DR group) and HCC patients without diaphragmatic resection (non-DR group). We applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to these subjects.

RESULTS

The study included 46 patients in DR group and 828 patients in non-DR group. The DR group cases were pathologically more advanced, and both overall and relapse-free survival among the patients in this group with pathological diaphragmatic invasion were similar to cases with pathological diaphragmatic fibrous adhesion. There were 40 patients from each group subjected to PSM. In these matched cohorts, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding perioperative outcomes, overall survival, and relapse-free survival. Multivariate analyses of our matched HCC patients revealed that alpha-fetoprotein expression and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for overall survival and poor differentiation for relapse-free survival, whereas neither diaphragmatic invasion nor diaphragmatic resection were prognostic indicators. The most frequent site of recurrence in non-DR group was the liver, whereas the most frequent site of recurrence in DR group was the lung before and after PSM.

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and long-term surgical outcomes of DR HCC cases are equivalent to their non-DR counterparts under a matched clinicopathological background. Hepatectomy combined with DR is an acceptable treatment for HCC with either diaphragmatic fibrous adhesion or diaphragmatic invasion.

Preoperative Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical and Pathological Analysis

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) is poor. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tri-modality therapy, including preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery, followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC patients with PVTT. In this report, we investigated the pathology of the irradiated PVTT specimen in resected cases and SBRT-related acute toxicity. A total of 8 HCC patients with PVTT received preoperative SBRT targeting the PVTT at a dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions at our institute from 2012 to 2016. Of the eight patients, six underwent surgery, while the remaining two did not because of disease progression. At the pathological examination, all patients’ irradiated PVTT specimens showed necrotic tissue, and three of six patients showed complete pathological response. Two patients showed 30% necrosis with high degeneration and one patient, with 30% necrosis without degeneration, was the only recurrent case found during the follow-up period (median: 22.5, range: 5.9–49.6 months). No SBRT-related acute toxicity worse than grade 2 was observed from SBRT to surgery. In conclusion, the preoperative SBRT for HCC was pathologically effective and the acute toxicities were tolerable.

Advances in resection and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

It would be impossible to summarise all of the significant developments in the surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even just over the past year, in a manuscript of this scope. Thus, we have selected topics for discussion that are the subject of current controversy and have attempted to present balanced points of view. Hepatic resection and transplantation are both mature modalities, and for the most part technical advances and improvements in candidate selection are incremental. The ability to readily cure hepatitis C stands out as the most impactful development in the field over recent years, especially in Western countries where hepatitis C has long been the chief aetiology underlying HCC and a predictor of poor outcomes after surgery, but its full implications remain to be clarified. The rising incidence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related HCC and what it means with regard to surgical HCC management is an area of great current interest. With advancing technology, non-surgical locoregional treatments are gaining increasing application as potentially curative therapies. In addition, the advances in molecular and genomic assessment of HCC hold promise for personalising treatment and prognostication. The possible role of immunotherapy as an adjuvant to resection is being aggressively investigated. While liver surgery maintains an important role, the care of patients with HCC is more and more a team effort and needs to take place in the context of a well-integrated interdisciplinary programme to achieve the best outcomes for patients.

Progress in research of hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with tumor thrombus is a hot and difficult issue in the study of HCC, and many key issues concerning this condition are still controversial. Clinical guidelines and treatment recommendations vary widely between the East and the West, and efficacy remains unsatisfactory. In recent years, with the progress of comprehensive tumor treatment concept and the rapid development of surgical techniques, perioperative management, interventional therapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and other treatment methods, the overall survival rate of HCC with tumor thrombus has been significantly extended and encouraging efficacy has been achieved. However, the core issues on how to select individualized treatment to achieve optimal treatment and how to prevent postoperative recurrence still need to be studied and discussed. This article reviews the progress in the research of hepatic carcinoma with portal vein thrombus, inferior vena cava thrombus, or bile duct thrombus.

A hypothesis on paradoxical privileged portal vein metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Can organ evolution shed light on patterns of human pathology, and vice versa?

