Patterns of failure and influence of potential prognostic factors after surgery in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract

Urologic Imaging of Collecting System and Ureters: Cancers and Mimics

Urothelial carcinoma can arise from any portion of the urothelial lining extending from the kidneys to the urethra, with morphologic subtypes including papillary, polypoid, infiltrative, and ulcerative growth patterns. Imaging plays a crucial role in detecting upper and lower urinary tract tumors and in differentiating them from other benign mimics. Computed tomographic urography (CTU) is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma as well as for noninvasive surveillance following treatment. CTU allows evaluation of recurrent primary tumor while evaluating for metastatic disease in a single study.

Comparison of clinicopathological features in metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma and urothelial bladder cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the characteristics of primary tumors, sites distribution of metastases and the metastasis-free interval (MFI) between metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial bladder cancer (UBC), and evaluate the clinicopathological factors associated with MFI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 153 metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients consecutively registered at our hospital from 1997 to 2015, including 71 UTUC and 82 UBC, with a median follow-up of 18.3 months. MFI indicators were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in median age at metastatic disease (p = 0.016), gender (p = 0.018), primary tumor size (p = 0.003), growth pattern (p < 0.001), grade (p < 0.001) and stage (p < 0.001) between metastatic UTUC and UBC. The median MFI of UTUC was dramatically shorter than that of UBC (6.1 vs. 17.4 months, p < 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed pathological stage was the only factor associated with the MFI of UTUC. Multivariate analysis showed that primary tumor grade was an independent inferior predictor for the MFI of UBC (HR 6.384, 95% CI 3.21-12.69, p < 0.001), while recurrence was an independent favorable factor for the MFI of UBC (HR 0.384, 95% CI 0.18-0.82, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to metastatic UBC, the primary tumors of metastatic UTUC were more invasive and the MFI was significantly shorter. Pathological stage was the only factor associated with the MFI in UTUC, while primary tumor grade and recurrence were independent factors for the MFI of UBC.