Unlike other carcinomas, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasizes to distant organs relatively rarely. In contrast, it routinely metastasizes to liver vasculature/liver, affecting portal veins 3-10 times more often than hepatic veins. This portal metastatic predominance is traditionally rationalized within the model of a reverse portal flow, due to accompanying liver cirrhosis. However, this intuitive model is not coherent with facts: 1) reverse portal flow occurs in fewer than 10% of cirrhotic patients, while portal metastasis occurs in 30-100% of HCC cases, and 2) portal vein prevalence of HCC metastasis is also characteristic of HCC in non-cirrhotic livers. Therefore, we must assume that the route for HCC metastatic dissemination is the same as for other carcinomas: systemic dissemination via the draining vessel, i.e., via the hepatic vein. In this light, portal prevalence versus hepatic vein of HCC metastasis appears as a puzzling pattern, particularly in cases when portal HCC metastases have appeared as the sole manifestation of HCC. Considering that other GI carcinomas (colorectal, pancreatic, gastric and small bowel) invariably disseminate via portal vein, but very rarely form portal metastasis, portal prevalence of HCC metastasis appears as a paradox. However, nature does not contradict itself; it is rather our wrong assumptions that create paradoxes. The 'portal paradox' becomes a logical event within the hypothesis that the formation of the unique portal venous system preceded the appearance of liver in evolution of chordates. The analysis suggests that the appearance of the portal venous system, supplying hormones and growth factors of pancreatic family, which includes insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, and pancreatic polypeptide (HGFPF) to midgut diverticulum in the early evolution of chordates (in an Amphioxus-like ancestral animal), promoted differentiation of enterocytes into hepatocytes and their further evolution to the liver of vertebrates. These promotional-dependent interactions are conserved in the vertebrate lineage. I hypothesize that selective homing and proliferation of malignant hepatocytes (i.e., HCC cells) in the portal vein environment are due to a uniquely high concentration of HGFPF in portal blood. HGFPF are also necessary for liver function and renewal and are significantly extracted by hepatocytes from passing blood, creating a concentration gradient of HGFPF between the portal blood and hepatic vein outflow, making post-liver vasculature and remote organs less favorable spaces for HCC growth. It also suggested that the portal vein environment (i.e., HGFPF) promotes the differentiation of more aggressive HCC clones from already-seeded portal metastases, explaining the worse outcome of HCC with the portal metastatic pattern. The analysis also offers new hypothesis on the phylogenetic origin of the hepatic diverticulum of cephalochordates, with certain implications for the modeling of the chordate phylogeny.

Hepatocellular carcinoma producing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: diagnosis and treatment

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a naturally occurring glycoprotein that is synthesized by stromal cells in bone marrow. Several cases of G-CSF-producing malignant tumors in various organs have been reported, but it is extremely rare in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we report a rare case of HCC producing G-CSF. The patient presented with a continuous fever and had a huge liver mass in the right lobe with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in the right first branch. He had marked granulocytosis, and his serum level of G-CSF was elevated. A complete curative liver resection was performed after preoperative radiotherapy to PVTT. The pathological findings of the resected specimen revealed poorly/moderately differentiated HCC, and immunohistochemical staining of G-CSF was negative the first time it was tested, but the second time, it was positive in the cytoplasm of other tumor cells of HCC. Only a few cases of G-CSF-producing HCC have been reported, and they resulted in rapid tumor growth, metastases, and poor prognosis. In our case with PVTT, there was no liver recurrence, although multiple lung metastases occurred at 8 months after curative resection. We should consider G-CSF-producing HCC and diagnose promptly when encountering liver tumor patients with leukocytosis, and we should perform multimodal treatment including radiation, radical surgery, and chemotherapy.

Systematic review of the outcomes of surgical resection for intermediate and advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A critical appraisal of the evidence

AIM

To perform a systematic review to determine the survival outcomes after curative resection of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC).

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature was performed using the PubMed database from 1^st January 1999 to 31^st Dec 2014 to identify studies that reported outcomes of liver resection as the primary curative treatment for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C HCC. The primary end point was to determine the overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) of liver resection of HCC in BCLC stage B or C in patients with adequate liver reserve (i.e., Child’s A or B status). The secondary end points were to assess the morbidity and mortality of liver resection in large HCC (defined as lesions larger than 10 cm in diameter) and to compare the OS and DFS after surgical resection of solitary vs multifocal HCC.

RESULTS

We identified 74 articles which met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this systematic review. Analysis of the resection outcomes of the included studies were grouped according to (1) BCLC stage B or C HCC, (2) Size of HCC and (3) multifocal tumors. The median 5-year OS of BCLC stage B was 38.7% (range 10.0-57.0); while the median 5-year OS of BCLC stage C was 20.0% (range 0.0-42.0). The collective median 5-year OS of both stages was 27.9% (0.0-57.0). In examining the morbidity and mortality following liver resection in large HCC, the pooled RR for morbidity [RR (95%CI) = 1.00 (0.76-1.31)] and mortality [RR (95%CI) = 1.15 (0.73-1.80)] were not significant. Within the spectrum of BCLC B and C lesions, tumors greater than 10 cm were reported to have median 5-year OS of 33.0% and multifocal lesions 54.0%.

CONCLUSION

Indication for surgical resection should be extended to BCLC stage B lesions in selected patients. Further studies are needed to stratify stage C lesions for resection.

Privileged portal metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in light of the coevolution of a visceral portal system and liver in the chordate lineage: a search for therapeutic targets

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) disseminates systemically, but metastases occur in distant organs only in minority of patients, whereas HCC routinely metastasizes to liver and its vessels. HCC cells disseminate via hepatic veins, but portal veins are affected by metastasis more frequently than are hepatic veins, and correlates with poor prognosis. In this review, I suggest that privileged HCC portal metastasis occurs because of high levels of pancreatic family hormones and growth factors (PHGFs) in the portal blood. The analysis suggests that the appearance of the portal system carrying PHGFs in the evolution of invertebrate chordate (Amphioxus) led to the evolution of the liver in vertebrate; given that the portal pattern of HCC metastasis and selection of more-aggressive clones are PHGF dependent, PHGFs and their ligands constitute therapeutic targets.

Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Despite surgical removal of tumors with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, early recurrence tends to occur, and overall survival (OS) periods remain extremely short. The role that hepatectomy may play in long-term survival for HCC with PVTT has not been established. The operative mortality of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT has also not been reviewed. Hence, we reviewed recent literature to assess these parameters. The OS of patients who received hepatectomy in conjunction with multidisciplinary treatment tended to be superior to that of patients who did not. Multidisciplinary treatments included the following: preoperative radiotherapy on PVTT; preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); subcutaneous administration of interferon-alpha (IFN-α) and intra-arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with infusion chemotherapy in the affected hepatic artery; cisplatin, doxorubicin and 5-FU locally administered in the portal vein; and subcutaneous injection of IFN-α, adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU + Adriamycin) administration via the portal vein with postoperative TACE, percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion and hepatic artery infusion and/or portal vein chemotherapy. The highest reported rate of operative mortality was 9.3%. In conclusion, hepatectomy for patients affected by HCC with PVTT is safe, has low mortality and might prolong survival in conjunction with multidisciplinary treatment.

Surgical treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system recommends a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (sorafenib) as standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Sorafenib has been shown to prolong median overall survival (OS) by approximately 3 months in advanced HCC patients with PVTT (8.1 vs. 4.9 months). However, its clinical effectiveness is still controversial and standard treatment with sorafenib is not established in Japan. Surgical resection is considered a potentially curative treatment and provides an acceptable outcome for carefully selected patients. The surgical mortality rate in patients with PVTT who receive surgical resection ranges from 0% to 10%. The median survival time and 1-year OS rate in HCC patients with PVTT who undergo surgical resection have been found to range from 8 to 22 months and 21.7% to 69.6%, respectively. But improvement in therapeutic outcome is difficult with surgical treatment alone. Combination treatment in conjunction with such methods as transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy, and radiotherapy has been found to improve the prognosis (median survival time, 11.5-37 months; 1-year OS rate, 46.8-100%). Yet, many problems remain, such as surgical indications and surgical techniques. After resolving these points, a multidisciplinary strategy based on surgical treatment should be established for advanced HCC with PVTT.

Surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus in the Asia-Pacific region beyond the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer treatment algorithms: a review and update

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) usually worsens prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as characterized by aggressive disease progression, impaired liver function and tolerance to treatment. Conventionally, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) accepted the Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer (BCLC) treatment algorithms, identifying PVTT as an absolute contra-indication of surgical resection for HCC. HCC-PVTT patients are offered sorafenib as the standard treatment. Evidently, SHARP and Asia-Pacific trials demonstrated that sorafenib only improves overall survival by approximately 3 months in patients with advanced HCC. Besides, BCLC treatment algorithm does not provide different therapeutic recommendations for different degree of PVTT, and only supports single treatment option for each stage of HCC rather than a combination of comprehensive treatments, which limited individual and best care for every HCC-PVTT patients. In the past few years, many surgeons do not restrict surgical resection to HCC with PVTT. There have been new reports demonstrated that surgical treatment is feasible for selected HCC-PVTT patients with resectable tumor and moderate liver function to prolong survival period and elevate life quality as long as PVTT limited to the first-order branch, whereas non-surgical treatments fail to provide comparable therapeutic effects. At present, guidelines on HCC management from mainland China, Japan, and Hong Kong have been updated and a consensus of Asia-Pacific experts has established that portal venous invasion is not an absolute contradiction of surgical resection for HCC. This review summarized the emerging data on surgical resection for HCC-PVTT patients beyond the BCLC treatment algorithms and discussed recent therapeutic conceptualchanges in the Asia-Pacific region.

Multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus - Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgical Hospital consensus statement

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated by portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is associated with poor prognosis, early recurrence of HCC, and limited treatment options. Current guidelines do not have standardized diagnostic and treatment modalities, thus creating a need for a multidisciplinary treatment model for standardization of the treatment. Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgical Hospital (China) convened two working parties of experts from all the departments, to consolidate the current evidence, prevailing vision for the future, and experience of the practicing clinicians engaged in HCC management, so as to develop a consensus for PVTT diagnosis and treatment according to the GRADE system. Based on the quality of the existing evidence and the strength of recommendations, the consensus statements were categorized into 3 evidence levels (A/B/C) and 5 classes (I/II/IIa/IIb/III).The panel discussed and provided clarity on the management and research options in the field of HCC with PVTT. In addition, the panel also assessed the quality of the cited studies and assigned grades to the recommendation statements. Among the group of experts, there was excellent agreement with regard to effective diagnosis and treatment of HCC with PVTT. The recommendations of this consensus will provide guidance to physicians and clinical researchers on the effective management of HCC with PVTT.

The efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant transarterial embolization and radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus

Objective

This study aims to find out the safety and efficiency of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiotherapy (RT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Methods

From 2009 to 2010, a total of 92 HCC patients with PVTT were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups according to their adjuvant therapies (conservative group, n=51; TACE group, n=31; RT group, n=10).

Results

In our analysis, median survival in patients with postoperative adjuvant TACE (21.91±3.60 months) or RT (14.53±1.61 months) was significantly longer than patients with hepatectomy alone (8.99±1.03 months). But the difference between adjuvant TACE and RT was of no significance (P=0.716). Also a similar result could be observed in median disease-free survival: conservative group (6.51±1.44 months), TACE group (13.98±3.38 months), and RT group (14.03±2.40 months). Treatment strategies (hazard ratio [HR] =0.411, P<0.001) and PVTT type (HR =4.636, P<0.001) were the independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Similarly, the risk factors were the same when multivariate analysis was conducted in disease-free survival (treatment strategies, HR =0.423, P<0.001; PVTT type, HR =4.351, P<0.001) and recurrence (treatment strategies, HR =0.459, P=0.030; PVTT type, HR =2.908, P=0.047). Patients with PVTT type I had longer overall survival than patients with PVTT type II (median survival: 18.43±2.88 months vs 11.59±1.45 months, P=0.035).

Conclusion

Postoperative adjuvant TACE and RT may be a choice for HCC patients with PVTT.

Optimal Selection of Radiotherapy as Part of a Multimodal Approach for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A multimodal approach to treatment is a basic oncologic principle with proven survival benefits for most cancer types. However, existing guidelines recommend single modalities for treating each stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nonetheless, multimodal approaches can be considered for HCC, depending on the characteristics of the disease in individual cases. Radiotherapy (RT), an effective local modality, is a critical element of most multimodal approaches. Improved RTtechnology and increased understanding of the tolerance of the liver to radiation have contributed to the popularity of RT for treating liver tumors in clinical practice. Consequently, numerous reports have described the effects of RT on liver cancer, despite a lack of stringent evidence for its benefits. RT can be delivered using various technologies and approaches, which may be the source of some confusion. For example, high-dose ablative RT can be curative on its own, or high-dose ablative or conventional RT can complement other treatments such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Combinations of systemic agents and RT can also be applied. This review discusses the optimal selection of RT as part of a multimodal approach for HCC.

Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus, Including Cases with Obstructive Jaundice

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT), including cases with obstructive jaundice.

METHODS

The study reviewed 42 HCC patients with BDTT, including six patients who needed preoperative biliary drainage due to obstructive jaundice, and 732 HCC patients without BDTT. The authors analyzed the impact of BDTT on the surgical outcomes and assessed the outcomes of hepatectomy for patients presenting with obstructive jaundice.

RESULTS

The HCC patients with BDTT, almost all with stage 3 or 4 disease, had increased alpha-fetoprotein expression, larger tumors, and more portal vein invasion status. The survival of the HCC patients with BDTT was significantly inferior to that of the patients without BDTT (p = 0.0003). Survival did not differ significantly between the HCC patients with BDTT and those without BDTT when the two groups were matched by stage (p = 0.3366). The HCC patients with BDTT who presented with obstructive jaundice demonstrated outcomes similar to those for the HCC patients with BDTT who did not present with obstructive jaundice in terms of the overall survival rate (p = 0.5469). The perioperative outcomes for the HCC patients with BDTT did not depend on the presence or absence of preoperative jaundice. No patients in either BDTT group demonstrated 90-day mortality in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy should be considered for HCC patients with BDTT, even for patients with obstructive jaundice, because the surgical outcomes equivalent to those for HCC without BDTT can be achieved.

Portal vein tumor thrombus is a bottleneck in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The effect of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma has become clear over the past several decades. However, identifying the mechanisms and performing the diagnosis and treatment of PVTT remain challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to summarize the progress in these areas. A computerized literature search in Medline and EMBASE was performed with the following combinations of search terms: “hepatocellular carcinoma” AND “portal vein tumor thrombus.” Although several signal transduction or molecular pathways related to PVTT have been identified, the exact mechanisms of PVTT are still largely unknown. Many biomarkers have been reported to detect microvascular invasion, but none have proved to be clinically useful because of their low accuracy rates. Sorafenib is the only recommended therapeutic strategy in Western countries. However, more treatment options are recommended in Eastern countries, including surgery, radiotherapy (RT), transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and sorafenib. Therefore, we established a staging system based on the extent of portal vein invasion. Our staging system effectively predicts the long-term survival of PVTT patients. Currently, several clinical trials had shown that surgery is effective and safe in some PVTT patients. RT, TARE, and TACE can also be performed safely in patients with good liver function. However, only a few comparative clinical trials had compared the effectiveness of these treatments. Therefore, more randomized controlled trials examining the extent of PVTT should be conducted in the future.

Effective treatment strategies other than sorafenib for the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma invading portal vein

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accompanying portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) have relatively few therapeutic options and an extremely poor prognosis. These patients are classified into barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C and sorafenib is suggested as the standard therapy of care. However, overall survival (OS) gain from sorafenib is unsatisfactory and better treatment modalities are urgently required. Therefore, we critically appraised recent data for the various treatment strategies for patients with HCC accompanying PVTT. In suitable patients, even surgical resection can be considered a potentially curative strategy. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can be performed effectively and safely in a carefully chosen population of patients with reserved liver function and sufficient collateral blood flow nearby the blocked portal vein. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that TACE achieved a substantial improvement of OS in HCC patients accompanying PVTT compared with best supportive care. In addition, transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using yttrium-90 microspheres achieves quality-of-life advantages and is as effective as TACE. A large proportion of HCC patients accompanying PVTT are considered to be proper for TARE. Moreover, TACE or TARE achieved comparable outcomes to sorafenib in recent studies and it was also reported that the combination of radiotherapy with TACE achieved a survival gain compared to sorafenib in HCC patients accompanying PVTT. Surgical resection-based multimodal treatments, transarterial approaches including TACE and TARE, and TACE-based appropriate combination strategies may improve OS of HCC patients accompanying PVTT.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombosis alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose

We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data on 46 patients who received 3D-CRT for PVTT alone between June 2002 and December 2011. Response was evaluated following the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Prognostic factors and 1-year survival rates were compared between responders and non-responders.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (80.4%) had category B Child-Pugh scores. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score was 2 in 20 patients. Thirty patients (65.2%) had main or bilateral PVTT. The median irradiation dose was 50 Gy (range, 35 to 60 Gy) and the daily median dose was 2 Gy (range, 2.0 to 2.5 Gy). PVTT response was classified as complete response in 3 patients (6.5%), partial response in 12 (26.1%), stable disease in 19 (41.3%), and progressive disease in 12 (26.1%). There were 2 cases of grade 3 toxicities during or 3 months after radiotherapy. Twelve patients in the responder group (15 patients) received at least 50 Gy irradiation, but about 84% of patients in the non-responder group received less than 50 Gy. The 1-year survival rate was 66.8% in responders and 27.4% in non-responders constituting a statistically significant difference (p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Conformal radiotherapy for PVTT alone could be chosen as a palliative treatment modality in patients with unfavorable conditions (liver, patient, or tumor factors). However, more than 50 Gy of radiation may be required.

Multidisciplinary treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein tumor thrombus

In recent years, various treatment options have become available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the degree of background liver damage, tumor diameter and other factors associated with disease progression. Therapy has also shifted toward evidence-based treatment. Policies for the management of HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus, which has been considered an intractable condition, have not been established. Surgical resection was previously positioned as the treatment of choice, but the outcomes after resection alone were found to be disappointing. At present, multiple interdisciplinary treatments, combining resection with intra-arterial chemotherapy, radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, are used on a trial-and-error basis since no standard regimens have been developed. Clinical trials of surgery combined with transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy and radiation have obtained improved 5-year survival rates of 21.5-56 %. The safety of surgical resection in HCC with major portal vein tumor thrombus has improved, but the optimal type(s) and timing of auxiliary therapy to use in combination with resection remain to be defined.

Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombi in the inferior vena cava or right atrium

Background

The prognosis for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with tumor thrombi in the inferior vena cava (IVC) or right atrium (RA) is poor, and there is no established effective treatment for this condition. Thus study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgical resection and prognosis after surgery for such cases.

Methods

Between January 1990 and December 2012, 891 patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC at our institution. Of these, 13 patients (1.5%) diagnosed with advanced HCC with tumor thrombi in the IVC or RA underwent hepatectomy and thrombectomy. Data detailing the surgical outcome were evaluated and recurrence-free and overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Seven patients had an IVC thrombus and six had an RA thrombus. Extra-hepatic metastasis was diagnosed in 8 of 13 patients. Surgical procedures included three extended right lobectomies, three extended left lobectomies, five right lobectomies, and two sectionectomies. Right adrenal gland metastases were excised simultaneously in two patients. All IVC thrombi were removed under hepatic vascular exclusion and all RA thrombi were removed under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Four patients (30.8%) experienced controllable postoperative complications, and there was no surgical mortality. The mean postoperative hospital stay for patients with IVC and RA thrombi was 23.6 ± 12.5 days and 21.2 ± 4.6 days, respectively. Curative resection was performed in 5 of 13 cases. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 50.4%, and 21.0%, respectively, and the median survival duration was 15.3 months. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates for patients who underwent curative surgical resection were 80.0% and 30.0%, respectively, with a median survival duration of 30.8 months. All patients who underwent curative resection developed postoperative recurrences, with a median recurrence-free survival duration of 3.8 months. The 1-year survival rate for patients who underwent noncurative surgery and had residual tumors was 29.2%, with a median survival duration of 10.5 months.

Conclusions

Aggressive surgical resection for HCC with tumor thrombi in the IVC or RA can be performed safely and may improve the prognoses of these patients. However, early recurrence and treatment for recurrent or metastatic tumors remain unresolved issues.

Impact of hepatectomy for huge solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the surgical outcome of patients with huge solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, ≥10 cm in diameter) without major vascular invasion.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 177 patients with huge HCC (≥10 cm in diameter) who underwent hepatectomy from 1990 to 2008. Surgical outcomes and clinicopathological characteristics were compared among 54 patients with solitary HCC without a major portal vein tumor thrombus (MPVT), 53 patients with multiple HCCs without MPVT, and 70 patients who have HCC with MPVT.

RESULTS

The mean tumor size and indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min showed no significant difference among patients groups. The overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients with solitary HCC (79%) than in patients with multiple HCCs (31%, P < 0.0001) and MPVT (17%, P < 0.0001). In patients who underwent curative surgery, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients with solitary HCC (48%) than in patients with multiple HCCs (12%, P = 0.0008) and MPVT (12%, P = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis showed solitary HCC to be a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with solitary HCC without MPVT show a favorable surgical outcome even for tumor size ≥10 cm in diameter.

Analysis of the risk factors for early death due to disease recurrence or progression within 1 year after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has the highest local controllability among all local treatments and results in a good survival rate. However, the recurrence rates of HCC continue to remain high even after curative hepatectomy Moreover, it has been reported that some patients with HCC have an early death due to recurrence. We analyzed the preoperative risk factors for early cancer death.

Methods

Between 1997 and 2009, 521 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC at our center were assigned to group ED (death due to HCC recurrence or progression within 1 year after hepatectomy) and group NED (alive over 1 year after hepatectomy). Risk factors for early cancer death were analyzed.

Results

Group ED included 48 patients, and group NED included 473 patients. The cause of death included cancer progression (150; 78.1%), operation-related (1; 0.5%), hepatic failure (15; 7.8%), and other (26; 13.5%). Between the ED and NED groups, there were significant differences in albumin levels, Child-Pugh classifications, anatomical resections, curability, tumor numbers, tumor sizes, macroscopic vascular invasion (portal vein and hepatic vein), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, AFP-L3 levels, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonism factor II (PIVKA-II) levels, differentiation, microscopic portal vein invasion, microscopic hepatic vein invasion, and distant metastasis by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified specific risk factors, such as AFP level > 1,000 ng/ml, tumor number ≥ 4, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, poor differentiation, and portal vein invasion. With respect to the preoperative risk factors such as AFP level, tumor number, and tumor size, 3 (1.1%) of 280 patients with no risk factors, 12 (7.8%) of 153 patients with 1 risk factor, 24 (32.9%) of 73 patients with 2 factors, and 9 (60.0%) of 15 patients with 3 risk factors died within 1 year of hepatectomy (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Hepatectomy should be judiciously selected for patients with AFP level > 1,000 ng/ml, tumor number ≥ 4, and tumor size ≥ 5 cm, because patients with these preoperative risk factors tend to die within 1 year after hepatectomy; these patients might be better treated with other therapy.

Surgical strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus based on prognostic factors

RATIONALE

Surgical strategy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains to be established.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2008, 48 hepatocellular carcinoma patients with PVTT detected by preoperative imaging underwent hepatic resection, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Possible prognostic factors for survival were analyzed with postoperative survival curves, and significant factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis. The frequency of postoperative severe complications was investigated for each prognostic factor.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic factors included patient age <60 years, serum total bilirubin (T-Bil) >0.8 mg/dl, serum aspartate aminotransferase >30 IU/L, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >300 IU/L, tumor size >4 cm, PVTT in the main trunk (Vp4), and a surgical margin <1 mm by univariate analysis, and independent prognostic factors were serum T-Bil, ALP, and Vp4. No patient with Vp4 survived for more than 400 days after surgery, and frequency of postoperative severe complications in these Vp4 patients was significantly higher than in other Vp1-3 patients.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection as a first-choice treatment should be carefully selected in patients with Vp4 unless emergent removal of the PVTT is required.

Is selective internal radioembolization safe and effective for patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma and venous thrombosis?

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of selective internal radioembolization (SIR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein or caval thrombosis (VT), or both. Recent reports have demonstrated that SIR is safe for patients with HCC, but the impact on efficacy of venous thrombosis is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective single-arm study of the use of Therasphere in patients with unresectable HCC enrolled from January 2004 to June 2007. Patients were categorized into three groups based on VT status and therapy.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled: 20 patients without VT who received SIR, 15 patients with VT who were treated, and 17 patients (10 with VT) who were not treated because of preprocedure screening failure. Fifty-eight treatments were administered, with a median of two treatments per patient (range of one to three treatments). Child's score was different between groups. Of the VT patients treated, 67% had portal VT, 7% had cava VT, and 26% had both. There were no treatment-related deaths. There was no difference in complications among groups (p = 0.34). Treated patients without thrombosis had a median overall survival of 13.9 months versus 2.7 months for those treated with thrombosis and 5.2 months for the untreated group given best supportive care only (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SIR is safe in patients with HCC. Although SIR can be delivered with minimal morbidity, there might be no benefit for patients with VT. Continued emphasis on multimodality therapy in this population is needed to improve survival.